我正在构建一个与Emacs通信的程序,我面临的挑战之一就是编写Emacs的进程过滤器函数。它的输入字符串是一系列要计算的s表达式。下面是一个示例:
(gimme-append-to-buffer "25 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Scene 2. Prelude - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "26 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Cybele: 'Je Veux Joindre' - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "27 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Scene 3. Cybele: 'Tu T'Etonnes, Melisse' - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "28 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Cybele: 'Que Les Plus Doux Zephyrs'. Scene 4. - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "29 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Entree Des Nations - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "30 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Entree Des Zephyrs - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "31 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Choeur Des Nations' 'Que Devant Vous' - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "32 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Atys: 'Indigne Que Je Suis' - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "33 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Florissants - Reprise Du Choeur Des Nations : 'Que Devant Nous' - Les Arts Florissants\n")
(gimme-append-to-buffer "34 - William Christie dir, Les Arts Flor*emphasized text*issants - Reprise De L'Air Des Zephyrs - Les Arts Florissants\n")我遇到的第一个问题是,当函数被调用时,字符串不知何故没有完全形成,所以编写像(mapcar 'eval (format "(%s)" input-string))这样的东西将不起作用。
为了处理第一个问题,我使用了一个循环。我写的完整函数是:
(defun eval-all-sexps (s)
(loop for x = (ignore-errors (read-from-string s))
then (ignore-errors (read-from-string (substring s position)))
while x
summing (or (cdr x) 0) into position
doing (eval (car x))))现在出现的第二个问题是,函数被调用了两次,输入有点大,第一次是有效但不完整的内容,然后是看起来像是剩余数据的片段。
为了解决这个问题,我正在考虑使用垃圾变量来保存循环的剩余部分,然后将其连接到下一个调用的输入,但我想知道你们是否有任何其他建议来更优雅地处理这样的问题。
谢谢!
发布于 2010-05-19 10:58:32
这就是我使用的shell模式所做的事情。
我在流程输出中查找一个特殊的记录结束字符串,以了解输出何时完成。在此之前,我会拼接这些块。
(defun my-shell-exec-filter (process result)
(let ((end-of-result (string-match my-shell-end-of-record-string result)))
(if (and end-of-result
(numberp end-of-result)
(> end-of-result 0))
(setq my-shell-reply
(concat my-shell-reply
(substring (substring result 0 end-of-result) 0 -1)))
(progn
(setq my-shell-reply (concat my-shell-reply result))
(accept-process-output process my-shell-exec-timeout 5)))))这是不太正确的,因为记录结束字符串可以被拆分到该过滤器fn的多次调用中。因此,为了正确,它应该首先连接,然后检查是否匹配。但不管怎样,你都明白了。
它还会递归,因此,对于非常长的输入,它可能会导致堆栈溢出异常。所以它肯定不像我想的那样干净。
这件事是以
(setq my-shell-reply nil)
(set-process-filter proc my-shell-exec-filter)
(process-send-string proc "whatever...")
(if (not (accept-process-output proc my-shell-exec-timeout 100))
(error "unexpected response."))
;; examine my-shell-reply here ... 发布于 2010-05-31 15:47:02
我的最终解决方案是:
(defun eval-all-sexps (s)
(let ((s (concat gimme-filter-remainder s)))
(setq gimme-filter-remainder
(loop for x = (ignore-errors (read-from-string s))
then (ignore-errors (read-from-string (substring s position)))
while x
summing (or (cdr x) 0) into position
doing (eval (car x))
finally (return (substring s position))))))https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2862209
复制相似问题