前往小程序,Get更优阅读体验!
立即前往
首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
社区首页 >专栏 >Baozi Training Leetcode solution 135: Candy

Baozi Training Leetcode solution 135: Candy

作者头像
包子面试培训
发布2019-11-10 16:59:54
3700
发布2019-11-10 16:59:54
举报
文章被收录于专栏:包子铺里聊IT包子铺里聊IT

Leetcode solution 135: Candy

Blogger:https://blog.baozitraining.org/2019/11/leetcode-solution-135-candy.html

博客园: https://www.cnblogs.com/baozitraining/p/11747009.html

B站: https://www.bilibili.com/video/av73575024/

Problem Statement

There are N children standing in a line. Each child is assigned a rating value.

You are giving candies to these children subjected to the following requirements:

  • Each child must have at least one candy.
  • Children with a higher rating get more candies than their neighbors.

What is the minimum candies you must give?

Example 1:

代码语言:javascript
复制
Input: [1,0,2]
Output: 5
Explanation: You can allocate to the first, second and third child with 2, 1, 2 candies respectively.

Example 2:

代码语言:javascript
复制
Input: [1,2,2]
Output: 4
Explanation: You can allocate to the first, second and third child with 1, 2, 1 candies respectively.
             The third child gets 1 candy because it satisfies the above two conditions.

Problem link

Video Tutorial

You can find the detailed video tutorial here

  • Youtube
  • B站

Thought Process

The straight forward idea is go through the ranking array, for each ranking, we try to make sure it has more points than its left and right neighbor. Note that it’s not going to work if you just do that because while you are increasing the values, it’s a chain effect that will affect the previous values as well, therefore we have to go all the way to the beginning.

Use below ranking as an example, assume everyone has 1 point already

Ranking: [5, 3, 1]

Points [1, 0, 0]

When at 5, [1, 0, 0]

When at 3, [2, 1, 0]

When at 1, [2, 2, 1]

you might think 5 points is enough, but it’s wrong. The culprit is when you at 1, and increase child at 3, you have the potential to break the assumption that child with 3 ranking always has less than its left neighbor if that neighbor has more points. Therefore, we have to go all the way to the beginning and comparison, thus resulting O(N^2) time complexity

That said, we have to go all the way to the beginning when we increase any value, so in the end it looks like [3, 2, 1]

Hint: if you cannot solve it in one pass, can we solve it in two passes?

A more clever thought is trying to distribute the candies in two passes. Previously we are trying to ensure at certain point both the left and right constrains should met. With two passes, namely first pass (from left to right) ensure all the left neighbors constrains are satisfied, and second pass ensures all the right neighbors contains are satisfied.

  • Left to right pass: Ensure I have more points than my left neighbor if my ranking is higher. Else I just have 1 candy (this is minimum)
  • Right to left pass: Ensure I have more points than my right neighbor if my ranking is higher.

Solutions

Naive solution

代码语言:javascript
复制
 1 // O(N^2), exceeds time limit
 2 public int candyON2(int[] ratings) {
 3     if (ratings == null || ratings.length == 0) return 0;
 4 
 5     if (ratings.length == 1) return 1;
 6 
 7     int[] candies = new int[ratings.length];
 8     candies[0] = 1;
 9 
10     for (int i = 1; i < ratings.length; i++) {
11         // if current rating is small, then we have to go back and increase previous candies if rating is larger
12         if (ratings[i] < ratings[i - 1]) {
13             int j = i - 1;
14             candies[i] = 1;
15             // This causes a chain of effect to go back to the beginning, the simple idea only increase the neighbor
16             // won't work, e.g, 5, 3, 1 should be 6 instead of 5
17             while (j >= 0 && ratings[j] > ratings[j + 1]) {
18                 candies[j] += 1;
19                 j--;
20             }
21 
22         } else if (ratings[i] > ratings[i - 1]) {
23             candies[i] = candies[i - 1] + 1;
24         } else {
25             candies[i] = 1;
26         }
27     }
28 
29     int count = 0;
30     for (int i = 0; i < candies.length; i++) {
31         count += candies[i];
32     }
33 
34     return count;
35 }

Time Complexity: O(N^2)

Space Complexity: O(N) the extra candies array

Two pass linear solution
代码语言:javascript
复制
 1 public int candy(int[] ratings) {
 2     if (ratings == null || ratings.length == 0) return 0;
 3 
 4     int n = ratings.length;
 5 
 6     if (n == 1) return 1;
 7 
 8     int[] candies = new int[n];
 9     candies[0] = 1;
10 
11     // left -> right, if increasing, + 1, else just assign to 1, only change the values going forward
12     // not changing the values we already visited(left)
13     for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
14         if (ratings[i - 1] < ratings[i]) {
15             candies[i] = candies[i - 1] + 1;
16         } else {
17             candies[i] = 1;
18         }
19     }
20 
21     // right -> left, if left is larger and candy is less, +1, not changing the right part, only changing the left
22     for (int i = n - 1; i >= 1; i--) {
23         if (ratings[i - 1] > ratings[i] && candies[i - 1] <= candies[i]) {
24             candies[i - 1] = candies[i] + 1;
25         }
26     }
27 
28     int count = 0;
29     for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
30         count += candies[i];
31     }
32 
33     return count;
34 }

Time Complexity: O(N)

Space Complexity: O(N) the extra candies array

References

  • Leetcode discussion solution
本文参与 腾讯云自媒体分享计划,分享自微信公众号。
原始发表:2019-11-06,如有侵权请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除

本文分享自 包子铺里聊IT 微信公众号,前往查看

如有侵权,请联系 cloudcommunity@tencent.com 删除。

本文参与 腾讯云自媒体分享计划  ,欢迎热爱写作的你一起参与!

评论
登录后参与评论
0 条评论
热度
最新
推荐阅读
目录
  • Problem Statement
  • Video Tutorial
  • Thought Process
  • Solutions
  • Naive solution
    • Two pass linear solution
    • References
    领券
    问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档