blocks|key|5297789|text|在编译器和解释器之间，源代码的解析并没有太大的区别。这就是大多数关于编译器的教科书所讲的内容。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5297790|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

The parsing of the source code is not very much different between a compiler and an interpreter. And that is what most textbooks on compilers are about.

blocks|key|3829677|text|现在有一些很好的工具可以实现自定义语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3829678|您可能希望查看Eclipse+Modelling+(http://www.eclipse.org)或MPS+(http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/)中的Xtext，后者是IntelliJ的语言工作台，可以免费获得。|offset|length|3829679|两者都允许您创建语言，并提供从源代码生成代码的工具和帮助创建代码的工具。|3829680|它们还创建抽象语法树，这些抽象语法树可以直接操作，即执行。然后你就有了一个解释器。|3829681|经典的方法是分别使用bison/yacc作为lexer解析器，目前有许多新的工具可用，如antlr。解析器的输出也是抽象语法树，可以执行、解释或生成代码。|3829682|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.eclipse.org/|1|http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/^0|0|Q|M|0|1J|T|1|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]|$D|10|E|11|1|12]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|U]]]]

There are some nice tools now to implement custom languages.

You might want to checkout Xtext in the Eclipse Modelling Package (<a href="http://www.eclipse.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.eclipse.org</a>) or MPS (<a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.jetbrains.com/mps/</a>), the language workbench of IntelliJ which is freely available.

Both allow you to create languages and provide the tools to generate code from the source and the tooling to help creating the code.

They also create abstract syntax trees which may be directly manipulated, i.e. executed. Then you have an interpreter.

The classical approach would be to use bison/yacc for as a lexer, respectively parser, and many newer tools are currently available like antlr. The output of the parser is then again the abstract syntax tree ready to do interprete or generate code from.

blocks|key|1514178|text|An+Incremental+Approach+to+Compiler+Construction+-它是关于创建编译器的，但它可能是一个很好的起点来查找参考资料。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1514179|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://scheme2006.cs.uchicago.edu/11-ghuloum.pdf^0|0|1C|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

<a href="http://scheme2006.cs.uchicago.edu/11-ghuloum.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">An Incremental Approach to Compiler Construction</a> - it's about creating compilers, but it might be a good starting point to find references from.

blocks|key|5297901|text|我在Uni编写了一个用于读取和转换逻辑表达式的解释器。它是用C、Lexx和Yacc写的，这些都是老派的Unix和C程序员似乎信以为真的。一旦你掌握了它们的诀窍，你就会变得相当强大，但我想说的是，学习曲线相当陡峭。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5297902|http://www.lugbe.ch/action/reports/lex_yacc.pdf|offset|length|5297903|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|1B|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

I wrote an interpreter for reading and converting logic expressions at Uni. Wrote it in C, Lexx and Yacc which old school Unix and C programmers seem to swear by. Pretty powerful once you get the hang of them, but reasonably steep learning curve I would say.

<a href="http://www.lugbe.ch/action/reports/lex_yacc.pdf" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.lugbe.ch/action/reports/lex_yacc.pdf</a>

i'm thinking on doing an undergrad project on building an interpreter for a simple/rudimentary custom language (perl / C like). I would be be glad if someone could point me in the right direction to start. Most of the books/resources i find are on theoretical implementation of compilers. Are there any resources aimed at interpreters ? i'm thinking of implementing it in C++, but have very little knowledge on the subject of interpreter design, so any pointers to books/references will be appreciated

Need help designing an interpreter

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我正在考虑做一个本科生项目，为简单/初级的自定义语言(如perl/C)构建一个解释器。如果有人能给我指明正确的开始方向，我会很高兴的。我找到的大多数书籍/资源都是关于编译器的理论实现的。有没有针对解释器的资源？我正在考虑用C++实现它，但我对解释器设计的知识知之甚少，因此任何书籍/参考资料的指针都将不胜感激

问需要帮助设计解释器
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问需要帮助设计解释器EN