blocks|key|4045771|text|Boost通常是一个很好的选择，并且它包含一个测试框架Boost+Test+Library。我在一些小的测试用例中使用过它，它做了我所期望的事情，但是我还没有像在TTD中那样广泛地使用它。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4045772|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/|1|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html^0|0|5|0|R|I|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

<a href="http://www.boost.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost</a> is usually a good choice, and it contains a testing framework, the <a href="http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/libs/test/doc/html/index.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost Test Library</a>. I have used it for small test cases and it did what I expected, but I haven't used it extensively like in TTD.

blocks|key|4890878|text|这似乎也是一个相同的问题：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4890879|Unit+testing+in+C%2B%2B，它实际上是c%2B%2B，尽管标题是URL。|offset|length|4890880|从那里，他们链接到另外两个问题，这应该会有所帮助：|4890881|Unit+testing+for+C%2B%2B+code+-+Tools+and+methodology+C%2B%2B+unit+testing+framework|4890882|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/387272/unit-testing-in-c|1|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/91384/unit-testing-for-c-code-tools-and-methodology|2|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/87794/c-unit-testing-framework^0|0|0|J|0|0|0|0|1D|1|1E|Q|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$D|X|E|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@$D|12|E|13|1|14]|$D|15|E|16|1|17]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]|R|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|S]]|T|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|U]]]]

This seems too be the same question as:

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/387272/unit-testing-in-c">Unit testing in C++</a> which is actually c++ despite the URL title.

From there, they link to two more SO questions which should help:

<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/91384/unit-testing-for-c-code-tools-and-methodology">Unit testing for C++ code - Tools and methodology</a>
<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/87794/c-unit-testing-framework">C++ unit testing framework</a>

blocks|key|827708|text|测试框架的"xUnit“系列通常是相当可靠的(jUnit、NUnit等)。我自己没有用过它，但是有一个用于C%2B%2B的jUnit端口：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|827709|http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit|offset|length|827710|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|13|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

The "xUnit" family of testing frameworks is usually pretty solid (jUnit, NUnit, etc.). I haven't used it myself, but there is a port of jUnit for C++:

<a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sourceforge.net/projects/cppunit</a>

blocks|key|1277498|text|通常使用Boost，但是如果你使用Qt，他们的QtTestLib可能是更好的选择。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1277499|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/test/doc/html/intro.html|1|http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qttestlib/qtest-overview.html^0|4|5|0|N|9|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]|$A|R|B|S|1|T]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]]]

Usually use <a href="http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/test/doc/html/intro.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Boost</a>, but if you are using Qt, their <a href="http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qttestlib/qtest-overview.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">QtTestLib</a> might be the better choice.

blocks|key|827806|text|维基百科上有一个table+comparing+all+(?)+the+C%2B%2B+unit+test+frameworks。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|827807|还有一个旧的comparison+of+C%2B%2B+unit+test+frameworks可用。我不认为它没有更新，所以我提到它作为补充，因为它比表格更具争议性。它涵盖了，CppUnit，CppUnitLite，Boost.Test，NanoCppUnit，Unit%2B%2B，CxxTest，特别是不包括Google+C%2B%2B+framework。|827808|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B|1|http://gamesfromwithin.com/?p=29|2|http://code.google.com/p/googletest^0|8|1G|0|0|6|12|1|45|K|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]|$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]]]

There is a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unit_testing_frameworks#C.2B.2B" rel="nofollow noreferrer">table comparing all (?) the C++ unit test frameworks</a> available from wikipedia.

There also is an old <a href="http://gamesfromwithin.com/?p=29" rel="nofollow noreferrer">comparison of C++ unit test frameworks</a> available. I do not think it has not been updated so I mention it as a complement as it's more argumented than the table. It covers, CppUnit, CppUnitLite, Boost.Test, NanoCppUnit, Unit++, CxxTest, especially it does not cover <a href="http://code.google.com/p/googletest" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Google C++ framework</a>.

blocks|key|4045966|text|我推荐doctest+(由我创建)--它是所有流行测试框架中编译时间最少的。它也是当前使用最多的框架Catch的直接竞争对手-检查FAQ中的差异|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|4045967|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://github.com/onqtam/doctest|1|https://github.com/philsquared/Catch|2|https://github.com/onqtam/doctest/blob/master/doc/markdown/faq.md#how-is-doctest-different-from-catch^0|3|7|0|1E|5|1|1T|3|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$A|Q|B|R|1|S]|$A|T|B|U|1|V]|$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]|L|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|M]]|N|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|O]]]]

I would recommend <a href="https://github.com/onqtam/doctest">doctest</a> (created by me) - it's the lightest on compile times from all the popular testing frameworks. It is also a direct competitor to <a href="https://github.com/philsquared/Catch">Catch</a> which is currently the most used framework - checkout the differences in the <a href="https://github.com/onqtam/doctest/blob/master/doc/markdown/faq.md#how-is-doctest-different-from-catch">FAQ</a>

blocks|key|4891088|text|如果你想在不知道如何构建一个库的情况下快速上手，有一个头文件include+solution，它支持fixtures+(设置和拆卸)，通常的CHECK_TRUE测试()+{}，等等。它还具有内存泄漏检测和性能测试功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4891089|https://gitlab.com/cppocl/unit_test_framework|offset|length|4891090|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|19|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$D|O|E|P|1|Q]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|A|$L|C]]]]

If you want to get off the ground quickly without figuring out how to build a library, there is a single header file include solution, which supports fixtures (setup and teardown), the usual TEST() {} with CHECK_TRUE, etc.
It also has memory leak detection and performance testing capabilities.

<a href="https://gitlab.com/cppocl/unit_test_framework" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://gitlab.com/cppocl/unit_test_framework</a>

I've been reading a lot about Unit tests and Test Driven developemnt.

Recently, I also read java unit test code.

I however, prefer to develop in Qt. So I googled up "unit testing in c++" and found a host of information about various unit testing frameworks available for C++.

However, I could not find a reliable comparison of the the various frameworks.

So I look to the SO community to guide me through the selection of what may the "best" unit testing framework for c++.

Also, if anybody had specific comments regarding TDD in Qt (especially using Qt-Creator), then they are more than welcome.

Unit testing in C++

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我读了很多关于单元测试和测试驱动开发的内容。最近，我也阅读了java单元测试代码。然而，我更喜欢在Qt中开发。因此，我在谷歌上搜索了“C++中的单元测试”，找到了大量关于C++可用的各种单元测试框架的信息。然而，我找不到各种框架的可靠比较。因此，我希望So社区能够指导我为c++选择“最好的”单元测试框架。此外，如果任何...

问C++中的单元测试
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问C++中的单元测试EN