blocks|key|605724|text|匈牙利符号现在通常是不受欢迎的，但是当您有保存相同数据的用户控件和数据实体时，为用户控件添加前缀可能会很有用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|605725|我给所有用户控件加上前缀ux。我过去经常使用lblLabel，txtTextbox，但是如果你把它们换成另一个，会带来很多痛苦。|605726|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Hungarian notation is generally frowned upon now, however when you have user controls and data entities that hold the same data, it can be useful to prefix the user controls.

I prefix all user controls with ux. I used to go with lblLabel, txtTextbox, but if you ever change one to another, it causes a lot of pain.

blocks|key|3827161|text|这个问题在这里以许多不同的形式被问到，但并不是专门关于web控件的。然而，普遍的智慧仍然存在：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3827162|只要你始终如一地使用它，选择什么都无关紧要。|3827163|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

This question has been asked in many different forms here on SO but not specifically about web controls. Yet the common wisdom remains:

<blockquote>
 It doesn't matter what you choose as long as you use it consistently.
</blockquote>

blocks|key|1169752|text|为了用户体验，我给所有的UI元素加上了前缀"ux“。与txt、lbl等相比，我更喜欢它，因为它使更改控件类型变得很容易。就ReSharper而言，我在ASP.NET中工作时关闭了命名约定检查。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1169753|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I prefix all my UI elements with "ux" for user experience. I prefer this to txt, lbl, etc. because it makes it easy to change the control type. As far as ReSharper goes, I turned off that naming convention check while working in ASP.NET.

blocks|key|3827260|text|您可以自定义ReSharper以打开/关闭或向其添加您自己的规则。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3827261|另一方面，对我来说，这并不重要，重要的是一致性。我的意思是，如果你想采取一种方法，比如给你的UI元素加上前缀"Privates“，那么你可以在整个网站上使用它。|3827262|这是您的选择，您的策略:)|3827263|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

You can customize ReSharper to turn on/off or add your own rules to it.

On the other side, for me it does not really matter, what matter is consistency. What I mean is if you want to take a method like prefixing your UI elements "Privates" then follow it all over the site.

It is your choice, your strategy :)

blocks|key|1169922|text|ReSharper+4.5允许您为每种实体添加多种命名样式。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1169923|所以，就像你可以添加一个前缀为"_“的UpperCamelCase，你也可以指定一个前缀为txt，lbl，cbo等的前缀。然而，这样做有点费力，而且不允许你将每个前缀限制为特定类型的web控件。|1169924|我猜这是ReSharper团队还没有解决的一件事，当然他们在documentation中没有提到这样的功能。|offset|length|1169925|编辑|1169926|目前肯定不支持-+http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/281015|1169927|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/features/coding_assistance.html#Extended_Naming_Style_Configuration|1|http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/281015^0|0|0|U|D|0|0|0|9|19|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$F|Y|G|Z|1|10]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@$F|13|G|14|1|15]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|U]]]]

ReSharper 4.5 allows you to add multiple naming styles for each kind of entity.

So, just as you can add one that specifies UpperCamelCase with a prefix of "_" you can specify the same with a prefix of txt, lbl, cbo, etc. This is, however, kind of laborious and doesn't allow you to restrict each prefix to a specific type of web control.

I guess that this is one thing that the ReSharper team have not yet addressed, certainly they don't mention such features in their <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/resharper/features/coding_assistance.html#Extended_Naming_Style_Configuration" rel="nofollow noreferrer">documentation</a>.

<h2>Edit</h2>

Definitely not currently supported - <a href="http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/281015" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.jetbrains.net/devnet/thread/281015</a>

blocks|key|4670286|text|您可以强制ReSharper全局或专门针对C#或VB询问事件名称。请查看我在以下帖子中的答案：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4670287|ReSharper+conventions+for+names+of+event+handlers|offset|length|4670288|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2994774/resharper-conventions-for-names-of-event-handlers^0|0|0|1D|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@$D|P|E|Q|1|R]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|M]]]]

You can force ReSharper to interrogate event names globally or specifically for C# or VB. Check out my answer in the following post:

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2994774/resharper-conventions-for-names-of-event-handlers">ReSharper conventions for names of event handlers</a>

Recenty I installed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReSharper" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ReSharper</a> 4.5. It has a cool new feature of checking naming conventions, but with this there has been lots of warning messages popping up in my aspx file suggesting to prefix all web control name with "_" as it is member field. What naming conventions do you prefer for web controls and do you prefix a control name with "_"

Web control naming convention and ReSharper

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

最近我安装了 4.5。它有一个很酷的新功能，可以检查命名约定，但是在我的aspx文件中出现了很多警告消息，建议给所有的web控件名称加上前缀"_“，因为它是成员字段。对于web控件，您更喜欢什么命名约定?您是否在控件名称前加上"_“

问Web控件命名约定和ReSharper
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Web控件命名约定和ReSharperEN