首页
学习
活动
专区
工具
TVP
发布
社区首页 >问答首页 >PostgreSQL数据库中具有大小(相对和绝对)的架构列表

PostgreSQL数据库中具有大小(相对和绝对)的架构列表
EN

Stack Overflow用户
提问于 2010-12-12 03:03:48
回答 3查看 48.4K关注 0票数 48

我正在寻找一个为任何数据库返回表单结果的查询(参见下面的示例,假设数据库使用的总空间为40 of )

代码语言:javascript
复制
schema | size | relative size
----------+-------------------
foo    | 15GB |   37.5%      
bar    | 20GB |     50%
baz    |  5GB |   12.5%

我已经设法使用数据库中按模式排序的实体编造了一个空间列表,这很有用,但从中获得每个模式的摘要看起来并不那么容易。见下文。

代码语言:javascript
复制
SELECT relkind,
       relname,
       pg_catalog.pg_namespace.nspname,
       pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(pg_catalog.pg_class.oid))
FROM   pg_catalog.pg_class
       INNER JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace
         ON relnamespace = pg_catalog.pg_namespace.oid
ORDER  BY pg_catalog.pg_namespace.nspname,
          pg_relation_size(pg_catalog.pg_class.oid) DESC;

这会产生如下结果

代码语言:javascript
复制
  relkind |                relname                |      nspname       | pg_size_pretty 
---------+---------------------------------------+--------------------+----------------
  r       | geno                                  | btsnp              | 11 GB
  i       | geno_pkey                             | btsnp              | 5838 MB
  r       | anno                                  | btsnp              | 63 MB
  i       | anno_fid_key                          | btsnp              | 28 MB
  i       | ix_btsnp_anno_rsid                    | btsnp              | 28 MB
  [...]
  r       | anno                                  | btsnp_shard        | 63 MB
  r       | geno4681                              | btsnp_shard        | 38 MB
  r       | geno4595                              | btsnp_shard        | 38 MB
  r       | geno4771                              | btsnp_shard        | 38 MB
  r       | geno4775                              | btsnp_shard        | 38 MB

看起来使用像SUM这样的聚合运算符可能是必要的,但到目前为止还没有成功。

EN

回答 3

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2020-08-26 22:56:14

更好的解决方案:

代码语言:javascript
复制
WITH 

schemas AS (
SELECT schemaname as name, sum(pg_relation_size(quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(tablename)))::bigint as size FROM pg_tables
GROUP BY schemaname
),

db AS (
SELECT pg_database_size(current_database()) AS size
)

SELECT schemas.name, 
       pg_size_pretty(schemas.size) as absolute_size,
       schemas.size::float / (SELECT size FROM db)  * 100 as relative_size
FROM schemas;

接受的答案解决了所描述的问题,但建议的查询效率不高。你可以通过解释来了解其中的区别:

代码语言:javascript
复制
EXPLAIN WITH 

schemas AS (
SELECT schemaname as name, sum(pg_relation_size(quote_ident(schemaname) || '.' || quote_ident(tablename)))::bigint as size FROM pg_tables
GROUP BY schemaname
),

db AS (SELECT pg_database_size(current_database()) AS size)

SELECT schemas.name, 
       pg_size_pretty(schemas.size) as absolute_size,
       schemas.size::float / (SELECT size FROM db)  * 100 as relative_size
FROM schemas;

                                                 QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CTE Scan on schemas  (cost=47100.79..47634.34 rows=16417 width=104)
   CTE schemas
     ->  Finalize HashAggregate  (cost=46854.50..47100.76 rows=16417 width=72)
           Group Key: n.nspname
           ->  Gather  (cost=43119.63..46608.25 rows=32834 width=96)
                 Workers Planned: 2
                 ->  Partial HashAggregate  (cost=42119.63..42324.85 rows=16417 width=96)
                       Group Key: n.nspname
                       ->  Hash Left Join  (cost=744.38..39763.93 rows=94228 width=128)
                             Hash Cond: (c.relnamespace = n.oid)
                             ->  Parallel Seq Scan on pg_class c  (cost=0.00..38772.14 rows=94228 width=72)
                                   Filter: (relkind = ANY ('{r,p}'::"char"[]))
                             ->  Hash  (cost=539.17..539.17 rows=16417 width=68)
                                   ->  Seq Scan on pg_namespace n  (cost=0.00..539.17 rows=16417 width=68)
   CTE db
     ->  Result  (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=8)
   InitPlan 3 (returns $3)
     ->  CTE Scan on db  (cost=0.00..0.02 rows=1 width=8)

vs

代码语言:javascript
复制
EXPLAIN SELECT schema_name, 
       pg_size_pretty(sum(table_size)::bigint),
       (sum(table_size) / pg_database_size(current_database())) * 100
FROM (
  SELECT pg_catalog.pg_namespace.nspname as schema_name,
         pg_relation_size(pg_catalog.pg_class.oid) as table_size
  FROM   pg_catalog.pg_class
     JOIN pg_catalog.pg_namespace ON relnamespace = pg_catalog.pg_namespace.oid
) t
GROUP BY schema_name
ORDER BY schema_name; 

                                       QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 GroupAggregate  (cost=283636.24..334759.75 rows=1202906 width=128)
   Group Key: pg_namespace.nspname
   ->  Sort  (cost=283636.24..286643.51 rows=1202906 width=72)
         Sort Key: pg_namespace.nspname
         ->  Hash Join  (cost=744.38..51446.15 rows=1202906 width=72)
               Hash Cond: (pg_class.relnamespace = pg_namespace.oid)
               ->  Seq Scan on pg_class  (cost=0.00..44536.06 rows=1202906 width=8)
               ->  Hash  (cost=539.17..539.17 rows=16417 width=68)
                     ->  Seq Scan on pg_namespace  (cost=0.00..539.17 rows=16417 width=68)
票数 5
EN

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2022-01-20 11:03:26

如果你想找到特定模式的大小,你可以简单地使用下面的查询:

代码语言:javascript
复制
select sum(
    pg_total_relation_size(quote_ident(schemaname) || 
    '.' || 
    quote_ident(tablename))
)::bigint 
from pg_tables where schemaname = 'mySchema';
票数 1
EN

Stack Overflow用户

发布于 2020-12-05 09:19:05

https://www.depesz.com/2018/02/17/which-schema-is-using-the-most-disk-space/

显示了同时计算TOAST选项卡数量的解决方案。在PG12上测试:

代码语言:javascript
复制
 WITH recursive all_elements AS (
    SELECT 'base/' || l.filename AS path, x.*
    FROM
        pg_ls_dir('base/') AS l (filename),
        LATERAL pg_stat_file( 'base/' || l.filename) AS x
    UNION ALL
    SELECT 'pg_tblspc/' || l.filename AS path, x.*
    FROM
        pg_ls_dir('pg_tblspc/') AS l (filename),
        LATERAL pg_stat_file( 'pg_tblspc/' || l.filename) AS x
    UNION ALL
    SELECT
        u.path || '/' || l.filename, x.*
    FROM
        all_elements u,
        lateral pg_ls_dir(u.path) AS l(filename),
        lateral pg_stat_file( u.path || '/' || l.filename ) AS x
    WHERE
        u.isdir
), all_files AS (
    SELECT path, SIZE FROM all_elements WHERE NOT isdir
), interesting_files AS (
    SELECT
        regexp_replace(
            regexp_replace(f.path, '.*/', ''),
            '\.[0-9]*$',
            ''
        ) AS filename,
        SUM( f.size )
    FROM
        pg_database d,
        all_files f
    WHERE
        d.datname = current_database() AND
        f.path ~ ( '/' || d.oid || E'/[0-9]+(\\.[0-9]+)?$' )
    GROUP BY filename
)
SELECT
    n.nspname AS schema_name,
    SUM( f.sum ) AS total_schema_size
FROM
    interesting_files f
    JOIN pg_class c ON f.filename::oid = c.relfilenode
    LEFT OUTER JOIN pg_class dtc ON dtc.reltoastrelid = c.oid AND c.relkind = 't'
    JOIN pg_namespace n ON COALESCE( dtc.relnamespace, c.relnamespace ) = n.oid
GROUP BY
    n.nspname
ORDER BY
    total_schema_size DESC
票数 0
EN
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4418403

复制
相关文章

相似问题

领券
问题归档专栏文章快讯文章归档关键词归档开发者手册归档开发者手册 Section 归档