blocks|key|2499419|text|这个问题确实很广泛，但我会根据我的经验来回答。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2499420|Javascript实际上并不意味着要进行数学计算，这可能是快速计算大量E&M现象所必需的(特别是如果它们不是表示为封闭形式的解决方案)。它还涉及到您希望在图形中包含多少细节(更多的步骤=更多的计算)。您可能会发现自己需要进行更多的优化来弥补性能差异。|2499421|我在Flash中做了一些天线阵列的可视化(他们有封闭的解决方案，只有简单的阵列)，结果还不错。Javascript肯定不会达到你想要做的任何3D模拟的水平。|2499422|我想知道Silverlight是否是一个更好的解决方案，因为你可能会发现.NET的数学库比Actionscript的数学库更多，这可以省去你自己写出数学的大量工作(但由于性能问题，你可能最终会这样做)。|2499423|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

The question is indeed broad but I will answer from the experience I've had. 

Javascript is not really meant to do mathematical calculations, which is what might be necessary to calculate a lot of E&amp;M phenomenon quickly (Especially if they are not represented as a closed form solution). It really goes into how much detail you want in your graphs as well (More steps = more calculations). You may find yourself needing to do more optimizations to make up for the performance difference. 

I did some visualizations of antenna arrays (They had closed form solutions, only simple arrays) in Flash and it worked out ok. Javascript will definitely not be up to par with any 3D simulations you might want to do. 

I wonder if Silverlight might be a better solution, because you may find more mathematics libraries for .NET than for Actionscript, that could save you a lot of work of writing the math out yourself (But you might end up doing this anyways because of the performance issues).

blocks|key|3755175|text|正如其他人所建议的，在可视化方面，javascript并不是那么强大的语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3755176|对于你正在尝试做的事情，Processing是一种非常好的语言，它很容易学习，而且是基于Java的。数据可视化被直接构建到语言中，以及时间空间中(即在时间上前进"1个刻度“，并使可视化对此做出反应)。|offset|length|3755177|另外，如果你有兴趣走这条路，我建议你选择Visualizing+Data，它是一个非常好的处理入门读物。|3755178|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://processing.org/|1|http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596514556/^0|0|C|A|0|0|K|G|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$D|T|E|U|1|V]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|Q]]]]

As others have suggested javascript is not that strong of a language when it comes to visualization.

<a href="http://processing.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Processing</a> is a really good language for what you're trying to do, it's easy to learn and is Java based. Data visualization is built directly into the language, as well as temporal space (ie advance "1 tick" in time and have the visualization react to that.)

Also if you're interested in going that route I'd suggest picking up <a href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596514556/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Visualizing Data</a> which is pretty much a Processing primer.

blocks|key|588361|text|Flash可能是你正在寻找的更常见的应用程序栈，但Silverlight基于它包含的强大功能，看起来已经准备好从他们那里夺得头衔。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|588362|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Flash may be the more common application stack right now for what you are looking for, but Silverlight is looking primed to take the title from them based on the powerful features that it contains.

blocks|key|3755186|text|我自己会选择Flex或Silverlight|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3755187|针对multimedia|3755188|Native的大量可重用libraries|unordered-list-item|3755189|
|3755190|Native支持针对图形和动画支持|3755191|ordered-list-item|3755192|3755193|3755194|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|L|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|P|$]]

I would go Flex or Silverlight myself

<ol>
<li>Plenty of re-usable libraries</li>
<li>Native support for multimedia</li>
<li>Native support for graphics and animation</li>
</ol>

blocks|key|2499530|text|我来得有点晚，但是你想要的，已经在JavaScript中实现了，你会发现它非常有用。我推荐在Chrome下运行它，因为JS处理引擎非常快。(你甚至可能想试试更快的Chrome2)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2499531|2499532|http://ejohn.org/blog/processingjs/|unordered-list-item|offset|length|2499533|http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/basic/+(91+basic+demos.)|2499534|http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/topics/+(51大型、专题型、demos.)|2499535|http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/custom/+(4个自定义“野外”演示))|2499536|2499537|另请参阅：http://www.chromeexperiments.com/|2499538|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1|http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/basic/|2|http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/topics/|3|http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/custom/|4|http://www.chromeexperiments.com/^0|0|0|0|Z|0|0|0|1F|1|0|0|1G|2|0|0|1G|3|0|0|5|X|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|17|8|@]|9|@$F|18|G|19|1|1A]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|1B|8|@]|9|@$F|1C|G|1D|1|1E]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1F|8|@]|9|@$F|1G|G|1H|1|1I]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1J|8|@]|9|@$F|1K|G|1L|1|1M]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1O|8|@]|9|@$F|1P|G|1Q|1|1R]]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|R|$S|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|D]]|X|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|Y]]|Z|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|10]]|11|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|12]]|13|$5|T|U|V|A|$W|14]]]]

I'm a little late to the show, but what you want, has been implemented in JavaScript, and you'll find this incredibly useful. I recommend running it under Chrome as the JS processing engine is extremely fast. (You may even want to try Chrome 2 which is even faster)

<ul>
<li><a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/processingjs/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://ejohn.org/blog/processingjs/</a></li>
<li><a href="http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/basic/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/basic/</a> (91 basic demos.)</li>
<li><a href="http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/topics/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/topics/</a> (51 larger, topical, demos.)</li>
<li><a href="http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/custom/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://ejohn.org/apps/processing.js/examples/custom/</a> (4 custom "in the wild" demos.)</li>
</ul>

See also: <a href="http://www.chromeexperiments.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.chromeexperiments.com/</a>

blocks|key|580248|text|我同意LFSR+Consulting的观点:+Processing经常用于教育目的，它是免费的，速度很快(Java通常比Flash更快)，而且很容易学习，所以你会有更快的结果。它支持3D，你可以处理用于模拟和计算的Java库，等等。它有一个很棒的社区！:-)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|580249|对于这样的用法，JavaScript有点轻量级。JavaFX是炒作，但它还没有真正的3D+(尽管有人使用了Java3D+)，而且它还有点年轻。|580250|Flash和Silverlight:无可奉告，在该领域没有太多经验。OpenLazlo可以是另一种选择...|580251|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I second LFSR Consulting's opinion: Processing is used a lot for educational purposes, it is free, and fast (Java is faster than Flash in general) and easy to learn, so you have faster results. It supports 3D, you can tackle Java libraries for simulation and computing, etc. And it has a great community! :-)

JavaScript is a bit light for such usage. JavaFX is hype, but it hasn't really 3D (although one used Java3D with it) and it is still a bit young. 
Flash and Silverlight: no comment, not much experience in the field. OpenLazlo can be an alternative...

blocks|key|3754984|text|你真的有两个选择:闪存中的ActionScript或者Silverlight中的VB.NET/C#/other。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3754985|因此，首先您需要确定这些平台中的哪些平台是您的目标。|3754986|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

You really have two choices ActionScript in Flash or VB.NET/C#/other in Silverlight.

So first you need to decide which of these platforms you will target.

blocks|key|2492242|text|您可以将问题分成两部分:用户交互和显示部分，以及繁重的计算部分。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2492243|如果您可以将繁重的计算转移到服务器上，那么您仍然可以在javascript中显示所有内容。|2492244|javascript的一个困难是它是解释的，你需要自己编写更多的方程式，所以会有性能影响和开发时间，但它可以在没有任何插件的情况下工作，除非你不想在canvas标签中做3D。|2492245|Flash和Silverlight可能有更好的选择，但你需要学习新的语言并需要插件，这取决于你想要使用的Flash版本。|2492246|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

You may be able to split the problem into two parts, the user-interaction and display part, and the heavy calculations part.

If you can move the heavy calculations to a server then you can still show everything in javascript.

One difficulty with javascript is that it is interpreted and you will need to write more of the equations yourself, so there is a performance hit and development time, but it will work without any plugins, unless you don't want to do 3D in the canvas tag.

Flash and Silverlight may have better options, but then you are learning new languages and requiring plugins, depending on what version of Flash you want to use.

blocks|key|5867210|text|查看processing.js、xcode和iprocessing！ProcessingJS非常适合数据可视化，但缺乏交互性。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5867211|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Check out processing.js, xcode, and iprocessing! 
ProcessingJS is great for data visualization but lacks in interactivity.

blocks|key|3755339|text|你可能应该试试python。对于教育和计算目的来说，它是一种非常好的语言，它有一个相当不错的社区，语法也不是那么严格。即使它是为命令行设计的，你也可以使用一些外部包为它创建前端图形用户界面，它还提供了像Scipy，Numpy和Matplotlib这样的包来进行高级绘图和数据可视化。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|3755340|entityMap^0|2T|5|2Z|5|35|A|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@$9|I|A|J|B|C]|$9|K|A|L|B|C]|$9|M|A|N|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$]]

You should probably try python. It is a really good language for educational and computational purposes it has a pretty decent community and the syntax is not so tough. Even though it was designed to for command line you can create front end gui's for it using some external package and it also provides packages like Scipy, Numpy and Matplotlib for advanced plotting and data visualization.

I'm going to develop a comprehensive educational software which runs on the browser and has many visualization and simulation works (electrostatic and electromagnetic visualization, 2D and 3D). 

Which language(<a href="http://processing.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Processing</a>, javascript or something else) is the best toward my purpose?

Processing language vs javascript?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我将开发一个全面的教学软件，它在浏览器上运行，有许多可视化和仿真工作(静电和电磁可视化，2D和3D)。哪种语言(、javascript或其他语言)最适合我的目的？

问处理语言vs javascript？
EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问处理语言vs javascript？EN

回答 10

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问处理语言vs javascript？
EN