问在此错误中引用的解析错误是什么？

EN

-- 8th Summer School on Formal Techniques

-- Menlo College, Atherton, California, US
--
-- 21-25 May 2018
--
-- Lecture 1: Introduction to Agda
--
-- File 1: The Curry-Howard Isomorphism

{-# OPTIONS --allow-unsolved-metas #-}

module Prelude where

-- Natural numbers as our first example of
-- an inductive data type.

data ℕ : Set where
  zero : ℕ
  suc  : (n : ℕ) → ℕ

-- To use decimal notation for numerals, like
-- 2 instead of (suc (suc zero)), connect it
-- to the built-in natural numbers.

{-# BUILTIN NATURAL ℕ #-}

-- Lists are a parameterized inductive data type.

data List (A : Set) : Set where
  []  : List A
  _∷_ : (x : A) (xs : List A) → List A   -- \ : :

infixr 6 _∷_

-- C-c C-l   load

-- Disjoint sum type.

data _⊎_ (S T : Set) : Set where  -- \uplus
  inl : S → S ⊎ T
  inr : T → S ⊎ T

infixr 4 _⊎_

-- The empty sum is the type with 0 alternatives,
-- which is the empty type.
-- By the Curry-Howard-Isomorphism,
-- which views a proposition as the set/type of its proofs,
-- it is also the absurd proposition.

data False : Set where

⊥-elim : False → {A : Set} → A
⊥-elim () {A}

-- C-c C-SPC give
-- C-c C-, show hypotheses and goal
-- C-c C-. show hypotheses and infers type

-- Tuple types

-- The generic record type with two fields
-- where the type of the second depends on the value of the first
-- is called Sigma-type (or dependent sum), in analogy to
--
--   ∑ ℕ A =  ∑   A(n) = A(0) + A(1) + ...
--           n ∈ ℕ

record ∑ (A : Set) (B : A → Set) : Set where  -- \GS  \Sigma
  constructor _,_
  field  fst : A
         snd : B fst
open ∑

-- module ∑ {A : Set} {B : A → Set} (p : ∑ A B) where
--   fst : A
--   fst = case p of (a , b) -> a
--   snd : B fst
--   snd = case p of (a , b) -> b

infixr 5 _,_

-- The non-dependent version is the ordinary Cartesian product.

_×_ : (S T : Set) → Set
S × T = ∑ S λ _ → T

infixr 5 _×_

-- The record type with no fields has exactly one inhabitant
-- namely the empty tuple record{}
-- By Curry-Howard, it corresponds to Truth, as
-- no evidence is needed to construct this proposition.

record True : Set where

test : True
test = _

-- C-c C-=  show constraints
-- C-c C-r  refine
-- C-c C-s  solve
-- C-c C-SPC give
-- C-c C-a   auto

-- Example: distributivity  A × (B ⊎ C) → (A × B) ⊎ (A × C)

dist : ∀ {A B C : Set} → A × (B ⊎ C) → (A × B) ⊎ (A × C)
dist (a , inl b) = inl (a , b)
dist (a , inr c) = inr (a , c)

dist' : ∀ {A B : Set} → A × (B ⊎ A) → (A × B) ⊎ (A × A)
dist' (a , inl b) = inl (a , b)
dist' (a , inr c) = inr (c , c)

-- Relations

-- Type-theoretically, the type of relations over (A×A) is
--
--   A × A → Prop
--
-- which is
--
--   A × A → Set
--
-- by the Curry-Howard-Isomorphism
-- and
--
--   A → A → Set
--
-- by currying.

Rel : (A : Set) → Set₁
Rel A = A → A → Set

-- Less-or-equal on natural numbers

_≤_ : Rel ℕ
zero  ≤ y     = True
suc x ≤ zero  = False
suc x ≤ suc y = x ≤ y

-- C-c C-l load
-- C-c C-c case split
-- C-c C-, show goal and assumptions
-- C-c C-. show goal and assumptions and current term
-- C-c C-SPC give