blocks|key|5306391|text|更新:我当然能理解。Eric+Lippert有一些更深入的帖子..Check+them+out。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5306392|5306393|我喜欢scottgu关于新语言特性的一系列帖子。更多的信息在这里以及http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2007/11/top-10-things-to-know-about-visual.html，特别是关于语言功能的部分。|5306394|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/tags/C_2300_/Lambda%2BExpressions/default.aspx|1|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/08/new-c-orcas-language-features-automatic-properties-object-initializers-and-collection-initializers.aspx|2|http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2007/11/top-10-things-to-know-about-visual.html^0|X|E|0|0|0|3|7|1|Y|26|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@$A|T|B|U|1|V]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]|$A|11|B|12|1|13]]|C|$]]|$1|G|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|H|$I|$5|J|K|L|C|$M|N]]|O|$5|J|K|L|C|$M|P]]|Q|$5|J|K|L|C|$M|R]]]]

Update: I can certainly understand. 
Eric Lippert has some more indepth posts..<a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/tags/C_2300_/Lambda+Expressions/default.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Check them out</a>.

<hr>

I liked the series of posts by <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/08/new-c-orcas-language-features-automatic-properties-object-initializers-and-collection-initializers.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">scottgu</a> on the new language features..
Some more info here as well <a href="http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2007/11/top-10-things-to-know-about-visual.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.danielmoth.com/Blog/2007/11/top-10-things-to-know-about-visual.html</a> esp the section on language features.

blocks|key|5306488|text|有一个"quick+and+dirty"+list+on+my+C#+in+Depth+site+(这也是一个有点开玩笑的意思)：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|5306489|为了回应查尔斯·格雷厄姆的帖子，我有一个针对.NET+2.0时语言特性的适用性的article：|5306490|如果您对语言而不是框架感兴趣，那么就像一个明显的插头一样，C#+in+Depth是我所见过的最接近“纯语言”的书。它还分为两部分(在介绍之后)：C#+2中的新功能和C#+3中的新功能。|5306491|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/General/BluffersGuide3.aspx|1|http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/Chapter1/Versions.aspx|2|http://www.manning.com/affiliate/idevaffiliate.php?id=876_230^0|3|19|0|0|14|7|1|0|T|B|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$A|U|B|V|1|W]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$A|12|B|13|1|14]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]|R|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|S]]]]

There's a <a href="http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/General/BluffersGuide3.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">"quick and dirty" list on my C# in Depth site</a> (which is also slightly tongue in cheek):

To respond somewhat to Charles Graham's post, I have an <a href="http://csharpindepth.com/Articles/Chapter1/Versions.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">article</a> about how applicable the language features are when targeting .NET 2.0:

Just as a blatant plug, if you're interested in language rather than framework, <a href="http://www.manning.com/affiliate/idevaffiliate.php?id=876_230" rel="nofollow noreferrer">C# in Depth</a> is about as close to a "language only" book as I've seen. It's also divided into two parts (after the introduction): new features in C# 2, and new features in C# 3.

blocks|key|3050801|text|Scott+Guthrie有一个good+series+of+blog+posts，描述了很多改进。向下滚动到“语言改进和LINQ”。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3050802|Lambda+Expressions|3050803|Anonymous+Types|3050804|Automatic+Properties+and+object/list+initializers|3050805|Extension+Methods|3050806|Query+Syntax|3050807|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/11/19/visual-studio-2008-and-net-3-5-released.aspx|1|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/04/08/new-orcas-language-feature-lambda-expressions.aspx|2|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/05/15/new-orcas-language-feature-anonymous-types.aspx?CommentPosted=true|3|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/08/new-c-orcas-language-features-automatic-properties-object-initializers-and-collection-initializers.aspx|4|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/13/new-orcas-language-feature-extension-methods.aspx|5|http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/04/21/new-orcas-language-feature-query-syntax.aspx^0|G|P|0|0|0|I|1|0|0|F|2|0|0|1D|3|0|0|H|4|0|0|C|5|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@$A|16|B|17|1|18]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@$A|1A|B|1B|1|1C]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@$A|1E|B|1F|1|1G]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1H|8|@]|9|@$A|1I|B|1J|1|1K]]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@$A|1M|B|1N|1|1O]]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|1P|8|@]|9|@$A|1Q|B|1R|1|1S]]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|1T|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|O|$P|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|U]]|V|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|W]]|X|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|Y]]|Z|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|10]]|11|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|12]]|13|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|14]]]]

Scott Guthrie has a <a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/11/19/visual-studio-2008-and-net-3-5-released.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">good series of blog posts</a> that describe a lot of the improvements. Scroll down to "Language Improvements and LINQ".

<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/04/08/new-orcas-language-feature-lambda-expressions.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Lambda Expressions</a> 
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/05/15/new-orcas-language-feature-anonymous-types.aspx?CommentPosted=true" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Anonymous Types</a> 
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/08/new-c-orcas-language-features-automatic-properties-object-initializers-and-collection-initializers.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Automatic Properties and object/list initializers</a> 
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/03/13/new-orcas-language-feature-extension-methods.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Extension Methods</a> 
<a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/04/21/new-orcas-language-feature-query-syntax.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Query Syntax</a>

blocks|key|3050814|text|请查看Eric怀特关于C#+3.0中函数式编程的tutorial|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3050815|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://blogs.msdn.com/ericwhite/pages/FP-Tutorial.aspx^0|O|8|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Check out Eric White's <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ericwhite/pages/FP-Tutorial.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">tutorial</a> on functional programming in C# 3.0

blocks|key|778461|text|这是我自己特别想知道的一件事。我可以告诉你的一件事是，如果你在VS2008中做多目标，C#+3.0中的许多新功能实际上将在一个纯粹的2.0应用程序中工作。我知道扩展方法就是这样一件事。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|778462|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

That's one thing that I would concretely like to know myself. The one thing that I can tell you is that a lot of the new features in C# 3.0 will actually work in a purely 2.0 application if you do multi targeting in VS 2008. I know that extension methods are one such thing.

blocks|key|778541|text|下面是帮助我快速理解新特性的一系列文章|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|778542|http://blah.winsmarts.com/2006/05/19/demystifying-c-30--part-4-lambda-expressions.aspx|offset|length|778543|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|2E|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

here is a series of articles that helped me understand the new features quickly

<a href="http://blah.winsmarts.com/2006/05/19/demystifying-c-30--part-4-lambda-expressions.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://blah.winsmarts.com/2006/05/19/demystifying-c-30--part-4-lambda-expressions.aspx</a>

There are a lot of new features that came with the .Net Framework 3.5. Most of the posts and info on the subject list stuff about new 3.5 features and C# 3 changes at the same time. But C# 3 can be used without .Net 3.5. Does anyone know of a good post describing the changes to the language? (Besides the boring, explicit official specs at <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb308966.aspx" rel="noreferrer">MSDN</a> that is.)

C# 3 new feature posts (and not about .Net 3.5 features)

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

.Net Framework3.5有很多新特性。主题上的大多数帖子和信息都列出了3.5的新特性和C# 3同时发生的变化。但是在没有.Net 3.5的情况下也可以使用C# 3。有没有人知道有一篇好的文章描述了这种语言的变化？(除了无聊、明确的官方规范。)

问C# 3新特性帖子(与.Net 3.5特性无关)
EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C# 3新特性帖子(与.Net 3.5特性无关)EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C# 3新特性帖子(与.Net 3.5特性无关)
EN