blocks|key|1755471|text|调查YUITest|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1755472|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/yuitest/^0|2|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Look into <a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/yuitest/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">YUITest</a>

blocks|key|1540607|text|另一个可以与Ant一起运行的JavaScript测试框架是CrossCheck。在项目的构建文件中有一个通过Ant运行CrossCheck的示例。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1540608|CrossCheck尝试模拟浏览器，包括模拟样式的XMLHttpRequest和timeout/interval，但只取得了有限的成功。|1540609|不过，它目前还不能处理从网页加载JavaScript。您必须指定要加载和测试的JavaScript文件。如果您将所有的JavaScript代码与HTML分开，那么它可能对您有效。|1540610|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://dev.thefrontside.net/crosscheck|1|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMLHttpRequest^0|T|A|0|0|P|E|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]]]

Another JavaScript testing framework that can be run with Ant is <a href="https://dev.thefrontside.net/crosscheck" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CrossCheck</a>. There's an example of running CrossCheck via Ant in the build file for the project.
CrossCheck attempts, with limited success, to emulate a browser, including mock-style implementations of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMLHttpRequest" rel="nofollow noreferrer">XMLHttpRequest</a> and timeout/interval.
It does not currently handle loading JavaScript from a web page, though. You have to specify the JavaScript files that you want to load and test. If you keep all of your JavaScript code separated from your HTML, it might work for you.

blocks|key|1540656|text|我最近读了Bruno的一篇文章，他使用JSUnit并在此基础上创建了一个JsMock框架……非常有趣。我正在考虑使用他的工作来开始对我的JavaScript代码进行单元测试。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1540657|Mock+JavaScript+or+How+to+unit+test+JavaScript+outside+the+Browser+environment|offset|length|1540658|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://brunofigueiredo.com/post/Mock-Javascript-or-How-to-unit-test-Javascript-outside-the-Browser-environment-Part-1.aspx^0|0|0|26|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

I recently read an article by Bruno using JSUnit and creating a JsMock framework on top of that... very interesting. I'm thinking of using his work to start unit testing my JavaScript code.
<a href="http://brunofigueiredo.com/post/Mock-Javascript-or-How-to-unit-test-Javascript-outside-the-Browser-environment-Part-1.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mock JavaScript or How to unit test JavaScript outside the Browser environment</a>

blocks|key|1540679|text|我是js-test-driver的铁杆粉丝。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1540680|它在CI环境中工作良好，能够捕获实际的浏览器进行跨浏览器测试。|1540681|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/|1|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration^0|2|E|0|0|2|2|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]]]

I'm a big fan of <a href="http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">js-test-driver</a>.
It works well in a <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CI</a> environment and is able to capture actual browsers for cross-browser testing.

blocks|key|1540785|text|我同意JSUnit在某种程度上是垂死的。我们刚刚用YUI+Test替换了它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1540786|与使用qUnit的示例类似，我们使用Selenium运行测试。我们独立于其他Selenium测试运行此测试，原因很简单，因为它没有普通UI回归测试所具有的依赖项(例如，将应用程序部署到服务器)。|offset|length|1540787|首先，我们有一个包含在所有测试JavaScript文件中的基本HTML文件。它负责设置YUI实例、测试运行器、YUI.Test.Suite对象以及Test.Case。它具有可以通过Selenium访问的方法，以运行测试套件，检查测试运行器是否仍在运行(完成后才能获得结果)，并获得测试结果(我们选择了JSON格式)：|1540788|var+yui_instance;+//+The+YUI+instance
var+runner;++//+The+YAHOO.Test.Runner
var+Assert;++++//+An+instance+of+YAHOO.Test.Assert+to+save+coding
var+testSuite;+//+The+YAHOO.Test.Suite+that+will+get+run.

/**
+*+Sets+the+required+value+for+the+name+property+on+the+given+template,+creates
+*+and+returns+a+new+YUI+Test.Case+object.
+*
+*+@param+template+the+template+object+containing+all+of+the+tests
+*/
function+setupTestCase(template)+{
++++template.name+=+"jsTestCase";
++++var+test_case+=+new+yui_instance.Test.Case(template);
++++return+test_case;
}

/**
+*+Sets+up+the+test+suite+with+a+single+test+case+using+the+given
+*+template.
+*
+*+@param+template+the+template+object+containing+all+of+the+tests
+*/
function+setupTestSuite(template)+{
++++var+test_case+=+setupTestCase(template);
++++++testSuite+=+new+yui_instance.Test.Suite("Bond+JS+Test+Suite");
++++++testSuite.add(test_case);
}

/**
+*+Runs+the+YAHOO.Test.Suite
+*/
function+runTestSuite()+{
++++runner+=+yui_instance.Test.Runner;
++++Assert+=+yui_instance.Assert;

++++runner.clear();
++++runner.add(testSuite);
++++runner.run();
}

/**
+*+Used+to+see+if+the+YAHOO.Test.Runner+is+still+running.++The
+*+test+results+are+not+available+until+it+is+done+running.
+*/
function+isRunning()+{
++++return+runner.isRunning();
}

/**
+*+Gets+the+results+from+the+YAHOO.Test.Runner
+*/
function+getTestResults()+{
++++return+runner.getResults(yui_instance.Test.Format.JSON);
}|code-block|syntax|javascript|1540789|至于Selenium方面，我们使用了参数化测试。我们在Internet+Explorer和Firefox中的data方法中运行测试，将测试结果解析为对象数组列表，每个数组包含浏览器名称、测试文件名、测试名称、结果(通过、失败或忽略)和消息。|1540790|实际的测试只是断言测试结果。如果不等于"pass“，则通过YUI测试结果返回的消息使测试失败。|1540791|@Parameters
public+static+List<Object[]>+data()+throws+Exception+{
++++yui_test_codebase+=+"file:///c://myapppath/yui/tests";

++++List<Object[]>+testResults+=+new+ArrayList<Object[]>();

++++pageNames+=+new+ArrayList<String>();
++++pageNames.add("yuiTest1.html");
++++pageNames.add("yuiTest2.html");

++++testResults.addAll(runJSTestsInBrowser(IE_NOPROXY));
++++testResults.addAll(runJSTestsInBrowser(FIREFOX));
++++return+testResults;
}

/**
+*+Creates+a+Selenium+instance+for+the+given+browser,+and+runs+each
+*+YUI+Test+page.
+*
+*+@param+aBrowser
+*+@return
+*/
private+static+List<Object[]>+runJSTestsInBrowser(Browser+aBrowser)+{
++++String+yui_test_codebase+=+"file:///c://myapppath/yui/tests/";
++++String+browser_bot+=+"this.browserbot.getCurrentWindow()"
++++List<Object[]>+testResults+=+new+ArrayList<Object[]>();
++++selenium+=+new+DefaultSelenium(APPLICATION_SERVER,+REMOTE_CONTROL_PORT,+aBrowser.getCommand(),+yui_test_codebase);
++++try+{
++++++++selenium.start();

++++++++/*
+++++++++*+Run+the+test+here
+++++++++*/
++++++++for+(String+page_name+:+pageNames)+{
++++++++++++selenium.open(yui_test_codebase+%2B+page_name);
++++++++++++//Wait+for+the+YAHOO+instance+to+be+available
++++++++++++selenium.waitForCondition(browser_bot+%2B+".yui_instance+!=+undefined",+"10000");
++++++++++++selenium.getEval("dom=runYUITestSuite("+%2B+browser_bot+%2B+")");

++++++++++++//+Output+from+the+tests+is+not+available+until
++++++++++++//+the+YAHOO.Test.Runner+is+done+running+the+suite
++++++++++++selenium.waitForCondition("!"+%2B+browser_bot+%2B+".isRunning()",+"10000");
++++++++++++String+output+=+selenium.getEval("dom=getYUITestResults("+%2B+browser_bot+%2B+")");

++++++++++++JSONObject+results+=+JSONObject.fromObject(output);
++++++++++++JSONObject+test_case+=+results.getJSONObject("jsTestCase");
++++++++++++JSONArray+testCasePropertyNames+=+test_case.names();
++++++++++++Iterator+itr+=+testCasePropertyNames.iterator();

++++++++++++/*
+++++++++++++*+From+the+output,+build+an+array+with+the+following:
+++++++++++++*+++++Test+file
+++++++++++++*+++++Test+name
+++++++++++++*+++++status+(result)
+++++++++++++*+++++message
+++++++++++++*/
++++++++++++while(itr.hasNext())+{
++++++++++++++++String+name+=+(String)itr.next();
++++++++++++++++if(name.startsWith("test"))+{
++++++++++++++++++++JSONObject+testResult+=+test_case.getJSONObject(name);
++++++++++++++++++++String+test_name+=+testResult.getString("name");
++++++++++++++++++++String+test_result+=+testResult.getString("result");
++++++++++++++++++++String+test_message+=+testResult.getString("message");
++++++++++++++++++++Object[]+testResultObject+=+{aBrowser.getCommand(),+page_name,+test_name,+test_result,+test_message};
++++++++++++++++++++testResults.add(testResultObject);
++++++++++++++++}
++++++++++++}
++++++++}
++++}+finally+{
++++++++//+If+an+exception+is+thrown,+this+will+guarantee+that+the+selenium+instance
++++++++//+is+shut+down+properly
++++++++selenium.stop();
++++++++selenium+=+null;
++++}
++++return+testResults;
}

/**
+*+Inspects+each+test+result+and+fails+if+the+testResult+was+not+"pass"
+*/
@Test
public+void+inspectTestResults()+{
++++if(!this.testResult.equalsIgnoreCase("pass"))+{
++++++++fail(String.format(MESSAGE_FORMAT,+this.browser,+this.pageName,+this.testName,+this.message));
++++}
}|1540792|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium_%2528software%2529^0|0|I|8|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$D|12|E|13|1|14]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|J|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$K|L]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|J|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$K|L]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$U|$5|V|W|X|A|$Y|Z]]]]

I am in agreement that JSUnit is kind of dying on the vine. We just finished up replacing it with YUI Test.
Similar to the example using qUnit, we are running the tests using <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium_%28software%29" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Selenium</a>. We are running this test independently from our other Selenium tests simply because it does not have the dependencies that the normal UI regression tests have (e.g. deploying the application to a server).
To start out, we have a base JavaScript file that is included in all of our test HTML files. This handles setting up the YUI instance, the test runner, the YUI.Test.Suite object as well as the Test.Case. It has methods that can be accessed via Selenium to run the test suite, check to see if the test runner is still running (results are not available until after it's done), and get the test results (we chose JSON format):
<pre><code>var yui_instance; // The YUI instance
var runner; // The YAHOO.Test.Runner
var Assert; // An instance of YAHOO.Test.Assert to save coding
var testSuite; // The YAHOO.Test.Suite that will get run.

/**
 * Sets the required value for the name property on the given template, creates
 * and returns a new YUI Test.Case object.
 *
 * @param template the template object containing all of the tests
 */
function setupTestCase(template) {
 template.name = &quot;jsTestCase&quot;;
 var test_case = new yui_instance.Test.Case(template);
 return test_case;
}

/**
 * Sets up the test suite with a single test case using the given
 * template.
 *
 * @param template the template object containing all of the tests
 */
function setupTestSuite(template) {
 var test_case = setupTestCase(template);
 testSuite = new yui_instance.Test.Suite(&quot;Bond JS Test Suite&quot;);
 testSuite.add(test_case);
}

/**
 * Runs the YAHOO.Test.Suite
 */
function runTestSuite() {
 runner = yui_instance.Test.Runner;
 Assert = yui_instance.Assert;

 runner.clear();
 runner.add(testSuite);
 runner.run();
}

/**
 * Used to see if the YAHOO.Test.Runner is still running. The
 * test results are not available until it is done running.
 */
function isRunning() {
 return runner.isRunning();
}

/**
 * Gets the results from the YAHOO.Test.Runner
 */
function getTestResults() {
 return runner.getResults(yui_instance.Test.Format.JSON);
}
</code></pre>
As for the Selenium side of things, we used a parameterized test. We run our tests in both Internet Explorer and Firefox in the data method, parsing the test results into a list of Object arrays with each array containing the browser name, the test file name, the test name, the result (pass, fail or ignore) and the message.
The actual test just asserts the test result. If it is not equal to &quot;pass&quot; then it fails the test with the message returned from the YUI Test result.
<pre><code>@Parameters
public static List&lt;Object[]&gt; data() throws Exception {
 yui_test_codebase = &quot;file:///c://myapppath/yui/tests&quot;;

 List&lt;Object[]&gt; testResults = new ArrayList&lt;Object[]&gt;();

 pageNames = new ArrayList&lt;String&gt;();
 pageNames.add(&quot;yuiTest1.html&quot;);
 pageNames.add(&quot;yuiTest2.html&quot;);

 testResults.addAll(runJSTestsInBrowser(IE_NOPROXY));
 testResults.addAll(runJSTestsInBrowser(FIREFOX));
 return testResults;
}

/**
 * Creates a Selenium instance for the given browser, and runs each
 * YUI Test page.
 *
 * @param aBrowser
 * @return
 */
private static List&lt;Object[]&gt; runJSTestsInBrowser(Browser aBrowser) {
 String yui_test_codebase = &quot;file:///c://myapppath/yui/tests/&quot;;
 String browser_bot = &quot;this.browserbot.getCurrentWindow()&quot;
 List&lt;Object[]&gt; testResults = new ArrayList&lt;Object[]&gt;();
 selenium = new DefaultSelenium(APPLICATION_SERVER, REMOTE_CONTROL_PORT, aBrowser.getCommand(), yui_test_codebase);
 try {
 selenium.start();

 /*
 * Run the test here
 */
 for (String page_name : pageNames) {
 selenium.open(yui_test_codebase + page_name);
 //Wait for the YAHOO instance to be available
 selenium.waitForCondition(browser_bot + &quot;.yui_instance != undefined&quot;, &quot;10000&quot;);
 selenium.getEval(&quot;dom=runYUITestSuite(&quot; + browser_bot + &quot;)&quot;);

 // Output from the tests is not available until
 // the YAHOO.Test.Runner is done running the suite
 selenium.waitForCondition(&quot;!&quot; + browser_bot + &quot;.isRunning()&quot;, &quot;10000&quot;);
 String output = selenium.getEval(&quot;dom=getYUITestResults(&quot; + browser_bot + &quot;)&quot;);

 JSONObject results = JSONObject.fromObject(output);
 JSONObject test_case = results.getJSONObject(&quot;jsTestCase&quot;);
 JSONArray testCasePropertyNames = test_case.names();
 Iterator itr = testCasePropertyNames.iterator();

 /*
 * From the output, build an array with the following:
 * Test file
 * Test name
 * status (result)
 * message
 */
 while(itr.hasNext()) {
 String name = (String)itr.next();
 if(name.startsWith(&quot;test&quot;)) {
 JSONObject testResult = test_case.getJSONObject(name);
 String test_name = testResult.getString(&quot;name&quot;);
 String test_result = testResult.getString(&quot;result&quot;);
 String test_message = testResult.getString(&quot;message&quot;);
 Object[] testResultObject = {aBrowser.getCommand(), page_name, test_name, test_result, test_message};
 testResults.add(testResultObject);
 }
 }
 }
 } finally {
 // If an exception is thrown, this will guarantee that the selenium instance
 // is shut down properly
 selenium.stop();
 selenium = null;
 }
 return testResults;
}

/**
 * Inspects each test result and fails if the testResult was not &quot;pass&quot;
 */
@Test
public void inspectTestResults() {
 if(!this.testResult.equalsIgnoreCase(&quot;pass&quot;)) {
 fail(String.format(MESSAGE_FORMAT, this.browser, this.pageName, this.testName, this.message));
 }
}
</code></pre>

blocks|key|1540821|text|我只是got+Hudson+CI+to+run+JasmineBDD+(无头)，至少对于纯JavaScript单元测试是这样的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1540822|(Hudson通过shell运行Java，运行Envjs，运行JasmineBDD。)|1540823|不过，我还没有得到一个像prototype这样的大型库。|1540824|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://skaug.no/ingvald/2010/10/javascript-unit-testing.html^0|3|V|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]]]

I just <a href="http://skaug.no/ingvald/2010/10/javascript-unit-testing.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">got Hudson CI to run JasmineBDD</a> (headless), at least for pure JavaScript unit testing.
(Hudson running Java via shell, running Envjs, running JasmineBDD.)
I haven't got it to play nice with a big library yet, though, like prototype.

blocks|key|1755751|text|有一个新项目允许您在Java环境(如Ant)中运行QUnit测试，因此您可以将客户端测试套件与其他单元测试完全集成。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1755752|http://qunit-test-runner.googlecode.com|1755753|我已经用它对jQuery插件、objx代码、定制的OO+JavaScript进行了单元测试，它无需修改就可以做任何事情。|1755754|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://docs.jquery.com/Qunit|1|http://qunit-test-runner.googlecode.com/|2|http://objx.googlecode.com/^0|P|5|0|0|0|13|1|0|F|4|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$A|12|B|13|1|14]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]|R|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|S]]]]

There's a new project that lets you run <a href="http://docs.jquery.com/Qunit" rel="nofollow noreferrer">QUnit</a> tests in a Java environment (like Ant) so you can fully integrate your client-side test suite with your other unit tests.
<a href="http://qunit-test-runner.googlecode.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://qunit-test-runner.googlecode.com</a>
I've used it to unit test jQuery plugins, <a href="http://objx.googlecode.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">objx</a> code, custom OO JavaScript and it works for everything without modification.

blocks|key|1540954|text|我正在做的项目使用Js-Test-Driver在Chrome10和Jasmine-JSTD-Adapter上托管Jasmine，包括使用JS-Test-Driver中包含的code+coverage测试。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1540955|虽然每次我们在CI+environment上更改或更新浏览器时都会出现一些问题，但Jasmine测试运行得相当顺利，只有异步测试的小问题，但据我所知，这些问题可以使用Jasmine+Clock解决，但我还没有机会对它们进行修补。|1540956|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/|1|https://github.com/ibolmo/jasmine-jstd-adapter|2|http://pivotal.github.com/jasmine/|3|http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/wiki/CodeCoverage|4|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration^0|9|E|0|X|K|1|1K|7|2|2E|D|3|0|7|E|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]|$A|Z|B|10|1|11]|$A|12|B|13|1|14]|$A|15|B|16|1|17]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@$A|19|B|1A|1|1B]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]|R|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|S]]|T|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|U]]]]

The project I'm working on uses <a href="http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Js-Test-Driver</a> hosting <a href="http://pivotal.github.com/jasmine/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Jasmine</a> on Chrome 10 with <a href="https://github.com/ibolmo/jasmine-jstd-adapter" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Jasmine-JSTD-Adapter</a> including making use of <a href="http://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/wiki/CodeCoverage" rel="nofollow noreferrer">code coverage</a> tests included in JS-Test-Driver.
While there are some problems each time we change or update browsers on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration" rel="nofollow noreferrer">CI environment</a> the Jasmine tests are running pretty smoothly with only minor issues with ansynchronous tests, but as far as I'm aware these can be worked around using Jasmine Clock, but I haven't had a chance to patch them yet.

blocks|key|1541003|text|我已经发布了用于验证依赖于浏览器的JavaScript测试的a+little+library，而不必使用浏览器。它是一个使用zombie.js加载测试页面并检查结果的Node.js模块。我已经在on+my+blog上写过了。下面是自动化的样子：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1541004|var+browsertest+=+require('../browsertest.js').browsertest;

describe('browser+tests',+function+()+{

++++it('should+properly+report+the+result+of+a+mocha+test+page',+function+(done)+{
++++++++browsertest({
++++++++++++url:+"file:///home/liam/work/browser-js-testing/tests.html",
++++++++++++callback:+function()+{
++++++++++++++++done();
++++++++++++}
++++++++});
++++});

});|code-block|syntax|javascript|1541005|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/liammclennan/browsertest|1|http://hackingon.net/post/Testing-Browser-dependent-JavaScript.aspx^0|U|G|0|2P|A|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$G|H]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|J|$K|$5|L|M|N|C|$O|P]]|Q|$5|L|M|N|C|$O|R]]]]

I've published <a href="https://github.com/liammclennan/browsertest" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a little library</a> for verifying browser-dependent JavaScript tests without having to use a browser. It is a Node.js module that uses zombie.js to load the test page and inspect the results. I've wrote about it <a href="http://hackingon.net/post/Testing-Browser-dependent-JavaScript.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">on my blog</a>. Here is what the automation looks like:
<pre><code>var browsertest = require('../browsertest.js').browsertest;

describe('browser tests', function () {

 it('should properly report the result of a mocha test page', function (done) {
 browsertest({
 url: &quot;file:///home/liam/work/browser-js-testing/tests.html&quot;,
 callback: function() {
 done();
 }
 });
 });

});
</code></pre>

blocks|key|1541051|text|我已经编写了一个Ant任务，它使用PhantomJS+(一种无头WebKit浏览器)在QUnit构建过程中运行Ant测试文件。如果任何测试失败，它也可能使构建失败。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1541052|https://github.com/philmander/ant-jstestrunner|1541053|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://phantomjs.org/|1|https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit|2^0|H|9|0|W|6|1|0|0|1A|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$A|R|B|S|1|T]|$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|E]]]]

I've written an Ant task which uses <a href="http://phantomjs.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">PhantomJS</a>, a headless <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebKit" rel="nofollow noreferrer">WebKit</a> browser, to run QUnit HTML test files within an Ant build process. It can also fail the build if any tests fail.
<a href="https://github.com/philmander/ant-jstestrunner" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://github.com/philmander/ant-jstestrunner</a>

blocks|key|1541107|text|这是对几个测试工具的很好的评估。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1541108|JavaScript+unit+test+tools+for+TDD|offset|length|1541109|我个人更喜欢https://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/|1541110|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/300855/looking-for-a-better-javascript-unit-test-tool|1|https://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/^0|0|0|Y|0|0|6|15|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$D|T|E|U|1|V]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|Q]]]]

This is a good evaluation of several testing tools.

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/300855/looking-for-a-better-javascript-unit-test-tool">JavaScript unit test tools for TDD</a>

I personally prefer 
<a href="https://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://code.google.com/p/js-test-driver/</a>

I'm trying to incorporate some JavaScript unit testing into my automated build process. Currently JSUnit works well with JUnit, but it seems to be abandonware and lacks good support for Ajax, debugging, and timeouts.
Has anyone had any luck automating (with <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Ant" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ant</a>) a unit testing library such as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_UI_Library" rel="nofollow noreferrer">YUI</a> test, jQuery's <a href="https://code.jquery.com/qunit/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">QUnit</a>, or <a href="http://code.google.com/p/jqunit/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">jQUnit</a>?
Note: I use a custom built Ajax library, so the problem with Dojo's DOH is that it requires you to use their own Ajax function calls and event handlers to work with any Ajax unit testing.

Automated unit testing with JavaScript

单元测试

回归测试

服务器

jQuery

JSON

Java

我正在尝试将一些JavaScript单元测试整合到我的自动化构建过程中。目前，JSUnit可以很好地与JUnit一起工作，但它似乎是被遗弃的软件，并且缺乏对Ajax、调试和超时的良好支持。有没有人有幸(用)自动化了单元测试库，如测试、jQuery的或注意:我使用的是定制的Ajax库，因此Dojo的DOH的问题在于，它要...

问使用JavaScript进行自动化单元测试
EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问使用JavaScript进行自动化单元测试EN

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问使用JavaScript进行自动化单元测试
EN