blocks|key|1712135|text|.Net+3.5运行时大约为50Mb。2.0运行时大约为23MB。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1712136|但是，如果您控制部署或安装，这真的不应该是问题。这对于“客户”和“客户”来说尤其正确，“客户”这个词涉及并持续着个人关系。如果到了这个地步，给他们寄张CD。那么700Mb以下的任何东西都是一样的。|1712137|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

The .Net 3.5 runtime is ~50Mb. The 2.0 runtime is ~23Mb.

But if you control the deployment or installation, that really shouldn't be an issue. This is especially true for 'clients' vs 'customers', and the word client involves and on-going, personal relationship. If it comes to it, send them a CD. Then anything under 700Mb is all the same.

blocks|key|1712155|text|查看LINQBridge：http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.aspx|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1712156|向CLR2添加LINQ支持(.net+3.5仍然使用.net+2.0)。|1712157|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.aspx^0|D|1C|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Check out LINQBridge:
<a href="http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.aspx</a>

Adding LINQ support to .net 2 (.net 3.5 still uses CLR 2.0).

blocks|key|1712014|text|.NET+3.5是.NET+2.0+%2B更多的库和扩展，所以是的，安装更大。然而，在我看来，额外的体积是非常值得的，因为它给了你额外的东西。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1712015|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

.NET 3.5 is .NET 2.0 + more libraries and extensions, so yes, the install is bigger. In my opinion however, it is very much worth the extra bulk because of the extra stuff it gives you.

blocks|key|1497208|text|如果它是一个VB6应用程序，你应该检查该应用程序当前使用的是哪个Windows版本，并相应地选择.Net版本。AFAIK3.5不能在W2K上运行。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1497209|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

If it's a VB6 app, you should check which Windows versions the app is currently used on, and select the .Net version accordingly. AFAIK 3.5 does not run on W2K.

blocks|key|1711953|text|如果你想利用LINQ，那就去3.5吧！我发现我自己使用LINQ时没有更多的“bulk”，但除非你想使用LINQ，否则这两个都可以。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1711954|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

If you would like to take advantage of LINQ, then go for 3.5! I find there's not more 'bulk' when using it myself, but unless you want to use LINQ, then either is fine.

blocks|key|1497290|text|请记住，某些OSes+(Windows2000Server)不允许您安装.NET+3.0或3.5，因此您可能不得不坚持使用2.0。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1497291|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Keep in mind that certain OSes (Windows 2000 Server) won't let you install .NET 3.0 or 3.5, so you may have to stick with 2.0 for that reason.

blocks|key|1712079|text|我建议你直接使用visual+studio+2008和.net+3.5+sp1，2.0是3.5的基础，你可以很容易地开始使用2.0，然后开始使用3.5的功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1712080|此外，3.5+SP1还带来了2.0框架的调整，这是很好的。|1712081|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I would suggest that you go straight with visual studio 2008 and .net 3.5 sp1,
2.0 is the basis of 3.5 and you can easily start using 2.0 and then start to use 3.5 functionalities.

Furthermore 3.5 SP1 also brings tweaks to the 2.0 framework which are nice to have.

blocks|key|1712183|text|我建议你直接转到3.5，因为你将不会太远(在未来...在3-5年内)更改为其他版本的框架。如果在5年内.Net是版本5，跳跃将会更小。所以，VB6到3.5是我推荐给你的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1712184|框架的大小不是很高，不到60兆...我想现在没什么大不了的。|1712185|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I suggest you to go directly to 3.5 because you will be less far away (in the future ... in 3-5 years) to change to other version of framework. If in 5 year .Net is at version 5, the jump will be smaller to do. So, VB6 to 3.5 is what I suggest you.

The size of the framework is not very high, less than 60 megs... not a big deal now I think.

blocks|key|1497184|text|还要注意，根据您安装的.NET框架，可能不会有多少额外的容量。从现代的角度来看，.NET框架的安装相对较小。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1497185|至于LINQ，它将为你节省大量的时间和精力，并提供一种快速获取数据的方法。但是，它还取决于应用程序将分发到的客户端。|1497186|我想说的是，除非客户因为任何原因而遇到另一个主要障碍，否则就使用3.5。|1497187|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Also note, depending were you install the .NET framework it might be irrelevant how much extra bulk there is. The .NET Framework installs are relatively small in modern terms.

As for LINQ, it will save you a lot of time and effort, and offers a quick way to get at data. However it also depends on the clients the application will be distributed out to.

I'd say at that, go with 3.5 unless there is another major roadblock on the clients for whatever reason.

blocks|key|1497256|text|正如其他人指出的那样，.NET+3.5的安装比.NET+2.0更长更大。请记住，CLR3.0和.NET+3.5都是.NET+2.0CLR2.0之上的扩展。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1497257|我仍然会说直接从VB6升级到.NET+3.5+(实际上是.NET+3.5+SP1)和VS2008，只要你的客户端操作系统支持该版本的框架(否则你将需要选择最低的通用框架版本，很可能是.NET+2.0)。从长远来看，你将为自己节省大量的时间/精力。|1497258|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

As others have pointed out, the .NET 3.5 install is longer and larger than .NET 2.0. Keep in mind that .NET 3.0 and .NET 3.5 are both extensions on top of the .NET 2.0 CLR.

I would still say upgrade from VB6 directly to .NET 3.5 (actually .NET 3.5 SP1) and VS2008, as long as your client operating systems support that version of the Framework (otherwise you will need to choose the lowest common Framework version, which very well may be .NET 2.0). You will save yourself a lot of time/effort in the long run.

Our clients use a vb6 version of our software.

We are upgrading them to a .NET application written in C#...

Is there less bulk using .net 2.0 than .net 3.5?

My definition of less bulk would be: Smaller size, smaller installation time, etc.

Most of them probably already have 2.0 anyway.

I only ask because I would like to take advantage of LINQ in 3.5.

.NET 2.0 or 3.5?

Windows

我们的客户使用的是我们软件的vb6版本。我们正在将它们升级到用C#编写的.NET应用程序...使用.net 2.0的数据量是否比使用.net 3.5的少？我对体积更小的定义是:更小的尺寸，更短的安装时间，等等。他们中的大多数可能已经有2.0版本了。我这么问只是因为我想利用3.5中的LINQ。

问.NET 2.0还是3.5？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问.NET 2.0还是3.5？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问.NET 2.0还是3.5？
EN