很抱歉发了这么长的帖子,但我想知道在我向Sun提交bug报告之前,我是否可以获得更多的关注。
JVM: 6u11
操作系统: Windows XP SP3
硬件: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ @2.41 GB,内存3.25 GB。
我相信我在JVM中遇到了一个错误,没有给任何线程一个监视器。在下面的线程跟踪中,RelayedMessages-0000000001获取了监视器<0x12a8f9f8>,并最终等待它;随后通知了该线程。然而,即使列出的所有线程都在争用监视器,但没有一个线程获得它。
我保证对于每个引用监视器<0x12a8f9f8>的线程,线程转储都是完整的。转储是使用Java VisualVM获得的,在16个小时内获得了三次,并且每次都是一致的(这些线程没有变化)。
有没有人不同意我的评估,即JVM未能将监视器交付给任何符合条件的线程,而它应该将监视器交付给其中一个线程?
"RelayedMessages-0000000001" daemon prio=6 tid=0x03694400 nid=0x1750 waiting for monitor entry [0x05e1f000..0x05e1fc94]
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method)
at com.companyremoved.thd.EzWaiter.ezWait(EzWaiter.java:249)
- locked <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.waitWithinMessage(IsolatedObject.java:352)
- locked <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender.waitForAvailablePipe(ComsSender.java:219)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender.sendObject(ComsSender.java:185)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender.processIocMessage(ComsSender.java:98)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.deliver(IsolatedObject.java:311)
- locked <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.iocMessage(IsolatedObject.java:265)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocTarget.iocMessage(IocTarget.java:138)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocBinding.iocMessage(IocBinding.java:105)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender$Messages.sendObject(ComsSender.java:333)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender$Messages.sendObject(ComsSender.java:316)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.RelayedMessage.run(RelayedMessage.java:104)
- locked <0x130fe8e0> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.RelayedMessage)
at com.companyremoved.thd.RunQueue.runEntry(RunQueue.java:293)
at com.companyremoved.thd.RunQueue.run(RunQueue.java:273)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- None
"ScbPipe Writer" daemon prio=6 tid=0x4fff0c00 nid=0xf14 waiting for monitor entry [0x0594f000..0x0594fc14]
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.deliver(IsolatedObject.java:293)
- waiting to lock <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.iocMessage(IsolatedObject.java:265)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocTarget.iocMessage(IocTarget.java:138)
at com.companyremoved.coms.stm.ioc.ComsPipe$Receiver.scbPipeDefaultProcessor(ComsPipe.java:403)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.processObject(ScbPipe.java:915)
- locked <0x131a4ea0> (a java.lang.Object)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.writerRun(ScbPipe.java:817)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.run(ScbPipe.java:728)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- None
"ScbPipe Writer" daemon prio=6 tid=0x4c647400 nid=0xe00 waiting for monitor entry [0x059ef000..0x059efb94]
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.deliver(IsolatedObject.java:293)
- waiting to lock <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.iocMessage(IsolatedObject.java:265)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocTarget.iocMessage(IocTarget.java:138)
at com.companyremoved.coms.stm.ioc.ComsPipe$Receiver.scbPipeDefaultProcessor(ComsPipe.java:403)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.processObject(ScbPipe.java:915)
- locked <0x13188bb8> (a java.lang.Object)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.writerRun(ScbPipe.java:817)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.run(ScbPipe.java:728)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- None
"ScbPipe Writer" daemon prio=6 tid=0x035f7800 nid=0x1130 waiting for monitor entry [0x0726f000..0x0726fc94]
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.deliver(IsolatedObject.java:293)
- waiting to lock <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.iocMessage(IsolatedObject.java:265)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocTarget.iocMessage(IocTarget.java:138)
at com.companyremoved.coms.stm.ioc.ComsPipe$Receiver.scbPipeDefaultProcessor(ComsPipe.java:403)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.processObject(ScbPipe.java:915)
- locked <0x12a8a478> (a java.lang.Object)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.writerRun(ScbPipe.java:817)
at com.companyremoved.scb.ScbPipe.run(ScbPipe.java:728)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- None
"IOC Signals-0000000001" daemon prio=6 tid=0x03673000 nid=0x1434 waiting for monitor entry [0x0415f000..0x0415fd94]
java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.deliver(IsolatedObject.java:293)
- waiting to lock <0x12a8f9f8> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.iocMessage(IsolatedObject.java:265)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocTarget.iocMessage(IocTarget.java:138)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IocBinding.iocMessage(IocBinding.java:105)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ComsSender$Messages.removePipe(ComsSender.java:302)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ConnectionController.disconnect(ConnectionController.java:712)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ConnectionController.shutdown(ConnectionController.java:224)
at com.companyremoved.system.coms.ConnectionController.processIocMessage(ConnectionController.java:168)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.deliver(IsolatedObject.java:311)
- locked <0x12a8b798> (a com.companyremoved.system.coms.ConnectionController)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject.access$100(IsolatedObject.java:36)
at com.companyremoved.ioc.IsolatedObject$SignalProxy.run(IsolatedObject.java:526)
at com.companyremoved.thd.RunQueue.runEntry(RunQueue.java:293)
at com.companyremoved.thd.RunQueue.run(RunQueue.java:273)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Locked ownable synchronizers:
- None发布于 2009-01-04 08:57:11
所提供的线程跟踪相对于所讨论的锁是完整的。与我共事的另外两个人也同意,JVM错误已被明确指出,jProfiler (ej-technologies)的程序员也是如此。
发布于 2008-12-16 09:33:34
您确定线程RelayedMessages-0000000001会收到通知吗?其他线程被阻塞是正常的,因为第一个线程仍然获得<0x12a8f9f8>的锁。为了让其他线程可以获得锁,应该将第一线程从等待列表中删除,并安排它再次运行,然后释放它获得的锁。
可能还有其他线程在等待第一个线程等待的同一对象,当您说通知时,这些线程将被选择唤醒。如果可能,请确保使用notifyAll()。
也可以在将线程放入等待列表之前释放锁,或者通过给出超时值来调用等待。线程在等待列表中等待16个小时是没有意义的。如果你也可以张贴其他的帖子,那也会很有帮助。
更新:
你说得对,我应该考虑到Thread.State。正如您所评论的,它不是处于等待状态,因为它已被通知。那么,处于等待列表中并不是不释放锁<0x12a8f9f8>的原因。但是,它处于阻塞状态。这意味着,它试图获得它在object.wait之前获得的锁,但它无法获得。因此,似乎有另一个线程(不在您提供的列表中)阻止它。
我认为,你认为object.wait应该释放锁<0x12a8f9f8>。但object.wait只释放该对象监视器上的锁,并保留其他锁。我认为,锁等待不是对象监视器的锁(为此调用<0x12a8f9f8> )。
当然,情况可能并非如此,而且可能存在真正的bug。我只是在试着想出可能的原因。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/370710
复制相似问题