blocks|key|619693|text|我认为在Win32，MFC，当然还有WinForms中还有很多应用程序。我认为将WPF添加到您的工具带是一个明智的选择。今天你应该放弃一切，学会它吗？那随你的便。我看到对WPF的需求越来越大。这并不是压倒性的，但2001年的C#/WinForms也不是。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|619694|因此，长篇大论的答案是，你只需抓住这个机会。没有人知道WPF应用程序是否会主导市场。我倾向于这种可能性，我也认为Silverlight可能是网络应用程序的真正参与者。由于两者之间有可转移的技能，我通过继续学习WPF来对冲我的赌注。|619695|请参阅在WinForms上使用WPF更好吗？|offset|length|619696|抱歉，这不是一个具体的答案。|619697|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/640633/is-it-better-to-use-wpf-over-winforms/^0|0|0|3|J|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@$F|U|G|V|1|W]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$L|$5|M|N|O|A|$P|Q]]]]

I think there are plenty of applications still done in Win32, MFC and of course, WinForms. I think it would be a wise choice to add WPF to your tool belt. Should you drop everything and learn it today? That's up to you. I am seeing more demand for WPF. It's not overwhelming, but neither was C#/WinForms in 2001.

So the long winded answer is that you just have to take the chance. No one knows if WPF apps will dominate the market. I'm leaning towards the possibility and I'm also thinking Silverlight may be a real player in web apps moving forward. Since there are transferrable skills between the two, I'm hedging my bet a little bit by continuing to learn WPF.

Please see also <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/640633/is-it-better-to-use-wpf-over-winforms/">Is it better to use WPF over WinForms</a>

Sorry it's not a concrete answer.

blocks|key|843811|text|你要求我们预测未来:)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|843812|我认为更好的方法是看看如果你不学习WPF的话，你可以学到的其他技术。我会权衡各种权衡，选择对我来说更有价值的。|843813|例如，如果选择是WinForms还是WPF，我肯定会选择WPF。与WinForms相比，WPF的学习曲线更陡峭。然而，一旦你通过了这个学习大纲，它是如此容易工作。WPF可以在WinForms中用几百行自定义控件来执行几行操作。|843814|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

You're asking us to predict the future :) 

I think a better way to approach this is to look at the other technology you could learn if you didn't learn WPF. I would weigh the various tradeoffs and pick the one that was more valuable to me. 

For instance if the choice was WinForms or WPF I would certainly go with WPF. WPF has a steeper learning curve than WinForms. However once you get past that learning curvie it is so much easier to work with. WPF can do in a few lines what took several hundred lines of a custom control in WinForms.

blocks|key|844077|text|是的，如果您要在Windows平台上设计桌面应用程序，WPF是正在出现的标准。WPF取代了Windows，该API到目前为止一直主导着Win32桌面，微软希望WPF平台具有类似的生命周期。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|844078|再说了，还挺酷的。|844079|当然还有银光。|844080|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Yes, if you will be designing desktop applications on the Windows platform, WPF is the emerging standard. WPF replaces the Win32 API that has dominated the Windows desktop until now, and Microsoft expects a similar lifetime for the WPF platform.

Besides, it's way cooler.

And then there is Silverlight, of course.

blocks|key|843841|text|是的，开始学习吧。它适用于Silverlight+(虽然不是1到1的映射)，它也是一个与Abobe的MXML范式非常相似的模型，因此您将以1的价格获得3胜。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|843842|我们开始看到工作的到来，这需要它，所以肯定有一个很好的理由让它在旧的公用事业带。|843843|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/paradigm.html^0|1E|4|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@$A|O|B|P|1|Q]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]]]

Yes start learning it. It's applicable to Silverlight (though not a 1 to 1 mapping), it's also a very similar model to Abobe Flex's paradigm of <a href="http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flex/articles/paradigm.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MXML</a> So you'll be getting 3 wins for the price of 1.

We're starting to see work come in that calls for it, so there's definitely a good reason to have it on the old utility belt.

blocks|key|2149843|text|WPF是一个最终的图形平台。Win32+32的GDI是“第一次尝试”，WPF是“永久结构”。用于组合Windows和平板显示器(f.e。3d显示可能需要其他的东西)，它将永远不会被取代。所以学习它，它是一个好商品。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|2149844|entityMap^0|6|3|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@$9|I|A|J|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$]]

WPF is an ultimate graphic platform for Windows. Win32's GDI was a "first try", WPF is a "permanent structure". For the combination of Windows and flat displays (f.e. 3d displays might require something else), it will never be replaced. So learn it, it is a good commodity.

blocks|key|843863|text|微软有一个习惯，就是把所有的东西都扔到墙上，看看到底有什么东西.Pocket平台、J#等。关于WPF，现在判断收养是否会在未来增加还为时过早。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|843864|如果您已经编写了.NET+Winforms和/或Webforms程序，学习曲线就不会那么陡峭。我建议你试一试，但不要把所有的鸡蛋扔进众所周知的WPF+(甚至Silverlight)篮子里。正如其他人所指出的，最好把它当作你武库中的另一个工具。|843865|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Microsoft has a habit of throwing everything in the wall and seeing what sticks... The Pocket PC platform, J#, and so on. With regards to WPF, it is too early to tell if adoption will increase in the future.

If you have programmed .NET Winforms and/or Webforms, the learning curve is not that steep. I would suggest dabble with it but don't throw all the eggs in the proverbial WPF (or even Silverlight) basket. As the others have noted, better to treat it as just another tool in your arsenal.

blocks|key|619811|text|WPF已经存在了几年，微软决定用WPF重写Visual+(2010)是一个好的迹象，表明它将继续存在。记住，这是市场上最受欢迎的IDE之一，也是微软员工的意图。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|619812|我的组织去年采用了这项技术，虽然它有一个陡峭的学习曲线--你真的必须学会用不同的术语思考--它已经在我们能够开发的丰富的应用程序中得到了回报。我喜欢winforms，并且是asp.net的忠实粉丝，但让我感到惊讶的是，WPF为您提供了构建块，并且有无限的可能性。|619813|如果我是你，我会学习WPF的经验，并在以后收获回报。别忘了--如果你采用WPF的话，你也会学到Silverlight的核心--在我看来，这两种技术是行不通的！|619814|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

WPF has been around for a few years now and Microsoft's decision to rewrite Visual Studio (2010) in WPF is a good sign that it is here to stay. Remember, this is one of the most popular IDEs on the market and a sign of intent from the guys at Microsoft.

My organization adopted the technology last year and while it has a steep learning curve - you really have to learn to think in different terms - it has paid dividends in the richness of applications we are able to develop. I love winforms and am a big fan of asp.net but what blows me away about WPF is that you are provided with the building blocks and the possibilities are endlesss...

If I were you I would learn WPF for the experience and reap the rewards later. Don't forget - you'll also be learning the core of Silverlight if you adopt WPF - these are two technologies that in my humble opinion are going nowhere!

blocks|key|619841|text|在WPF中有很多东西需要学习。你需要以GUI程序员的身份死去并重生。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|619842|但值得付出努力吗。为什么？，这是我的答案。|619843|由于您是在问这个问题，所以我假设您是基于Microsoft技术的程序员。|619844|由于MS的方向是面向GUI开发的WPF，我认为没有选择。获胜的形式将持续很长的时间，可能两年以上。由于WPF的外观和感觉很酷，使得用户对WPF应用程序的要求越来越多，而不是WPF表单。如您所知，对于许多用户来说，GUI是S/W+:)|619845|现在，如果您不是基于MS的程序员，可能来自Java，我说WPF与Java有很多相似之处。但这是一个非常-非常大的超级秋千。|619846|要想赶上WPF，至少需要2/3年的时间，到那时，WPF可能会统治这个词，我不认为Swing比这更容易，如果不是困难的话。|619847|由于silverlight是独立于平台的，而且它的模型类似于WPF，我预测WPF将至少在未来6/7年(如果不是十年)统治。|619848|我相信并希望MS能使程序员更容易学习，这样学习曲线就会缩短或委托给GUI艺术家(使用表达式混合)。|619849|希望我回答了你的问题。|619850|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|Q|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|R|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|S|$]]

There is hell lot to learn in WPF. You need to die and reborn as a GUI programmer.

But is it worth the effort. Why?, Here is my answer.

Since you are asking this question, I assume you are Microsoft technologies based programmer.

As the direction of MS is towards WPF for GUI development, I see no choice. Win Forms will last long for probably 2 years more. Since the cool look and feel of WPF make users to ask for more and more WPF applications than Win Forms. As you know for many users GUI is the S/W :)

Now if you are non MS based programmer, probably from Java, I say WPF has lot of similarities with Java Swing. But it is a very-very big super set of Swing. 

To have Swing catchup with WPF might take at least 2/3 years and by that time WPF might be ruling the word and I don't expect Swing to be much easier than this, if not difficult.

As silverlight is kind of platform independent and as it's model is similar to WPF, I predict WPF is going to rule at least for next 6/7 years if not a decade.

I believe and hope MS would make things much more easier for the programmers so that learning curve would be shortened or delegated to GUI artiists (using expression blend).

Hope I answered your question.

blocks|key|619862|text|与WinForms相比，使用WPF要好得多，您需要有不同的心态。我只能说，微软在创建WPF和Silverlight应用程序时应该使用HTML语法，这样前端就可以重用，至少对于silverlight应用程序也是如此，这样在桌面上开发的人在编写可以在任何地方使用的浏览器应用程序时都可以重用相同的代码。如果HTML5变得更好，我相信它将成为流行的趋势，因为开放源码(廉价技术)。毫无疑问，在开发桌面应用程序方面，WPF比我使用过的任何东西都要好得多，而且c#作为语言(而不是速度)和它的使用方式更加强大。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|619863|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Using WPF is way better then WinForms and you need to have different mindset.
All I can say is Microsoft should have used HTML syntax when creating WPF and Silverlight applications so that front end coulde reused or at least for silverlight apps so that people that develope on Desktop could reuse the same code when writing browser apps that could be used anywhere. 
If HTML5 becomes better I'm sure it will become popular as trend is toward open source (cheap technologies). No doubt WPF is far better for developing desktop apps then anything else I've used and c# is more powerfull as language (not speed) and how it's used.

blocks|key|619904|text|我开始学习它，马修MacDonald写了一本关于它的超级书。我向每个人推荐那本书(事实上，我是在上网学习WPF，直到我看到他的书，还有一件事是“远离微软网站(MSDN)”。)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|619905|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I am begining to learn it Matthew MacDonald has writen a super book about it. I recommend that book to everyone (Infact I was surfing internet to learn WPF till I came across with his book and one more thing "stay away from Microsoft site (MSDN)"

There has been a lot of talk surrounding the likes of WPF. I am wondering if WPF will become a new standard for graphical interactive user interface design. Is this where we are headed in terms of windows interfaces? Will it really take off like everyone says it will?
<h3>See also</h3>
<blockquote>
<a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/173471/learning-windows-forms-vs-windows-presentation-foundation">Learning Windows Forms vs. Windows Presentation Foundation</a>
(Contains links to many other useful posts on WPF).
</blockquote>

Is WPF the future of user interface design? Should I learn it now?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

有很多关于WPF之类的话题。我想知道WPF是否会成为图形交互用户界面设计的新标准。这就是我们在windows接口方面的发展方向吗？它真的会像大家说的那样起飞吗？另请参阅(包含指向WPF上许多其他有用文章的链接)。

问WPF是用户界面设计的未来吗？我现在应该学吗？
EN

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问WPF是用户界面设计的未来吗？我现在应该学吗？EN

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问WPF是用户界面设计的未来吗？我现在应该学吗？
EN