blocks|key|2658114|text|如果您使用工作项，并且对将源代码更改与这些工作项相关联感兴趣，那么TFS可能会很好。否则，在客户那里使用它几周(不使用工作项)会让我想要回到subversion。合并UI不是很好(礼貌地说)，VS插件总是希望联系TFS服务器以检查您正在使用的文件的任何更改，存在冲突的错误警告……|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2658115|请注意，我是一个经常为微软辩护的人，反对Java/PHP的家伙，所以我写这篇文章很奇怪……|2658116|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

TFS can be good if you use work items and are interested in associating source changes with these work items. Otherwise, using it for a couple of weeks at a customer (that was not using work items) just made me want to run back to subversion. 
Merging UI is not very good (to be polite), the VS plug-in always wants to contact the TFS server to check for any changes of the files you're using, there are false warnings of conflicts...

Note that I am the guy that usually defends Microsoft against the Java/PHP guys, so it is very strange for me to write this...

blocks|key|1248660|text|Professional和Team+System之间的主要区别是Team+Foundation+Server。Team+Foundation+Server是对Visual+SourceSafe的大规模检修/替换。但TFS还为您提供了其他功能，如工作项跟踪和管理整个开发生命周期的其他功能。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1248661|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

The major difference between Professional &amp; Team System is Team Foundation Server. Team Foundation Server is the massive overhaul/replacement of Visual SourceSafe. But TFS also gives you other functionality such as work item tracking and other features to manage the complete development life cycle.

blocks|key|1248706|text|Team+system，即使没有team+foundation+server，也具有代码分析功能和代码的度量标准，这些功能和度量实际上可以量化代码的可维护性。对于项目经理来说，当试图找出谁在代码上做得很好时，这是天堂，而对于开发人员来说，这给了他关于在哪里改进代码的铁一般的事实。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1248707|话虽如此，我认为Team+Foundation+Server对于一个6人的团队来说可能有些过头了，除非你正在构建一个非常大的系统。|1248708|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Team system, even without team foundation server has code analysis capabilities and metrics for your code that actually quantifies how maintainable it is. For a project manager this is nirvana when trying to find out who does a great job on their code and for a developer it gives him hard facts about where to improve his code.

That being said I think Team Foundation Server might be overkill for a team of 6 people except if you are building an extremely large system.

blocks|key|142881|text|嘿，感谢所有人到目前为止的答案！我以前从来没有在团队/协作环境中工作过，所以这对我来说有点陌生。我们正在获取"Microsoft+Visual+Studio2008专业版与MSDN+Premium订阅“。我知道这个包在2010年3月22日更新到了"Visual+Studio2010+Premium+with+MSDN“。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|142882|我是否仍然可以使用此软件包来利用协作工作？这2970美元的额外成本值得吗？|142883|EDIT：我们正在申请Empower+for+ISV订阅。我们主要致力于SaaS/RIA解决方案。我是否正确理解了术语“工作项”--也就是说，如果我想让开发人员1使用XHTML/CSS，开发人员2使用某个功能模块，开发人员3使用另一个功能模块--这些都被认为是可以通过VSTS轻松跟踪的工作项？|offset|length|style|BOLD|142884|entityMap^0|0|0|0|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@$F|O|G|P|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

Hey, thanks to all for the answers so far! I have never worked in a team/collaborative environment before, so this is a tad bit new to me. We are in the midst of acquiring a "Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 Professional Edition with MSDN Premium subscription". I know that this package gets updated to "Visual Studio 2010 Premium with MSDN" on March 22 2010.

Will I still be able to leverage collaborative efforts using this package? Is it worth the $2970 additional cost?

EDIT: We are applying for the Empower for ISVs subscription. We work mainly on SaaS/RIA solutions. Am I understanding the term "Work Item" correctly - that is if I wish to task Developer 1 with say XHTML/CSS, Developer 2 with a certain functional module, and Developer 3 with another functional module - each of these is considered a work item that can be easily tracked with VSTS?

blocks|key|142912|text|如果您对Subversion或不同的版本控制管理器感到满意，您不介意使用Nunit+(或其他单元测试工具)，并且您熟悉或可以找到开源(或收费)代码度量工具，并且您有bug跟踪器，您可以在许可上节省相当多的钱。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|142913|我使用过很多Team+System，在一些客户机上，我只使用了Pro版本。虽然TS提供的一些集成很巧妙，但我太习惯于nUnit和Subversion，以至于在TS中工作时，我有时会怀念它们。|142914|现在，在2010年，旗舰版确实提供了一些很棒的UML图表和代码分析工具，我在较低版本中将会错过这些工具。|142915|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

If you are comfortable with Subversion or a different version control manager, 
you are dont mind using Nunit (or alternative unit test tool) and you are
familiar with or can find the open source (or fee based) code metric tools, 
and you have bug tracker in place you can save quite a bit of money on the licensing. 

I have worked a lot with Team System, and at some clients, just the Pro Version.
While some of the integration TS offers is slick, I am so used to nUnit and
Subversion that I actually miss them at times when working in TS.

Now in 2010, the Ultimate edition does offer some great UML diagramming and code analysis
tools that I will miss in lower versions.

blocks|key|2658381|text|对于每个组织来说，TFS都是一个很棒的源代码控制工具。比Visual+Source+Safe要先进得多。它还具有类似于Rational软件的工作项管理(用于任务)。我们已经使用它很多年了，而且不仅仅是用于.Net语言。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2658382|对于Team+System版本，您已经有了一个团队资源管理器，您的用户可以在其中访问源代码管理。此外，Team+System由不同的子产品组成，这些子产品针对特定的工作功能，例如Team+System+for+Development+Edition+(面向开发人员)、Team+System+database+Edition+(面向数据库架构师)、Team+System+Architect+Edition+(面向System+Architect)和Team+System+Test+Edition+(面向测试人员)。所有这些子版本都包含在Team+Suite版本中。|2658383|对于专业版，如果机器上安装了团队资源管理器，那么它也会对TFS源代码控制系统带来好处。|2658384|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

TFS is a great source control tool for every organization. And is much advance than Visual Source Safe. It also has work item management (for tasks) simmilar to Rational software. We are using it for years and not just for .Net languages. 

With the Team System version you already have a Team Explorer wherein your users can access the source control. Also Team System consists of different sub products that targets specific job functions such as Team System for Development Edition (For developers), Team System Database Edition (For database architect), Team System Architect Edition (For System Architect), and Team System Test Edition (For testers). All those subversions are included on the Team Suite edition.

For the Professional version it could also benefit to the TFS source control system if the machine is installed with Team Explorer.

Ok, I know this isnt a programming question, but I think its really important to understand the differences to be a more productive developer...so please don't close this question!! And yes, I do feel stupid for asking this question! Have only ever worked with the Prof edition of VS 2005/2008. 

Now that we have a team of 6 people, I would like to what benefits Team System would offer us over 6 licenses of VS Professional? Also, what advantages does Team Foundation Server offer?

Visual Studio 2008/2010 - Professional vs Team System

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

好的，我知道这不是一个编程问题，但我认为理解其中的区别是非常重要的，这样才能使developer...so更高效。请不要结束这个问题！！是的，我确实觉得问这个问题很愚蠢！只与VS 2005/2008的教授版合作过。现在我们有了一个6人的团队，我想知道team System会为我们提供超过6个VS Professiona...

问Visual Studio 2008/2010 -专业版vs Team System
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Visual Studio 2008/2010 -专业版vs Team SystemEN