前往小程序,Get更优阅读体验!
立即前往
首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
社区首页 >专栏 >MySQL中的全表扫描案例

MySQL中的全表扫描案例

作者头像
AsiaYe
发布2019-11-06 11:54:25
2.6K0
发布2019-11-06 11:54:25
举报
文章被收录于专栏:DBA随笔DBA随笔DBA随笔

MySQL中的全表扫描案例

这两天看到了两种可能会导致全表扫描的sql,这里给大家看一下,希望可以避免踩坑:

情况1:

强制类型转换的情况下,不会使用索引,会走全表扫描。

举例如下:

首先我们创建一个表

 CREATE TABLE `test` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `age` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `score` varchar(20) NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `idx_score` (`score`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=12 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8

我们可以看到,这个表有三个字段,其中两个int类型,一个varchar类型。varchar类型的字段score是一个索引,而id是主键。

然后我们给这个表里面插入一些数据,插入数据之后的表如下:

mysql:yeyztest 21:43:12>>select * from test;
+----+------+-------+
| id | age  | score |
+----+------+-------+
|  1 |    1 | 5     |
|  2 |    2 | 10    |
|  5 |    5 | 25    |
|  8 |    8 | 40    |
|  9 |    2 | 45    |
| 10 |    5 | 50    |
| 11 |    8 | 55    |
+----+------+-------+
7 rows in set (0.00 sec)

这个时候,我们使用explain语句来查看两条sql的执行情况,分别是:

explain select * from test where score ='10';

explain select * from test where score =10;

结果如下:

mysql:yeyztest 21:42:29>>explain select * from test where score ='10';
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+-----------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key       | key_len | ref   | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+-----------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test  | NULL       | ref  | idx_score     | idx_score | 62      | const |    1 |   100.00 | NULL  |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+-----------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

mysql:yeyztest 21:43:06>>explain select * from test where score =10;  
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra       |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test  | NULL       | ALL  | idx_score     | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    7 |    14.29 | Using where |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set, 3 warnings (0.00 sec)

可以看到,如果我们使用的是varchar类型的值,那么结果中扫描的行数rows就是1,而当我们使用的是整数值10的时候,扫描行数变为了7,证明,如果出现了强制类型转换,则会导致索引失效。

情况2:

反向查询不能使用索引,会导致全表扫描。

创建一个表test1,它的主键是score,然后插入6条数据:

CREATE TABLE `test1` (
  `score` varchar(20) not null default '' ,
  PRIMARY KEY (`score`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8

mysql:yeyztest 22:09:37>>select * from test1;
+-------+
| score |
+-------+
| 111   |
| 222   |
| 333   |
| 444   |
| 555   |
| 666   |
+-------+
6 rows in set (0.00 sec)

当我们使用反向查找的时候,不会使用到索引,来看下面两条sql:

explain select * from test1 where score='111';

explain select * from test1 where score!='111';

mysql:yeyztest 22:13:01>>explain select * from test1 where score='111';
+----+-------------+-------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref   | rows | filtered | Extra       |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test1 | NULL       | const | PRIMARY       | PRIMARY | 62      | const |    1 |   100.00 | Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

mysql:yeyztest 22:13:08>>explain select * from test1 where score!='111';
+----+-------------+-------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type  | possible_keys | key     | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra                    |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test1 | NULL       | index | PRIMARY       | PRIMARY | 62      | NULL |    6 |   100.00 | Using where; Using index |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+-------+---------------+---------+---------+------+------+----------+--------------------------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

可以看到,使用!=作为条件的时候,扫描的行数是表的总记录行数。因此如果想要使用索引,我们就不能使用反向匹配规则。

情况3:

某些or值条件可能导致全表扫描。

首先我们创建一个表,并插入几条数据:

CREATE TABLE `test4` (
  `id` int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  `name` varchar(20) DEFAULT NULL,
  KEY `idx_id` (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

mysql--dba_admin@127.0.0.1:yeyztest 22:23:44>>select * from test4;
+------+------+
| id   | name |
+------+------+
|    1 | aaa  |
|    2 | bbb  |
|    3 | ccc  |
|    4 | yeyz |
| NULL | yeyz |
+------+------+
5 rows in set (0.00 sec)

其中表test4包含两个字段,id字段是一个索引,而name字段是varchar类型,我们来看下面三个语句的扫描行数:

explain select * from test4 where id=1;

explain select * from test4 where id is null;

explain select * from test4 where id=1 or id is null;

mysql:yeyztest 22:24:12>>explain select * from test4 where id is null;
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+--------+---------+-------+------+----------+-----------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key    | key_len | ref   | rows | filtered | Extra                 |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+--------+---------+-------+------+----------+-----------------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test4 | NULL       | ref  | idx_id        | idx_id | 5       | const |    1 |   100.00 | Using index condition |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+--------+---------+-------+------+----------+-----------------------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

mysql:yeyztest 22:24:17>>explain select * from test4 where id=1;                      
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+--------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key    | key_len | ref   | rows | filtered | Extra |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+--------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test4 | NULL       | ref  | idx_id        | idx_id | 5       | const |    1 |   100.00 | NULL  |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+--------+---------+-------+------+----------+-------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

mysql:yeyztest 22:24:28>>explain select * from test4 where id=1 or id is null;
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key  | key_len | ref  | rows | filtered | Extra       |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+
|  1 | SIMPLE      | test4 | NULL       | ALL  | idx_id        | NULL | NULL    | NULL |    5 |    40.00 | Using where |
+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

可以看到单独使用id=1和id is null,都只会扫描一行记录,而使用or将二者连接起来就会导致扫描全表而不使用索引。

简单总结一下:

1.强制类型转换的情况下,不会使用索引,会走全表扫描

2.反向查询不能使用索引,会导致全表扫描。

3.某些or值条件可能导致全表扫描。

本文参与 腾讯云自媒体分享计划,分享自微信公众号。
原始发表:2019-07-08,如有侵权请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除

本文分享自 DBA随笔 微信公众号,前往查看

如有侵权,请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除。

本文参与 腾讯云自媒体分享计划  ,欢迎热爱写作的你一起参与!

评论
登录后参与评论
0 条评论
热度
最新
推荐阅读
相关产品与服务
云数据库 MySQL
腾讯云数据库 MySQL(TencentDB for MySQL)为用户提供安全可靠,性能卓越、易于维护的企业级云数据库服务。其具备6大企业级特性,包括企业级定制内核、企业级高可用、企业级高可靠、企业级安全、企业级扩展以及企业级智能运维。通过使用腾讯云数据库 MySQL,可实现分钟级别的数据库部署、弹性扩展以及全自动化的运维管理,不仅经济实惠,而且稳定可靠,易于运维。
领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档