源码剖析 Spring Security 的实现原理
Spring Security 是一个轻量级的安全框架，可以和 Spring 项目很好地集成，提供了丰富的身份认证和授权相关的功能，而且还能防止一些常见的网络攻击。
入门示例
我们先从一个简单的例子开始，这里我直接使用了 使用 Spring 项目脚手架 中的 Hello World 示例。为了让这个示例程序开启 Spring Security 功能，我们在 pom.xml 文件中引入 spring-boot-starter-security 依赖即可：
<dependency>`` ``<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>`` ``<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-security</artifactId>``</dependency>
启动程序，会在控制台日志中看到类似下面这样的信息：
2023-05-15 06:52:52.418 INFO 8596 --- [ main] .s.s.UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration : ` `Using generated security password: eeb386a9-e16a-4b9b-bbc6-c054c8d263b0
这个是由 Spring Security 随机生成的密码。访问 /hello 页面，可以看到出现了一个登录页面：
输入用户名（默认为 user）和密码（控制台日志）登录成功后我们才能正常访问页面。默认的用户名和密码可以使用下面的配置进行修改：
spring.security.user.name=admin``spring.security.user.password=123456
为了后续更好地对 Spring Security 进行配置，理解 Spring Security 的实现原理，我们需要进一步学习 Spring Security 的三大核心组件：
- 过滤器（Servlet Filters）
- 认证（Authentication）
- 授权（Authorization）
Servlet Filters：Spring Security 的基础
我们知道，在 Spring MVC 框架中，DispatcherServlet 负责对用户的 Web 请求进行分发和处理，在请求到达 DispatcherServlet 之前，会经过一系列的 Servlet Filters，这被称之为过滤器，主要作用是拦截请求并对请求做一些前置或后置处理。这些过滤器串在一起，形成一个过滤器链（FilterChain）：
我们可以在配置文件中加上下面的日志配置：
logging.level.org.springframework.boot.web.servlet.ServletContextInitializerBeans=TRACE
然后重新启动服务，会在控制台输出类似下面这样的日志（为了方便查看，我做了一点格式化）：
2023-05-18 07:08:14.805 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Added existing Filter initializer bean 'webMvcMetricsFilter'; order=-2147483647, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/actuate/autoconfigure/metrics/web/servlet/WebMvcMetricsAutoConfiguration.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.806 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Added existing Filter initializer bean 'securityFilterChainRegistration'; order=-100, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/security/servlet/SecurityFilterAutoConfiguration.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.808 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Added existing Servlet initializer bean 'dispatcherServletRegistration'; order=2147483647, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/web/servlet/DispatcherServletAutoConfiguration$DispatcherServletRegistrationConfiguration.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.810 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Added existing Filter initializer bean 'errorPageSecurityFilter'; order=2147483647, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/security/servlet/SpringBootWebSecurityConfiguration$ErrorPageSecurityFilterConfiguration.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.813 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Added existing ServletContextInitializer initializer bean 'servletEndpointRegistrar'; order=2147483647, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/actuate/autoconfigure/endpoint/web/ServletEndpointManagementContextConfiguration$WebMvcServletEndpointManagementContextConfiguration.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.828 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Created Filter initializer for bean 'characterEncodingFilter'; order=-2147483648, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/web/servlet/HttpEncodingAutoConfiguration.class] ``2023-05-18 07:08:14.831 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Created Filter initializer for bean 'formContentFilter'; order=-9900, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/web/servlet/WebMvcAutoConfiguration.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.834 TRACE 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Created Filter initializer for bean 'requestContextFilter'; order=-105, `` ``resource=class path resource [org/springframework/boot/autoconfigure/web/servlet/WebMvcAutoConfiguration$WebMvcAutoConfigurationAdapter.class]``2023-05-18 07:08:14.842 DEBUG 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Mapping filters: `` ``filterRegistrationBean urls=[/*] order=-2147483647, `` ``springSecurityFilterChain urls=[/*] order=-100, `` ``filterRegistrationBean urls=[/*] order=2147483647, `` ``characterEncodingFilter urls=[/*] order=-2147483648, `` ``formContentFilter urls=[/*] order=-9900, `` ``requestContextFilter urls=[/*] order=-105``2023-05-18 07:08:14.844 DEBUG 10020 --- [ main] o.s.b.w.s.ServletContextInitializerBeans : `` ``Mapping servlets: dispatcherServlet urls=[/]
这里显示了应用开启的所有 Filter 以及对应的自动配置类，可以看到 Spring Security 自动注入了两个 FilterRegistrationBean：
- 来自配置类
SecurityFilterAutoConfiguration的securityFilterChainRegistration - 来自配置类
ErrorPageSecurityFilterConfiguration的errorPageSecurityFilter
DelegatingFilterProxy：Servlet Filter 与 Spring Bean 的桥梁
注意上面显示的并非 Filter 的名字，而是 FilterRegistrationBean 的名字，这是一种 RegistrationBean，它实现了 ServletContextInitializer 接口，用于在程序启动时，将 Filter 或 Servlet 注入到 ServletContext 中：
public abstract class RegistrationBean implements ServletContextInitializer, Ordered {` ` ``@Override`` ``public final void onStartup(ServletContext servletContext) throws ServletException {`` ``...`` ``register(description, servletContext);`` ``}` `}
其中 securityFilterChainRegistration 的定义如下：
@Bean``@ConditionalOnBean(name = DEFAULT_FILTER_NAME)``public DelegatingFilterProxyRegistrationBean securityFilterChainRegistration(`` ``SecurityProperties securityProperties) {`` ``DelegatingFilterProxyRegistrationBean registration = new DelegatingFilterProxyRegistrationBean(`` ``DEFAULT_FILTER_NAME);`` ``registration.setOrder(securityProperties.getFilter().getOrder());`` ``registration.setDispatcherTypes(getDispatcherTypes(securityProperties));`` ``return registration;``}
这个 RegistrationBean 的类型为 DelegatingFilterProxyRegistrationBean，由它注入的 Filter 叫 DelegatingFilterProxy：
public class DelegatingFilterProxyRegistrationBean extends AbstractFilterRegistrationBean<DelegatingFilterProxy> {`` ``...``}
这是一个非常重要的 Servlet Filter，它充当着 Servlet 容器和 Spring 上下文之间的桥梁，由于 Servlet 容器有着它自己的标准，在注入 Filter 时并不知道 Spring Bean 的存在，所以我们可以通过 DelegatingFilterProxy 来实现 Bean Filter 的延迟加载：
看一下 DelegatingFilterProxy 的实现：
public class DelegatingFilterProxy extends GenericFilterBean {` ` ``@Override`` ``public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain filterChain)`` ``throws ServletException, IOException {` ` ``// Lazily initialize the delegate if necessary.`` ``Filter delegateToUse = this.delegate;`` ``if (delegateToUse == null) {`` ``synchronized (this.delegateMonitor) {`` ``delegateToUse = this.delegate;`` ``if (delegateToUse == null) {`` ``WebApplicationContext wac = findWebApplicationContext();`` ``if (wac == null) {`` ``throw new IllegalStateException("No WebApplicationContext found: " +`` ``"no ContextLoaderListener or DispatcherServlet registered?");`` ``}`` ``delegateToUse = initDelegate(wac);`` ``}`` ``this.delegate = delegateToUse;`` ``}`` ``}` ` ``// Let the delegate perform the actual doFilter operation.`` ``invokeDelegate(delegateToUse, request, response, filterChain);`` ``}``}
这段代码很容易理解，首先判断代理的 Bean Filter 是否存在，如果不存在则根据 findWebApplicationContext() 找到 Web 应用上下文，然后从上下文中获取 Bean Filter 并初始化，最后再调用该 Bean Filter。
FilterChainProxy：Spring Security 的统一入口
那么接下来的问题是，这个 DelegatingFilterProxy 代理的 Bean Filter 是什么呢？我们从上面定义 DelegatingFilterProxyRegistrationBean 的地方可以看出，代理的 Bean Filter 叫做 DEFAULT_FILTER_NAME，查看它的定义就知道，实际上就是 springSecurityFilterChain：
public static final String DEFAULT_FILTER_NAME = "springSecurityFilterChain";
那么这个 springSecurityFilterChain 是在哪定义的呢？我们可以在 WebSecurityConfiguration 配置类中找到答案：
public class WebSecurityConfiguration {` ` ``@Bean(name = AbstractSecurityWebApplicationInitializer.DEFAULT_FILTER_NAME)`` ``public Filter springSecurityFilterChain() throws Exception {`` ``boolean hasConfigurers = this.webSecurityConfigurers != null && !this.webSecurityConfigurers.isEmpty();`` ``boolean hasFilterChain = !this.securityFilterChains.isEmpty();`` ``if (!hasConfigurers && !hasFilterChain) {`` ``WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter adapter = this.objectObjectPostProcessor`` ``.postProcess(new WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter() {`` ``});`` ``this.webSecurity.apply(adapter);`` ``}`` ``for (SecurityFilterChain securityFilterChain : this.securityFilterChains) {`` ``this.webSecurity.addSecurityFilterChainBuilder(() -> securityFilterChain);`` ``for (Filter filter : securityFilterChain.getFilters()) {`` ``if (filter instanceof FilterSecurityInterceptor) {`` ``this.webSecurity.securityInterceptor((FilterSecurityInterceptor) filter);`` ``break;`` ``}`` ``}`` ``}`` ``for (WebSecurityCustomizer customizer : this.webSecurityCustomizers) {`` ``customizer.customize(this.webSecurity);`` ``}`` ``return this.webSecurity.build();`` ``}``}
很显然，springSecurityFilterChain 经过一系列的安全配置，最后通过 this.webSecurity.build() 构建出来的，进一步深入到 webSecurity 的源码我们就可以发现它的类型是 FilterChainProxy：
public final class WebSecurity extends AbstractConfiguredSecurityBuilder<Filter, WebSecurity>`` ``implements SecurityBuilder<Filter>, ApplicationContextAware, ServletContextAware {` ` ``@Override`` ``protected Filter performBuild() throws Exception {` ` ``int chainSize = this.ignoredRequests.size() + this.securityFilterChainBuilders.size();`` ``List<SecurityFilterChain> securityFilterChains = new ArrayList<>(chainSize);`` ``List<RequestMatcherEntry<List<WebInvocationPrivilegeEvaluator>>> requestMatcherPrivilegeEvaluatorsEntries = new ArrayList<>();`` ``for (RequestMatcher ignoredRequest : this.ignoredRequests) {`` ``SecurityFilterChain securityFilterChain = new DefaultSecurityFilterChain(ignoredRequest);`` ``securityFilterChains.add(securityFilterChain);`` ``requestMatcherPrivilegeEvaluatorsEntries`` ``.add(getRequestMatcherPrivilegeEvaluatorsEntry(securityFilterChain));`` ``}`` ``for (SecurityBuilder<? extends SecurityFilterChain> securityFilterChainBuilder : this.securityFilterChainBuilders) {`` ``SecurityFilterChain securityFilterChain = securityFilterChainBuilder.build();`` ``securityFilterChains.add(securityFilterChain);`` ``requestMatcherPrivilegeEvaluatorsEntries`` ``.add(getRequestMatcherPrivilegeEvaluatorsEntry(securityFilterChain));`` ``}` ` ``FilterChainProxy filterChainProxy = new FilterChainProxy(securityFilterChains);`` ``if (this.httpFirewall != null) {`` ``filterChainProxy.setFirewall(this.httpFirewall);`` ``}`` ``if (this.requestRejectedHandler != null) {`` ``filterChainProxy.setRequestRejectedHandler(this.requestRejectedHandler);`` ``}`` ``filterChainProxy.afterPropertiesSet();` ` ``Filter result = filterChainProxy;` ` ``this.postBuildAction.run();`` ``return result;`` ``}``}
从 FilterChainProxy 的名字可以看出来，它也是一个代理类，它代理的类叫做 SecurityFilterChain，它包含了多个 Security Filters 形成一个过滤器链，这和 Servlet Filters 有点类似，只不过这些 Security Filters 都是普通的 Spring Bean：
使用 FilterChainProxy 来代理 Security Filters 相比于直接使用 Servlet Filters 或使用 DelegatingFilterProxy 来代理有几个明显的好处：
FilterChainProxy作为 Spring Security 对 Servlet 的支持入口，方便理解和调试；FilterChainProxy可以对 Spring Security 做一些集中处理，比如统一清除SecurityContext防止内存泄漏，以及统一使用HttpFirewall对应用进行保护等；- 支持多个
SecurityFilterChain，传统的Servlet Filters只能通过 URL 来匹配，使用FilterChainProxy可以配合RequestMatcher更灵活地控制调用哪个SecurityFilterChain；
构建 SecurityFilterChain
上面讲到，FilterChainProxy 是通过 webSecurity 构建的，一个 FilterChainProxy 里包含一个或多个 SecurityFilterChain，那么 SecurityFilterChain 是由谁构建的呢？答案是 httpSecurity。我们可以在 SecurityFilterChainConfiguration 配置类中看到 SecurityFilterChain 的构建过程：
@Configuration(proxyBeanMethods = false)``@ConditionalOnDefaultWebSecurity``static class SecurityFilterChainConfiguration {` ` ``@Bean`` ``@Order(SecurityProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER)`` ``SecurityFilterChain defaultSecurityFilterChain(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {`` ``http.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated();`` ``http.formLogin();`` ``http.httpBasic();`` ``return http.build();`` ``}``}
深入到 http.build() 的源码，可以看到过滤器链的默认实现为 DefaultSecurityFilterChain：
public final class HttpSecurity extends AbstractConfiguredSecurityBuilder<DefaultSecurityFilterChain, HttpSecurity>`` ``implements SecurityBuilder<DefaultSecurityFilterChain>, HttpSecurityBuilder<HttpSecurity> {` ` ``@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")`` ``@Override`` ``protected DefaultSecurityFilterChain performBuild() {` ` ``this.filters.sort(OrderComparator.INSTANCE);`` ``List<Filter> sortedFilters = new ArrayList<>(this.filters.size());`` ``for (Filter filter : this.filters) {`` ``sortedFilters.add(((OrderedFilter) filter).filter);`` ``}`` ``return new DefaultSecurityFilterChain(this.requestMatcher, sortedFilters);`` ``}``}
构建 Security Filters
通过上面的梳理，我们大概清楚了 SecurityFilterChain 的构建过程，接下来，我们继续看 Security Filters 的构建过程。我们知道，一个SecurityFilterChain 中包含了多个 Security Filters，那么这些 Security Filters 是从哪里来的呢？
在 HttpSecurity 的代码里可以找到这么几个方法：
public HttpSecurity addFilter(Filter filter)public HttpSecurity addFilterBefore(Filter filter, Class<? extends Filter> beforeFilter)public HttpSecurity addFilterAfter(Filter filter, Class<? extends Filter> afterFilter)public HttpSecurity addFilterAt(Filter filter, Class<? extends Filter> atFilter)
我们不妨在 addFilter 方法内下个断点，然后以调试模式启动程序，每次触发断点时，我们将对应的 Filter 记录下来，并通过堆栈找到该 Filter 是从何处添加的：
序号 | Filter | 来源 |
|---|---|---|
1 | WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter | HttpSecurityConfiguration.httpSecurity() |
2 | CsrfFilter | CsrfConfigurer.configure() |
3 | ExceptionTranslationFilter | ExceptionHandlingConfigurer.configure() |
4 | HeaderWriterFilter | HeadersConfigurer.configure() |
5 | SessionManagementFilter | SessionManagementConfigurer.configure() |
6 | DisableEncodeUrlFilter | SessionManagementConfigurer.configure() |
7 | SecurityContextPersistenceFilter | SecurityContextConfigurer.configure() |
8 | RequestCacheAwareFilter | RequestCacheConfigurer.configure() |
9 | AnonymousAuthenticationFilter | AnonymousConfigurer.configure() |
10 | SecurityContextHolderAwareRequestFilter | ServletApiConfigurer.configure() |
11 | DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter | DefaultLoginPageConfigurer.configure() |
12 | DefaultLogoutPageGeneratingFilter | DefaultLoginPageConfigurer.configure() |
13 | LogoutFilter | LogoutConfigurer.configure() |
14 | FilterSecurityInterceptor | AbstractInterceptUrlConfigurer.configure() |
15 | UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter | AbstractAuthenticationFilterConfigurer.configure() |
16 | BasicAuthenticationFilter | HttpBasicConfigurer.configure() |
除了第一个 WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter 是在创建 HttpSecurity 的时候直接添加的，其他的 Filter 都是通过 XXXConfigurer 这样的配置器添加的。我们继续深挖下去可以发现，生成这些配置器的地方有两个，第一个地方是在 HttpSecurityConfiguration 配置类中创建 HttpSecurity 时，如下所示：
class HttpSecurityConfiguration {` ` ``@Bean(HTTPSECURITY_BEAN_NAME)`` ``@Scope("prototype")`` ``HttpSecurity httpSecurity() throws Exception {`` ``WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter.LazyPasswordEncoder passwordEncoder = new WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter.LazyPasswordEncoder(`` ``this.context);`` ``AuthenticationManagerBuilder authenticationBuilder = new WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter.DefaultPasswordEncoderAuthenticationManagerBuilder(`` ``this.objectPostProcessor, passwordEncoder);`` ``authenticationBuilder.parentAuthenticationManager(authenticationManager());`` ``authenticationBuilder.authenticationEventPublisher(getAuthenticationEventPublisher());`` ``HttpSecurity http = new HttpSecurity(this.objectPostProcessor, authenticationBuilder, createSharedObjects());`` ``// @formatter:off`` ``http`` ``.csrf(withDefaults())`` ``.addFilter(new WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter())`` ``.exceptionHandling(withDefaults())`` ``.headers(withDefaults())`` ``.sessionManagement(withDefaults())`` ``.securityContext(withDefaults())`` ``.requestCache(withDefaults())`` ``.anonymous(withDefaults())`` ``.servletApi(withDefaults())`` ``.apply(new DefaultLoginPageConfigurer<>());`` ``http.logout(withDefaults());`` ``// @formatter:on`` ``applyDefaultConfigurers(http);`` ``return http;`` ``}``}
另外一个地方则是在上面的 SecurityFilterChainConfiguration 配置类中使用 http.build() 构建 SecurityFilterChain 之前（参见上面 defaultSecurityFilterChain 的代码），至此，我们大概理清了所有的 Security Filters 是如何创建的，下面再以表格的形式重新整理下：
序号 | Filter | httpSecurity 配置 |
|---|---|---|
1 | WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter | http.addFilter(new WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter()) |
2 | CsrfFilter | http.csrf(withDefaults()) |
3 | ExceptionTranslationFilter | http.exceptionHandling(withDefaults()) |
4 | HeaderWriterFilter | http.headers(withDefaults()) |
5 | SessionManagementFilter | http.sessionManagement(withDefaults()) |
6 | DisableEncodeUrlFilter | http.sessionManagement(withDefaults()) |
7 | SecurityContextPersistenceFilter | http.securityContext(withDefaults()) |
8 | RequestCacheAwareFilter | http.requestCache(withDefaults()) |
9 | AnonymousAuthenticationFilter | http.anonymous(withDefaults()) |
10 | SecurityContextHolderAwareRequestFilter | http.servletApi(withDefaults()) |
11 | DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter | http.apply(new DefaultLoginPageConfigurer<>()) |
12 | DefaultLogoutPageGeneratingFilter | http.apply(new DefaultLoginPageConfigurer<>()) |
13 | LogoutFilter | http.logout(withDefaults()) |
14 | FilterSecurityInterceptor | http.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() |
15 | UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter | http.formLogin() |
16 | BasicAuthenticationFilter | http.httpBasic() |
其实，如果仔细观察我们的程序输出的日志，也可以看到 Spring Security 默认的过滤器链为 DefaultSecurityFilterChain，以及它注入的所有 Security Filters：
2023-05-17 08:16:18.173 INFO 3936 --- [ main] o.s.s.web.DefaultSecurityFilterChain : Will secure any request with [`` ``org.springframework.security.web.session.DisableEncodeUrlFilter@1d6751e3, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.context.request.async.WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter@2d258eff, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.context.SecurityContextPersistenceFilter@202898d7, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.header.HeaderWriterFilter@2c26ba07, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.csrf.CsrfFilter@52d3fafd, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.authentication.logout.LogoutFilter@235c997d, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.authentication.UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter@5d5c41e5, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.authentication.ui.DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter@50b93353, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.authentication.ui.DefaultLogoutPageGeneratingFilter@6dca31eb, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.authentication.www.BasicAuthenticationFilter@22825e1e, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.savedrequest.RequestCacheAwareFilter@2c719bd4, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.servletapi.SecurityContextHolderAwareRequestFilter@53aa38be, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.authentication.AnonymousAuthenticationFilter@4a058df8, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.session.SessionManagementFilter@42ea7565, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.access.ExceptionTranslationFilter@77cb452c, `` ``org.springframework.security.web.access.intercept.FilterSecurityInterceptor@8054fe2]
在某些低版本中，可能会显示
DefaultSecurityFilterChain: Will not secure any request这样的日志，这可能是 Spring Security 的 BUG，升级到最新版本即可。
其中有几个 Security Filters 比较重要，是实现认证和授权的基础：
CsrfFilter：默认开启对所有接口的 CSRF 防护，关于 CSRF 的详细信息，可以参考 Configuring CSRF/XSRF with Spring Security；DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter：用于生成/login登录页面；DefaultLogoutPageGeneratingFilter：用于生成/login?logout登出页面；LogoutFilter：当用户退出应用时被调用，它通过注册的LogoutHandler删除会话并清理SecurityContext，然后通过LogoutSuccessHandler将页面重定向到/login?logout；UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter：实现基于用户名和密码的安全认证，当认证失败，抛出AuthenticationException异常；BasicAuthenticationFilter：实现 Basic 安全认证，当认证失败，抛出AuthenticationException异常；AnonymousAuthenticationFilter：如果SecurityContext中没有Authentication对象时，它自动创建一个匿名用户anonymousUser，角色为ROLE_ANONYMOUS；FilterSecurityInterceptor：这是 Spring Security 的最后一个Security Filters，它从SecurityContext中获取Authentication对象，然后对请求的资源做权限判断，当授权失败，抛出AccessDeniedException异常；ExceptionTranslationFilter：用于处理过滤器链中抛出的AuthenticationException和AccessDeniedException异常，AuthenticationException异常由AuthenticationEntryPoint来处理，AccessDeniedException异常由AccessDeniedHandler来处理；
认证和授权
有了 Security Filters，我们就可以实现各种 Spring Security 的相关功能了。应用程序的安全性归根结底包括了两个主要问题：认证（Authentication） 和 授权（Authorization）。认证解决的是 你是谁？ 的问题，而授权负责解决 你被允许做什么？，授权也被称为 访问控制（Access Control）。这一节将深入学习 Spring Security 是如何实现认证和授权的。
跳转到 /login 页面
让我们回到第一节的例子，当访问 /hello 时，可以看到浏览器自动跳转到了 /login 登录页面，那么 Spring Security 是如何实现的呢？为了一探究竟，我们可以将 Spring Security 的日志级别调到 TRACE：
logging.level.org.springframework.security=TRACE
这样我们就能完整地看到这个请求经过 Security Filters 的处理过程：
/*
* 提示：该行代码过长，系统自动注释不进行高亮。一键复制会移除系统注释
* 2023-05-20 09:37:38.558 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Securing GET /hello``2023-05-20 09:37:38.559 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking DisableEncodeUrlFilter (1/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.559 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking WebAsyncManagerIntegrationFilter (2/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.560 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking SecurityContextPersistenceFilter (3/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.561 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] w.c.HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository : No HttpSession currently exists``2023-05-20 09:37:38.561 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] w.c.HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository : Created SecurityContextImpl [Null authentication]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.562 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] s.s.w.c.SecurityContextPersistenceFilter : Set SecurityContextHolder to empty SecurityContext``2023-05-20 09:37:38.562 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking HeaderWriterFilter (4/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.562 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking CorsFilter (5/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.566 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking CsrfFilter (6/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.567 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.csrf.CsrfFilter : Did not protect against CSRF since request did not match CsrfNotRequired [TRACE, HEAD, GET, OPTIONS]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.568 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking LogoutFilter (7/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.571 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.logout.LogoutFilter : Did not match request to Ant [pattern='/logout', POST] ``2023-05-20 09:37:38.573 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter (8/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.574 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] w.a.UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter : Did not match request to Ant [pattern='/login', POST]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.576 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter (9/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.578 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking DefaultLogoutPageGeneratingFilter (10/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.582 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] .w.a.u.DefaultLogoutPageGeneratingFilter : Did not render default logout page since request did not match [Ant [pattern='/logout', GET]]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.583 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking BasicAuthenticationFilter (11/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.584 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.www.BasicAuthenticationFilter : Did not process authentication request since failed to find username and password in Basic Authorization header``2023-05-20 09:37:38.587 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking RequestCacheAwareFilter (12/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.588 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.s.HttpSessionRequestCache : No saved request``2023-05-20 09:37:38.590 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking SecurityContextHolderAwareRequestFilter (13/17) ``2023-05-20 09:37:38.591 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking AnonymousAuthenticationFilter (14/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.592 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.AnonymousAuthenticationFilter : Set SecurityContextHolder to AnonymousAuthenticationToken [Principal=anonymousUser, Credentials=[PROTECTED], Authenticated=true, Details=WebAuthenticationDetails [RemoteIpAddress=127.0.0.1, SessionId=null], Granted Authorities=[ROLE_ANONYMOUS]]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.593 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking SessionManagementFilter (15/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.593 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking ExceptionTranslationFilter (16/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.594 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.security.web.FilterChainProxy : Invoking FilterSecurityInterceptor (17/17)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.596 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] edFilterInvocationSecurityMetadataSource : Did not match request to EndpointRequestMatcher includes=[health], excludes=[], includeLinks=false - [permitAll] (1/2)``2023-05-20 09:37:38.610 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.i.FilterSecurityInterceptor : Did not re-authenticate AnonymousAuthenticationToken [Principal=anonymousUser, Credentials=[PROTECTED], Authenticated=true, Details=WebAuthenticationDetails [RemoteIpAddress=127.0.0.1, SessionId=null], Granted Authorities=[ROLE_ANONYMOUS]] before authorizing``2023-05-20 09:37:38.619 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.i.FilterSecurityInterceptor : Authorizing filter invocation [GET /hello] with attributes [authenticated]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.626 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.expression.WebExpressionVoter : Voted to deny authorization``2023-05-20 09:37:38.632 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.i.FilterSecurityInterceptor : Failed to authorize filter invocation [GET /hello] with attributes [authenticated] using AffirmativeBased [DecisionVoters=[org.springframework.security.web.access.expression.WebExpressionVoter@f613067], AllowIfAllAbstainDecisions=false]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.640 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.a.ExceptionTranslationFilter : Sending AnonymousAuthenticationToken [Principal=anonymousUser, Credentials=[PROTECTED], Authenticated=true, Details=WebAuthenticationDetails [RemoteIpAddress=127.0.0.1, SessionId=null], Granted Authorities=[ROLE_ANONYMOUS]] ``to authentication entry point since access is denied` `org.springframework.security.access.AccessDeniedException: Access is denied`` ``at org.springframework.security.access.vote.AffirmativeBased.decide(AffirmativeBased.java:73) ~[spring-security-core-5.7.8.jar:5.7.8]` `2023-05-20 09:37:38.691 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.s.HttpSessionRequestCache : Saved request http://localhost:8080/hello to session``2023-05-20 09:37:38.693 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] s.w.a.DelegatingAuthenticationEntryPoint : Trying to match using And [Not [RequestHeaderRequestMatcher [expectedHeaderName=X-Requested-With, expectedHeaderValue=XMLHttpRequest]], MediaTypeRequestMatcher [contentNegotiationStrategy=org.springframework.web.accept.HeaderContentNegotiationStrategy@4b95451, matchingMediaTypes=[application/xhtml+xml, image/*, text/html, text/plain], useEquals=false, ignoredMediaTypes=[*/*]]] ``2023-05-20 09:37:38.701 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] s.w.a.DelegatingAuthenticationEntryPoint : Match found! Executing org.springframework.security.web.authentication.LoginUrlAuthenticationEntryPoint@168ad26f``2023-05-20 09:37:38.709 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.web.DefaultRedirectStrategy : Redirecting to http://localhost:8080/login``2023-05-20 09:37:38.712 TRACE 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] o.s.s.w.header.writers.HstsHeaderWriter : Not injecting HSTS header since it did not match request to [Is Secure]``2023-05-20 09:37:38.720 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] w.c.HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository : Did not store empty SecurityContext``2023-05-20 09:37:38.730 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] w.c.HttpSessionSecurityContextRepository : Did not store empty SecurityContext``2023-05-20 09:37:38.731 DEBUG 6632 --- [nio-8080-exec-9] s.s.w.c.SecurityContextPersistenceFilter : Cleared SecurityContextHolder to complete request
*/
这个过程中有两点比较重要：第一点是经过 AnonymousAuthenticationFilter 时，将当前用户设置为 anonymousUser，角色为 ROLE_ANONYMOUS；第二点是经过 FilterSecurityInterceptor 时，校验当前用户是否有访问 /hello 页面的权限，在上面的 defaultSecurityFilterChain 中，可以看到 http.authorizeRequests().anyRequest().authenticated() 这样的代码，这说明 Spring Security 默认对所有的页面都开启了鉴权，所以会抛出 AccessDeniedException 异常，而这个异常被 ExceptionTranslationFilter 拦截，并将这个异常交给 LoginUrlAuthenticationEntryPoint 处理，从而重定向到 /login 页面，整个过程的示意图如下：
接下来，浏览器开始访问重定向后的 /login 页面，这时请求又会再一次经历一系列的 Security Filters，和上面的 /hello 请求不一样的是，/login 请求经过 DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter 时，会生成上面我们看到的登录页面并结束整个调用链：
public class DefaultLoginPageGeneratingFilter extends GenericFilterBean {` ` ``private void doFilter(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response, FilterChain chain)`` ``throws IOException, ServletException {`` ``boolean loginError = isErrorPage(request);`` ``boolean logoutSuccess = isLogoutSuccess(request);`` ``if (isLoginUrlRequest(request) || loginError || logoutSuccess) {`` ``String loginPageHtml = generateLoginPageHtml(request, loginError, logoutSuccess);`` ``response.setContentType("text/html;charset=UTF-8");`` ``response.setContentLength(loginPageHtml.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8).length);`` ``response.getWriter().write(loginPageHtml);`` ``return;`` ``}`` ``chain.doFilter(request, response);`` ``}``}
AuthenticationManager：剖析认证流程
接下来，输入用户名和密码并提交，请求会再一次经历 Security Filters，这一次，请求在 UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter 这里被拦截下来，并开始了用户名和密码的认证过程：
public class UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter extends AbstractAuthenticationProcessingFilter {` ` ``@Override`` ``public Authentication attemptAuthentication(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)`` ``throws AuthenticationException {`` ``if (this.postOnly && !request.getMethod().equals("POST")) {`` ``throw new AuthenticationServiceException("Authentication method not supported: " + request.getMethod());`` ``}`` ``String username = obtainUsername(request);`` ``username = (username != null) ? username.trim() : "";`` ``String password = obtainPassword(request);`` ``password = (password != null) ? password : "";`` ``UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken authRequest = UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken.unauthenticated(username,`` ``password);`` ``// Allow subclasses to set the "details" property`` ``setDetails(request, authRequest);`` ``return this.getAuthenticationManager().authenticate(authRequest);`` ``}``}
这里将遇到 Spring Security 中处理认证的核心接口：AuthenticationManager：
public interface AuthenticationManager {` ` ``Authentication authenticate(Authentication authentication) throws AuthenticationException;``}
这个接口只有一个 authenticate() 方法，它的入参是一个未认证的 Authentication，从 UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter 的代码中可以看到使用了 UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken，它的返回有三种情况：
- 如果认证成功，则返回认证成功后的
Authentication（通常带有authenticated=true）； - 如果认证失败，则抛出
AuthenticationException异常； - 如果无法判断，则返回
null；
AuthenticationManager 接口最常用的一个实现是 ProviderManager 类，它包含了一个或多个 AuthenticationProvider 实例：
public class ProviderManager implements AuthenticationManager {` ` ``private List<AuthenticationProvider> providers;``}
AuthenticationProvider 有点像 AuthenticationManager，但它有一个额外的方法 boolean supports(Class<?> authentication)：
public interface AuthenticationProvider {` ` ``Authentication authenticate(Authentication authentication) throws AuthenticationException;` ` ``boolean supports(Class<?> authentication);``}
Spring Security 会遍历列表中所有的 AuthenticationProvider，并通过 supports() 方法来选取合适的 AuthenticationProvider 实例来实现认证，从上文中我们知道，UsernamePasswordAuthenticationFilter 在认证时使用的 Authentication 类型为 UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken，对于这个 Authentication，默认使用的 AuthenticationProvider 是 DaoAuthenticationProvider，它继承自抽象类 AbstractUserDetailsAuthenticationProvider：
public abstract class AbstractUserDetailsAuthenticationProvider`` ``implements AuthenticationProvider, InitializingBean, MessageSourceAware {` ` ``@Override`` ``public Authentication authenticate(Authentication authentication) throws AuthenticationException {` ` ``String username = determineUsername(authentication);`` ``UserDetails user = retrieveUser(username, (UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken) authentication);`` ` ` ``this.preAuthenticationChecks.check(user);`` ``additionalAuthenticationChecks(user, (UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken) authentication);`` ``this.postAuthenticationChecks.check(user);`` ` ` ``Object principalToReturn = user;`` ``if (this.forcePrincipalAsString) {`` ``principalToReturn = user.getUsername();`` ``}`` ``return createSuccessAuthentication(principalToReturn, authentication, user);`` ``}``}
其中，最关键的代码有两行，第一行是通过 retrieveUser() 方法获取 UserDetails：
public class DaoAuthenticationProvider extends AbstractUserDetailsAuthenticationProvider {` ` ``@Override`` ``protected final UserDetails retrieveUser(String username, UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken authentication)`` ``throws AuthenticationException {`` ` ` ``UserDetails loadedUser = this.getUserDetailsService().loadUserByUsername(username);`` ``return loadedUser;`` ``}``}
进入 retrieveUser() 方法内部，可以看到它是通过 UserDetailsService 的 loadUserByUsername() 方法来获取 UserDetails 的，而这个 UserDetailsService 默认实现是 InMemoryUserDetailsManager：
public class InMemoryUserDetailsManager implements UserDetailsManager, UserDetailsPasswordService {` ` ``@Override`` ``public UserDetails loadUserByUsername(String username) throws UsernameNotFoundException {`` ``UserDetails user = this.users.get(username.toLowerCase());`` ``if (user == null) {`` ``throw new UsernameNotFoundException(username);`` ``}`` ``return new User(user.getUsername(), user.getPassword(), user.isEnabled(), user.isAccountNonExpired(),`` ``user.isCredentialsNonExpired(), user.isAccountNonLocked(), user.getAuthorities());`` ``}``}
它的实现非常简单，就是从 users 这个 Map 中直接获取 UserDetails，那么 users 这个 Map 又是从哪来的呢？ 答案就是我们在配置文件中配置的 spring.security.user，我们可以从自动配置类 UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration 中找到 InMemoryUserDetailsManager 的初始化代码：
public class UserDetailsServiceAutoConfiguration {` ` ``@Bean`` ``@Lazy`` ``public InMemoryUserDetailsManager inMemoryUserDetailsManager(SecurityProperties properties,`` ``ObjectProvider<PasswordEncoder> passwordEncoder) {`` ``SecurityProperties.User user = properties.getUser();`` ``List<String> roles = user.getRoles();`` ``return new InMemoryUserDetailsManager(User.withUsername(user.getName())`` ``.password(getOrDeducePassword(user, passwordEncoder.getIfAvailable()))`` ``.roles(StringUtils.toStringArray(roles))`` ``.build());`` ``}``}
另一行关键代码是通过 additionalAuthenticationChecks() 方法对 UserDetails 和 UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken 进行校验，一般来说，就是验证密码是否正确：
public class DaoAuthenticationProvider extends AbstractUserDetailsAuthenticationProvider {` ` ``@Override`` ``protected void additionalAuthenticationChecks(UserDetails userDetails,`` ``UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken authentication) throws AuthenticationException {`` ` ` ``String presentedPassword = authentication.getCredentials().toString();`` ``if (!this.passwordEncoder.matches(presentedPassword, userDetails.getPassword())) {`` ``this.logger.debug("Failed to authenticate since password does not match stored value");`` ``throw new BadCredentialsException(this.messages`` ``.getMessage("AbstractUserDetailsAuthenticationProvider.badCredentials", "Bad credentials"));`` ``}`` ``}``}
一旦用户名和密码都验证通过，就调用 createSuccessAuthentication() 方法创建并返回一个认证成功后的 Authentication，然后经过一系列的后处理，整个认证的流程如下所示：
其中，SecurityContextHolder 将认证成功后的 Authentication 保存到安全上下文中供后续 Filter 使用；AuthenticationSuccessHandler 用于定义一些认证成功后的自定义逻辑，默认实现为 SimpleUrlAuthenticationSuccessHandler，它返回一个重定向，将浏览器转到登录之前用户访问的页面。
在我的测试中，
SimpleUrlAuthenticationSuccessHandler貌似并没有触发，新版本的逻辑有变动？
AccessDecisionManager：剖析授权流程
其实，在上面分析重定向 /login 页面的流程时已经大致了解了实现授权的逻辑，请求经过 FilterSecurityInterceptor 时，校验当前用户是否有访问页面的权限，如果没有，则会抛出 AccessDeniedException 异常。FilterSecurityInterceptor 的核心代码如下：
public class FilterSecurityInterceptor extends AbstractSecurityInterceptor implements Filter {`` ` ` ``public void invoke(FilterInvocation filterInvocation) throws IOException, ServletException {` ` ``InterceptorStatusToken token = super.beforeInvocation(filterInvocation);`` ``try {`` ``filterInvocation.getChain().doFilter(filterInvocation.getRequest(), filterInvocation.getResponse());`` ``}`` ``finally {`` ``super.finallyInvocation(token);`` ``}`` ``super.afterInvocation(token, null);`` ``}``}
可以看到，主要逻辑就包含在 beforeInvocation()、finallyInvocation() 和 afterInvocation() 这三个方法中，而对授权相关的部分则位于 beforeInvocation() 方法中：
public abstract class AbstractSecurityInterceptor`` ``implements InitializingBean, ApplicationEventPublisherAware, MessageSourceAware {` ` ``protected InterceptorStatusToken beforeInvocation(Object object) {`` ` ` ``Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes = this.obtainSecurityMetadataSource().getAttributes(object);`` ` ` ``Authentication authenticated = authenticateIfRequired();`` ` ` ``// Attempt authorization`` ``attemptAuthorization(object, attributes, authenticated);`` ` ` ``if (this.publishAuthorizationSuccess) {`` ``publishEvent(new AuthorizedEvent(object, attributes, authenticated));`` ``}` ` ``return new InterceptorStatusToken(SecurityContextHolder.getContext(), false, attributes, object);`` ``}` ` ``private void attemptAuthorization(Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes,`` ``Authentication authenticated) {`` ``try {`` ``this.accessDecisionManager.decide(authenticated, object, attributes);`` ``}`` ``catch (AccessDeniedException ex) {`` ``publishEvent(new AuthorizationFailureEvent(object, attributes, authenticated, ex));`` ``throw ex;`` ``}`` ``}``}
在这里，我们遇到了 Spring Security 实现授权的核心接口：AccessDecisionManager，Spring Security 就是通过该接口的 decide() 方法来决定用户是否有访问某个资源的权限。AccessDecisionManager 接口的默认实现为 AffirmativeBased，可以从 AbstractInterceptUrlConfigurer 中找到它的踪影：
public abstract class AbstractInterceptUrlConfigurer<C extends AbstractInterceptUrlConfigurer<C, H>, H extends HttpSecurityBuilder<H>>`` ``extends AbstractHttpConfigurer<C, H> {`` ` ` ``private AccessDecisionManager createDefaultAccessDecisionManager(H http) {`` ``AffirmativeBased result = new AffirmativeBased(getDecisionVoters(http));`` ``return postProcess(result);`` ``}``}
AffirmativeBased 实例中包含一个或多个 AccessDecisionVoter，它通过遍历所有的 AccessDecisionVoter 依次投票决定授权是否允许，只要有一个 AccessDecisionVoter 拒绝，则抛出 AccessDeniedException 异常：
public class AffirmativeBased extends AbstractAccessDecisionManager {` ` ``@Override`` ``@SuppressWarnings({ "rawtypes", "unchecked" })`` ``public void decide(Authentication authentication, Object object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> configAttributes)`` ``throws AccessDeniedException {`` ``int deny = 0;`` ``for (AccessDecisionVoter voter : getDecisionVoters()) {`` ``int result = voter.vote(authentication, object, configAttributes);`` ``switch (result) {`` ``case AccessDecisionVoter.ACCESS_GRANTED:`` ``return;`` ``case AccessDecisionVoter.ACCESS_DENIED:`` ``deny++;`` ``break;`` ``default:`` ``break;`` ``}`` ``}`` ``if (deny > 0) {`` ``throw new AccessDeniedException(`` ``this.messages.getMessage("AbstractAccessDecisionManager.accessDenied", "Access is denied"));`` ``}`` ``// To get this far, every AccessDecisionVoter abstained`` ``checkAllowIfAllAbstainDecisions();`` ``}``}
默认情况下，AffirmativeBased 实例中只有一个 AccessDecisionVoter，那就是 WebExpressionVoter：
public class WebExpressionVoter implements AccessDecisionVoter<FilterInvocation> {` ` ``@Override`` ``public int vote(Authentication authentication, FilterInvocation filterInvocation,`` ``Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes) {`` ` ` ``WebExpressionConfigAttribute webExpressionConfigAttribute = findConfigAttribute(attributes);`` ` ` ``EvaluationContext ctx = webExpressionConfigAttribute.postProcess(`` ``this.expressionHandler.createEvaluationContext(authentication, filterInvocation), filterInvocation);` ` ``boolean granted = ExpressionUtils.evaluateAsBoolean(webExpressionConfigAttribute.getAuthorizeExpression(), ctx);`` ``if (granted) {`` ``return ACCESS_GRANTED;`` ``}`` ``return ACCESS_DENIED;`` ``}``}
WebExpressionVoter 将授权转换为 SpEL 表达式，检查授权是否通过，就是看执行 SpEL 表达式的结果是否为 true，这里的细节还有很多，详细内容还是参考 官方文档 吧。
腾讯云开发者
