blocks|key|1752881|text|适用于windows、unix或Mac？在Mac或*nix上，您可以使用命令行或GUI版本的emacs或vim。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1752882|对于Mac:+TextWrangler可以很好地处理大文件。我对Windows环境还不够精通，无法在这方面提供帮助。|1752883|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

For windows, unix, or Mac? On the Mac or *nix you can use command line or GUI versions of emacs or vim. 

For the Mac: TextWrangler to handle big files well. I'm not versed enough on the Windows landscape to help out there.

blocks|key|1538114|text|Emacs可以处理huge+file+sizes，你可以在Windows或*nix上使用它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1538115|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/|1|http://www.freelists.org/archives/glug_t/03-2005/msg00032.html^0|0|5|0|9|F|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Emacs</a> can handle <a href="http://www.freelists.org/archives/glug_t/03-2005/msg00032.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">huge file sizes</a> and you can use it on Windows or *nix.

blocks|key|1753099|text|Jeff+Atwood在这里有一篇文章：http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000229.html|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1753100|他最终选择了Edit+Pad+Pro，因为“根据我以前的使用记录，我觉得IDE+Pro是最合适的:它对大型文本文件的处理速度相当快，具有最佳的正则表达式支持，而且它不会伪装成EditPad。”|1753101|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000229.html^0|K|1H|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Jeff Atwood has a post on this here: <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000229.html" rel="noreferrer">http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/000229.html</a>

He eventually went with Edit Pad Pro, because "Based on my prior usage history, I felt that EditPad Pro was the best fit: it's quite fast on large text files, has best-of-breed regex support, and it doesn't pretend to be an IDE."

blocks|key|1538308|text|像这样处理4G文件真的很难。我过去常常处理较大的文本文件，但我从未将它们加载到我的编辑器中。在我以前的公司，我主要使用UltraEdit，现在我使用Notepad%2B%2B，但我只会得到我需要编辑的部分。(大多数情况下，文件从不需要编辑)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1538309|为什么要在编辑器中加载这么大的文件？当我处理这些大小的文件时，我使用GNU+Core+Utils。我在这些文件上执行的最常见的操作是head+(获取前25万行)、tail、split、sort、shuf、uniq等，它非常强大。|1538310|使用GNU+Core+Utils可以做很多事情。我肯定会推荐这些，而不是一个新的编辑器。|1538311|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

It's really tough to handle a 4G file as such. I used to handle larger text files, but I never used to load them in to my editor. I mostly used UltraEdit in my previous company, now I use Notepad++, but I would get just those parts which i needed to edit. (Most of the cases, the files never needed an edit).

Why do u want to load such a big file in to an editor? When I handled files of these size, I used GNU Core Utils. The most common operations i performed on those files were head ( to get the top 250k lines etc ), tail, split, sort, shuf, uniq etc. It's really powerful.

There's a lot of things you can do with GNU Core Utils. I would definitely recommend those, instead of a new editor.

blocks|key|1538407|text|您使用的是什么操作系统和CPU？如果您使用的是32位操作系统，则系统上的进程物理上不能寻址超过4+4GB的内存。由于大多数文本编辑器都试图将整个文件加载到内存中，因此我怀疑您是否能找到一个可以执行您想要的操作的编辑器。它必须是一个非常花哨的文本编辑器，可以进行内核外的处理，即一次加载文件的一大块。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1538408|如果您在具有64位CPU和64位操作系统的计算机上使用64位文本编辑器，则可以使用加载如此大的文件。并且您必须确保在交换分区或交换文件中有足够的空间。|1538409|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

What OS and CPU are you using? If you are using a 32-bit OS, then a process on your system physically cannot address more than 4GB of memory. Since most text editors try to load the entire file into memory, I doubt you'll find one that will do what you want. It would have to be a very fancy text editor, that can do out-of-core processing, i. e. load a chunk of the file at a time.

You may be able to load such a huge file with if you use a 64-bit text editor on a computer with a 64-bit CPU and a 64-bit operating system. And you have to make sure that you have enough space in your swap partition or your swap file.

blocks|key|1753276|text|我也喜欢notepad%2B%2B。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1753277|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm^0|4|9|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I also like <a href="http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/site.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">notepad++</a>.

blocks|key|1753393|text|为什么要将4%2B+GB文件加载到内存中？即使你找到了可以做到这一点的文本编辑器，你的机器有4+GB的内存吗？除非它有比4+GB多得多的物理内存，否则你的机器会慢很多，并疯狂地交换文件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1753394|那么为什么你想要一个4%2B+GB的文件呢？如果你想转换它，或者做一个搜索和替换，你最好写一个小的快速程序来做这件事。|1753395|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Why do you want to load a 4+ GB file into memory? Even if you find a text editor that can do that, does your machine have 4 GB of memory? And unless it has a lot more than 4 GB in physical memory, your machine will slow down a lot and go swap file crazy.

So why do you want a 4+ GB file? If you want to transform it, or do a search and replace, you may be better off writing a small quick program to do it.

blocks|key|1753478|text|当我面对一个巨大的日志文件时，我不会尝试查看整个文件，而是使用Free+File+Splitter|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1753479|诚然，这是一种变通方法，而不是解决方案，有时您需要整个文件。但我通常只需要查看较大文件中的几行，这似乎也是您的问题所在。如果不是，也许其他人会发现这个实用程序很有用。|1753480|例如，如果您试图将大量文本文件加载到Excel中以使用自动筛选，那么让您查看大量文本文件的查看器就没有多大帮助。因为我们都花了一天的时间将问题分解成更小的部分来解决它们，所以将相同的原则应用于大文件并不会让我觉得有争议。|1753481|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.filesplitter.org/^0|V|I|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]]]

When I'm faced with an enormous log file, I don't try to look at the whole thing, I use <a href="http://www.filesplitter.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Free File Splitter</a>

Admittedly this is a workaround rather than a solution, and there are times when you would need the whole file. But often I only need to see a few lines from a larger file and that seems to be your problem too. If not, maybe others would find that utility useful.

A viewer that lets you see enormous text files isn't much help if you are trying to get it loaded into Excel to use the Autofilter, for example. Since we all spend the day breaking down problems into smaller parts to be able to solve them, applying the same principle to a large file didn't strike me as contentious.

blocks|key|1538699|text|Textpad在打开这种大小的文件时也工作得很好。当我不得不处理3-5+5gb范围内的超大日志文件时，我已经做过很多次了。此外，使用grep提取有价值的代码行，然后查看这些代码。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1538700|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Textpad also works well at opening files that size. I have done it many times when having to deal with extremely large log files in the 3-5gb range. Also, using grep to pull out the worthwhile lines and then look at those works great.

blocks|key|1753551|text|我不得不查看怪物(失控)日志文件(20%2B+GB)。我使用的是hexedit+FREE+version，它可以处理任何大小的文件。它也是开源的。它是一个Windows可执行文件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1753552|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.hhdsoftware.com/free-hex-editor^0|U|K|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I've had to look at monster(runaway) log files (20+ GB). I used <a href="http://www.hhdsoftware.com/free-hex-editor" rel="noreferrer">hexedit FREE version</a> which can work with any size files. It is also open source. It is a Windows executable.

blocks|key|1753628|text|我在处理4G文件时也遇到过TextPad的问题。Notepad%2B%2B运行得很好。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1753629|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I have had problems with TextPad on 4G files too. Notepad++ works nicely.

blocks|key|1753669|text|我没有在编辑器中加载一个巨大的日志文件，而是使用grep、tail、gawk等Unix命令行工具将感兴趣的部分过滤成一个小得多的文件，然后打开它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1753670|在Windows上，试试Cygwin。|1753671|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.cygwin.com/^0|O|4|T|4|Y|4|0|C|6|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@$9|Q|A|R|B|C]|$9|S|A|T|B|C]|$9|U|A|V|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|D|@$9|X|A|Y|1|Z]]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|E|$N|O]]]]

Instead of loading a gigantic log file in an editor, I'm using Unix command line tools like <code>grep</code>, <code>tail</code>, <code>gawk</code>, etc. to filter the interesting parts into a much smaller file and then, I open that.

On Windows, try <a href="http://www.cygwin.com/" rel="noreferrer">Cygwin</a>.

blocks|key|1753739|text|如果你只想查看一个大文件而不是编辑它，有几个免费软件程序可以一次读取一块文件，而不是试图将整个文件加载到内存中。当我需要读取大文件(>5+GB)时，我会使用它们。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1753740|swiftgear+http://www.swiftgear.com/ltfviewer/features.html开发的大型文本文件查看器|offset|length|1753741|海象团队的大文件查看器。|1753742|你必须自己找到最后一个的链接，因为我最多只能发布一个新手的超链接。|1753743|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.swiftgear.com/ltfviewer/features.html^0|0|A|1C|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$D|T|E|U|1|V]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

f you just want to view a large file rather than edit it, there are a couple of freeware programs that read files a chunk at a time rather than trying to load the entire file in to memory. I use these when I need to read through large ( > 5 GB) files.

Large Text File Viewer by swiftgear <a href="http://www.swiftgear.com/ltfviewer/features.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.swiftgear.com/ltfviewer/features.html</a>

Big File Viewer by Team Walrus.

You'll have to find the link yourself for that last one because the I can only post a maximum of one hyperlink being a newbie.

blocks|key|1538971|text|你试过context+editor吗？它又小又快。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1538972|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.contexteditor.org/^0|3|E|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Have you tried <a href="http://www.contexteditor.org/" rel="nofollow">context editor</a>? It is small and fast.

blocks|key|1539072|text|很抱歉在这样一个老帖子上发帖，但我在这里尝试了几个技巧，但没有一个对我有效。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1539073|它与文本编辑器略有不同，但我发现Beyond+Compare可以在我的Vista32位机器上处理非常大(3.6G)的文件。|1539074|这是一个Emacs、大型文本文件查看器、HexEdit和Notepad%2B%2B都无法处理的文件。|1539075|-Eric|1539076|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

Sorry to post on such an old thread, but I tried several of the tips here, and none of them worked for me.

It's slightly different than a text editor, but I found that Beyond Compare could handle an extremely large (3.6 Gig) file on my Vista 32-bit machine. 

This is a file that that Emacs, Large Text File Viewer, HexEdit, and Notepad++ all choked on.

-Eric

blocks|key|1753945|text|HxD+--它是一个十六进制编辑器，但它允许就地编辑，并且不会在大文件上吐出。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1753946|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

HxD -- it's a hexeditor, but it allows in place edits, and doesn't barf on large files.

blocks|key|1754009|text|Tweak是一个十六进制编辑器，可以处理对非常大的文件的编辑，包括插入和删除。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1754010|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/tweak/^0|0|5|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/tweak/" rel="nofollow">Tweak</a> is a hex editor which can handle edits to very large files, including inserts and deletes.

blocks|key|1539269|text|我在这篇文章中偶然发现了很多次，因为我经常需要处理大文件(10+Gigas%2B)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1539270|在厌倦了buggy和相当有限的免费软件，不愿意在试用期满后为昂贵的编辑器付费(毕竟不值得)之后，我使用了VIM+for+Windows，获得了巨大的成功和满足感。|offset|length|1539271|它非常适合这种需要，完全可定制，具有人们在处理文本文件时能想到的所有功能(搜索、替换、阅读等)|1539272|我非常惊讶没有人回答这个问题(除了之前的答案，除了MacOS)……|1539273|郑重声明，我是在this+blog+post上偶然发现它的，它明智地建议了它。|1539274|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/pc/gvim73_46.exe|1|http://blog.shlomoid.com/2009/08/free-text-editor-for-very-large-huge.html^0|0|1G|F|0|0|0|0|8|E|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@$D|13|E|14|1|15]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|U]]]]

I Stumbled on this post many times, as I often need to handle huge files (10 Gigas+). 
After being tired of buggy and pretty limited freeware, and not willing to pay fo costly editors after trial expired (not worth the money after all), I just used <a href="ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/pc/gvim73_46.exe" rel="nofollow">VIM for Windows</a> with great success and satisfaction. 
It is simply PERFECT for this need, fully customizable, with ALL feature one can think of when dealing with text files (searching, replacing, reading, etc. you name it) 

I am very surprised nobody answered that (Except a previous answer but for MacOS)...

For the record I stumbled on it on <a href="http://blog.shlomoid.com/2009/08/free-text-editor-for-very-large-huge.html" rel="nofollow">this blog post</a>, which wisely adviced it.

blocks|key|1539353|text|我发现远指挥官可以打开大文件(我尝试了4.2+GB的xml文件)，它不加载整个文件在内存中，而且工作速度很快。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1539354|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I found that FAR commander could open large files ( I tried 4.2 GB xml file)
And it does not load the entire file in memory and works fast.

I am looking for a text editor that will be able to load a 4+ Gigabyte file into it. Textpad doesn't work. I own a copy of it and have been to its support site, it just doesn't do it. Maybe I need new hardware, but that's a different question. The editor needs to be free OR, if its going to cost me, then no more than $30. For Windows.

Best Free Text Editor Supporting *More Than* 4GB Files?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我要找一个文本编辑器，将能够加载一个4+千兆字节的文件到它。Textpad无法工作。我有一份它的副本，并访问过它的支持站点，它就是不能做到这一点。也许我需要新的硬件，但这是另一个问题。编辑需要是免费的，或者，如果它将花费我，那么不超过30美元。适用于Windows。

问支持超过4 4GB文件的最佳自由文本编辑器？
EN

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问支持*超过*4 4GB文件的最佳自由文本编辑器？EN

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问支持超过4 4GB文件的最佳自由文本编辑器？
EN