首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
社区首页 >问答首页 >核心数据多NSManagedObjectContext性能难题

核心数据多NSManagedObjectContext性能难题
EN

Stack Overflow用户
提问于 2015-08-19 06:03:48
回答 1查看 392关注 0票数 17

我有一个iOS核心数据性能问题,我还没有完全解决。我的应用程序有一个相对简单的UICollectionViewController,它有一个创建NSFetchedResultsController的函数,大致如下:

代码语言:javascript
复制
func loadCollection(collectionID: String) {
    let fetchRequest = NSFetchRequest(entityName: "Story")
    fetchRequest.predicate = NSPredicate(format: "collectionID == %@ AND wasDeleted == FALSE", collectionID)

    fetchRequest.sortDescriptors = [NSSortDescriptor(key: "yearMonthDay", ascending: true), NSSortDescriptor(key: "startDate", ascending: true)]
    fetchRequest.fetchBatchSize = 100

    self.fetchedResultsController = NSFetchedResultsController(fetchRequest: fetchRequest, managedObjectContext: mainObjectContext!,
                                                                sectionNameKeyPath: "yearMonth", cacheName: collectionID)
    var error: NSError?
    self.fetchedResultsController.performFetch(&error)
    ....
}

我的核心数据堆栈看起来大致像下面的两个托管对象上下文,以改善新的和编辑的"Story“对象的对象保存的UI响应时间。这是我在Marcus Zarra的核心数据手册和blog post等地方看到的基本模式。

代码语言:javascript
复制
// Variation "A" with two managed object contexts.
lazy var mainObjectContext: NSManagedObjectContext? = {

    if let coordinator = self.persistentStoreCoordinator {

        self.rootContext = NSManagedObjectContext(concurrencyType: .PrivateQueueConcurrencyType)
        self.rootContext?.persistentStoreCoordinator = coordinator

        let managedObjectContext = NSManagedObjectContext(concurrencyType: .MainQueueConcurrencyType)
        managedObjectContext.parentContext = self.rootContext
        return managedObjectContext  

    } else {
        return nil
    }
}()

问题是,当我有两个类似上面的上下文时,上面的初始fetchedResultsController.performFetch()花费的时间大约是只有一个(.MainQueueConcurrencyType)上下文时的10倍。

例如,在iPad Air上,使用两个上下文和大约1,700个对象执行上面的fetch需要超过5秒,但如果只使用一个上下文,则需要不到0.4秒,如下所示。

代码语言:javascript
复制
// Variation "B" with one managed object context.
    lazy var mainObjectContext: NSManagedObjectContext? = {

        if let coordinator = self.persistentStoreCoordinator {

            let managedObjectContext = NSManagedObjectContext(concurrencyType: .MainQueueConcurrencyType)
            managedObjectContext.persistentStoreCoordinator = coordinator
            return managedObjectContext  

        } else {
            return nil
        }
    }()

我打开了核心数据日志记录(SQL1),从日志记录中我可以看到,当我有两个对象上下文时,1,700个对象中的所有属性都是从-com.apple.CoreData.SQLDebug数据库加载的,用于初始获取。但是,如果我只有一个上下文,则最初不会从数据库加载任何属性。

代码语言:javascript
复制
    Log from variation "A" with two object contexts:
    2015-08-18 13:31:49.761 Myapp[27646:4374573] CoreData: sql: SELECT 0, t0.Z_PK, t0.Z_OPT, t0.ZAUTOCREATED, t0.ZBLOCKS, t0.ZCHANGETOKEN, t0.ZCOLLECTIONID, t0.ZCREATIONDATE, t0.ZEDITDATE, t0.ZENDDATE, t0.ZFULLTEXT, t0.ZGLOBALID, t0.ZLOCATION, t0.ZLOCATIONTEXT, t0.ZSTARTDATE, t0.ZTAGS, t0.ZTHUMBNAILIMAGE, t0.ZTIMEZONE, t0.ZTITLE, t0.ZWASDELETED, t0.ZYEARMONTH, t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE ( t0.ZCOLLECTIONID = ? AND  t0.ZWASDELETED = ?) ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY, t0.ZSTARTDATE
    2015-08-18 13:31:52.093 Myapp[27646:4374573] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 2.3314s
    2015-08-18 13:31:55.011 Myapp[27646:4374573] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 5.2502s for 1743 rows.
    2015-08-18 13:31:55.016 Myapp[27646:4374573] CoreData: sql: SELECT t0.ZYEARMONTH, COUNT (DISTINCT  t0.Z_PK) FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE ( t0.ZCOLLECTIONID = ? AND  t0.ZWASDELETED = ?) GROUP BY  t0.ZYEARMONTH ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTH
    2015-08-18 13:31:55.276 Myapp[27646:4374573] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.2590s
    2015-08-18 13:31:55.276 Myapp[27646:4374573] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.2600s for 371 rows.


    Log from variation "B" with one object context:
    2015-08-18 13:25:19.448 Myapp[27635:4362501] CoreData: sql: SELECT 0, t0.Z_PK FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE ( t0.ZCOLLECTIONID = ? AND  t0.ZWASDELETED = ?) ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY, t0.ZSTARTDATE
    2015-08-18 13:25:19.789 Myapp[27635:4362501] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.3405s
    2015-08-18 13:25:19.789 Myapp[27635:4362501] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.3410s for 1743 rows.
    2015-08-18 13:25:19.790 Myapp[27635:4362501] CoreData: sql: SELECT t0.ZYEARMONTH, COUNT (DISTINCT  t0.Z_PK) FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE ( t0.ZCOLLECTIONID = ? AND  t0.ZWASDELETED = ?) GROUP BY  t0.ZYEARMONTH ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTH
    2015-08-18 13:25:19.825 Myapp[27635:4362501] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.0339s
    2015-08-18 13:25:19.825 Myapp[27635:4362501] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.0349s for 371 rows.

因此,基于这些结果,我修改了loadCollection函数以添加

代码语言:javascript
复制
fetchRequest.includesPropertyValues = false 

现在有了两个对象上下文,我得到了以下内容,初始加载时间恢复到0.4秒以下-太棒了!

代码语言:javascript
复制
    2015-08-18 13:53:43.345 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: sql: SELECT 0, t0.Z_PK FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE ( t0.ZCOLLECTIONID = ? AND  t0.ZWASDELETED = ?) ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY, t0.ZSTARTDATE

    2015-08-18 13:53:43.683 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.3378s

    2015-08-18 13:53:43.684 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.3383s for 1743 rows.

    2015-08-18 13:53:43.688 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: sql: SELECT t0.ZYEARMONTH, COUNT (DISTINCT  t0.Z_PK) FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE ( t0.ZCOLLECTIONID = ? AND  t0.ZWASDELETED = ?) GROUP BY  t0.ZYEARMONTH ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTH

    2015-08-18 13:53:43.722 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.0329s

    2015-08-18 13:53:43.722 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.0339s for 371 rows.

但是,现在为NSFetchedResultsController获取的每个对象都是错误的,并导致单行SQL查询,这会显着减慢集合视图的滚动:

代码语言:javascript
复制
2015-08-18 13:53:44.078 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: sql: SELECT 0, t0.Z_PK, t0.Z_OPT, t0.ZAUTOCREATED, t0.ZBLOCKS, t0.ZCHANGETOKEN, t0.ZCOLLECTIONID, t0.ZCREATIONDATE, t0.ZEDITDATE, t0.ZENDDATE, t0.ZFULLTEXT, t0.ZGLOBALID, t0.ZLOCATION, t0.ZLOCATIONTEXT, t0.ZSTARTDATE, t0.ZTAGS, t0.ZTHUMBNAILIMAGE, t0.ZTIMEZONE, t0.ZTITLE, t0.ZWASDELETED, t0.ZYEARMONTH, t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE  t0.Z_PK = ? 

2015-08-18 13:53:44.081 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.0011s

2015-08-18 13:53:44.081 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.0029s for 1 rows.

2015-08-18 13:53:44.082 Myapp[27692:4414951] CoreData: annotation: fault fulfilled from database for : 0xd00000001ad8000c <x-coredata://967F5940-D73C-48E2-A26D-E60FF87BA9F7/Story/p1718>

而不是像下面这样的100个左右的批次,单个上下文和includesPropertyValues缺省为true:

代码语言:javascript
复制
2015-08-18 14:47:44.221 Myapp[27792:4515252] CoreData: sql: SELECT 0, t0.Z_PK, t0.Z_OPT, t0.ZAUTOCREATED, t0.ZBLOCKS, t0.ZCHANGETOKEN, t0.ZCOLLECTIONID, t0.ZCREATIONDATE, t0.ZEDITDATE, t0.ZENDDATE, t0.ZFULLTEXT, t0.ZGLOBALID, t0.ZLOCATION, t0.ZLOCATIONTEXT, t0.ZSTARTDATE, t0.ZTAGS, t0.ZTHUMBNAILIMAGE, t0.ZTIMEZONE, t0.ZTITLE, t0.ZWASDELETED, t0.ZYEARMONTH, t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE  t0.Z_PK IN (SELECT * FROM _Z_intarray0)  ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY, t0.ZSTARTDATE LIMIT 100
2015-08-18 14:47:44.468 Myapp[27792:4515252] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.0959s
2015-08-18 14:47:44.469 Myapp[27792:4515252] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.2566s for 100 rows.
2015-08-18 14:47:44.550 Myapp[27792:4515252] CoreData: sql: SELECT 0, t0.Z_PK, t0.Z_OPT, t0.ZAUTOCREATED, t0.ZBLOCKS, t0.ZCHANGETOKEN, t0.ZCOLLECTIONID, t0.ZCREATIONDATE, t0.ZEDITDATE, t0.ZENDDATE, t0.ZFULLTEXT, t0.ZGLOBALID, t0.ZLOCATION, t0.ZLOCATIONTEXT, t0.ZSTARTDATE, t0.ZTAGS, t0.ZTHUMBNAILIMAGE, t0.ZTIMEZONE, t0.ZTITLE, t0.ZWASDELETED, t0.ZYEARMONTH, t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY FROM ZSTORY t0 WHERE  t0.Z_PK IN  (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)  ORDER BY t0.ZYEARMONTHDAY, t0.ZSTARTDATE LIMIT 100
2015-08-18 14:47:44.614 Myapp[27792:4515252] CoreData: annotation: sql connection fetch time: 0.0067s
2015-08-18 14:47:44.614 Myapp[27792:4515252] CoreData: annotation: total fetch execution time: 0.0635s for 44 rows.

任何关于更好的方法的想法或建议都将不胜感激。

EN

回答 1

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2015-09-29 14:40:37

这是NSFetchedResultsController和批处理大小的已知问题。使用父子上下文时,不能不丢失batchSize功能。有关详细信息,请参阅此answer

换句话说,如果您需要使用NSFetchedResultsController并需要最佳性能,那么您的必须将其附加到主线程上下文,且该上下文必须附加到持久存储协调器。

票数 1
EN
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32083335

复制
相关文章

相似问题

领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档