当然，GC和YGC的发生和下一步行动
当然，GC和YGC的发生和下一步行动
提问于 2013-10-22 01:07:00
我们有一个java应用程序，我可以说它也使用了相当多的字符串变量。此外，我们在启动时将最大内存和初始内存设置为256Mb。此后，它运行了一段时间，直到最近我们发现，首先是一个GC，近2周后又是另一个GC。因此，我们发现FC的平均值为0.2145s，YGC的平均值为0.0511s。我们不确定这些值是否合适，或者导致了其他的东西？我们决定将内存增加到512Mb，并查看一些其他GC设置，如CMS设置？是否也应该对代码进行优化，例如字符串变量的使用？通常什么是对象或变量类型会移动到旧对象中？
Timestamp S0 S1 E O P YGC YGCT FGC FGCT GCT
2752472.6 69.74 0.00 3.67 51.72 44.17 4614 235.630 2 0.429 236.059
2752477.6 69.74 0.00 5.38 51.72 44.17 4614 235.630 2 0.429 236.059
2752482.6 69.74 0.00 7.51 51.72 44.17 4614 235.630 2 0.429 236.059
2752487.6 69.74 0.00 9.52 51.72 44.17 4614 235.630 2 0.429 236.059
2752492.6 69.74 0.00 10.55 51.72 44.17 4614 235.630 2 0.429 236.059代码片段
BoneCP connectionPool = null;
class ConnectionHandler implements Runnable {
private Socket receivedSocketConn1;
ConnectionHandler(Socket receivedSocketConn1) {
this.receivedSocketConn1=receivedSocketConn1;
}
Connection dbconn = null;
public void run() { // etc
BufferedWriter writeBuffer = null;
BufferedReader readBuffer = null;
String capturedMessage="";
try{
dbconn = connectionPool.getConnection();
dbconn.setAutoCommit(false);
while ((nextChar=readBuffer.read()) != -1){
capturedMessage += (char) nextChar;
if (nextChar == '*')
{
try{
//all queries here.
//for insert query this how i do
Statement stmt1 = null;
stmt1 = dbconn.createStatement();
String insertQuery3 =........
count = stmt9.executeUpdate(insertQuery3);
try{
if ( stmt1!= null ){ stmt1.close();
}
else{
System.out.println("No stm1 exist");
}
}catch(SQLException ex){
System.out.println("SQLException has been caught for stmt1");
ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
///For select we do this
Statement stmt2 = null;
stmt2 = dbconn.createStatement();
String selectQuery2= .........
ResultSet rs2 = stmt2.executeQuery(selectQuery2);
if(rs2.next())
{
}
try{
if ( rs2!= null ){
rs2.close();
} else{
System.out.println("No rs2 exist");
}
if ( stmt2!= null ){
stmt2.close();
} else{
System.out.println("No stm2 exist");
}
}catch(SQLException ex)
{
System.out.println("SQLException has been caught for stmt2");
ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
dbconn.commit
}
catch (SQLException ex){
ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
try{
dbconn.rollback();
}
catch (Exception rollback){
rollback.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace(System.out);
try{
dbconn.rollback();
}
catch (Exception rollback){
rollback.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
finally
{
}
}
catch (SocketTimeoutException ex){
ex.printStackTrace();
}
catch (IOException ex){
ex.printStackTrace();
}
catch (Exception ex){
ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
finally{
try{
if ( dbconn != null ){
dbconn.close();
}
else{
System.out.println("dbConn is null in finally close");
}
}
catch(SQLException ex){
ex.printStackTrace();
}
try{
if ( writeBuffer != null ){
writeBuffer.close();
}
else{
System.out.println("w is null in finally close");
}
}
catch(IOException ex){
ex.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
}
}来自sun.misc.Launcher$ExtClassLoader @ 0xe003a648 (50%)的终结器分析大小: 11.2 MB类: 196个对象: 201.7k类加载器:7
总共有91个对象实现了finalize方法。
Histogram of Objects with Finalize Method
Class Name Objects Shallow Heap
com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection
First 10 of 38 objects 38 42,560
java.net.SocksSocketImpl
First 10 of 39 objects 39 4,368
java.util.jar.JarFile
All 6 objects 6 384
java.util.zip.Inflater
All 6 objects 6 192
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
All 1 objects 1 80
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor
All 1 objects 1 72
Total: 6 entries
91 47,656 终结器分析来自
(46%)大小:13.6MB类: 578个对象: 304.8k类加载器:4
共有19,341个对象实现了finalize方法。
Class Name Objects Shallow Heap
java.net.SocksSocketImpl
First 10 of 18,354 objects 18,354 2,055,648
com.sun.mail.smtp.SMTPTransport
First 10 of 162 objects 162 25,920
java.io.FileOutputStream
First 10 of 742 objects 742 23,744
com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4Connection
First 10 of 15 objects 15 16,800
java.util.jar.JarFile
First 10 of 20 objects 20 1,280
java.util.zip.Inflater
First 10 of 25 objects 25 800
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor
All 8 objects 8 576
sun.net.www.protocol.jar.URLJarFile
All 5 objects 5 400
java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor
All 2 objects 2 160
java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary
All 4 objects 4 128
java.io.FileInputStream
All 3 objects 3 96
sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver
All 1 objects 1 24
Total: 12 entries
19,341 2,125,576 来自org.rzo.yajsw.boot.WrapperClassLoader @ 0xe02818c0的终结器分析(4%)大小: 966.3 KB类: 361个对象: 19.9k类加载器:3
共有22个对象实现了finalize方法。
Histogram of Objects with Finalize Method
Class Name Objects Shallow Heap
java.util.jar.JarFile
First 10 of 11 objects 11 704
java.util.zip.Inflater
All 10 objects 10 320
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor
All 1 objects 1 72
Total: 3 entries
22 1,096 Histo实时结果。
num #instances #bytes class name
----------------------------------------------
1: 6001 18078232 [I
2: 44562 7196072 [B
3: 103183 6054240 [C
4: 31832 4786936 <constMethodKlass>
5: 31832 4340240 <methodKlass>
6: 31638 3543456 java.net.SocksSocketImpl
7: 20127 3542352 com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4ResultSet
8: 41022 3461576 [Ljava.util.HashMap$Entry;
9: 104185 3333920 java.lang.String
10: 20198 3070096 com.mysql.jdbc.StatementImpl
11: 20323 2926512 com.mysql.jdbc.Field
12: 60329 2895792 java.util.TreeMap
13: 2343 2800032 <constantPoolKlass>
14: 61239 2449560 java.util.TreeMap$Entry
15: 149690 2395040 java.lang.Object
16: 41000 1968000 java.util.HashMap
17: 2343 1895080 <instanceKlassKlass>
18: 1954 1569536 <constantPoolCacheKlass>
19: 31623 1517904 java.net.SocketInputStream套接字的初始启动
71: 2 224 java.net.SocksSocketImpl
176: 1 32 java.net.Socket
202: 1 24 java.net.InetSocketAddress
206: 1 24 java.net.ServerSocket在运行50个Sockets之后。
19: 52 5824 java.net.SocksSocketImpl
37: 50 2400 java.net.SocketInputStream
48: 51 1632 java.net.Socket
88: 8 384 java.net.SocketOutputStream
95: 8 320 java.net.SocketTimeoutException
135: 7 112 java.net.Socket$3
136: 7 112 java.net.Socket$2
229: 1 24 java.net.ServerSocket回答 1
Stack Overflow用户
发布于 2013-10-22 01:23:14
512MB听起来并不多，可能不值得你花时间去进一步优化它。BTW 512Mb是512兆比特。
中长期存活的物体最终在老一辈人手中。
您可以使用内存分析器优化您的代码，以减少字符串的使用。您可以使用StringBuilder回收对象并减少GC压力，这是对象不正确地进入永久空间的常见原因。
在极端情况下，您可能会发现可以消除所有字符串生成，但我怀疑这是否值得，并且将内存增加到1 GB可能会更简单/更便宜。
页面原文内容由Stack Overflow提供。腾讯云小微IT领域专用引擎提供翻译支持
原文链接：
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19500611
复制相关文章
相似问题
腾讯云开发者
