blocks|key|1470457|text|Microsoft使Visual+Source安全，但不会在内部将其用于任何规模较大的项目。在我的书中，这是反对它的一个主要标志。在大型项目中使用它，你会明白为什么；它很慢，如果你决定让它自动合并任何东西，上帝会帮助你。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1470458|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Microsoft, which makes Visual Source Safe, does not use it internally for any projects of any significant size. That's a major mark against it, in my book. And using it for large projects, you understand why; it's SLOW, and god help you if you ever decide to let it auto-merge anything.

blocks|key|1470854|text|VSS不是最新的，因此在来自另一个用户的大型签入期间获取atomic将导致文件集不完整。如果在WAN上工作，由于VSS的设计是在共享上工作，这种情况也会变得更糟。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1470855|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_operation^0|S|6|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

VSS is not <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_operation" rel="nofollow noreferrer">atomic</a>, so a get latest during a large check-in from another user will result in an incomplete file set. This also gets worse if working over a WAN due to the design of VSS to work over shares.

blocks|key|1685828|text|与CVS/VSS相比，SVN具有一些重要的特性，比如原子提交、廉价的副本、服务器端更高效的存储。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1685829|然而，SVN并不是唯一的修订控制系统。有很多不同的版本控制应用程序。一个新的趋势似乎是走向分布式修订控制，如Git或Mercurial。|offset|length|1685830|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://git.or.cz/|1|http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/^0|0|1I|3|0|1M|9|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@$D|R|E|S|1|T]|$D|U|E|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|O]]]]

SVN has some important features over CVS/VSS, like atomic commits, cheap copies, more efficient storage on the server side.

SVN is, however, not the only revison control system out there... There are a lot of different revision control applications. A new trend seems to be towards distributed revision control, like <a href="http://git.or.cz/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Git</a> or <a href="http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Mercurial</a>.

blocks|key|1685735|text|VSS有一个非常糟糕的历史，它必须克服。最近的版本似乎更稳定，但它仍然背负着一大堆负面负担。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1685736|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

VSS has a really bad history that it has to overcome. More recent versions seem to be more stable, but it still has a metric crap ton of negative baggage that it is toting around.

blocks|key|1686212|text|您应该尽快从VSS运行。如果你在过去没有遇到过问题，那么你应该得到一些。这就像俄罗斯轮盘赌的定时炸弹--你永远不知道它什么时候会爆炸。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1686213|SVN是一个很好的工具，非常容易设置和管理。用于备份或复制的管理工具非常好用。|1686214|我会推荐SVN而不是VSS。|1686215|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

You should run from VSS as soon as you can. If you haven't had problems with it in the past then you are due from some. It's like a Russian Roulette time-bomb - you never know when it's going to blow.

SVN is a great tool and very easy to setup, manage. Administration tools for backing up or replicating are very nice.

I would recommend SVN over VSS anyday.

blocks|key|1686298|text|在Visual+Studio中集成的旧论点不再有效。AnkhSVN+2.0提供了一个集成的解决方案，VisualSVN将TortoiseSVN集成到Visual+Studio中。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1686299|对于许多用户来说，TortoiseSVN本身就是切换的充分理由。|1686300|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://ankhsvn.net/|1|http://www.visualsvn.com/|2|http://tortoisesvn.net/^0|Q|B|0|1E|9|1|0|9|B|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]|$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]]]

The old argument of integration in Visual Studio doesn't work any more. <a href="http://ankhsvn.net" rel="nofollow noreferrer">AnkhSVN 2.0</a> delivers an integrated solution and <a href="http://www.visualsvn.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">VisualSVN</a> integrates TortoiseSVN into Visual Studio.

And <a href="http://tortoisesvn.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">TortoiseSVN</a> itself is enough reason to switch for many users.

blocks|key|1686339|text|我对Java代码的VSS有问题。虽然是getLatestVersion，但VSS无法处理java中项目和包的嵌套结构。我得到了同样的inifite文件夹结构。SVN在这方面非常简单。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1686340|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I have problems with VSS with Java code. While a getLatestVersion, VSS is unable to handle the nested structure of projects and packages in java.
I got inifite folder structures for the same. SVN is quite simple in this regard.

blocks|key|1685915|text|就功能而言，CVS和VSS基本上是一样的。因此，它们不是比较它们每一个的好起点。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1685916|但是，如果您只是将SVN和VSS用作团队中的一员，那么您可能永远看不到它们之间的区别。你真的必须开始使用他们作为项目经理，才能真正看到不同之处，例如分支、合并等。|1685917|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Well CVS and VSS are pretty much the same thing as far as functionality goes. So they are not a good starting point to compare each of them. 

However you probably will never see a difference between SVN and VSS if you just use them as a grunt on the team. You really have to start using them as a project manager to really see the differences, such as branching, merging, etc.

blocks|key|1686012|text|从开发人员的角度来看，SVN工作得很好，但它将配置信息存储在整个目录树上的方式让系统管理员抓狂(特别是当开发人员拒绝执行提交/重新签出过程时，负责将配置信息转移到另一台服务器的人)。:)所以，这并不都是镀金的好东西！|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1686013|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

SVN works well from a developer standpoint, but the way it stores config info all over the directory tree is maddening to sysadmins (especially those tasked with moving it to another server when the developers refuse to do a commit/re-checkout process). :) So, it's not ALL gold-plated goodness!

blocks|key|1470939|text|我实际上认为Perforce是镀金的善。GUI工具足够好，您可以将它们提供给设计师或艺术家，并让他们像我们开发人员一样使用源代码控制。我非常确定VSS文件->添加文件窗口早于Windows95。锁定正在使用的文件的整个概念是荒谬的。我们不是在几十年前就用并发版本控制解决了这个问题吗？我经历过历史损坏(如果我错了，请纠正我)，但VSS甚至不支持分支和合并。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1470940|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I actually think Perforce is the gold-plated goodness. The GUI tools are good enough that you can give them to a designer or artist and get them to use source control like us devs. I'm pretty sure the VSS File->Add Files window predates windows 95. The whole concept of files in use being locked is absurd. Didn't we solve that decades ago with CONCURRENT versioning? I have experienced history corruption and (correct me if I'm wrong) but VSS does not even support branches and merges.

I tend to get the feeling that most folks here think SVN is gold-plated goodness, whereas VSS is the worst program ever devised (at least as Version Control is concerned).

That said, why? I've used some CVS, and my current job uses VSS, and from a grunt on the team's perspective, I can't really tell that much difference. Most of the differences I've seen are cosmetic. Granted, I've not tried to do any branching/merging in either, but as a coder who comes in, checks out files, works on those files and checks them in at the end of the day, why would I want 1 over the other?

SVN? VSS? Why is one better than the other?

Visual Studio

服务器

Java

我倾向于感觉这里的大多数人认为SVN是镀金的好东西，而VSS是有史以来设计的最糟糕的程序(至少在版本控制方面)。话虽如此，为什么呢？我使用过一些CVS，而我目前的工作使用的是VSS，从团队的角度来看，我真的不能区分太多区别。我所看到的大多数差异都是表面上的。诚然，我也没有尝试做任何分支/合并，但是作为一个程序员，他进来了，签出文件，处理这些文件，并在一天结束时签入它们，为什么我要一个比另一个呢？

问SVN？VSS？为什么一种比另一种更好？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问SVN？VSS？为什么一种比另一种更好？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

资源

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问SVN？VSS？为什么一种比另一种更好？
EN