当我尝试用空手道中的!contains deep检查一些数组内容时,我得到了一些意想不到的行为和奇怪的错误信息。我正在尝试验证我的people对象列表是否包含一个针对Alice的对象,而不是针对查利的对象:
* def people = [ {"name": "Alice", "phone": 123}, {"name": "Bob", "phone": 456} ]
* def alice = { "name": "Alice" }
* def charlie = { "name": "Charlie" }
# assert Alice is present and Charlie is not
# all of these work
* match people contains deep alice
* match people == '#(^+alice)'
* match people != '#(^+charlie)'
* match each people[*] !contains charlie
# but this doesn't
* match people !contains deep charlie最后一次检查失败:
match failed: CONTAINS_DEEP
$ | actual does not contain expected | actual array does not contain expected item - {"name":"Charlie"} (LIST:MAP)
[{"name":"Alice","phone":123},{"name":"Bob","phone":456}]
{"name":"Charlie"}
$[1] | actual does not contain expected | all key-values did not match, expected has un-matched keys - [name] (MAP:MAP)
{"name":"Bob","phone":456}
{"name":"Charlie"}
$[1].name | not equal (STRING:STRING)
'Bob'
'Charlie'
$[0] | actual does not contain expected | all key-values did not match, expected has un-matched keys - [name] (MAP:MAP)
{"name":"Alice","phone":123}
{"name":"Charlie"}
$[0].name | not equal (STRING:STRING)
'Alice'
'Charlie'这看起来就是我对contains的期望,所以这里似乎忽略了!?这是一个错误,还是将contains deep和!contains组合在一起太乐观了(我注意到文档中只单独提到了它们)?
(在第二种情况下,是否有可能简单地否定整个match?)
发布于 2021-04-25 20:02:39
这会让你得到你想要的:
* match each people !contains charlie因此,如果在数组上操作,建议首选match each。
是的,我不认为!contains deep是实现的--我只想说,非常欢迎你贡献代码来修复这个问题或错误消息--或者提供文档来告知用户这个限制。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67252838
复制相似问题