blocks|key|30089|text|我一直在想，为什么你要在Windows服务器上运行，而不使用ASP.Net。它是windows环境中最好的服务器端框架，因为它最直观地与IIS一起工作。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|30090|但还有另一个问题:如果内存有效，所有其他框架都需要额外的软件才能在服务器上运行。PHP+requires+PHP+runtime+to+be+installed+as+a+CGI+Extension+in+IIS，Rails+requires+Ruby，CGI样式选项(C，Perl，Python)不仅需要编译器/运行时，还需要一些关于IIS如何处理这些文件的幕后操作。我不确定，我从来没有用过JSP和ColdFusion+requires+that+framework+and+it+really+is+a+hefty+licensing+cost+(而不是ASP.Net，它是服务器上免费下载的)。|offset|length|30091|所以，最后，你基本上只剩下选择一个选项，安装必要的软件，然后继续前进。就我个人而言，如果必须做出这样的选择，我会选择PHP或Ruby+on+Rails，但除了随机和主观的选择之外，没有其他有效的理由。|30092|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://us2.php.net/install.windows|1|http://codebetter.com/blogs/ben.reichelt/archive/2006/02/21/138812.aspx|2|http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/buy/^0|0|14|1U|0|2Z|J|1|5L|22|2|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$D|V|E|W|1|X]|$D|Y|E|Z|1|10]|$D|11|E|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|Q]]|R|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|S]]]]

I'm stuck wondering why you'd host on a Windows server and not use ASP.Net. It is the best of the server-side frameworks for a windows environment, as it works most intuitively with IIS.

But there's another problem there: If memory serves, all the other frameworks require additional software to run on the server. <a href="http://us2.php.net/install.windows" rel="nofollow noreferrer">PHP requires PHP runtime to be installed as a CGI Extension in IIS</a>, <a href="http://codebetter.com/blogs/ben.reichelt/archive/2006/02/21/138812.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Rails requires Ruby</a>, CGI style options (C, Perl, Python) require not only the compiler/runtimes but also some poking under the hood in regards to how IIS handles those files, JSP requires... I'm not sure, I've never used JSP, and <a href="http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/buy/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ColdFusion requires that framework and it really is a hefty licensing cost</a> (as opposed to ASP.Net which is a free download for the server).

So, in the end, you're left with basically picking an option, installing the necessary software and going forward. Personally, if forced to make this choice, I would choose either PHP or Ruby on Rails, but there's no valid reason for that outside of a random, and subjective choice.

blocks|key|4097424|text|前段时间我读了一篇基准测试文章，它建议在Windows之上运行一个开源的web堆栈是所有变体(即WAMP)中性能最好的。我不知道对这些类型的文章有多大的信心，IIRC它以很小的优势击败了LAMP。你可能会发现WAMP很适合你的情况，但我认为你应该省下视窗税，改用台灯(或者使用Postgres而不是MySQL……我更喜欢它)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4097425|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I read a benchmark article some time ago that suggested running an open source web stack on top of Windows was the best performer out of all the variations (i.e. WAMP). I don't know how much faith to put in those types of articles, and IIRC it beat out LAMP by some really small margin. You might find WAMP to be a good fit for your situation, but I think you should save yourself the Windows tax and use a LAMP (or use Postgres instead of MySQL... I like it better).

blocks|key|3252157|text|Weblocks|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3252158|是一个用Common+Lisp语言编写的基于延续的web框架。|3252159|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-weblocks/^0|0|8|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

<a href="http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-weblocks/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Weblocks</a>

<blockquote>
 Weblocks is a continuations-based web framework written in Common Lisp.
</blockquote>

blocks|key|3252221|text|我同意Stephen的观点，将不使用ASP.NET的原因归咎于许可费用似乎有点奇怪，特别是当你打算使用Windows托管的时候？诚然，VS2008+Pro并不便宜，但它也很难打破银行。新的2008+Express版本的VS是免费的，我不得不说还不错。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3252222|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/295624/best-free-web-framework-to-deploy-on-windows-server#295705^0|3|7|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

I agree with <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/295624/best-free-web-framework-to-deploy-on-windows-server#295705">Stephen</a>, seems a bit strange to blame licensing costs for not using ASP.NET especially when you're going to be using Windows to host? Admittedly VS 2008 Pro isn't cheap, but it hardly breaks the bank either. The new 2008 Express editions of VS are free and I have to say aren't half bad.

blocks|key|3252270|text|我怀疑在Windows上加载Smalltalk+Squeak非常容易，所以我会认真考虑使用Seaside。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|3252271|另一种选择是查看ActivePerl+for+Windows，然后您可以使用任何免费的Perl+web框架，如Catalyst或Jifty。|3252272|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.squeak.org/|1|http://www.seaside.st/|2|http://www.activestate.com/activeperl/|3|http://www.catalystframework.org/|4|http://jifty.org/^0|O|6|0|19|7|1|0|8|A|2|1J|8|3|1S|5|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]|$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@$A|13|B|14|1|15]|$A|16|B|17|1|18]|$A|19|B|1A|1|1B]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]|R|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|S]]|T|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|U]]]]

I suspect loading Smalltalk <a href="http://www.squeak.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Squeak</a> is very easy on Windows so I would seriously consider using <a href="http://www.seaside.st/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Seaside</a> as an option.

Another option is to look at <a href="http://www.activestate.com/activeperl/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ActivePerl</a> for Windows and then you can use any of the free Perl web frameworks like <a href="http://www.catalystframework.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Catalyst</a> or <a href="http://jifty.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Jifty</a>.

If you are starting to develop a new web application from scratch and the only two requirements you have is that it will be deployed to Windows 2008 Server and that standard ASP.NET incl. VS2008 doesn't cut it (doesn't matter why, let's say it's the license cost, you won't be hosting Windows 2008 Server yourself). Which web framework would you choose under this circumstances?

Best free web framework to deploy on Windows Server?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

如果您正在从头开始开发一个新的web应用程序，并且您仅有的两个要求是将其部署到Windows2008Server和包含的标准ASP.NET。VS2008没有削减它(原因并不重要，假设是许可证成本，你不会自己托管Windows2008Server)。在这种情况下，您会选择哪种web框架？

问在Windows Server上部署的最好的免费web框架？
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问在Windows Server上部署的最好的免费web框架？EN