blocks|key|823388|text|对于业余编程爱好者(即，一个非商业的努力，你只会工作在你自己)，这真的没有任何真正的区别。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|823389|无论你对有什么感觉，都可以使用。|offset|length|style|BOLD|823390|entityMap^0|0|A|6|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@$D|L|E|M|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

For hobbyist programming (i.e. a non-commercial endeavour you will only work on yourself), it really doesn't make any real difference.

Go with whichever you are more comfortable with.

blocks|key|2773627|text|C#，因为如果你知道它，你的工作机会会更大，而且在我看来，它是一种更优雅的语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2773628|它有一个更大的社区，你可能会找到更多用c#编写的教程。如果您选择任一语言，都有online+converters可为您提供帮助。|offset|length|2773629|之后，您将可以轻松地阅读Java代码。您可能还会对c或c%2B%2B语法感到熟悉。|2773630|哦，如果你从来没有接触过web表单，并且有典型的asp背景，为什么不尝试一下asp.net+mvc呢？在某些方面，它更接近于“老方法”。|2773631|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.developerfusion.com/tools/convert/csharp-to-vb/|1|http://www.asp.net/mvc/default.aspx?wwwaspnetrdirset=1^0|0|13|H|0|0|0|12|B|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$D|V|E|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@$D|10|E|11|1|12]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|S]]]]

C# because if you know it, your job opportunities will be bigger and it's in my opinion a much more elegant language.

It has a bigger community and you will probably find more tutorials written in c#. If you choose either language, there are <a href="http://www.developerfusion.com/tools/convert/csharp-to-vb/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">online converters</a> available to help you.

You will have an easy time reading Java code afterwards. You will also probably feel somewhat at home with c or c++ syntax.

Oh and if you've never been exposed to web forms and come from a classic asp background, why not give <a href="http://www.asp.net/mvc/default.aspx?wwwaspnetrdirset=1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">asp.net mvc</a> a try? It's nearer to 'the old ways' in some regards.

blocks|key|823410|text|我在3年前的工作中遇到过这个问题。如果你深入研究这些语言的语法，你会发现它们非常接近。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|823411|我选择了C#的方式，因为它似乎得到了更广泛的使用，询问了更多的例子，而且它是跨平台的(我上次看的时候缺少单声道vb.net+)。|823412|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I faced this one about 3 years ago in my Job. If you look in depth at the syntax of the languages you will see they are very close. 

I went with the C# way as it seemed more widely used, asked for, more examples were available and it was cross platform (the mono vb.net was lacking last time I looked).

blocks|key|4239147|text|自从1991年开始在VB工作后，我发现VB.Net真的很难上手--这些语言很相似，感觉很熟悉，但又足够不同，经常让我犯错。让它更令人困惑的是，我做了很多工作与Excel/VBA，它仍然是VB6。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4239148|因此，当我在.Net中工作时，我更喜欢C#：我从来不是一个C%2B%2B或Java程序员，所以我不会被它们之间的差异所绊倒。|4239149|缺点是，在多年的VB自动更正之后，C#区分大小写是乏味的……|4239150|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I found VB.Net really hard to pick up after working in VB since 1991 - the languages are similar enough to feel familiar but different enough to constantly trip me up. To make it even more confusing, I do a lot of work with Excel/VBA, which is still VB6.

So I much prefer C# when I'm working in .Net: I was never much of a C++ or Java programmer, so I don't trip over differences there.

On the downside, C# being case-sensitive is tedious after years of VB auto-correction...

blocks|key|823495|text|基于以下原因的c#：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|823496|823497|我没有任何确凿的证据，但似乎c#程序员阅读/编码vb.net代码比其他方式更容易。|ordered-list-item|823498|c#似乎在就业市场上更受欢迎(我知道您是一个业余爱好者，但仍然...)|823499|c#在语法上更接近c/c%2B%2B/java。如果你想学习其他语言，c#会给你带来些许优势(除了java，因为语言非常相似，所以你会有相当大的优势……你只需要学习一个新的框架。)|823500|823501|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$]]

c# for these reasons:

<ol>
<li>I don't have any conclusive proof or anything, but it seems that c# programmers have an easier time reading/coding vb.net code than the other way around.</li>
<li>c# seems to be more popular in the job market (I know you are a hobbyist, but still...)</li>
<li>c# is syntactically closer to c/c++/java. If you ever want to go into those other language, c# will put you at a slight advantage (except for java, in which you'd have a pretty good advantage since the languages are very similar.... you'd just need to mostly learn a new framework.)</li>
</ol>

blocks|key|4239361|text|虽然VB.Net是可行的，但趋势是C#。如今，顶级开发人员撰写的大多数文章都是用C#编写的，使用C#进行开发可能会节省您的时间，而不必将您的“语法思维过程”转换回VB。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4239362|从语法是大小写敏感的角度来看，你会发现C#更具挑战性，而且你可能会发现自己比预期更依赖智能感知。|4239363|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Although VB.Net is viable, the trend is toward C#. Most of the articles written by the top tier of developers today are in C# and it may save you time to simply develop in C# as opposed to having to translate your "syntactic thought process" back to VB.

You will find C# more challenging from the perspective that the syntax is case sensitive, and you might find yourself relying on intellisense more than what you'd expect.

blocks|key|2773905|text|我也是从asp+classic开始的，发现使用VB.NET比使用C#要容易得多。当然，大多数示例都是用C#编写的，但是如果您理解C#语法，那么理解和应用它并不难。无论哪种方式，你都应该能够相当轻松地阅读这两本书。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2773906|我没有(也不想)编写大型、复杂的web应用程序。我发现VB有很多小东西可以帮助我专注于逻辑，而不是像区分大小写这样的“愚蠢”事情。|2773907|我认为这与你的思维方式有很大关系。我发现读VB比读C#容易100倍，但其他人不同。这就是为什么没有一种语言对每个人来说都是最好的。|2773908|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I also started in asp classic and found it much easier to pick up VB.NET than C#. Sure, most of the samples are in C# but if you understand C# syntax it isn't that hard to understand and apply. You should be able to read both fairly comfortably either way. 

I'm not coding(nor do I want to) large, complex web applications. I find that VB has lots of little things that help me concentrate on the logic rather than "silly" things like case sensitivity. 

I think it has a lot to do with how you think. I find it 100 times easier to read VB than C# but other people are different. That is why there isn't just one language that is best for everybody.

blocks|key|2773583|text|c#：开始的时候会更难，但将来会有回报的。我的意见是..。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2773584|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

c#: it will be harder in the beginning, but will pay in the future. my opinion...

blocks|key|4239184|text|我的感觉是，C#比VB有更光明的未来，从长远来看，它会给你带来更丰富的体验。C派生的语法也被许多其他现代语言使用，这将使它们更容易学习。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4239185|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

My feeling is that C# has a brighter future than VB, and will give you a much richer experience in the long term. The C derived syntax is also in use by many other modern languages and will make them easier to learn too.

blocks|key|457509|text|您可以直接从C#开始。除了外观和感觉，VB.NET和VB没有太多共同之处。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|457510|如果你从VB.NET开始，你无论如何都要学习这个框架。|457511|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

You can start with C# directly. There are not many common things in VB.NET and VB, dispite the look and feel.

If you start with VB.NET, you have to learn the framework anyway.

blocks|key|823471|text|我给你的建议是使用C#。我是一名VB程序员，但我总是觉得自己被排除在编程社区之外。C#使用业界广泛使用的术语，而as+VB.NET使用自己的术语。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|823472|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

My suggestion to you is to go with C#. I was a VB programmer, but I always felt left out of the programming community. C# uses the terminology which industry widely uses, where as VB.NET uses its own terminology.

blocks|key|2773800|text|回想一下这里的几个人：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2773801|2773802|“经典”ASP和VB.net是完全不同的野兽。有些语法是相似的，但一旦你开始深入研究，它就是一种完全不同的语言。|unordered-list-item|2773803|，|2773804|，如果你坚持使用一种类似VB的语言，你可能会感到困惑。在ASP.NET中有如此多的不同，我会强烈地考虑完全重新开始。买一本C#的书，花一个周末的时间可能是清理学习管道的最好方法。|2773805|C#对大小写和语法的要求要高得多。VB.Net和VBS有太多的不同，所以你要确保无论你用的是哪一种，你都有一个很好的集成开发环境来保护你，让你在学习的过程中保持一致。相比于一个外行的招聘经理，|2773806|C#在简历上看起来要复杂得多。一种是锋利、锐利和灼热的。另一种是基本的。无论如何，C#/Java语法的工作通常比VB的要多得多。|2773807|，但最终你应该去你最满意的地方。享受yourself.|2773808|吧，你有完全的自由选择|offset|length|style|BOLD|2773809|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|2|9|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|E|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|15|8|@$R|16|S|17|T|U]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|W|$]]

Just to echo a couple of people in here:

<ul>
<li>"Classic" ASP and VB.net are different beasts completely. Some of the syntax is similar but it's a whole different language once you start to dig in.</li>
<li>You might get confused if you stick with a VB-like language. So much is different in ASP.NET that I would strongly consider starting afresh completely. Buying a C# book and making a weekend of it might be the best way to clean out the learning pipes.</li>
<li>C# is much, much more anal about cases and syntax. VB.Net is too compared to VBS (ASP) so you want to make sure whichever you're going with, you have a good IDE to watch your back and keep you in line while you're learning.</li>
<li>C# looks a lot more sophisticated on a CV/resume compared to Visual Basic to a layman hiring manager. One is sharp and cutting and hot. The other is Basic. There are generally a lot more jobs for the C#/Java syntax than VB's anyway.</li>
<li>But ultimately you should go where you're happiest. You have complete free choice so enjoy yourself.</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|823550|text|这两种语言非常相似，就是我所说的句法上的差异。选择你更满意的事情。我也会附和其他人说，如果你没有强烈的感觉，那么你应该去c#，因为这是更多产的语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|823551|当你在这里的时候，还有一些其他的提示。|823552|823553|不再需要隐藏字段-您不再需要隐藏字段来保存您的状态，使用Session集合或ViewState将您的数据库访问转移到不同的项目中，不要从页面或页面代码后面与数据库通信。|unordered-list-item|823554|查看使用一些对象关系映射(LLBGenPro、CodeSmith、链接到CodeSmith等)|823555|日志查看所有异常查看global.aspx.cs|823556|中的应用程序事件|823557|欢迎来到一个全新的世界！|823558|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|G|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|G|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|Q|$]]

The two languages are very similar, just what I call syntactic sugar differences.
Choose what you are more happy with.
I too would echo others in saying if you have do not feel strongly then you should go c# as this is more prolific language. 

A couple of other hints while you are here.

<ul>
<li>No more hidden fields - you no longer have to have hidden fields holding your state, use either the Session collection or the ViewState collection.</li>
<li>Move your database access out into a different project, don't talk to the db from the page or the page code behind.</li>
<li>Look at using some ORM Object relation mapping (LLBGenPro, CodeSmith, LINK to SQL, etc) </li>
<li>Log all exceptions look at the application events in global.aspx.cs</li>
</ul>

Welcome to a brand new world!

I'm a hobbyist programmer with couple of database driven mobile web sites and I finally have decided to switch from classic asp to .net. But after couple of days reading I couldn’t decide which way I should go. Shall I learn c# or continue to vb in .net?

From classic ASP to .net c# or vb?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

教程

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云智能顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

EdgeOne AI 安全实战专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

聚焦“写作效率、视觉美观与运行性能”三方面进行全面升级，为您提供更高效、稳定的创作环境

社区富文本&Markdown编辑器全新改版上线，欢迎大家体验!

诚挚邀请您参与本次调研，分享您的真实使用感受与建议。您的反馈至关重要，感谢您的支持与参与！

社区新版编辑器体验调研

我是一个业余程序员，有几个数据库驱动的移动网站，我最终决定从经典的asp切换到.net。但读了几天后，我无法决定我应该走哪条路。我应该在.net中学习c#还是继续学习vb？

问从经典的ASP到.net c#还是vb？
EN

回答 13

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问从经典的ASP到.net c#还是vb？EN

回答 13

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问从经典的ASP到.net c#还是vb？
EN