blocks|key|31879|text|绝对是PEP+8，Python的风格指南。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|31880|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/^0|3|5|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Definitely <a href="http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/" rel="noreferrer">PEP 8</a>, a Style Guide for Python.

blocks|key|1583450|text|尽管Python非常直观，但很多人并不理解他的哲学。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1583451|1583452|+Pep+20：The+Zen+of+Python|blockquote|offset|length|style|BOLD|1583453|1583454|1583455|美丽胜过丑陋。显式比implicit.|1583456|Simple更好比complex.|unordered-list-item|1583457|
|1583458|Complex更好比complicated.|1583459|1583460|Flat比nested.|1583461|1583462|Sparse更好dense.|1583463|1583464|Readability+counts.|1583465|1583466|Special案例不够特殊，不足以打破rules.|1583467|1583468|Although的实用性purity.|1583469|1583470|Errors永远不应该通过silently.|1583471|1583472|Unless显式沉默。|1583473|1583474|面对歧义，拒绝猜测的诱惑。|1583475|1583476|应该有1，最好只有一种--显而易见的方法。|1583477|1583478|，尽管这种方式一开始可能不明显，除非你是荷兰人。|1583479|1583480|now比never.|1583481|1583482|Although更好，通常不会比现在更好。|1583483|1583484|如果实现很难解释，那就不是一个好主意。|1583485|
<代码>H140如果实现很容易解释，这可能是一个很好的idea.|1583486|Namespaces是一个非常棒的想法--让我们做更多的事情吧！|1583487|1583488|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/^0|0|0|8|H|1|6|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|2A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|2B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|2C|8|@$F|2D|G|2E|H|I]]|9|@$F|2F|G|2G|1|2H]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|2I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|2J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|2K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|P|7|2L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|2M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|P|7|2N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|R|5|6|7|2O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|V|3|W|5|P|7|2P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|X|3|R|5|6|7|2Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Y|3|Z|5|P|7|2R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|10|3|R|5|6|7|2S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|11|3|12|5|P|7|2T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|13|3|R|5|6|7|2U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|14|3|15|5|P|7|2V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|16|3|R|5|6|7|2W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|17|3|18|5|P|7|2X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|19|3|R|5|6|7|2Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1A|3|1B|5|P|7|2Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1C|3|R|5|6|7|30|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1D|3|1E|5|P|7|31|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1F|3|R|5|6|7|32|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1G|3|1H|5|P|7|33|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1I|3|R|5|6|7|34|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1J|3|1K|5|P|7|35|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1L|3|R|5|6|7|36|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1M|3|1N|5|P|7|37|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1O|3|R|5|6|7|38|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1P|3|1Q|5|P|7|39|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1R|3|R|5|6|7|3A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1S|3|1T|5|P|7|3B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1U|3|R|5|6|7|3C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1V|3|1W|5|P|7|3D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1X|3|1Y|5|6|7|3E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|1Z|3|20|5|P|7|3F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|21|3|-4|5|6|7|3G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|22|3|-4|5|6|7|3H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|23|$24|$5|25|26|27|A|$28|29]]]]

Although Python is incredibly intuitive, a lot of people do not comprehend his philosophy.

<blockquote>
 <a href="http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/" rel="noreferrer">Pep 20</a>: The Zen of Python
 
 <ul>
 <li>Beautiful is better than ugly.</li>
 <li>Explicit is better than implicit.</li>
 <li>Simple is better than complex.</li>
 <li>Complex is better than complicated.</li>
 <li>Flat is better than nested.</li>
 <li>Sparse is better than dense.</li>
 <li>Readability counts.</li>
 <li>Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.</li>
 <li>Although practicality beats purity.</li>
 <li>Errors should never pass silently.</li>
 <li>Unless explicitly silenced.</li>
 <li>In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.</li>
 <li>There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do
 it.</li>
 <li>Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.</li>
 <li>Now is better than never.</li>
 <li>Although never is often better than right now.</li>
 <li>If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.</li>
 <li>If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.</li>
 <li>Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!</li>
 </ul>
</blockquote>

blocks|key|31989|text|另请参阅pep+0257文档字符串约定|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|31990|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/^0|8|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Also pep <a href="http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/" rel="noreferrer">0257</a> docstring convention

blocks|key|1580924|text|它现在是回顾，但仍然很有趣:我认为Things+that+will+Not+Change+in+Python+3000是一本很好的读物，有很多链接到决策之前的讨论。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1580925|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3099/^0|H|16|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

It is now retrospective, but still interesting: I think <a href="http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3099/" rel="noreferrer">Things that will Not Change in Python 3000</a> is a good read, with lots of links to the discussions that preceded the decisions.

blocks|key|1436257|text|我发现阅读那些被拒绝的文章可以很好地洞察哪些是Pythonic的，哪些不是，这是一段时间之前的事了，所以我没有任何具体的例子。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1436258|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I found that reading the declined ones can give some good insights into what's Pythonic and what isn't.
This was a while ago so I don't have any specific examples.

blocks|key|281781|text|这是PEP+-+http://www.python.org/dev/peps/的索引|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|281782|当人们对一个主题有疑问时，他们可以在这个主题中进行搜索|281783|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.python.org/dev/peps/^0|8|V|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Here is a index of PEP - <a href="http://www.python.org/dev/peps/" rel="nofollow">http://www.python.org/dev/peps/</a> 

when ever one has doubt about a topic, they can search in that

blocks|key|1436389|text|我也推荐PEPs+8和257。我知道这稍微偏离了最初的问题，但我想指出的是，PyCharm+(在我看来可能是最好的Python+IDE+)会自动检查你是否遵循了一些最重要的PEP8指南，以防有人感兴趣……|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1436390|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I'd also recommend PEPs 8 and 257. I know this deviates slightly from the original question, but I'd like to point out that PyCharm (probably the best Python IDE around in my opinion) automatically checks if you're following some of the most important PEP 8 guidelines, just in case anyone's interested...

I'm a fairly strong Python coder, but too much of my style is a little haphazard, and I'm sure there are more Pythonic solutions to many problems than the ones I come up with. Which PEPs are essential for any well versed Pythonista to read?

Which PEP's are must reads?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我是一个相当强大的Python程序员，但我的风格有点随意，我相信有更多的Python解决方案来解决许多问题。对于任何精通Pythonista的人来说，哪些PEP是必不可少的？

问哪些PEP是必须阅读的？
EN

回答 7

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问哪些PEP是必须阅读的？EN

回答 7

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问哪些PEP是必须阅读的？
EN