让我们在应用程序中使用一个经典的Executor。应用程序的许多部分使用这个Executor进行一些计算,每次计算都可以取消,为此我可以在executor上调用shutdown()或shutdownNow()。
但我只想关闭Executor中的部分任务。遗憾的是,我无法访问Future对象,它们是计算实现的私有部分(实际上计算是由actor框架jetlang支持的)
我想要像Executor wrapper这样的东西,我可以把它传递给计算,它应该由真正的Executor支持。如下所示:
// main application executor
Executor applicationExecutor = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
// starting computation
Executor computationExecutor = new ExecutorWrapper(applicationExecutor);
Computation computation = new Computation(computationExecutor);
computation.start();
// cancelling computation
computation.cancel();
// shutting down only computation tasks
computationExecutor.shutdown();
// applicationExecutor remains running and happy或者其他的想法?
发布于 2011-11-05 01:07:57
对于那些想要好结果的人来说:有一个最终的解决方案,部分基于伊万·索波夫的答案。幸运的是,jetlang只使用Executor接口(而不是ExecutorService)来运行它的任务,所以我制作了包装器类,它支持停止仅由该包装器创建的任务。
static class StoppableExecutor implements Executor {
final ExecutorService executor;
final List<Future<?>> futures = Lists.newArrayList();
boolean stopped;
public StoppableExecutor(ExecutorService executor) {
this.executor = executor;
}
void stop() {
this.stopped = true;
synchronized (futures) {
for (Iterator<Future<?>> iterator = futures.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
Future<?> future = iterator.next();
if (!future.isDone() && !future.isCancelled()) {
System.out.println(future.cancel(true));
}
}
futures.clear();
}
}
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
if (!stopped) {
synchronized (futures) {
Future<?> newFuture = executor.submit(command);
for (Iterator<Future<?>> iterator = futures.iterator(); iterator.hasNext();) {
Future<?> future = iterator.next();
if (future.isDone() || future.isCancelled())
iterator.remove();
}
futures.add(newFuture);
}
}
}
}使用它非常简单:
ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5);
StoppableExecutor executor = new StoppableExecutor(service);
// doing some actor stuff with executor instance
PoolFiberFactory factory = new PoolFiberFactory(executor);
// stopping tasks only created on executor instance
// executor service is happily running other tasks
executor.stop();就这样。效果很好。
发布于 2011-11-03 18:45:36
如何让您的Computation成为Runnable (并使用提供的Executor运行),直到设置了布尔标志?大致是这样的:
public class Computation
{
boolean volatile stopped;
public void run(){
while(!stopped){
//do magic
}
public void cancel)(){stopped=true;}
}您所做的实际上是停止线程。但是,它不会被垃圾回收,而是会被重用,因为它是由Executor管理的。查找“停止线程的正确方式是什么?”。
编辑:请注意,上面的代码非常原始,因为它假定while循环的主体只需要很短的时间。如果不是这样,检查将不会频繁执行,并且您将注意到在取消任务和实际停止任务之间存在延迟。
发布于 2011-11-03 19:27:10
像这样的东西?您可以执行部分关闭:
for (Future<?> future : %ExecutorServiceWrapperInstance%.getFutures()) {
if (%CONDITION%) {
future.cancel(true);
}
}代码如下:
package com.sopovs.moradanen;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Future;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
public class ExecutorServiceWrapper implements ExecutorService {
private final ExecutorService realService;
private List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<Future<?>>();
public ExecutorServiceWrapper(ExecutorService realService) {
this.realService = realService;
}
@Override
public void execute(Runnable command) {
realService.execute(command);
}
@Override
public void shutdown() {
realService.shutdown();
}
@Override
public List<Runnable> shutdownNow() {
return realService.shutdownNow();
}
@Override
public boolean isShutdown() {
return realService.isShutdown();
}
@Override
public boolean isTerminated() {
return realService.isTerminated();
}
@Override
public boolean awaitTermination(long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException {
return realService.awaitTermination(timeout, unit);
}
@Override
public <T> Future<T> submit(Callable<T> task) {
Future<T> future = realService.submit(task);
synchronized (this) {
futures.add(future);
}
return future;
}
public synchronized List<Future<?>> getFutures() {
return Collections.unmodifiableList(futures);
}
@Override
public <T> Future<T> submit(Runnable task, T result) {
Future<T> future = realService.submit(task, result);
synchronized (this) {
futures.add(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public Future<?> submit(Runnable task) {
Future<?> future = realService.submit(task);
synchronized (this) {
futures.add(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public <T> List<Future<T>> invokeAll(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks) throws InterruptedException {
List<Future<T>> future = realService.invokeAll(tasks);
synchronized (this) {
futures.addAll(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public <T> List<Future<T>> invokeAll(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks, long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException {
List<Future<T>> future = realService.invokeAll(tasks, timeout, unit);
synchronized (this) {
futures.addAll(future);
}
return future;
}
@Override
public <T> T invokeAny(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {
//don't know what to do here. Maybe this method is not needed by the framework
//than just throw new NotImplementedException();
return realService.invokeAny(tasks);
}
@Override
public <T> T invokeAny(Collection<? extends Callable<T>> tasks, long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
//don't know what to do here. Maybe this method is not needed by the framework
//than just throw new NotImplementedException();
return realService.invokeAny(tasks, timeout, unit);
}
}https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7993422
复制相似问题