blocks|key|1069464|text|官方名称是"object+operator“-+T_OBJECT_OPERATOR。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1069465|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://php.net/manual/en/tokens.php^0|O|H|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

The official name is &quot;object operator&quot; - <a href="http://php.net/manual/en/tokens.php" rel="nofollow noreferrer">T_OBJECT_OPERATOR</a>.

blocks|key|1069662|text|当我自己读代码的时候，我认为它是一种“占有式的东西”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1069663|例如：|1069664|x->value+=+y->value|code-block|syntax|javascript|1069665|会变成“x的值等于y的值”|1069666|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$G|H]]|$1|I|3|J|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$]]

When reading the code to myself, I think of it like a "possessive thing".

For example:

<pre><code>x-&gt;value = y-&gt;value
</code></pre>

would read "x's value equals y's value"

blocks|key|1284225|text|大多数情况下，我使用@Tor+Valamo的方法(“A的B方法”或“A的B方法”)的一些变体，但有时我会说“点”。例如，“调用A点B()”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1284226|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Most often, I use some variation on @Tor Valamo's method ("the B method of A" or "A's B method"), but I sometimes say "dot". E.g. "call A dot B()".

blocks|key|1284161|text|属性运算符。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1284162|在朗读$a->b()或$a->b时，我只会说“$a+obj上的调用b”或“$a的get+b+from/in/of”|offset|length|style|CODE|1284163|entityMap^0|0|3|7|B|5|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@$D|L|E|M|F|G]|$D|N|E|O|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Property operator.

When reading <code>$a-&gt;b()</code> or <code>$a-&gt;b</code> loud I just say "call b on the $a obj" or "get b from/in/of $a"

blocks|key|1069689|text|回到Cobol+'+in‘，你会说“在a中移动5到b”。今天的大多数语言都将事情限定在另一个方向。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1069690|然而，我仍然会将$a->b();读作“在a中调用b”。|offset|length|style|CODE|1069691|entityMap^0|0|8|8|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@$D|L|E|M|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Harkening back to the Cobol 'in' where you would say "Move 5 to b in a." Most languages today qualify things the other direction.

Yet I would still read <code>$a-&gt;b();</code> as "Call b in a".

blocks|key|1284349|text|$a->b+|type|code-block|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|syntax|javascript|1284350|我称之为“$a的参数b”。|unstyled|1284351|$a->b()|1284352|我调用为“$a的函数b”。|1284353|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$B|C]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$B|C]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|F|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$]]

<pre><code>$a-&gt;b 
</code></pre>

I call as "param b of $a". 

<pre><code>$a-&gt;b()
</code></pre>

I call as "function b of $a".

blocks|key|1069597|text|我工作的资深PHP开发人员说“箭头”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1069598|$A->B;|code-block|syntax|javascript|1069599|当他让我输入上面的内容时，他会说“美元A箭头B”或者|1069600|$A->B();|1069601|“美元A箭头B括号。”|1069602|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$E|F]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|D|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$E|F]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|N|$]]

The senior PHP developer where I work says "arrow".

<pre><code>$A-&gt;B;
</code></pre>

When he's telling me to type the above, he'll say, "Dollar A arrow B" or for

<pre><code>$A-&gt;B();
</code></pre>

"Dollar A arrow B parens."

blocks|key|1284422|text|user187291已经回答了非主观问题，至于主观问题，我说是“子”。例如，我会将$x->y读成"x+sub+y“--在此上下文中，"sub”是"subscript“的缩写。这对于数组表示法更合适；sub+i也读作"x+$x['y']+y“。通常，当我大声朗读代码时，我会用我的话来识别其他开发人员可以看到的一行，所以歧义还没有成为问题。我认为原因是我将结构/对象和数组视为“集合”，其元素的下标形式为数学表示法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1284423|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/a/2588183/118153^0|15|5|32|7|0|A|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@$9|O|A|P|B|C]|$9|Q|A|R|B|C]]|D|@$9|S|A|T|1|U]]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|E|$L|M]]]]

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/a/2588183/118153">user187291</a> has answered the non-subjective question, as for the subjective one, I say "sub". For example, I would pronounce <code>$x-&gt;y</code> as "x sub y" - "sub" in this context is short for "subscript". This is more appropriate for array notation; <code>$x['y']</code> I also pronounce "x sub y". Typically when reading code out loud, I am using my words to identify a line the other developer can see, so the ambiguity has yet to become a problem. I believe the cause is that I view structs/objects and arrays as "collections", and elements thereof are subscripted as in mathematical notation.

blocks|key|1069889|text|日语有一个方便的助词，"no“(の)。它是所有格助词，大致意思是“与前一术语有关”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1069890|"Fredのbadger“意思是"Fred's+badger”。|1069891|这是很长一段路要说，至少在精神上，也在那些懂日语的人中，我倾向于通过阅读它们来区分它们：|1069892|$A->B();+//+"Call+$A's+B."
C::D();++//+"Call+C+の+D."|code-block|syntax|javascript|1069893|但是，对于非日语的人来说，读这两个单词作为所有格“s”也很管用。你也可以把它们颠倒过来，用"+of+"，也就是"D+of+C“……但这有点尴尬，而且很难做到你正在快速阅读，因为它打破了你的线性阅读流程。|1069894|但是，如果我在口述，也许在编写代码和建议键入内容时，我会将特定字符称为“破折号-大于箭头”和“双冒号”(如果我知道与我交谈的人是PHPophile，我可能会在第一次使用时称之为"paamayim+nekudotayim双冒号“，部分原因是这是一个很酷的笑话，部分原因是为了防止他们”纠正“我)。|1069895|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$I|J]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|P|$]]

Japanese has a convenient particle for this, "no" (の). It is the possessive particle, meaning roughly "relating to the preceding term".

"Fred の badger" means "Fred's badger".

Which is a long way round of saying that at least mentally, and also amongst those who understand Japanese, I tend to differentiate them by reading them as:

<pre><code>$A-&gt;B(); // "Call $A's B."
C::D(); // "Call C の D."
</code></pre>

But reading both as a possessive "'s" works too, for non-Japanese speakers. You can also flip them and use "of", so "D of C"... but that's kinda awkward, and hard to do it you're reading rapidly because it breaks your linear flow.

If I were dictating, though, perhaps when pair coding and suggesting what to type, I'd refer to the specific characters as "dash-greater-than arrow" and "double-colon" (if i know the person I'm talking to is a PHPophile, I might call that a "paamayim nekudotayim double-colon" the first time, partly because it's a cool in-joke, partly to prevent them from "correcting" me).

blocks|key|1069765|text|对象。所以$a->$b->$c应该是'A+object+B+object+c‘。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1069766|entityMap^0|5|A|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@$9|I|A|J|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$]]

Object. So <code>$a-&gt;$b-&gt;$c</code> would be 'A object B object c'.

What do you call this arrow looking <code>-&gt;</code> operator found in PHP? 

It's either a minus sign, dash or hyphen followed by a greater than sign (or right chevron). 

How do you pronounce it when reading code out loud?

What is the "->" PHP operator called?

在PHP中找到的这个箭头状的->操作符叫什么？它可以是减号、破折号或连字符，后跟大于号(或右V形)。朗读代码时如何发音？

问"->“PHP操作符叫什么？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问"->“PHP操作符叫什么？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问"->“PHP操作符叫什么？
EN