blocks|key|1665098|text|如果您是一名C#开发人员，那么F#可能是您最容易使用的函数式编程语言，因此值得研究那些让您有不同想法的编程语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1665099|即使您决定不使用F#开发应用程序，使用F#的体验也会改变您编写C#的方式。|1665100|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

It's worthwhile to take a look at programming languages that make you think differently, and if you're a C# developer, F# is probably the functional programming language you'd find most accessible.

Even if you decide that you don't want to develop applications in F#, the experience of using F# could change the way you write C#.

blocks|key|1665146|text|你说，“我应该学习函数式编程语言吗？”|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1665147|如果你想在更深的层次上理解编程，我建议你应该这样做。学习LISP对我来说是一次大开眼界的冒险。一开始是很难的。然后有一天，就像魔法一样，这对我来说是自然而然的。这只会提高你以不同的方式看待问题的能力。|1665148|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

You said, "should I learn functional programming languages in general?"

If you want to understand programming on a deeper level I say you should. Learning LISP was an eye-opening adventure for me. It was very hard at first. And then one day as if by magic it was natural to me. That can only be better for your ability to see problems in different ways.

blocks|key|1665207|text|查看What+would+be+a+good+second+lanuguage+to+learn+for+a+C#+programmer.中的回应，底线是:函数式语言提供了一种全新的范式，它将提高您的编程技能，对您很有价值。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1665208|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/349418/what-would-be-a-good-second-language-to-learn-for-a-c-programmer^0|2|1V|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Check out the responses in <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/349418/what-would-be-a-good-second-language-to-learn-for-a-c-programmer">What would be a good second lanuguage to learn for a C# programmer.</a> The bottom line is: functional languages offer a complete new paradigm and will be of value to you as it will enhance your programming skills.

blocks|key|1665306|text|我很久以前就学习了Prolog，在很多方面它仍然是我最喜欢的语言。现在，Prolog不仅仅是一种函数式语言，而是一种AI语言，然而不久前我学习了基于Prolog的Erlang。我建议你同时学习这两种语言，因为你学到了很多有益于你日常开发的东西，比如C#。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1665307|如果我现在要学习一门新的函数式语言，它很可能是F#，因为它将成为.Net平台的一等公民。我认为F#是一种函数式(好吧，多范式)语言，你最有可能用它来提高效率。|1665308|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I learned Prolog a long time ago and it's remained my favorite language in many regards. Now Prolog is not just a functional language but an AI language, however some time ago I learned Erlang which is based on Prolog. I can recommend you to learn both these languages as you learn alot that benefits your day to day development in - for example - C#.

If I was to learn a new functional language today it would most probably be F# since it's going to be a first class citizen of the .Net platform. I think that F# is the functional (well multi paradigm) language you'll have the best chance of being productive in.

blocks|key|1450328|text|F#是开始学习函数式语言的一个很好的地方。如果您担心F#知识不适用于其他函数式语言，则不必担心。F#是ML语言家族的成员。微软只是对它做了一些调整，以便它能很好地与.NET配合使用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1450329|Luca+Bolognese在PDC2008的F#上发表了一篇amazing+presentation。我强烈建议你去看一看，然后自己决定F#是否值得学习。|offset|length|1450330|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://channel9.msdn.com/pdc2008/TL11/^0|0|V|K|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

F# is a perfectly good place to start learning functional languages. If you're worried that F# knowledge won't apply to other functional languages, you shouldn't. F# is a member of the ML family of languages. Microsoft just tweaked it a bit so that it plays well with .NET.

Luca Bolognese gave an <a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/pdc2008/TL11/" rel="noreferrer">amazing presentation</a> on F# at PDC 2008. I would strongly recommend you watch it and decide for yourself whether F# is worth learning.

blocks|key|1450459|text|它在开发“通用”应用程序时会有用吗？不是特别的，不能超过或小于c或c#。它不是RAD，所以在F#中没有捷径可以让你比任何其他非RAD语言更快地发布一个“通用”应用程序。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1450460|另一方面，对于计算多于表示的程序，F#可能比另一种语言更接近应用领域。函数式语言使得处理某些问题域变得更加直观。|1450461|我个人认为它值得学习，不是因为它可以解决你所有的问题，而是因为每个值得大惊小怪的程序员都应该至少知道一种函数式语言。当函数式编程概念在你的脑海中浮现时，许多看似巴洛克式的编程概念变得更加透明。|1450462|我的另一个个人喜好是:我喜欢具有稳定、多样化类型系统的编程语言。我不喜欢把鞋角结构变成没有非常强的概念匹配的类型。在我看来，ML类型系统允许您以比大多数主流类型系统更精细的粒度来构建类型。因此，我觉得我可以用像F#这样的ML风格语言，以更自然的方式编写与这些结构交互的代码。|1450463|虽然这对常见的概念没有太大帮助，因为在更主流的语言中有支持它们的功能集，但对于任何甚至是一点也不常见的概念，我更喜欢F#而不是大多数其他语言。|1450464|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

Will it be useful in development of 'common' applications? Not particularly, no more or less than c or c# is anyhow. It's not RAD, so there are no shortcuts available in F# that will get you any closer to release of a 'common' application any faster than any other non-RAD language.

On the other hand, for programs that are more computation than presentation, F# may be closer to the application domain than another language. Functional languages make dealing with certain problem domains a lot more intuitive.

I personally think it's worth learning, not because it is going to solve all your problems, but because every programmer worth a flip should know atleast one functional language. A lot of seemingly baroque programatic concepts are made more transparent when functional programming concept are floating around in your head.

Another personal preference of mine; I like programming languages with a solid, diverse type system. I do not like shoe horning structures into types that do not have a very strong conceptual match to them. ML type systems, in my mind, allow you to build types with a much finer granularity than more mainstream type systems. As a result, I feel that I can write code that interacts with these structures in a more natural way with ML style languages like F#.

While this doesn't help much with common concepts, that have feature sets to support them in more mainstream languages, for anything that is even remotely uncommon, I would prefer F# to most other languages.

Should I invest time learning Microsoft's new F# language?
I am mainly a C# .NET developer and I wonder if learning F# will be of any help in developing today's typical applications.

Should I learn F# or functional programming languages in general?

Erlang

我应该花时间学习微软的新F#语言吗？我主要是一名C# .NET开发人员，我想知道学习F#是否会对开发当今的典型应用程序有所帮助。

问我应该学习F#还是函数式编程语言？
EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问我应该学习F#还是函数式编程语言？EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问我应该学习F#还是函数式编程语言？
EN