blocks|key|2069052|text|由于代码片段的原因，在答案中只有一些反馈：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2069053|将3rd+link中的代码调整为：|offset|length|2069054|#include+<iostream>
using+namespace+std;

struct+SM+{
++++int+val;
++++SM(int+a)+:+val(a)+{+cout+<<"Constructor+val="<<a<<endl;}
++++~SM()+{+cout+<<+"Destructor+val="<<val<<endl;+}

++++SM(const+SM&+)+=+delete;
++++SM(SM&&+)+=+delete;
};

int+main()
{
++++SM+sc[8]+=+{+{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{6},{7}+};
++++return+0;
}|code-block|syntax|javascript|2069055|使用编译|2069056|g%2B%2B+-std=c%2B%2B11|2069057|并运行，结果是：|2069058|Constructor+val=0
Constructor+val=1
Constructor+val=2
Constructor+val=3
Constructor+val=4
Constructor+val=5
Constructor+val=6
Constructor+val=7
Destructor+val=7
Destructor+val=6
Destructor+val=5
Destructor+val=4
Destructor+val=3
Destructor+val=2
Destructor+val=1
Destructor+val=0|2069059|到底是什么问题呢？|2069060|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24678701/move-constructor-is-required-even-if-it-is-not-used-why^0|0|1|8|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@$D|14|E|15|1|16]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$I|J]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|H|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$I|J]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|H|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$I|J]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|-4|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|V|$W|$5|X|Y|Z|A|$10|11]]]]

Just some feedback, in an answer due to code snippets:

Adapting the code at the <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24678701/move-constructor-is-required-even-if-it-is-not-used-why">3rd link</a> to:

<pre><code>#include &lt;iostream&gt;
using namespace std;

struct SM {
 int val;
 SM(int a) : val(a) { cout &lt;&lt;"Constructor val="&lt;&lt;a&lt;&lt;endl;}
 ~SM() { cout &lt;&lt; "Destructor val="&lt;&lt;val&lt;&lt;endl; }

 SM(const SM&amp; ) = delete;
 SM(SM&amp;&amp; ) = delete;
};

int main()
{
 SM sc[8] = { {0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{6},{7} };
 return 0;
}
</code></pre>

compiling with 

<pre><code>g++ -std=c++11
</code></pre>

and running, results in:

<pre><code>Constructor val=0
Constructor val=1
Constructor val=2
Constructor val=3
Constructor val=4
Constructor val=5
Constructor val=6
Constructor val=7
Destructor val=7
Destructor val=6
Destructor val=5
Destructor val=4
Destructor val=3
Destructor val=2
Destructor val=1
Destructor val=0
</code></pre>

What exactly is the trouble?

blocks|key|2069080|text|“复制初始化”并不意味着“调用复制构造函数”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2069081|C%2B%2B14+8.5/15：|2069082|2069083|表单中发生的初始化|blockquote|2069084|2069085|2069086|T+x+=+a;|code-block|syntax|javascript|2069087|2069088|以及参数传递、函数返回、抛出异常、处理异常和聚合成员初始化称为复制初始化。|2069089|2069090|2069091|请注意，初始化器和初始化对象可以有不同的类型。|2069092|因此，您可以使用初始化器列表来初始化数组，而不必调用任何复制构造函数。|2069093|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|L|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$M|N]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|G|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|U|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|Y|$]]

"copy-initialized" does not mean "calls a copy constructor."

C++14 8.5/15:

<blockquote>
 The initialization that occurs in the form
</blockquote>

<pre><code>T x = a;
</code></pre>

<blockquote>
 as well as in argument passing, function return, throwing an exception, handling an exception, and aggregate member initialization is called copy-initialization.
</blockquote>

Note that an initializer and an initialized object can have different types.

So you can use an initializer list to initialize an array without necessarily invoking any copy constructor.

I run into trouble if I would create an array of objects like this:

<pre><code>SM sc[8]{{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{6},{7}};
</code></pre>

The constructor for SM is defined as:

<pre><code>SM::SM(int);
</code></pre>

Because in c++ <code>Each member is copy-initialized from the corresponding initializer-clause.</code> is given, I have a unsolved problem.

I already read:

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7885479/move-constructors-and-static-arrays">Move Constructors and Static Arrays</a>

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20617452/initialization-of-member-array-objects-avoiding-move-constructor">Initialization of member array objects avoiding move constructor</a>

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24678701/move-constructor-is-required-even-if-it-is-not-used-why">Move constructor is required even if it is not used. Why?</a>

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27303650/constexpr-array-of-constexpr-objects-using-move-ctor">constexpr array of constexpr objects using move ctor</a>

Yes, all the answers describing very well what is giong on with list initialization but I could not found an idea how to get a static array of objects now.

Is there any work around for that problem? Creating a array of pointers and do a runtime initialization with new or new@ operation requires a lot more runtime a memory space. It is a bit problematic because I am on a AVR 8 bit controller.

How to create an array of objects which are NOT move/copy constructible

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

如果我像这样创建一个对象数组，我就会遇到麻烦：SM sc[8]{{0},{1},{2},{3},{4},{5},{6},{7}};SM的构造函数定义为：SM::SM(int);因为在c++中给出了Each member is copy-initialized from the corresponding initial...

问如何创建不可移动/复制构造对象数组
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问如何创建不可移动/复制构造对象数组EN