对于不同国家如何应对《京都议定书》，一直存在激烈的争论。为保障公共安全，韩国以个人隐私为代价积极使用个人信息，而法国则以公共安全为代价鼓励自愿合作。在这篇文章中，我们分析了流行病学疫情调查中这两种不同方法的优缺点。此外，在控制这一疫情的过程中，我们提出了消除个人信息识别的技术选择。我们讨论对未来研究和政策影响的教训。

原文标题：Balancing Personal Privacy and Public Safety in COVID-19: Case of Korea and France

原文：There has been vigorous debate on how different countries responded to the COVID-19. To secure public safety, Korea has actively used personal information at the risk of personal privacy whereas France encourages voluntary cooperation at the risk of public safety. In this article, we examine the pros and cons of these two different approaches in epidemiological investigations. In addition, we present technological options of de-identification of personal information in the course of managing this pandemic under control. We discuss lessons for future research and policy implications.

原文作者：Na-Young Ahn, Jun Eun Park, Dong Hoon Lee, Paul C. Hong

原文地址：https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.14495