blocks|key|2674169|text|敏捷/XP将是最好的选择。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2674170|在我看来，瀑布是最糟糕的选择。|2674171|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Agile/XP would be best.

Waterfall would be the worst choice in my opinion.

blocks|key|2674273|text|除了瀑布之外的任何东西。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2674274|但请记住，说你很敏捷和真正的敏捷是两码事。|2674275|为了让敏捷在更长的时间内真正发挥作用，人们还必须做好几件技术上的事情。|2674276|http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2010/02/20/nice-process-but-what-about-the-engineering-bits.aspx|offset|length|2674277|http://davybrion.com/blog/2010/02/youll-never-get-sustainable-progress-for-free/|2674278|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|1^0|0|0|0|0|2N|0|0|0|28|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$H|X|I|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@$H|11|I|12|1|13]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|G]]|S|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|K]]]]

Anything but waterfall....

But keep in mind that saying you are agile and being really agile are two different things.

For agile to really work over an extended period one has to also be doing several technical things well.

<a href="http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2010/02/20/nice-process-but-what-about-the-engineering-bits.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2010/02/20/nice-process-but-what-about-the-engineering-bits.aspx</a>

<a href="http://davybrion.com/blog/2010/02/youll-never-get-sustainable-progress-for-free/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://davybrion.com/blog/2010/02/youll-never-get-sustainable-progress-for-free/</a>

blocks|key|151590|text|这取决于客户是谁。如果你是你自己的客户，那么一定要敏捷。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|151591|如果您不是自己的客户，那么您将不得不与您的客户就您的开发方法进行协商。如果你的客户想要一个固定的投标项目和一个硬的截止日期，那么瀑布方法将是你最好的选择。|151592|如果你的客户愿意成为开发过程的积极参与者，并且没有硬性的截止日期和固定的预算，那么你可以选择Agile/XP。|151593|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

It depends on who the customer is. If you are your own customer, then definately Agile.

If your aren't your own customer then you will have to negotiate with your customer on your development method. If your customer wants a fixed bid project and a hard deadline, then you will be best served by the waterfall method.

If your customer is willing to be an active participant in the development process and doesn't have a hard deadline and fixed budget then you could do Agile/XP.

blocks|key|2674355|text|它总是取决于你正在开发的网站的类型，你有多少开发人员，什么是时间表，对交付时间的期望。但毫无疑问，敏捷或原型迭代方法将很好地适用于网站开发。在不同阶段完成开发，并在夹头中增强，作为识别强弱区域时的一种方法。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2674356|此外，您还可以检查目标受众、站点的最大使用部分等因素，并优先考虑这些部分的开发。|2674357|始终考虑使用标准框架，这将使未来的开发工作变得更容易。|2674358|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

It always depends on the type of the website you are developing, how many developers you got, what is the timeline, expectation for delivery time. But definitely Agile or prototype-iterative method will work fine for website development. To complete the development in different phases, and enhancing in the chucks, as an when identifying the strong and weak areas. 

As well you can check the factors like target audience, maximum used sectors of the site and prioritize the development of those pieces first. 

Always consider to go with standard framework, that will make life easier in long run with the future developments.

blocks|key|2674427|text|我发现瀑布非常适合一些网站的项目。获取需求，线框图设计，做图形设计，将图形设计转换为HTML/CSS/JS，然后填写网站的内容。客户在每个阶段都会签收。如果站点很大，那么最后一个阶段(“填写内容”)可能比前面所有阶段的工作都多，您将希望使用迭代方法，而不是瀑布。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|2674428|瀑布往往不太适合web+应用程序。这些都是软件，就像对待它们一样。|2674429|entityMap^0|B|3|0|C|4|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@$9|K|A|L|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@$9|N|A|O|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|I|$]]

I find that waterfall fits some web site projects fairly well. Get the requirements, wireframe a design, do the graphic design, convert the graphic designs to HTML/CSS/JS, then fill out the content of the site. Client signs off at each stage. If the site is large the last stage ("fill out content") is probably more work than all the preceding ones and you'll want to use iterative methodologies for it, not waterfall.

Waterfall tends to not fit web applications very well. Those are software, treat them as such.

blocks|key|897161|text|使用瀑布！但是：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|897162|897163|将项目工期设置为1个月。|ordered-list-item|897164|然后重复此项目，直到客户满意为止！|897165|897166|entityMap^0|0|8|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|O|8|@$9|P|A|Q|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|I|7|S|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|I|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|N|$]]

Use waterfall! But: 

<ol>
<li>Set duration of the project to 1 month.</li>
<li>Then repeat this project until customer is happy!</li>
</ol>

Which is a good Project Managment Method to Develop a Website?
XP? The Waterfall Model?

Which Development Method use for a Website Development?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

什么是开发网站的好的项目管理方法？XP？瀑布模型？

问网站开发使用哪种开发方法？
EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问网站开发使用哪种开发方法？EN

回答 6

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问网站开发使用哪种开发方法？
EN