blocks|key|2484430|text|看看android+SDK系统需求Here|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2484431|我猜一些额外的内存会帮助你开发experience...Also，模拟器在最快的系统上也需要一些时间才能启动。|2484432|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://developer.android.com/sdk/requirements.html^0|H|4|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Have a look at the android SDK system requirements <a href="http://developer.android.com/sdk/requirements.html" rel="nofollow">Here</a>

I'm guessing some extra RAM would help your developing experience...Also the emulator does take some time to start on even the speediest systems.

blocks|key|1557798|text|嘿，我已经在AMD+3Ghz芯片上使用了相同的软件，双核。当时有2+to的内存，我注意到模拟器以正常的速度运行，但加载时间长得离谱。我还没有在Android上做足够的开发来告诉你这是不是一个常见的问题，甚至是仍然存在的问题，但这肯定是我从经验中记住的东西。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1557799|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Hey, I have used the same software on an AMD 3Ghz chip, dual core. had 2gbs of ram at the time, and i noticed the emulator ran at an alright speed, but took a ridiculous amount of time to load. 
I have not done enough development on Android to tell you if this is a common, or even still existing problem, but it is certainly something I remember from my experience.

blocks|key|2484497|text|首先，ADT插件和Helios存在一个问题，导致查找Android类时出现延迟-请使用Galileo+(3.5版)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2484498|其次，仿真器会变得更加耗费资源，这取决于您正在为其开发的Android版本。例如，我有一台P4+2.4+RAM、1+1GB内存的PC，Win+XP+32位操作系统，而一个Androidv2.2模拟器至少需要4-5分钟才能加载。另一方面，Android+v1.6模拟器在不到1分钟的时间内加载完毕。但是请记住，一旦模拟器启动并运行，您可以让它保持加载状态，它将比第一次使用时响应更快。|2484499|还要记住，如果你给你的模拟器一个2+2GB的SD卡(例如)，如果没有足够的物理内存，它会尝试通过虚拟内存来创建。|2484500|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Firstly, there is an issue with the ADT plugin and Helios which causes lag with looking up Android classes - use Galileo instead (v3.5).

Secondly, the emulators become more resource hungry depending on the version of Android you're developing for. Example, I have a P4 2.4GHz, 1GB RAM PC with Win XP 32-bit and an Android v2.2 emulator takes at least 4-5 minutes to load up. An Android v1.6 emulator on the other hand loads up in less than 1 minute. Remember though that once the emulator is up and running, you can leave it loaded and it will be more responsive than first use.

Also bear in mind that if you give your emulator a 2GB SD card (for example) it will try to create that through virtual memory if there isn't enough physical memory.

blocks|key|4080929|text|我发现相同规格的AVDs在我的家用机器(Phenom+II+x4+945/8+8GB内存/Win7HP+64位)上运行和加载要比在我的工作机器(Core2Duo/3+8GB内存/Ubuntu11.04+32位)上运行和加载要好得多。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4080930|由于你实际上是在运行一台虚拟机，我个人会选择一台dual+core/4GB，不过如果你能花钱的话，强烈建议你买一台4/8+8GB的。|offset|length|style|CODE|4080931|entityMap^0|0|O|D|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@$D|L|E|M|F|G]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

I find identically-specced AVDs run and load far better on my home machine (Phenom II x4 945/8GB RAM/Win7 HP 64bit) than they do on my work machine (Core2Duo/3GB RAM/Ubuntu 11.04 32bit).

As you're essentially running a virtual machine, I would personally go for nothing less than a <code>dual core/4GB</code>, though highly recommend a quad/8GB if you can splash out for that.

blocks|key|4080955|text|这是没有用的，即使你增加你的内存大小，因为我也尝试过。我使用的是P4+3.00+GB处理器和3+GB内存(从1+GB更改为3+GB)，但是甚至Hello+world应用程序都没有出现。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4080956|最好是升级你的系统。|4080957|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Its of no use even if you increase your RAM size because I tried it too. I am using P4 3.00GHz processor and 3 GB RAM(changed from 1 GB to 3GB), But even the Hello world application never turned up.

Its preferable to upgrade your system.

blocks|key|417288|text|我使用的是i5处理器，内存为4+4Gb。它工作得很好。我觉得这是同时运行eclipse和android+avd所需的最低配置。仅仅拥有高RAM的旧处理器是不够的。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|417289|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I use an i5 processor with 4Gb RAM. It works very well. I feel this is the minimum configuration required to run both eclipse and android avd simultaneously.
Just an old processor with high RAM is not sufficient.

blocks|key|1559950|text|IMHO它依赖于cpu和RAM。在我的Wolfdale+(采用Intel虚拟化技术)%2B4+4GB的RAM上，它非常快且可用。据我所知，emu是基于qemu的，所以最好让Intel启用虚拟化技术，并且不要忘记在内核中插入任何病毒模块(如果使用linux)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1559951|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

IMHO it is cpu and RAM dependant. On my Wolfdale (with Intel virtualisation technology) + 4GB of RAM it's very fast and usable. As I know the emu is qemu based so it`s better to have Intel with virtualisation tech enabled and don't forget to insert any virulatisation modules to the kernel (if using linux).

blocks|key|2484794|text|在脱离Java+15年之后，我刚刚开始在Eclipse+(Juno)上使用Java。我在一台1.6+the的Atom+N270上使用了ADK，内存是4+4Gb，在W7+32位上，磁盘几乎是空的。我不确定是不是Atom，或者Java是不是像15年前一样糟糕，但Eclipse甚至需要2分钟才能启动。仿真器最终确实会出现，但速度非常慢。即使没有模拟器，Eclipse也很慢。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2484795|在1.6+2GHz酷睿i7或2+2GHz酷睿2+Duo上，操作是合理的。模拟器工作，Eclipse大约需要5到10秒才能准备好工作。这个故事的寓意是:不要使用Atom或任何其他低功耗处理器。即使有4+4Gb的内存，它的速度也很慢，时钟速度与高端处理器相同。|2484796|我还在1.6+the酷睿i7和酷睿2上的VMWare虚拟机上尝试过它。在模拟器启动之前，它是相当快的。然后，它会减速到无法返回的地步。重绘现在非常类似于Atom，但至少在单击按钮时它会做出响应。注意，它现在正在仿真器中运行仿真器。VM的唯一问题是W7经常做W7做的事情。有一个等待光标，整个机器在一两分钟内完全没有反应，然后它又恢复了活力。这是和VMWare+V3的。V4/V5可能不同。改变内核/处理器的数量对eclipse或仿真器没有任何影响。|2484797|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I've just started using Java on Eclipse (Juno) after a 15 year break from Java. I was using the ADK on a 1.6GHz Atom N270 with 4Gb RAM on W7 32bit on a nearly empty disk. Not sure if it is the Atom or whether Java is as bad as it used to be 15 years ago but it takes over 2 minutes for Eclipse to even start. The emulator does turn up eventually but is extremely sluggish. Even without the emulator, Eclipse is sluggish.

On a 1.6GHz Core i7 or a 2GHz Core 2 Duo, operation is reasonable. Emulator works, Eclipse takes about 5 to 10 seconds to be ready for work. Moral of the story: don't use an Atom or any other low powered processor. It is sluggish even with 4Gb memory and having the same clock speed as a high end processor.

I've also tried it in a VMWare VM on the 1.6GHz Core i7 and on the Core 2. It is reasonably fast until the the emulator is started. It then slows down to the point of no return. Redraws is now very much like that of the Atom but at least it responds when the buttons are clicked. Note that it is now running an emulator within an emulator. The only problem with VMs is that every so often W7 does what W7 does. There is a wait cursor and whole machine is totally unresponsive for a minute or two then it springs back to life. This was with VMWare V3. V4/V5 might be different. Varying the number of cores/processors did not make any difference to eclipse or the emulator.

blocks|key|4081146|text|我在家里做了以下实验：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|4081147|让我们比较两台计算机如何在eclipse中编译相同的android应用程序。以下是竞争对手：|4081148|“怪兽”-+i7+-16G内存-固态硬盘|4081149|“皮博迪”-五金级i3+-4G内存|4081150|结果:当我在eclipse中编译相同的应用程序时，怪物和皮博迪花了完全相同的时间来启动模拟器，直到你必须滑动按钮才能运行应用程序:1分12秒。|4081151|在那之后，怪物执行应用程序的速度比皮博迪快30-40秒。|4081152|这款怪兽比皮博迪贵了500美元。所以问题是，这真的值得吗？在我看来，不是。我可以多等30-40秒|4081153|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|O|$]]

I did the following experiment at home: 

let's compare how 2 computers compile the same android application in eclipse. Here are the competitors:

"the monster"
- pentinum i7 
- 16 gig RAM 
- solid state hard drive

"peabody"
- pentinum i3
- 4 gig RAM 

The results:
when I compiled the same application in eclipse, the monster and peabody took exactly the same amount of time to bring up the emulator to the point where you have to slide the button to run the app: 1 minute 12 seconds.

After that point, the monster executed the app 30-40 seconds faster than peabody. 

The monster costs about $500 more than the peabody. So the question is, is it really worth it? In my opinion, No. I can wait the extra 30-40 seconds

blocks|key|4081186|text|我使用的是双核3-GHZ和2+2GB内存，Windows8操作系统。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|4081187|我可以流畅地运行eclipse和AVD+(即使运行2Avd也是很好的)，只要我不打开太多的其他标签(游戏，浏览器，MS+Word等)。|4081188|entityMap^0|5|7|D|7|L|C|0|L|D|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@$9|K|A|L|B|C]|$9|M|A|N|B|C]|$9|O|A|P|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Q|8|@$9|R|A|S|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|I|$]]

I use DUAL CORE 3-GHZ with 2GB RAM, windows 8 OS.

I can run eclipse and AVD (even running 2 AVD is still good) smoothly, as long as i dont open too much other tabs (Game, Browser, MS Word, etc).

Need information about minimum hardware requirement for better experience in developing Android application. 

My current configuration is as follows. P4 3.0 GHz, 512 MB of ram. 

Started with Hello Android development on my machine and experience was sluggish, was using Eclipse Helios for development. Emulator used to take lot of time to start. And running program too. 
Do I need to upgrade my machine for the development purpose or is there anything else I am missing on my machine(like heavy processing by some other application I might have installed). 

And If I do need to upgrade, do I need to upgrade my processor too(that counts to new machine actually, which I am not in favor of), or only upgrading RAM will suffice.

Minimum Hardware requirements for Android development

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

需要最低硬件要求的信息，以便在开发Android应用程序时获得更好的体验。我当前的配置如下所示。P4 3.0 GHz，512MB内存。在我的机器上开始使用Hello Android开发，体验很慢，使用Eclipse Helios进行开发。仿真器过去需要花费很多时间才能启动。也在运行程序。为了开发的目的，我是否需要升级我...

问Android开发的最低硬件要求
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问Android开发的最低硬件要求EN