blocks|key|1285|text|不幸的是，UI测试通常不是很可靠。必须使用XPath，因为没有在页面上的元素上设置ID。不得不使用框架(我讨厌框架，很高兴它在HTML5中被弃用了)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1286|不幸的是，这是野兽的本性，我发现Selenium的一个主要问题是，人们从Selenium+IDE开始，它试图记录您所做的一切，但它只能做这么多事情，从而使测试不可靠。Selenium是我在浏览器中首选的UI测试工具。|1287|记录/重放工具应该被称为记录/调整/重放，这样它就可以正确地处理测试。|1288|为Selenium+RC或WebDriver编写测试(它们目前正在合并以创建Selenium+2)允许您处理您可能在Selenium+IDE中看到的问题。它使你可以使用Java、Python、C#等编程语言来编写测试。因为你可以在你的测试中添加条件。|1289|我让较少的技术人员使用Selenium的方法是创建一个供他们使用的DSL，以便在编写测试时使其成为一种更自然的语言。|1290|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XPath|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5|2|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language^0|L|5|0|1R|5|1|0|0|0|0|X|3|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$A|Y|B|Z|1|10]|$A|11|B|12|1|13]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@$A|18|B|19|1|1A]]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|U]]|V|$5|O|P|Q|C|$R|W]]]]

Unfortunately, UI testing is not very reliable in general. Having to use <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XPath" rel="nofollow noreferrer">XPath</a>, because IDs aren't set on elements on the page. Having to use frames (I hate frames and glad its being deprecated in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTML5" rel="nofollow noreferrer">HTML5</a>).

It's the nature of the beast unfortunately and a major issue I find with Selenium, which is my prefered UI testing tool for browsers, is that people start on the Selenium IDE which tries to record everything you do, but it can only do so much making tests unreliable.

Record/Replay tools should be called Record/Tweak/Replay, so that it can handle tests correctly.

Writing your tests for Selenium RC or WebDriver (these are currently being merged to create Selenium 2) allows you to handle the issues that you may see in Selenium IDE. It makes you write tests using programming languages like Java, Python, C# and many more. Since you can add conditionals to your tests.

The way that I have got less technical people to use Selenium is to create a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain-specific_language" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DSL</a> for them to use, so that it is a more natural language when writing tests.

blocks|key|966098|text|看看Sahi吧。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|966099|966100|它不需要等待Ajax或页面加载。|ordered-list-item|966101|它不使用XPaths，而是使用DOM关系(_near，_in)。|966102|它遍历框架/iframe记录器适用于框架、iframe和弹出窗口|966103|它可以很好地处理自动生成的It|966104|几乎所有浏览器和操作系统都可以使用该记录器和回放功能。|966105|它不使用特殊权限运行测试。|966106|966107|在过去的一年里，Sahi已经发布了七个公共版本，论坛上的支持很迅速。|966108|免责声明:我是Sahi的作者。|966109|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://sahi.co.in/|1|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajax_%2528programming%2529|2|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Object_Model^0|2|4|0|0|0|6|4|1|0|F|3|2|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@$A|19|B|1A|1|1B]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|G|7|1D|8|@]|9|@$A|1E|B|1F|1|1G]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|G|7|1H|8|@]|9|@$A|1I|B|1J|1|1K]]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|G|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|G|7|1M|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|G|7|1N|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|G|7|1O|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|1P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|S|3|T|5|6|7|1Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|1R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|W|3|-4|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|X|$Y|$5|Z|10|11|C|$12|13]]|14|$5|Z|10|11|C|$12|15]]|16|$5|Z|10|11|C|$12|17]]]]

Have a look at <a href="http://sahi.co.in" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Sahi</a>.

<ol>
<li>It does not need to wait for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajax_%28programming%29" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Ajax</a> or page loads.</li>
<li>It does not use XPaths, using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Document_Object_Model" rel="nofollow noreferrer">DOM</a> relations (_near, _in) instead.</li>
<li>It traverses frames/iframes automatically</li>
<li>The recorder works for frames, iframes, and popup windows</li>
<li>It handles auto generated IDs well</li>
<li>The recorder and playback works on almost all browsers and operating systems.</li>
<li>It does not use special privileges to run tests.</li>
</ol>

Over the last year, Sahi has had seven public releases and the support is prompt on the forums.

Disclaimer: I am the author of Sahi.

blocks|key|2375102|text|不是使用selenium.waitForPageToLoad("30000");，而是像这样使用|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|2375103|超时(+|2375104|+selenium.waitForPageToLoad)；|blockquote|2375105|2375106|2375107|并且不要忘记使用settimeout选项设置超时|2375108|超时(+|2375109|+selenium.setTimeout)；|2375110|2375111|2375112|我也面临着与超时相同的问题。设置超时后，一切运行正常。|2375113|entityMap^0|4|10|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Y|8|@$9|Z|A|10|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|11|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|J|7|12|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|15|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|16|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|J|7|17|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|T|3|-4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|1A|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|W|3|-4|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|X|$]]

Instead of using <code>selenium.waitForPageToLoad("30000");</code> use like this 

<blockquote>
 selenium.waitForPageToLoad(Timeout);
</blockquote>

and don't forget to set the timeout using settimeout option

<blockquote>
 selenium.setTimeout(Timeout);
</blockquote>

I too faced the same issues with the timeout. After setting the timeout, things worked well.

I'm currently using <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selenium_%28software%29" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Selenium</a> for testing our web application's interface. However, it isn't very reliable (it's hard to set a good waiting timeout, absolutely a nightmare to work with in any webpages involving frames) and lacks many features (popups/downloads).

I took a look at <a href="http://sikuli.csail.mit.edu/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://sikuli.csail.mit.edu/</a> and quite like it, but again, it isn't very reliable as in very often it fails to identify the correct buttons/links.

What is a good approach for testing web applications?

PS: I'm after the ones that would allow for testing even if the tester has ZERO knowledge about the internal of the codes (not even the method signatures).

Reliable web application GUI testing

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我目前正在使用来测试我们的web应用程序的界面。然而，它不是很可靠(很难设置一个好的等待超时，在任何涉及框架的网页中处理起来绝对是一场噩梦)，并且缺乏许多功能(弹出/下载)。我看了一下，非常喜欢它，但它又不是很可靠，因为它经常无法识别正确的按钮/链接。测试web应用程序的好方法是什么？PS:我追求的是那些允许测试的代码...

问可靠的web应用程序GUI测试
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问可靠的web应用程序GUI测试EN