blocks|key|1970935|text|有没有解释型语言？(TCL和Lua被设计为扩展语言，但您几乎可以轻松地与任何其他语言交互)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1970936|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Any interpreted language? (TCL and Lua were designed as extension languages, but you can nearly as easily interface with any other).

blocks|key|5756153|text|python集成怎么样？|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5756154|您可以创建一个与您的应用程序交互的python接口。Python非常容易学习，应该很容易与c/c%2B%2B集成。The+python+documentation+has+an+own+chapter+on+that.|offset|length|5756155|您还可以使用像swig这样的工具来生成界面。|5756156|这样做的好处是他们不需要编译任何东西。他们可以只提供python文件，这些文件可以加载到您的应用程序中并在软件中运行。这是python的一个众所周知的用法，也是它简单的语法所促进的。|5756157|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://docs.python.org/extending/index.html|1|http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Python.html^0|0|1H|1G|0|0|7|4|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$D|V|E|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$D|Z|E|10|1|11]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|S]]]]

How about python integration?

You could create an python interface that interfaces with your application. Python is rather easy to learn and should integrate easily with c/c++. <a href="http://docs.python.org/extending/index.html" rel="nofollow">The python documentation has an own chapter on that.</a>

You could also use a tool like <a href="http://www.swig.org/Doc1.3/Python.html" rel="nofollow">swig</a> to generate the interface.

The advantage of this is that they wouldn't have to compile anything. They could just supply python files that could be loaded into your application and run within the software. This is a well known use for python, and something its simple syntax promotes.

blocks|key|5756197|text|正如另一个人所说，通过提供一种嵌入式语言，你将是最好的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5756198|我会为javascript出钱，并通过javascript使用google+v8+engine，你可以得到一种几乎每个人都可以使用和编程的语言。你还可以嵌入其他的javascript引擎，比如SpiderMonkey。有关要选择的内容，请参阅此answer。|offset|length|5756199|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://code.google.com/p/v8/|1|https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SpiderMonkey|2|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/93692/which-javascript-engine-would-you-embed-in-an-application^0|0|V|G|0|2O|C|1|3E|6|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$D|T|E|U|1|V]|$D|W|E|X|1|Y]|$D|Z|E|10|1|11]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|Q]]]]

As the other says you will be best of by providing an embedded language.

I would chip in for javascript and use the <a href="http://code.google.com/p/v8/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">google v8 engine</a> 
By using javascript you get a language nearly everbody can use and program in.
There is other javascript engines you can embed like <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/en/SpiderMonkey" rel="nofollow noreferrer">SpiderMonkey</a>.
See this <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/93692/which-javascript-engine-would-you-embed-in-an-application">answer</a> for what to choose.

blocks|key|1587441|text|一种解释型语言是不够的。我需要速度。软件本身就是一种解释型语言。所以我添加了对微型C编译器的支持。它只是C，我确实检查了mingw，它可能不会像这个那么小。谢谢你的所有提示。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1587442|几个月后添加：|1587443|实际上，我现在有两个工具:+TinyC和Python。它们之间的速度差异是明显的(系数5-10)，但这通常不是太重要。Python对用户来说要容易得多，尽管我设法将两者很好地集成到了Euler+GUI中。|1587444|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

An interpreted language is not good enough. I need speed. The software itself is an interpreted language. So I added support for the tiny C compiler. It is only C, and I do check mingw, which probably would not be as tiny as this. Thanks for all your hints.

Added after several months:

I have now two tools, actually: TinyC and Python. The speed difference between those is noticable (factor 5-10), but that usually does not matter too much. Python is much easier for the user, though I managed to integrate both into the Euler GUI quite nicely.

blocks|key|1587456|text|其中一种方法是添加脚本。您的应用程序可以托管脚本环境并在其中公开其服务。用户将能够执行JScript/VBScript脚本并与您的应用程序交互。这样做的好处是，只要付出合理的努力，您就可以在应用程序中获得众所周知的、有文档记录的脚本语言的强大功能(我想那里甚至有用于脚本编写的调试器)。您将需要将您的应用程序服务塑造为COM接口，并且脚本将能够使用您在C%2B%2B端分配的方法名称自动访问它们。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1587457|1587458|C%2B%2B,+Win32+and+Scripting:+Quick+way+to+add+Scripting+support+to+your+applications|unordered-list-item|offset|length|1587459|MSDN+Entry+Point+-+IActiveScript+interface|1587460|1587461|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/349554/Cplusplus-Win32-and-Scripting-Quick-way-to-add-Scr|1|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ky29ffxd%2528v=vs.94%2529.aspx^0|0|0|0|29|0|0|0|16|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|W|8|@]|9|@$F|X|G|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|10|8|@]|9|@$F|11|G|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|A|$Q|R]]|S|$5|N|O|P|A|$Q|T]]]]

One of the ways is to add scripting. You application can host scripting environment and expose its services there. Users would be able to execute JScript/VBScript scripts and interact with your application. The advantage is that with reasonable effort you can get the power of well known and well documented scripting languages into your application (I suppose there is even debugger for scripting there). You will be required to shape your app services as COM interfaces and scripts will be able to access them automatically using method names you assigned on C++ side.

<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/349554/Cplusplus-Win32-and-Scripting-Quick-way-to-add-Scr" rel="nofollow">C++, Win32 and Scripting: Quick way to add Scripting support to your applications</a></li>
<li><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ky29ffxd%28v=vs.94%29.aspx" rel="nofollow">MSDN Entry Point - IActiveScript interface</a></li>
</ul>

I am not sure if the title of this question gets to the point. I have written a large software system in C C++ for Windows, and want to give the users of this system the option to add compiled code to it. The user should be able to do basic stuff, and exchange data with my program.

Currently the implemented way is via DLLs. But for this, a grown up compiler is needed, and it is not as easy as I wished. Is there a tiny C compiler that can create Windows DLLs?

Another idea is the Java native interface. But this requires a complete Java system to run in the background, and it is not easy to run code in it.

Do you have any other ideas?

Wanted: Compiler Tool for Users of Software System

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我不确定这个问题的标题是否切中要害。我已经为Windows用C C++写了一个大型的软件系统，并希望给这个系统的用户提供添加编译代码的选项。用户应该能够做基本的事情，并与我的程序交换数据。目前的实现方式是通过动态链接库。但要做到这一点，需要一个成熟的编译器，而这并不像我希望的那样容易。有没有可以创建Windows DLL的微型C编译器？另一个想法是Java本机接口。但这需要一个完整的Java系统在

问招聘:软件系统用户的编译工具
EN

回答 5

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问招聘:软件系统用户的编译工具EN

回答 5

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问招聘:软件系统用户的编译工具
EN