blocks|key|1178008|text|许多软件公司会购买一些代码混淆工具，它们通常不是免费的(或仅限试用版)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1178009|有些人还会购买好的覆盖工具。|1178010|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Many software companies will buy some code obfuscation tool, and they are usually not free (or free for trial only).

Some will also buy good coverage tools.

blocks|key|1184342|text|Intellij是一个很棒的工具，特别是与Eclipse+IMO相比。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1184343|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/^0|0|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Intellij</a> is a great tool, especially compared to Eclipse IMO.

blocks|key|1178035|text|虽然我更喜欢用开源库编写软件，但我真的很喜欢使用IntelliJ。在使用eclipse工作了大约一年之后，它确实提高了我的工作效率。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1178036|我现在正在考虑购买javarebel，这应该会带来另一次生产力提升。|1178037|另一方面，在源代码不可用的地方使用一个库，将会导致错误，因为不知道它是如何工作的，调试将会困难得多，并且它可能包含没有机会检测到的安全问题。|1178038|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/index.html|1|http://www.zeroturnaround.com/javarebel/^0|O|8|0|0|9|9|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]]]

although i prefer to write software with open source libraries, i really like using <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/index.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">IntelliJ</a>. Having worked for about a year with eclipse, it definately boosts my productivity.

I am now considering purchasing <a href="http://www.zeroturnaround.com/javarebel/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">javarebel</a> which should give another productivity boost.

on the other hand, using a library where the source is not available, would feed akward, because would not know how it works, debugging would be much harder, and it could potentially contain security problems wich no chance of detection.

blocks|key|3480385|text|据我所知，Intellij可能是开发人员使用的最流行的“付费”工具。我曾在客户站点工作过，他们认为它非常高效，以至于他们拥有站点范围的许可证，而一些类似的站点将使用(免费的)+Eclipse或NetBeans。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3480386|有一个巨大的动机是不花钱买东西的。但如果不是非得节省你那么多时间才有价值。在大型企业中，每个席位/每天的开发人员成本令人惊讶地高。如果你声称Intellij在一个工作年中为你节省了2-3天的生产力，那么它本身就会产生回报(我想说，这在很大程度上是一个主观的论点，但我知道独立顾问自己为Intellij买单)。|3480387|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/^0|5|8|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

<a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Intellij</a> is probably the most popular 'paid-for' tool that I know developers use. I've worked at client sites where they regard it as so productive that they have site-wide licenses, whereas some similar sites will use (the free) Eclipse or NetBeans.

There's a huge motivation not to pay for stuff. But if doesn't have to save you that much time to be worthwhile. The per-seat/per-day developer cost in large enterprises is surprisingly high. If you claim that Intellij saves you, say, 2-3 days productivity in a man-year, then it'll have paid for itself (this is largely a subjective argument, I would say, but I know independent consultants who pay for Intellij themselves).

blocks|key|3480421|text|我也喜欢NetBeans，但我知道许多人为MyEclipse付费，因为它增加了一些功能。价格也相当合理(约50美元)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3480422|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I like NetBeans as well, but I know many people who pay for MyEclipse, for its added features. The price it quite reasonable as well (~50$).

blocks|key|3480457|text|JIRA和FishEye提高了生产力，而且它们并不局限于Java。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3480458|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/|1|http://www.atlassian.com/software/fisheye/^0|0|4|0|5|7|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

<a href="http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">JIRA</a> and <a href="http://www.atlassian.com/software/fisheye/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">FishEye</a> improve productivity and they are not restricted to Java.

blocks|key|4949707|text|用于内存分析等的JProfiler|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4949708|http://www.ej-technologies.com/products/jprofiler/overview.html|offset|length|4949709|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|1R|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

JProfiler for memory profiling etc

<a href="http://www.ej-technologies.com/products/jprofiler/overview.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.ej-technologies.com/products/jprofiler/overview.html</a>

blocks|key|1178115|text|Eclipse用于在JUnit中进行连续测试。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1178116|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

JUnit Max for continuous testing in Eclipse.

blocks|key|1164709|text|我们一直在使用Jira+%2B+Fisheye+%2B+Crucible。虽然前两个工具只是用于跟踪问题和查看/搜索存储库的标准工具，但第三个工具Crucible是无价的。它是一个帮助进行代码审查的工具。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1164710|http://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/|offset|length|1164711|它极大地增加了我们所做的代码审查的数量，并为我们提供了一些跟踪错误得到修复和代码审查的机会。|1164712|此外，我们还有一些用于YourKit+http://www.yourkit.com/的浮动许可证|1164713|我们经常使用它来解决内存和性能问题。|1164714|我们试着遵循这个咒语:首先，写好它，让它工作。第二，只优化需要优化的部分。|1164715|为了进行优化，您需要知道瓶颈在哪里，分析是找出瓶颈的最好方法之一。你选择最慢的并修复它，再次分析，如果它足够快，你就完成了。如果不是，选择最慢的东西并修复它，冲洗并重复。|1164716|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1|http://www.yourkit.com/^0|0|0|17|0|0|0|J|N|1|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@$D|10|E|11|1|12]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@$D|15|E|16|1|17]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|-4|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|Q|$R|$5|S|T|U|A|$V|C]]|W|$5|S|T|U|A|$V|X]]]]

We have been using Jira + Fisheye + Crucible. While the first two are just your standard tools for tracking issues and viewing/searching the repository, the third tool Crucible has been invaluable. It is a tool to help with code reviews.

<a href="http://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.atlassian.com/software/crucible/</a>

It has increased the amount of code reviews we do dramatically as well as giving us some tracking that bugs got fixed and the code was reviewed.

In addition, we have some floating licenses for YourKit
<a href="http://www.yourkit.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.yourkit.com/</a>

That we use quite frequently to sort out memory and performance issues.

We try to follow the mantra:
First, write it so it works.
Second, optimize only what needs optimization.

In order to optimize, you need to know where the bottle necks are, and profiling is one of the best ways to find out. You pick the slowest thing and fix it, profile again, if it's fast enough you are done. If not, pick the slowest thing and fix it, rinse and repeat.

blocks|key|1164739|text|Beyond+compare是文件/文件夹比较的最佳工具。http://www.scootersoftware.com/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1164740|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.scootersoftware.com/^0|T|V|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Beyond compare is the best tool for file/folder comparison. <a href="http://www.scootersoftware.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scootersoftware.com/</a>

The vast majority of developers I interact with are using Eclipse (I prefer NetBeans) and will leverage many of the free plugins that are available. However, many of them are using few if any tools that require monetary payment.

Have developers ever considered that this may be unwise and that they are compromising their own productivity? Are there certain types of tools that the majority of developers will pay for? Likewise, are there tools they would like to use but aren't because they aren't free?

What non-free tools are popular amongst Java developers

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我接触到的绝大多数开发人员都在使用Eclipse (我更喜欢NetBeans)，并将利用许多可用的免费插件。然而，他们中的许多人使用的工具很少，如果有的话，需要货币支付。开发人员有没有考虑过这可能是不明智的，他们正在牺牲自己的生产力？是否有某些类型的工具是大多数开发人员愿意付费的？同样，有没有工具他们想使用，但因为它们...

问哪些非免费工具在Java开发人员中很受欢迎
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问哪些非免费工具在Java开发人员中很受欢迎EN