概述
1、以jdk1.8为例分析Java的源码
2、Java提供了一个静态的工具类Arrays,其中Arrays.sort()提供了对基本数据类型的排序
3、jdk1.8之前,Arrays.sort()方法使用的是传统快排的方式进行排序
4、jdk1.8后,Arrays.sort()方法使用的是双轴快排
5、双轴快排(DualPivotQuicksort)的基本思想是:
顾名思义有两个轴元素pivot1,pivot2,且pivot ≤pivot2
将序列分成三段:x < pivot1、pivot1 ≤ x ≤ pivot2、x >pivot2
然后分别对三段进行递归
写一行代码
这是随机定义了一个数组
使用Arrays.sort()方法排序
打印出排序后的结果(Arrays提供了.toString()方法将数组打印出来)
由打印结果可以知道,Arrays.sort()的结果是增序排列
下面就进入Arrays.sot()看看源码
看看源码
1.
/**
* Sorts the specified array into ascending numerical order.
*
* <p>Implementation note: The sorting algorithm is a Dual-Pivot Quicksort
* by Vladimir Yaroslavskiy, Jon Bentley, and Joshua Bloch. This algorithm
* offers O(n log(n)) performance on many data sets that cause other
* quicksorts to degrade to quadratic performance, and is typically
* faster than traditional (one-pivot) Quicksort implementations.
*
* @param a the array to be sorted
*/
public static void sort(int[] a) {
DualPivotQuicksort.sort(a, 0, a.length - 1, null, 0, 0);
}
原来他直接调用了DualPivotQuicksort.sort()这个方法
注释的大概意思就是:
这是排序算法叫双轴快排
能保证大多数数组排序的时间复杂度保持在O(nlogn)
传统快排的时间复杂度最差的情况为n平方
并且比传统的快排算法(单轴快排)要快
2.
/*
* Sorting methods for seven primitive types.
*/
/**
* Sorts the specified range of the array using the given
* workspace array slice if possible for merging
*
* @param a the array to be sorted
* @param left the index of the first element, inclusive, to be sorted
* @param right the index of the last element, inclusive, to be sorted
* @param work a workspace array (slice)
* @param workBase origin of usable space in work array
* @param workLen usable size of work array
*/
static void sort(int[] a, int left, int right,
int[] work, int workBase, int workLen) {
//······
}
点进去之后进入到了这个方法
注释的大概意思是:
这个排序算法可以为7中基本数据类型的数组进行排序
该方法会把将给定的数组和给定范围内的数据进行排序
参数a就是给定的数组
参数left就是给定范围的起始下标(含)
参数right就是给定范围的结束下标(不含)
另外三个参数在这里没有用到,默认是null,0,0
3.
static void sort(int[] a, int left, int right,
int[] work, int workBase, int workLen) {
// Use Quicksort on small arrays
if (right - left < QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
//······
}
程序首选会判断数组的长度,是否小于QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD这个参数
4.
/**
* If the length of an array to be sorted is less than this
* constant, Quicksort is used in preference to merge sort.
*/
private static final int QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD = 286;
如果数组的长度小于这个参数,则使用快排的效率是比归并排序要好的
这里的快排,就是双轴快排
点击进入sort(a, left, right, true);看看什么样子
5.
/**
* Sorts the specified range of the array by Dual-Pivot Quicksort.
*
* @param a the array to be sorted
* @param left the index of the first element, inclusive, to be sorted
* @param right the index of the last element, inclusive, to be sorted
* @param leftmost indicates if this part is the leftmost in the range
*/
private static void sort(int[] a, int left, int right, boolean leftmost) {
//······
}
注释的意思就是使用双轴快排算法对给定数组在指定的范围内进行排序
参数leftmost的含义是给定的范围,是不是这个数组最左边的部分
5.1
接下来看看这个方法
int length = right - left + 1;
// Use insertion sort on tiny arrays
if (length < INSERTION_SORT_THRESHOLD) {
if (leftmost) {
/*
* Traditional (without sentinel) insertion sort,
* optimized for server VM, is used in case of
* the leftmost part.
*/
for (int i = left, j = i; i < right; j = ++i) {
int ai = a[i + 1];
while (ai < a[j]) {
a[j + 1] = a[j];
if (j-- == left) {
break;
}
}
a[j + 1] = ai;
}
}
首选判断数组排序的长度是否小于插入排序的阈值
/**
* If the length of an array to be sorted is less than this
* constant, insertion sort is used in preference to Quicksort.
*/
private static final int INSERTION_SORT_THRESHOLD = 47;
这个值是47,小于这个值的时候,插入排序的效率要高于快排
所以这个时候会才去插入排序
5.2
如果不采用插入排序,则执行以下代码
// Inexpensive approximation of length / 7
int seventh = (length >> 3) + (length >> 6) + 1;
/*
* Sort five evenly spaced elements around (and including) the
* center element in the range. These elements will be used for
* pivot selection as described below. The choice for spacing
* these elements was empirically determined to work well on
* a wide variety of inputs.
*/
int e3 = (left + right) >>> 1; // The midpoint
int e2 = e3 - seventh;
int e1 = e2 - seventh;
int e4 = e3 + seventh;
int e5 = e4 + seventh;
// Sort these elements using insertion sort
if (a[e2] < a[e1]) { int t = a[e2]; a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
if (a[e3] < a[e2]) { int t = a[e3]; a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
if (a[e4] < a[e3]) { int t = a[e4]; a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t;
if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
}
if (a[e5] < a[e4]) { int t = a[e5]; a[e5] = a[e4]; a[e4] = t;
if (t < a[e3]) { a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t;
if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
}
}
int seventh = (length >> 3) + (length >> 6) + 1;
这行代码相当于length/8+length/64+1,
近似于数组排序长度的1/7
然后选出5个点,分别是e1,e2,e3,e4,e5,将数组等分为6份
然后针对这个5个元素,进行插入排序
5.3
5.3.1
/*
* Use the second and fourth of the five sorted elements as pivots.
* These values are inexpensive approximations of the first and
* second terciles of the array. Note that pivot1 <= pivot2.
*/
int pivot1 = a[e2];
int pivot2 = a[e4];
/*
* The first and the last elements to be sorted are moved to the
* locations formerly occupied by the pivots. When partitioning
* is complete, the pivots are swapped back into their final
* positions, and excluded from subsequent sorting.
*/
a[e2] = a[left];
a[e4] = a[right];
/*
* Skip elements, which are less or greater than pivot values.
*/
while (a[++less] < pivot1);
while (a[--great] > pivot2);
如果e1,e2,e3,e4,e5两两都不相等
则选取a[e2],a[e4]分别作为pivot1,pivot2。
由于步骤5.2进行了排序,所以必有pivot1 <=pivot2
定义两个指针less和great
less从最左边开始向右遍历,一直找到第一个不小于pivot1的元素
great从右边开始向左遍历,一直找到第一个不大于pivot2的元素。
5.3.2
/*
* Partitioning:
*
* left part center part right part
* +--------------------------------------------------------------+
* | < pivot1 | pivot1 <= && <= pivot2 | ? | > pivot2 |
* +--------------------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (left, less) < pivot1
* pivot1 <= all in [less, k) <= pivot2
* all in (great, right) > pivot2
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
outer:
for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) {
int ak = a[k];
if (ak < pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
/*
* Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i++;" instead
* of "a[i++] = b;" due to performance issue.
*/
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else if (ak > pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] > pivot2) {
if (great-- == k) {
break outer;
}
}
if (a[great] < pivot1) { // a[great] <= pivot2
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = a[great];
++less;
} else { // pivot1 <= a[great] <= pivot2
a[k] = a[great];
}
/*
* Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i--;" instead
* of "a[i--] = b;" due to performance issue.
*/
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
接着定义指针k从less-1开始向右遍历至great
把小于pivot1的元素移动到less左边,大于pivot2的元素移动到great右边
需要注意:我们已知great处的元素小于pivot2,
但是它与pivot1的大小关系,还需要进行判断
如果比pivot1还小,需要移动到到less左边,否则只需要交换到k处。
5.3.3
// Swap pivots into their final positions
a[left] = a[less - 1]; a[less - 1] = pivot1;
a[right] = a[great + 1]; a[great + 1] = pivot2;
// Sort left and right parts recursively, excluding known pivots
sort(a, left, less - 2, leftmost);
sort(a, great + 2, right, false);
将less-1处的元素移动到队头,great+1处的元素移动到队尾,并把pivot1和pivot2分别放到less-1和great+1处
至此,less左边的元素都小于pivot1,great右边的元素都大于pivot2,分别对两部分进行同样的递归排序
5.3.4
/*
* If center part is too large (comprises > 4/7 of the array),
* swap internal pivot values to ends.
*/
if (less < e1 && e5 < great) {
/*
* Skip elements, which are equal to pivot values.
*/
while (a[less] == pivot1) {
++less;
}
while (a[great] == pivot2) {
--great;
}
/*
* Partitioning:
*
* left part center part right part
* +----------------------------------------------------------+
* | == pivot1 | pivot1 < && < pivot2 | ? | == pivot2 |
* +----------------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (*, less) == pivot1
* pivot1 < all in [less, k) < pivot2
* all in (great, *) == pivot2
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
outer:
for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) {
int ak = a[k];
if (ak == pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else if (ak == pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] == pivot2) {
if (great-- == k) {
break outer;
}
}
if (a[great] == pivot1) { // a[great] < pivot2
a[k] = a[less];
/*
* Even though a[great] equals to pivot1, the
* assignment a[less] = pivot1 may be incorrect,
* if a[great] and pivot1 are floating-point zeros
* of different signs. Therefore in float and
* double sorting methods we have to use more
* accurate assignment a[less] = a[great].
*/
a[less] = pivot1;
++less;
} else { // pivot1 < a[great] < pivot2
a[k] = a[great];
}
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
}
// Sort center part recursively
sort(a, less, great, false);
对于中间的部分,如果大于4/7的数组长度,很可能是因为重复元素的存在
所以把less向右移动到第一个不等于pivot1的地方,把great向左移动到第一个不等于pivot2的地方
然后再对less和great之间的部分进行递归排序
5.4
/*
* Use the third of the five sorted elements as pivot.
* This value is inexpensive approximation of the median.
*/
int pivot = a[e3];
/*
* Partitioning degenerates to the traditional 3-way
* (or "Dutch National Flag") schema:
*
* left part center part right part
* +-------------------------------------------------+
* | < pivot | == pivot | ? | > pivot |
* +-------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (left, less) < pivot
* all in [less, k) == pivot
* all in (great, right) > pivot
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
for (int k = less; k <= great; ++k) {
if (a[k] == pivot) {
continue;
}
int ak = a[k];
if (ak < pivot) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else { // a[k] > pivot - Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] > pivot) {
--great;
}
if (a[great] < pivot) { // a[great] <= pivot
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = a[great];
++less;
} else { // a[great] == pivot
/*
* Even though a[great] equals to pivot, the
* assignment a[k] = pivot may be incorrect,
* if a[great] and pivot are floating-point
* zeros of different signs. Therefore in float
* and double sorting methods we have to use
* more accurate assignment a[k] = a[great].
*/
a[k] = pivot;
}
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
/*
* Sort left and right parts recursively.
* All elements from center part are equal
* and, therefore, already sorted.
*/
sort(a, left, less - 1, leftmost);
sort(a, great + 1, right, false);
如果e1,e2,e3,e4,e5有相等的情况
则选取a[e3]作为pivot
将数组分成了三个部分
经过不断对比移动,使less左边的元素都小于pivot,great右边的元素都大于pivot
分别对两部分进行同样的递归排序
至此,双轴快排的源码就看完了,
6.
int[] run = new int[MAX_RUN_COUNT + 1];
int count = 0; run[0] = left;
// Check if the array is nearly sorted
for (int k = left; k < right; run[count] = k) {
if (a[k] < a[k + 1]) { // ascending
while (++k <= right && a[k - 1] <= a[k]);
} else if (a[k] > a[k + 1]) { // descending
while (++k <= right && a[k - 1] >= a[k]);
for (int lo = run[count] - 1, hi = k; ++lo < --hi; ) {
int t = a[lo]; a[lo] = a[hi]; a[hi] = t;
}
} else { // equal
for (int m = MAX_RUN_LENGTH; ++k <= right && a[k - 1] == a[k]; ) {
if (--m == 0) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
}
}
/*
* The array is not highly structured,
* use Quicksort instead of merge sort.
*/
if (++count == MAX_RUN_COUNT) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
}
如果数组长度大于286的时候,先对数组进行一个初步判断,看看是否适合使用归并排序
基本思路是:
这里主要作用是看他数组具不具备结构:实际逻辑是分组排序,每降序为一个组,像1,9,8,7,6,8。
9到6是降序,为一个组,然后把降序的一组排成升序:1,6,7,8,9,8。然后最后的8后面继续往后面找
每遇到这样一个降序组,++count,当count大于MAX_RUN_COUNT(67),被判断为这个数组不具备结构(也就是这数据时而升时而降)
然后送给之前的sort(里面的快速排序)的方法(The array is not highly structured,use Quicksort instead of merge sort.)
如果count少于MAX_RUN_COUNT(67)的,说明这个数组还有点结构,就继续往下走下面的归并排序。
如果数组每个区块都近似有序,并且递增变递减的次数没有超过MAX_RUN_COUNT次数
那就使用归并排序进行排序
反之,就使用快速排序,也就是5的代码
/**
* The maximum number of runs in merge sort.
*/
private static final int MAX_RUN_COUNT = 67;
/**
* The maximum length of run in merge sort.
*/
private static final int MAX_RUN_LENGTH = 33;
这里边用到了这两个变量,是使用归并排序的两个最优解限制
7.
归并排序
// Check special cases
// Implementation note: variable "right" is increased by 1.
if (run[count] == right++) { // The last run contains one element
run[++count] = right;
} else if (count == 1) { // The array is already sorted
return;
}
// Determine alternation base for merge
byte odd = 0;
for (int n = 1; (n <<= 1) < count; odd ^= 1);
// Use or create temporary array b for merging
int[] b; // temp array; alternates with a
int ao, bo; // array offsets from 'left'
int blen = right - left; // space needed for b
if (work == null || workLen < blen || workBase + blen > work.length) {
work = new int[blen];
workBase = 0;
}
if (odd == 0) {
System.arraycopy(a, left, work, workBase, blen);
b = a;
bo = 0;
a = work;
ao = workBase - left;
} else {
b = work;
ao = 0;
bo = workBase - left;
}
// Merging
for (int last; count > 1; count = last) {
for (int k = (last = 0) + 2; k <= count; k += 2) {
int hi = run[k], mi = run[k - 1];
for (int i = run[k - 2], p = i, q = mi; i < hi; ++i) {
if (q >= hi || p < mi && a[p + ao] <= a[q + ao]) {
b[i + bo] = a[p++ + ao];
} else {
b[i + bo] = a[q++ + ao];
}
}
run[++last] = hi;
}
if ((count & 1) != 0) {
for (int i = right, lo = run[count - 1]; --i >= lo;
b[i + bo] = a[i + ao]
);
run[++last] = right;
}
int[] t = a; a = b; b = t;
int o = ao; ao = bo; bo = o;
}
总结
Arrays.sot()实际上是根据数组的情况综合了双轴快排、插入排序和归并排序,针对每种情况都做了极大的优化
流程图如下
文/戴先生@2020年6月3日
---end---