首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
社区首页 >问答首页 >Go strings.Contains()比Python3慢2倍?

Go strings.Contains()比Python3慢2倍?
EN

Stack Overflow用户
提问于 2018-07-31 19:01:48
回答 2查看 471关注 0票数 0

我正在将一个文本模式扫描器从Python3转换到Go1.10,但我很惊讶它实际上慢了2倍。经过分析,罪魁祸首在strings.Contains()中。请参阅下面的简单基准测试。我错过什么了吗?你能推荐一种更快的Go模式搜索算法,在这种情况下会执行得更好吗?我不担心启动时间,同样的模式也会被用来扫描数百万个文件。

Py3基准测试:

import time
import re

RUNS = 10000

if __name__ == '__main__':
    with open('data.php') as fh:
        testString = fh.read()

    def do():
        return "576ad4f370014dfb1d0f17b0e6855f22" in testString

    start = time.time()
    for i in range(RUNS):
        _ = do()
    duration = time.time() - start
    print("Python: %.2fs" % duration)

Go1.10基准:

package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "io/ioutil"
    "log"
    "strings"
    "time"
)

const (
    runs = 10000
)

func main() {
    fname := "data.php"
    testdata := readFile(fname)
    needle := "576ad4f370014dfb1d0f17b0e6855f22"
    start := time.Now()

    for i := 0; i < runs; i++ {
        _ = strings.Contains(testdata, needle)

    }
    duration := time.Now().Sub(start)
    fmt.Printf("Go: %.2fs\n", duration.Seconds())
}

func readFile(fname string) string {
    data, err := ioutil.ReadFile(fname)
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    return string(data)
}

data.php是一个528KB的文件,可以是found here

输出:

Go:     1.98s
Python: 0.84s
EN

回答 2

Stack Overflow用户

回答已采纳

发布于 2018-08-05 03:47:30

我用我在Wikipedia上找到的各种字符串搜索实现进行了更多的基准测试,例如:

基准测试结果(code here):

BenchmarkStringsContains-4         10000        208055 ns/op
BenchmarkBMSSearch-4                1000       1856732 ns/op
BenchmarkPaddieKMP-4                2000       1069495 ns/op
BenchmarkKkdaiKMP-4                 1000       1440147 ns/op
BenchmarkAhocorasick-4              2000        935885 ns/op
BenchmarkYara-4                     1000       1237887 ns/op

然后,我对我的实际用例进行了基准测试,针对本机(strings.Containsregexp)和基于C的Yara实现,针对500KB的非匹配文件测试了大约1100个签名(100个正则表达式,1000个文字):

BenchmarkScanNative-4              2     824328504 ns/op
BenchmarkScanYara-4              300       5338861 ns/op

尽管Go中的C调用被认为是昂贵的,但在这些“繁重”的操作中,利润是显著的。侧面观察:匹配1100个签名而不是1个,Yara只需要5倍的CPU时间。

票数 0
EN

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2018-08-01 02:39:07

为什么Python 3 (24.79s)比Go (5.47s)慢4.5倍?你得到了什么结果?

Python

$ cat contains.py
import time
import re

RUNS = 10000

if __name__ == '__main__':
    # The Complete Works of William Shakespeare by William Shakespeare
    # http://www.gutenberg.org/files/100/100-0.txt
    file = '/home/peter/shakespeare.100-0.txt' # 'data.php'
    with open(file) as fh:
        testString = fh.read()

    def do():
        return "Means to immure herself and not be seen." in testString

    start = time.time()
    for i in range(RUNS):
        _ = do()
    duration = time.time() - start
    print("Python: %.2fs" % duration)
    print(do())
$ python3 --version
Python 3.6.5
$ python3 contains.py
Python: 24.79s
True
$ 

Go

$ cat contains.go
package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "io/ioutil"
    "log"
    "strings"
    "time"
)

const (
    runs = 10000
)

func main() {
    // The Complete Works of William Shakespeare by William Shakespeare
    // http://www.gutenberg.org/files/100/100-0.txt
    fname := `/home/peter/shakespeare.100-0.txt` // "data.php"
    testdata := readFile(fname)
    needle := "Means to immure herself and not be seen."
    start := time.Now()

    for i := 0; i < runs; i++ {
        _ = strings.Contains(testdata, needle)

    }
    duration := time.Now().Sub(start)
    fmt.Printf("Go: %.2fs\n", duration.Seconds())

    fmt.Println(strings.Contains(testdata, needle))
    fmt.Println(strings.Index(testdata, needle))

}

func readFile(fname string) string {
    data, err := ioutil.ReadFile(fname)
    if err != nil {
        log.Fatal(err)
    }
    return string(data)
}
$ go version
go version devel +5332b5e75a Tue Jul 31 15:44:37 2018 +0000 linux/amd64
$ go run contains.go
Go: 5.47s
true
5837178
$ 
票数 2
EN
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51611862

复制
相关文章

相似问题

领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档