blocks|key|175255|text|Windows+Forms和WPF现在变得越来越流行，但是看到MFC的一个新版本在几个月前刚刚发布(参见here)，我不会说它已经过时了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|175256|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Foundation_Class_Library#Versions^0|1G|4|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Windows Forms and WPF are becoming more and more popular these days,
but seeing that a new version of MFC was released just a few months ago (see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Foundation_Class_Library#Versions" rel="noreferrer">here</a>) I wouldn't call it deprecated just yet.

blocks|key|5543783|text|是的，MFC不是你所说的最先进的。如果您正在从头开始一个新的(UI)应用程序，那么您应该提出使用MFC的非常有力的理由(例如，您已经有了现有的代码)。有很多缺点，例如文档/视图架构，如果你想要没有包含在这个框架中的控件，它只适用于小的UI应用程序或你需要放入的大量定制(你肯定会在某些时候)。此外，测试MFC类并不那么容易，您也应该记住这一点。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|5543784|广泛使用的是具有MVC+(模型-视图-控制器)架构的方法。您可以在此处阅读有关这两个归档的更多信息：|5543785|Document+/+View+as+used+in+MFC|offset|length|5543786|Model+View+Controller|5543787|既然你正在考虑MFC，我假设你已经具备了C%2B%2B的知识。因此，来自Trolltech+/诺基亚的Qt+Framework可能会让您感兴趣。它支持MVC架构，是跨平台兼容的，并且仍在积极开发中。|5543788|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4x1xy43a%2528v=vs.80%2529.aspx|1|http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff649643.aspx|2|http://qt.nokia.com/products/^0|0|0|0|U|0|0|0|L|1|0|1B|C|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@$F|10|G|11|1|12]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@$F|14|G|15|1|16]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@$F|18|G|19|1|1A]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|U]]|V|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|W]]]]

Yes, MFC is not what you would call state-of-the-art. If you are starting a new (UI) application from scratch, you should come up with really strong reasons to use MFC (for example, you have already existing code). There are many disadvantages, for exeample the document/view archtiecture, which is only suitable for small UI applications or the high amount of customization you need to put in, if you want controls that are not included in this framework (and you certainly will at some point). Additionally, it is not that easy to test MFC classes, which you should have in mind as well.

Widely used are approaches with a MVC (model-view-controller) architecture. You can read more about these two archiectures here:

<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/4x1xy43a%28v=vs.80%29.aspx" rel="nofollow">Document / View as used in MFC</a>

<a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff649643.aspx" rel="nofollow">Model View Controller</a>

As you are considering MFC, I assume you already have knowledge in C++. Therefore, the <a href="http://qt.nokia.com/products/" rel="nofollow">Qt Framework</a> from Trolltech / Nokia might be interesting for you. It supports MVC architecture, is cross-platform compatible and still actively developed.

blocks|key|1193431|text|MFC并不是那么糟糕。问题是，大多数组件(窗口/窗口小部件)都很糟糕，或者更准确地说，非常不灵活。正如Hans所说，它有18年的向后兼容性，因此每个时钟周期和内存字节都是有价值的。今天很疼。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1193432|我之所以使用它，是因为Windows+Forms和WPF不适用于后端语言是C或C%2B%2B的跨平台图形用户界面开发(无论出于何种原因，Java都不是您的项目的选项)。|1193433|MFC可能是唯一的选择，这取决于您想要做什么，以及非常本地化的GUI有多重要，特别是当您有能力购买第三方组件并使用功能包或功能区时。|1193434|只要你不告诉我们更多关于你的项目，我就不评论QT/GTK/FLTK或其他工具包|1193435|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$]]

MFC is not so bad. The problem is that most of the components (windows/widgets) are pretty bad or more precisely very inflexible. As Hans said it's 18 years of backward compatibility and therefore every clock cycle and memory byte counted. This hurts today.
I'm using it because Windows Forms and WPF is just not useable for cross platform GUI development where the lingua franca of the backend is C or C++ (if Java is not an option for your project for whatever reason).
Depending on what you want to do and how important a very native looking GUI is, MFC might be the only choice, especially when you can afford to buy third party components and use the feature-pack or Ribbons.
I not commenting on QT/GTK/FLTK or other toolkit as long as you don't tell us more about your project

Currently I am working in a project that uses MFC a lot, but it seems to me that MFC technology is not widely used nowadays. How deprecated is MFC? What are the alternatives for it? I am using VS2010 on Windows.

Thank you for your answers.

Is MFC deprecated?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

目前我在一个项目中大量使用MFC，但在我看来，MFC技术目前并没有得到广泛的应用。MFC有多过时？它的替代方案是什么？我在Windows上使用的是VS2010。感谢您的回答。

问MFC是否已弃用？
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问MFC是否已弃用？EN