我正在尝试更新APC中的一个变量,将有许多进程尝试这样做。
APC不提供锁定功能,所以我正在考虑使用其他机制...到目前为止,我找到的是mysql的GET_LOCK()和php的flock()。还有什么值得考虑的吗?
更新:我找到了sem_acquire,但它似乎是一个阻塞锁。
发布于 2010-10-13 18:37:51
/*
CLASS ExclusiveLock
Description
==================================================================
This is a pseudo implementation of mutex since php does not have
any thread synchronization objects
This class uses flock() as a base to provide locking functionality.
Lock will be released in following cases
1 - user calls unlock
2 - when this lock object gets deleted
3 - when request or script ends
==================================================================
Usage:
//get the lock
$lock = new ExclusiveLock( "mylock" );
//lock
if( $lock->lock( ) == FALSE )
error("Locking failed");
//--
//Do your work here
//--
//unlock
$lock->unlock();
===================================================================
*/
class ExclusiveLock
{
protected $key = null; //user given value
protected $file = null; //resource to lock
protected $own = FALSE; //have we locked resource
function __construct( $key )
{
$this->key = $key;
//create a new resource or get exisitng with same key
$this->file = fopen("$key.lockfile", 'w+');
}
function __destruct()
{
if( $this->own == TRUE )
$this->unlock( );
}
function lock( )
{
if( !flock($this->file, LOCK_EX | LOCK_NB))
{ //failed
$key = $this->key;
error_log("ExclusiveLock::acquire_lock FAILED to acquire lock [$key]");
return FALSE;
}
ftruncate($this->file, 0); // truncate file
//write something to just help debugging
fwrite( $this->file, "Locked\n");
fflush( $this->file );
$this->own = TRUE;
return TRUE; // success
}
function unlock( )
{
$key = $this->key;
if( $this->own == TRUE )
{
if( !flock($this->file, LOCK_UN) )
{ //failed
error_log("ExclusiveLock::lock FAILED to release lock [$key]");
return FALSE;
}
ftruncate($this->file, 0); // truncate file
//write something to just help debugging
fwrite( $this->file, "Unlocked\n");
fflush( $this->file );
$this->own = FALSE;
}
else
{
error_log("ExclusiveLock::unlock called on [$key] but its not acquired by caller");
}
return TRUE; // success
}
};
发布于 2008-12-02 19:53:50
如果锁的目的是防止多个进程试图填充一个空的缓存键,那么为什么不想要一个阻塞锁呢?
$value = apc_fetch($KEY);
if ($value === FALSE) {
shm_acquire($SEMAPHORE);
$recheck_value = apc_fetch($KEY);
if ($recheck_value !== FALSE) {
$new_value = expensive_operation();
apc_store($KEY, $new_value);
$value = $new_value;
} else {
$value = $recheck_value;
}
shm_release($SEMAPHORE);
}
如果缓存很好,你可以直接使用它。如果缓存中什么都没有,你就会得到一个锁。一旦获得了锁,就需要仔细检查缓存,以确保在等待获取锁的过程中,缓存没有被重新填充。如果缓存被重新填充,则使用该值并释放锁,否则,执行计算,填充缓存,然后释放锁。
发布于 2008-11-30 23:22:57
如果你不介意将锁建立在文件系统上,那么你可以使用fopen()和模式'x‘。下面是一个示例:
$f = fopen("lockFile.txt", 'x');
if($f) {
$me = getmypid();
$now = date('Y-m-d H:i:s');
fwrite($f, "Locked by $me at $now\n");
fclose($f);
doStuffInLock();
unlink("lockFile.txt"); // unlock
}
else {
echo "File is locked: " . file_get_contents("lockFile.txt");
exit;
}
参见www.php.net/fopen
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/325806
复制相似问题