blocks|key|558422|text|在一个开发环境中总是有一些东西不在另一个开发环境中，但归根结底，它归结为两件事。1)您更喜欢使用哪一个。2)什么是你能负担得起的。Eclipse是免费的，这对很多人来说是一个非常大的特性。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|558423|你已经把它们都安装好了，所以你为什么不先试一试，然后再试一试另一台，然后自己决定。我可以告诉你人们会告诉你什么更好。|558424|如果他们使用VS，他们会告诉你VS更好，如果他们使用Eclipse，他们会告诉你Eclipse更好。|558425|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

There are always things in one development environment that aren't in another, but at the end of the day it comes down to two things. 1) What one you prefer to use. 2) What one you can afford. Eclipse is free which is a very big feature for a lot of people.

You have them both installed so why don't you try one for a little bit, and then try the other for a little bit and make up your own mind. I can tell you what people will tell you is better.

If they use VS they will tell you VS is better, and if they use Eclipse they'll tell you that Eclipse is better.

blocks|key|559744|text|首先，Eclipse是跨平台的，而Visual+Studio只能在Windows上运行。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|559745|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

For one, Eclipse is cross-platform whereas Visual Studio only runs on Windows.

blocks|key|2081922|text|上一次我尝试Eclipse+(大约一年前)时，我发现它太慢了。例如，自动完成将需要几秒钟才能调出可能匹配的列表。UI的其他元素响应也很差。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2081923|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Last time I tried Eclipse (about a year ago), I found it to be dog slow. Autocomplete would take multiple seconds to bring up the list of possible matches, for instance. Other elements of the UI were also poorly responsive.

blocks|key|559823|text|@user168715:+eclipse中自动完成的计时器默认为这种行为，但可以配置为具有更快的响应速度。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|559824|我主要使用eclipse，但在很多项目中也使用过VS，在这样做的过程中，唯一让我印象深刻的是在visual+studio中自动补全的速度有多快(我想让它慢一点)，当你在源文件中有错误时，eclipse会在编辑器的右侧滚动条旁边放置一些小标记。我喜欢这个特性，但在Visual+Studio中我错过了它。|559825|像这样的小事情是主要的不同之处，我不认为你会发现这两者中的任何一个都缺少许多主要的功能。|559826|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

@user168715: the timer for auto-complete in eclipse defaults to that sort of behavior, but can be configured to have a faster response.

I primarily use eclipse but have used VS for a number of projects, in doing so the only things that stuck out to me are how quick the auto complete is in visual studio (I'd like to slow it down a bit) and when you have errors in a source file, eclipse places little markers on the right side of the editor next to your scroll bar. I like that feature and missed it in Visual Studio.

Small things like that are the primary differences, I don't think you will find many major features that are missing from either of the two.

blocks|key|558520|text|请记住，我还没有使用过Visual+Studio+2010。Eclipse具有更快、更多的重构选项。可以对元件进行内联重命名，并通过将光标放在这些实例上来突出显示文件中元件的所有实例。它有连续的和自动的后台编译(无论如何是针对Java的)。搜索引用的速度也更快。它有一个“栏”，可以显示整个文件的错误和警告，便于导航。它有一个集成的diff工具，我通常更喜欢Eclipse的源代码控制插件。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|558521|其中许多功能都是由ReSharper提供的，但这是一个商业产品。|558522|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Keep in mind I haven't used Visual Studio 2010.
Eclipse has faster and more refactoring options. Symbols can be renamed inline, and all instances of a symbol in a file are highlighted by putting the cursor over them. It has continuous and automatic background compilation (for Java anyway). Searching for references is faster as well. It has a "gutter" that displays errors and warnings for an entire file with easy navigation. It has an integrated diff tool, and I usually prefer Eclipse's source control plugins.

Many of these features are provided by ReSharper, but that is a commercial product.

blocks|key|559864|text|以前的Visual+Studio版本没有太多的自定义(即首选项)选项。在这方面，我一直认为Eclipse提供了丰富的选项来调整首选项和自定义设置。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|559865|但是粗略地看一下Visual+Studio2008就会发现，MS+IDE现在推出了一系列相互竞争的自定义和首选项选项。我怀疑VS2010在这方面不会更糟。|559866|Visual+Studio的一个优点是取决于版本/版本(Express、Professional、Team+System等)除了VS+IDE和编译器工具之外，您已经安装了大量支持开发、调试和平台工具。我目前使用的是VS2008专业版，它在我的系统上安装了大量的支持工具。|559867|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Prior versions of Visual Studio didn't have very many customization (i.e. preferences) options. In that regard I've always thought Eclipse presented a wealth of options for tweaking preferences and customizing your setup.

But a cursory look at Visual Studio 2008 reveals that the MS IDE now sports a competing array of customization &amp; preferences options. I suspect that VS 2010 is no worse in this regard.

One advantage of Visual Studio is that depending on the version/edition (Express, Professional, Team System, etc.) you have installed, in addition to the VS IDE and the compiler tools you'll get a plethora of supporting development, debugging, and platform tools. I am currently using VS 2008 Professional edition, and it has an extensive array of supporting tools installed on my system.

blocks|key|1303350|text|在Eclipse中，我非常喜欢：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1303351|1303352|"Find+type“窗口(ctrl%2Bshift%2Bt)+-您只需输入类的名称，就可以转到它的定义。我认为这会大大提高生产率。|unordered-list-item|1303353|非常好的代码自动格式化(只需按ctrl%2Bshift%2Bf键)|1303354|1303355|上次我使用VS+(大概2-3年前)的时候，我找不到这些特性。虽然有自动格式化功能，但不知何故它的效果不如Eclipse中的好。|1303356|编辑：|offset|length|style|BOLD|1303357|实际上，我在VS中发现了一件更好的事情。它有一个非常好的内置可视化GUI设计器。在Eclipse中，你必须使用插件才能拥有它，而它们所提供的功能通常远远落后于VS中的GUI+designer。|1303358|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|10|8|@$M|11|N|12|O|P]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|14|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$]]

In Eclipse I really like:

<ul>
<li>"Find type" window (ctrl+shift+t) - you just type the name of a class and you can go to its definition. I think this boosts productivity a lot.</li>
<li>Very good auto formatting of code (just press ctrl+shift+f)</li>
</ul>

Last time I used VS (something like 2-3 years ago) I couldn't find these features. There was auto formatting feature but somehow it wasn't working as good as in Eclipse.

EDIT:

There is actually one thing that I found better in VS. It has a very good built in visual GUI designer. In Eclipse you have to use plugins to have it and what they provide is usually far behind what GUI designer in VS provides.

blocks|key|2082176|text|Eclipse可能需要一些训练才能让我掌握它的诀窍，eclipse最好的东西是MYLYN插件，它让生活变得如此简单，试一试，你就会成为它的终生客户。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2082177|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Eclipse is something that might require a little training to get the hang of it
To me, the best thing about eclipse is the MYLYN plugin which makes life so much simpler, give it a shot and you'll be its customer for life.

blocks|key|3489741|text|@user168715+-有很多事情可以让Eclipse变得更慢/更快：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3489742|如果你不给足够的内存，它就会变慢。它将花费大量时间进行垃圾收集，并不断丢弃缓存的信息，否则会加快速度。|3489743|如果你在存储在网络挂载文件系统中的项目上运行Eclipse，它会变慢。|unordered-list-item|3489744|如果你从网络挂载安装的项目上启动Eclipse，它会变慢。|3489745|如果你打开了很多大项目，Eclipse会变慢。这在很大程度上是因为缓存方法签名等所需的内存占用增加了，例如在Windows上运行auto-completion.|3489746|If，它将比在相同硬件配置的Linux/UNIX上运行要慢。Linux/UNIX拥有比Windows更高性能的文件系统、文件系统缓存和虚拟内存管理器。对于32位平台，Linux可以为JVM提供比Windows更多的内存。|3489747|3489748|编辑-我注意到@ssahmed555的经历与我的最后一点相矛盾……但这是我的经验。|offset|length|style|BOLD|3489749|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|F|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|F|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|F|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|F|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|12|8|@$P|13|Q|14|R|S]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|T|3|-4|5|6|7|15|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|U|$]]

@user168715 - There are a number of things that you can do to make Eclipse slower/faster:

<ul>
<li>If you don't give Eclipse enough memory it will be slower. It will spend a lot of time garbage collecting, and will continually be throwing out the cached information that would otherwise speed things up. These combine to make the UI sluggish.</li>
<li>If you run Eclipse on a project stored in a network mounted file system, it will be slower.</li>
<li>If you launch Eclipse from a network mounted installation it will be slower.</li>
<li>If you have lots of large projects open, Eclipse will be slower. This is largely due to the increased memory footprint needed to cache the method signatures etc used for things such as auto-completion.</li>
<li>If you run Eclipse on Windows, it will be slower than running on Linux/UNIX for the same hardware configuration. Linux/UNIX has more performant file systems, file system caches and virtual memory managers than Windows. And for a 32 bit platform, Linux can give the JVM more memory than Windows can.</li>
</ul>

EDIT - I notice that @ssahmed555's experience contradicts my last point ... but this is my experience.

blocks|key|2082269|text|对我来说，为了有用，IDE应该满足以下要求：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2082270|2082271|为了最大化工作空间，应该可以杀死每个该死的工具栏和按钮、选项卡标题等等。|ordered-list-item|2082272|Ide应支持非等宽字体。|2082273|应该可以使用组合键调用任何窗口(文件列表、输出等)，并使用转义将其关闭。|2082274|屏幕上不应浪费任何像素。不允许圆角按钮，文本和小工具边框之间不允许额外的间距。|2082275|应该可以不使用鼠标，只使用键盘。|2082276|2082277|任何其他功能都是可选的，包括自动完成。|2082278|也就是说，我的工作环境通常看起来像this。对我来说，这是一个最有效的布局。|offset|length|2082279|上一次我尝试eclipse+(2...3年前)的时候，它不能满足#1和#4的要求，有一些按钮无法移除，一些界面元素不必要地弯曲和圆润，并在没有实际需要的情况下占用了额外的屏幕空间。它也不够快。我花了一些时间试图解决这些问题，但后来放弃了，失去了兴趣。也许有一些不正确的隐藏选项可以帮助解决这些问题，但我再也没有尝试过eclipse。我可能不会再尝试了，因为我的IDE适合我。我必须承认，尽管我不太喜欢微软，但他们的IDE+(至少是2008版)非常接近完美(尽管它仍然有很多问题)|2082280|根据我的经验，还有另外两个编辑器可以用来替代VS+(在Linux上)--+jEdit和Kate。如果你能接受等宽字体，vim也是非常有用的。|2082281|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://img265.imageshack.us/i/14846978.png/^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|H|4|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|C|3|D|5|E|7|18|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|E|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|E|7|1A|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|E|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|E|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|1D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|1F|8|@]|9|@$S|1G|T|1H|1|1I]]|A|$]]|$1|U|3|V|5|6|7|1J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|W|3|X|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Y|3|-4|5|6|7|1L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|Z|$10|$5|11|12|13|A|$14|15]]]]

For me, in order to be useful, IDE should meet following requirements:

<ol>
<li>It should be possible to kill every damn toolbar and button, tab captions and so on in order to maximize working space.
<li>Ide should support non-monospace font.
<li>It should be possible to summon any window (file list, output, etc) with key combo and dismiss it with escape.
<li>No pixel should be wasted on screen. No rounded buttons, no extra spacing between text and widget border are allowed.
<li>It should be possibel to work without mouse, using keyboard only.
</ol>

Any other functionality is optional, including autocomplete.

I.e. my working environment normally look like <a href="http://img265.imageshack.us/i/14846978.png/" rel="noreferrer">this</a>. This is a most efficient layout for me.

Last time I tried eclipse (2..3 years ago) it couldn't satisfy #1 and #4. There were buttons that could not be removed, some interface elements were needlessly curvy and rounded and took extra screen space without real need for that. It also wasn't fast enough. I spent some time trying to fix those problems, gave up and lost interest. Maybe there were some deviously hidden options that could be useful to fix those problems, but I never tried eclipse again.
And I probably won't try it again, because my IDE works for me. I must admit, that although I don't exactly like Microsoft, their IDE (2008 edition, at least) is very close to perfection (it still has quite a lot of problems, though)

From my experience, there are two other editors that could be used as a VS replacement (on Linux) - jEdit and Kate. And if you can live with monospace font, vim is also quite useful.

blocks|key|2082314|text|这取决于你使用ide做什么类型的项目。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2082315|例如，如果您想要编写一个C#/VB项目，Visual+Studio拥有您想要的一切，代码完成、重构等，而eclipse使用了一个不能完成此任务的插件Looking+for+up-to-date+eclipse+plugin+for+C#|offset|length|2082316|但是如果你正在编写一个C%2B%2B项目，如果没有Visual+Assist，Visual+Studio提供的自动补全功能非常少，不会工作，不会突出显示实例，甚至不会突出显示括号和括号，这几乎与使用notepad%2B%2B相同。另一方面，Eclipse以更多的计算资源为代价提供了所有这些功能，但在2.0+the双核和2+to内存上，我几乎不必等待任何东西。|2082317|同样在我工作的公司，大多数项目都是c%2B%2B，我们切换到eclipse，发现大多数开发人员比VC%2B%2B更满意，并考虑到节省的资金:D|2082318|另外，VS和Eclipse之间最大的区别是插件，我发现Eclipse有很多方便的免费插件，而VS只有几个，而且我发现像Visual+Assist这样有用的插件是付费的。|2082319|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/145484/looking-for-up-to-date-eclipse-plugin-for-c^0|0|22|18|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$D|V|E|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]]]

This depends on what type of projects you are using your ide for.

For example if you want to write a C#/VB project, the Visual Studio has everything you want, code completion, refactoring, etc, while eclipse uses a plugin that just doesn't do it <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/145484/looking-for-up-to-date-eclipse-plugin-for-c">Looking for up-to-date eclipse plugin for C#</a>

But if you are writing a C++ project things change, without Visual Assist, Visual Studio offers very little, a fast autocomplete that never works, no instance highlighting, doesn't even highlight brackets and parenthesis, it is almost the same as using notepad++. On the other hand Eclipse offers all of this, at the cost of more computing resources, but on a 2.0GHz dual core with 2 gbram I almost never had to wait for anything.

Also at the company I work for most projects are c++, we switched to eclipse and found that most of the developers are more satisfied than with VC++ and consider the money savings :D

And another thing, that makes a very big difference between VS and Eclipse are the plugins, I find that Eclipse has tons of handy free plugins while VS only a few, and the ones that I find useful like Visual Assist are paid.

blocks|key|1303471|text|我个人对Eclipse和VS的经验是，VS是一个更加结构化的环境，每个功能都“正常工作”，插件之间没有不兼容的地方，VS中也没有“修饰”因素，没有bug。我不得不说我喜欢VS，因为它也是智能感知的，它更有意义，不需要工作就能工作，就在那里。eclipse中的自动补全功能不如VS中的intellisense智能，而且有很大的不同，在Eclipse中，如果你想让它像VS中那样工作，你需要向Eclipse“提供”与实际编程语言(PHP案例)相关的函数和东西的信息。我在VS中编写Visual+Basic程序，并尝试过Eclipse编程Php。我还没有看到Zend+Studio是如何工作的，我之前试用过Zend+Studio，但我花了大约一个月的时间都没能绕过它来测试它，所以当我最终到达它的时候，免费试用到期了，这是什么旗帜！我正在考虑试一试，我注意到它的价格下降了，这很好，但另一方面，如果有人想使用VS，他们可以使用免费的Express版本，没有借口。我可以说VS也是一个比Zend+Studio更好用的IDE的原因。但我们现在谈论的是Eclipse+...Hummm是比Eclipse更好的IDE。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1303472|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

My personal experience with Eclipse and VS is that VS is a more structured environment, every feature "Works right" there are no incompatibilities between plugins, and the "anoying" factor is not present in VS, no bugs. I have to say I love VS because of the intellisense too, it makes more sense and works without work, is right there. The autocomplete in eclipse, is not as smart as the intellisense in VS and there is a huge difference, in Eclipse if you want to get it working like in VS you will need to "feed" Eclipse with information regarding the functions and things related to the actual programming language (PHP case). I program Visual Basic in VS and I have tried Eclipse programming Php. I have not seen how Zend Studio works, I got a trial of Zend Studio before but I was not able to get around it to test it for about a month, so when I finally got to it, the free trial expired, what the flagnards!!. I am thinking in giving it a try, I have noticed that it has gone down in price, that is great, but on the other hand if anybody wanted to use VS they could use the Express edition that is for free, There are no excuses. Reason why I can say that VS is also a more ready and available IDE than Zend Studio. But we are talking about Eclipse now... Hummm VS is a better IDE than Eclipse.

blocks|key|2082415|text|Visual+Studio和Eclipse都是优秀的IDE，具有丰富的功能。我从未发现Eclipse特别慢，尽管它偶尔会暂停(我想知道JVM是否在进行垃圾收集)。我没有在Eclipse中使用过C%2B%2B插件，但Visual+Studio的优势在于它支持将C%2B%2B作为其“本机”语言之一。如果您正在进行Windows开发，最好使用Visual+Studio。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2082416|如果您想为其他平台进行开发，那么Eclipse可能值得一试。|2082417|我已经为这两个插件开发了插件，最近我在这里写了一个比较：http://geekswithblogs.net/cyberycon/archive/2011/05/01/eclipse-vs-visual-studio.aspx|offset|length|2082418|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://geekswithblogs.net/cyberycon/archive/2011/05/01/eclipse-vs-visual-studio.aspx^0|0|0|S|2C|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$F|S|G|T|1|U]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|O]]]]

Visual Studio and Eclipse are both excellent IDEs with a wealth of features. I've never found Eclipse to be particularly slow, although it will occasionally pause (I wonder if the JVM is garbage collecting). I haven't used the C++ plugins with Eclipse, but the advantage Visual Studio has is that it supports C++ as one of its "native" languages. If you are doing Windows development, you are probably best of with Visual Studio. 

If you want to develop for other platforms, Eclipse is likely to be worth a second look. 

I've developed plugins for both, and I recently wrote a comparison, here: <a href="http://geekswithblogs.net/cyberycon/archive/2011/05/01/eclipse-vs-visual-studio.aspx" rel="noreferrer">http://geekswithblogs.net/cyberycon/archive/2011/05/01/eclipse-vs-visual-studio.aspx</a>

blocks|key|1307305|text|嗯，我使用Visual+Studio已经有一段时间了:-)很久以前我接触过Eclipse。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1307306|几周前，当我开始为安卓手机platform..tell开发一个项目时，now...things在我的脑海里发生了变化。ECLIPSE是更好的是的..我说过了。|offset|length|style|BOLD|1307307|别误会我的意思。我仍然喜欢Visual+Studio，我用它开发了很多程序，它永远是我的最爱。然而……Eclipse中的自动代码生成它在编写代码时给了您许多很好的提示。放置try，使List不是泛型，而是类型定义，等等。分析你所有的包含，并删除那些不再需要的，例如，我定义了一个类的私有浮点变量，创建了一个构造函数和所有的Setter和getters，只需按下菜单中的一个选项，当我以对浮点类型太高的精度执行构造函数时，它会自动建议将私有类型更改为double，并完成所有更改，包括返回类型等：)|1307308|ECLIPSE更像是程序员的伙伴，而不是一个枯燥的基于REGEX的环境。|1307309|entityMap^0|0|1N|B|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|O|8|@$D|P|E|Q|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$]]

Well,
I have been working with Visual Studio for a some looong time now :-) I have touched Eclipse ONCE long time ago.
and now...things changed in my head like a couple of weeks ago when I started developing a project for Android mobile platform..tell you what.... ECLIPSE IS BETTER yes..I've said it.
Don't get me wrong. I still love Visual Studio , I've developed many programs using it and it always will be my first love. HOWEVER.... automatic code generation in Eclipse MANY MANY GOOD HINTS it gives you while writing the code.. to place try's, make List not generic but type defined, etc.. analysing your includes ALL THE TIME and eliminating the ones that are not needed anymore, for example I've defined a private FLOAT variable of a class, made a constructor and all the Setters and getters AUTOMATICALLY just by pressing an option in a menu, when I've executed the constructor with a number of precision too high for a float type it automatically suggested changing the private type to double and done all the changes including return types etc:)
ECLIPSE is more like a programmer's companion than a dull REGEX based environment.

blocks|key|3490083|text|在处理动态web项目时，Eclipse可能会非常混乱和不可预测，因为它与Tomcat+Server进行了恼人的交互，73%25的时间都会失败。Visual+Studio内置了IIS服务器，用户不必手动安装像apache+tomcat这样的杂乱服务器。Eclipse也需要很长时间才能加载工作区，而VS将所有内容都组织得很好，可以快速加载。在Visual+Studio中，一切都很简单，不像eclipse，在eclipse中，你必须不断地从杂乱无章的菜单中配置设置，才能让一些功能发挥作用。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|3490084|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Eclipse can be very messy and unpredictable when working on dynamic web projects due to its annoying interaction with Tomcat Server which fails 73% of time. Visual Studio has IIS server built in it and the user does not have to manually install a messy server like apache tomcat. Eclipse also takes like forever to load workspace while VS has everything well organized to load fast. With Visual Studio everything is straight foward unlike eclipse where u have to keep on configuring settings from its disorganized menu, for some features to work.

blocks|key|2082594|text|我又一次来到这个页面，寻找一种让Visual+Studio更像Eclipse的方法。特别是指出源文件中存在的错误的问题。Eclipse在文本面板下有一个标记栏，用于标记错误、警告、待办事项和备注。单击标记可跳转到文件中的该位置。这是一个非常简单的小部件，几乎不占用任何空间，在标记中提供工具提示，并内置于Eclipse+IDE中。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2082595|我对Visual+Studio非常恼火，我写了一篇关于Visual+Studio有多糟糕的博客文章。到目前为止，我得到了24分！|2082596|http://www.bigsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2011/08/19/come-back-eclipse-all-is-forgiven|offset|length|2082597|有几个Visual+Studio插件可以做到这一点，但我还没有找到一个免费的。|2082598|基本上，Resharper+Visual+Studio插件中的所有内容(代码检查、自动重构和编码辅助)都已经存在于Eclipse中，并且是内置的，而Resharper插件的成本是at+272(在撰写本文时)，这使得Visual+Studio+(at+800-1200)成为一个非常昂贵的解决方案。|2082599|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|0|2C|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$F|V|G|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|E]]]]

Once again I've ended up on this page looking for a way to make Visual Studio more like Eclipse. Specifically the problem of indicating errors that exist in your source file. Eclipse has a marker bar down the text panel which flags errors, warnings, todos and notes. Clicking on the marker jumps you to that location in the file. It's a really simple widget that takes hardly any room, gives tool tips in the markers and is built in to the Eclipse IDE.

I was so peed off with Visual Studio I wrote a blog article all about how bad Visual Studio is. I have 24 points so far!

<a href="http://www.bigsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2011/08/19/come-back-eclipse-all-is-forgiven" rel="nofollow">http://www.bigsoft.co.uk/blog/index.php/2011/08/19/come-back-eclipse-all-is-forgiven</a>

There are a couple of Visual Studio plugins that will do it but i haven't found one that is free yet.

Basically everything that is in the Resharper Visual Studio plug-in (code inspections, automated refactorings and coding assistance) already exist in Eclipse and is built in, whereas the Resharper plug-in costs £272 (at the time of writing) making Visual Studio (£800-1200) a very expensive solution.

blocks|key|1303607|text|这取决于您是否将vanilla与vanilla+Eclipse进行了比较。如果是这样的话，Eclipse就会像一张纸一样吹嘘VS。但是如果你在VS上安装Resharper，那就是完全不同的IDE了。但是ReSharper是商业的，就像VS的一些版本一样，所以我不得不投票给.NET，尽管我主要是Eclipse开发人员……|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1303608|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

It depends if you compare vanilla VS with vanilla Eclipse. If that is the case, Eclipse blows VS like piece of paper. But if you install Resharper on VS that is completely different IDE. 
But ReSharper is commercial, as some versions of VS, so I will have to give my vote to Eclipse, even thoe I am mainly .NET developer...

I keep hearing <code>Eclipse</code> is better than or way ahead of <code>Visual Studio</code> but when I installed <code>Eclipse</code> I felt it is very clunky and hard to use interface. So I want to know what is so great about <code>Eclipse</code> and if there are others who agree with me.

I also could not find a similar question that talks about the specific features about <code>Eclipse</code> and their comparison to <code>Visual Studio</code>.

Eclipse vs. Visual Studio: What are the features in Eclipse that are not present in Visual Studio and vice versa?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我一直听说Eclipse比Visual Studio更好，或者远远领先于Eclipse，但当我安装Eclipse时，我觉得它非常笨拙，很难使用界面。所以我想知道Eclipse的伟大之处，以及是否有其他人同意我的观点。我也找不到一个类似的问题来谈论Eclipse的具体功能以及它们与Visual Studio的比较。

问Eclipse vs. Studio: Eclipse中有哪些特性没有出现在Visual Studio中，反之亦然？
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Eclipse vs. Studio: Eclipse中有哪些特性没有出现在Visual Studio中，反之亦然？EN