blocks|key|909992|text|编写自己的Javascript通常意味着在尝试实现跨浏览器兼容性时重新发明轮子。像jQuery和MooTools这样的框架为您提供了大量的服务。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|909993|就个人而言，我建议选择Javascript框架或使用GWT，但实际上这只是个人偏好的问题，就像选择编程语言一样。选一个最适合你的，或者你最熟悉的。|909994|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

Writing your own Javascript often means reinventing the wheel when it comes to trying to attain cross-browser compatibility. Frameworks such as jQuery and MooTools take care of much of that grunt work for you.

Personally, I would suggest picking a Javascript framework or using GWT, but really it's just a matter of personal preference at that point, much like choosing a programming language. Pick that one that is best for your purposes, or that you're most familiar with.

blocks|key|2283554|text|我会和jQuery一起去。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2283555|jQuery将与Visual的下一个版本捆绑在一起。谷歌使用jQuery。jQuery拥有世界上最大的用户群。说到不要再发明轮子:+jQuery也拥有世界上最大的插件存储库。包括它自己的官方UI库，该库正在不断开发中。|2283556|。。如果你是书迷，目前有3-4本关于这个框架的书。|2283557|哦，太棒了！查看道格拉斯·克罗克福德的网站获得伟大的香草JavaScript技巧和技巧。|offset|length|2283558|我的两分钱:)|2283559|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://crockford.com/^0|0|0|0|8|D|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@$H|X|I|Y|1|Z]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]]]

I'd go with jQuery.

jQuery will be bundled with the next version of Visual Studio. Google uses jQuery. jQuery has the largest user-base of any of the frameworks out there.. And speaking of not re-inventing the wheel: jQuery also has the largest plugin-repository of any of the frameworks out there.. Including its own official UI library which is in constant development.

.. And if you're a fan of books; there's 3-4 books about the framework out currently.

Oh, yeah! Check out <a href="http://crockford.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Douglas Crockford's website</a> for great vanilla JavaScript tips and tricks.

Just my two cents :)

blocks|key|758626|text|jQuery|type|unordered-list-item|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|758627|原型|758628|MooTools|758629|道场|758630|GWT|758631|ExtJS|758632|所有这些都会让您使用非常可靠的代码，这通常是提高您自己技能的最佳方法。别忘了他们的所有扩展/插件。|unstyled|758633|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://jquery.com/|1|http://www.prototypejs.org/|2|http://mootools.net/|3|http://dojotoolkit.org/|4|http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/|5|http://www.extjs.com/^0|0|6|0|0|0|2|1|0|0|8|2|0|0|2|3|0|0|3|4|0|0|5|5|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|18|8|@]|9|@$A|19|B|1A|1|1B]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@$A|1D|B|1E|1|1F]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|1G|8|@]|9|@$A|1H|B|1I|1|1J]]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|9|@$A|1L|B|1M|1|1N]]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|1O|8|@]|9|@$A|1P|B|1Q|1|1R]]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|1S|8|@]|9|@$A|1T|B|1U|1|1V]]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|P|7|1W|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|P|7|1X|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|R|$S|$5|T|U|V|C|$W|X]]|Y|$5|T|U|V|C|$W|Z]]|10|$5|T|U|V|C|$W|11]]|12|$5|T|U|V|C|$W|13]]|14|$5|T|U|V|C|$W|15]]|16|$5|T|U|V|C|$W|17]]]]

<ul>
<li><a href="http://jquery.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">jQuery</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.prototypejs.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">prototype</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mootools.net/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">MooTools</a></li>
<li><a href="http://dojotoolkit.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">dojo</a></li>
<li><a href="http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">GWT</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.extjs.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ExtJS</a></li>
</ul>

Those will all have you working with very solid code, which is usually the best way to improve your own skills. And don't forget all their extensions/plugins.

blocks|key|2283431|text|我推荐jQuery。与我见过的大多数其他JavaScript库相比，它更易于扩展和重量更轻(您可以使用AJAX+API缓存它)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2283432|对于基于Flash的AJAX+web应用程序，Flex是一个更好的解决方案。|2283433|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I would recommend jQuery. It's more extensible and light-weight than most other JavaScript libraries I've seen (and you can have it Google-cached with the AJAX APIs).

For Flash-based AJAX web apps, Flex is a better solution.

blocks|key|2283505|text|由于这是一个相当主观的问题，我将投入我的两分钱。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2283506|我使用Dojo工具包进行了开发，发现它非常全面。但是，如果不在库上进行自定义构建，则会减慢一切。它的学习曲线比其他框架更陡峭，但似乎非常接近Javascript的核心。|2283507|但这不是道场的广告。我目前正在开发一个Ajax+web应用程序，我的目标是尽量避免使用框架。为什么？几个原因。|2283508|最大的原因是对代码的完全控制。并不是说我不信任工具包，我只是喜欢我的自定义代码。我没有任何我不使用的代码，我的所有抽象都是为我的目的定制的。有时，我实际上是在重新发明轮子*，但它总是有点不同，因为它的目的是建立。|2283509|另一个主要原因是我所获得的知识的数量。我相信我可以更快地获得任何框架，因为我没有在项目中使用任何框架。我比以前了解得更多。在此之前，它更像是一个巫毒神秘盒，而现在，框架对我来说更有意义了。|2283510|事实是，如果您执行任何重要的javascript，您最终将得到一个框架(或混乱)。在现实中，它可能不是最快的方式来编写网络应用，但这并不是所有的困难，通过一点练习。你可能会惊讶于你能想到的那些以前不存在的创造性的东西。|2283511|*发明方向盘是一个可怕的类比，我们都使用。我们一直在重新发明轮子。先是用石头做的，然后是更轻的木头，轮胎等等.我的卡车的轮子和我的轿车不一样。|2283512|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|O|$]]

Since this is a fairly subjective question I will put in my 2 cents.

I've developed using the Dojo toolkit and found it very well rounded. However, if you don't do a custom build on your library it slows everything down. It has a steeper learning curve than other frameworks, but seems to sit pretty close to heart of Javascript. 

But this isn't an advertisement for dojo. I'm working on a Ajax web app currently and my goal is to try and avoid using a framework. Why? A few reasons.

The biggest reason is complete control over the code. Not that I don't trust toolkits, I just like my custom code. I don't have any code that I don't use, and all of my abstractions are custom made for my purposes. At times I am in fact reinventing the wheel*, but its always a bit different because it's purpose built.

The other big reason is the amount of knowledge I gain. I'm confident that I could pick up any framework much faster, because of not using one for a project. I understand so much more than I did previously. Before It was more like a voodoo mystery box, and now even frameworks make more sense to me.

The fact of the matter is if you do any non-trivial javascript you will end up with a framework (or a mess). In reality it may not be the fastest way to write web apps, but it isn't all that hard with a little practice. You can be amazed at what creative things you can come up with that didn't exist before.

<hr>

*Reinventing the wheel is a terrible analogy that we all use. We reinvent wheels all the time. First made of stone, then lighter wood, tires, etc... My truck doesn't have the same wheels as my sedan.

blocks|key|910035|text|和其他响应者一样，我更喜欢使用框架，但我最喜欢的是道场+--干净、设计精良的体系结构、好书(我最喜欢的是马修·拉塞尔)，如果用户安装了浏览器扩展(比如Google或Microsoft+)，那么使用浏览器扩展(比如Google或Microsoft)尤其令人印象深刻；如果没有合适的浏览器扩展(或者有HTML5支持的足够先进的浏览器)，则会优雅地后退(例如使用Ajax接口的服务器端存储)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|910036|目前，Dojo比jquery稍受欢迎(例如，[jquery+ajax]在Google上的点击量为840万次，[dojo+ajax]为430万次)，但这仍然足够受欢迎，以确保它不会很快消失；-)。|style|CODE|910037|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://dojotoolkit.org/|1|https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0596516487^0|P|2|0|1G|6|1|0|M|D|1I|B|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]|$A|V|B|W|1|X]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Y|8|@$A|Z|B|10|F|G]|$A|11|B|12|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|O]]|P|$5|K|L|M|C|$N|Q]]]]

Like other responders I prefer to use frameworks, but my favorite is <a href="http://dojotoolkit.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">dojo</a> -- clean and well-designed architecture, good books (my favorite being <a href="https://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/com/0596516487" rel="nofollow noreferrer" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Matthew Russel's</a>), and a particularly impressive approach to using browser extensions (such as Google Gears or Microsoft Silverlight) if the user has them installed, while falling back gracefully (e.g. to Ajax-interfaced server-side storage) if no suitable browser extensions (or sufficiently advanced browsers, with HTML5 support) are present.

Dojo is, currently, slightly less popular than jquery (e.g., <code>[jquery ajax]</code> has 8.4 million hits on Google Search, vs 4.3 million for <code>[dojo ajax]</code>), but that's still way popular enough to ensure it won't go away any time soon;-).

blocks|key|910921|text|您必须检查ExtJS。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|910922|我见过的大多数库都有可用的核心，但缺少可以相互融合的小部件/控制库。当然，您可以为jQuery获得大量的控件，但您是否有时间了解哪些控件具有预期的功能，并调整它们的外观以与其他控件匹配？ExtJS给你的正是这个。核心就是核心。它起作用了，效果也很好。但是，兼容的和功能丰富的控件的广泛选择是使您的生活更轻松的主要驱动程序。|style|BOLD|910923|我将ExtJS与Asp.Net和WCF服务结合使用，这是一次非常好的体验。您将需要一些时间来了解ExtJS组件模型，以便进一步扩展它(就像您需要对其他库进行同样的扩展一样)，但是当您这样做时，您就开始更加喜欢它了。|910924|还有一件事:由于MS附带了MVC的jQuery，这并不意味着它是最好的。这只意味着它是最好的之一(也比微软内部的Ajax好得多)，但它拥有最宽松的开源许可。|910925|编辑：既然Silverlight+3已经发布，它显然会因其离线支持和丰富的图形支持而有所动摇。以及独立的桌面，如网络应用程序。肯定是要考虑的..。|910926|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.extjs.com/^0|5|5|0|0|3K|3|0|0|0|0|2|5|D|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Z|8|@$A|10|B|11|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|14|8|@$A|15|B|16|F|G]|$A|17|B|18|F|G]]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|N|3|-4|5|6|7|19|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|O|$P|$5|Q|R|S|C|$T|U]]]]

You must check <a href="http://www.extjs.com" rel="nofollow noreferrer">ExtJS</a>.

Most libraries I've seen have usable core but lack the widget/control library that will blend-in with each other. Sure you can get a vast number of controls for jQuery, but do you have the time to find out which ones have intended functionality and tweak their visual appearance to match the rest of controls? ExtJS gives you just that. Core is core. It works and it works great. But the vast selection of compatible and functionality rich controls is the main driver that will make your life easier.

I've used ExtJS with Asp.Net and WCF services and it was a really nice experience overall. You will need some time to get to know ExtJS component model to extend it even further (as you would need to do the same with other libs), but when you do, you start loving it even more.

One more thing: since MS ships jQuery with MVC it doesn't mean it's the best. It only means it's one of the best (and much better than Microsoft's in-house Ajax) but with the most relaxed open source license.

Edit: Now that Silverlight 3 has shipped it became apparent it will shake things a bit with its offline support and rich graphics support. As well as standalone desktop like web apps. Definitely something to consider...

blocks|key|2283619|text|请注意，WPF与ajax无关。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2283620|AJAX+=异步javascript和xml|2283621|WPF+=一种只使用windows的UI显示技术。在浏览器中使用的唯一选项是创建一个Xbap。与之相对应的是silverlight+(比方说，就像flash，但来自微软)，所以也许你也应该研究一下.这就像使用flash，但使用熟悉的MS技术。|2283622|关于在ajax情况下使用哪个框架的问题:我更喜欢jQuery。它的简短语法和链接允许您非常迅速地达到您的目标，以一种直观的方式。|2283623|而且，据我所知，GWT是一个Java框架，它也在客户机上呈现内容。所以你会有Java作为后端语言的局限性。|2283624|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|N|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|K|$]]

Please note that WPF has nothing to do with ajax.

AJAX = Asynchronous javascript and xml

WPF = a windows-only UI display technology. The only option there for in-browser use is to create an Xbap. The more-suited-for-the-web counterpart is silverlight (say, like flash but from microsoft), so perhaps you should look into that as well... it's like using flash, but with familiar MS technologies.

<hr>

Concerning your question about which framework to use in case of ajax: I prefer jQuery. It's short syntax and chaining allow you to reach your goals very fast in an intuitive way.

Also, GWT is a Java framework that also renders stuff on the client, as far as i know. So you would have the limitation of Java as backend language...

blocks|key|910117|text|在过去的7个月里，GWT取得了相当大的飞跃。多个GWT小部件库得到了广泛的关注，Google在库方面的工作令人印象深刻。GWT限制您：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|910118|使用GWT小部件|ordered-list-item|910119|可能成为GWT小部件开发人员|910120|这些好处包括：|910121|用Java编写代码|910122|Java中的调试|910123|跳过JavaScript中让你把头发拔出来的部分|910124|GWT是超越AJAX的一步。它掩埋了HTML+/+JavaScript，这样您就不需要处理它了，而且还提供了访问权限，以防您想要处理它。|910125|总的来说，您将花费更少的时间尝试使小事情工作，而更多的时间为您的应用程序添加令人敬畏的东西。|910126|entityMap^0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|E|3|F|5|D|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|G|3|H|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|D|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|D|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|D|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|S|3|-4|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|T|$]]

GWT has made considerable leaps and bounds over the past 7 months. The mutiple GWT widget libraries have received a good deal of attention, and Google's work on the library has been impressive. Going GWT limits you to:

<ol>
<li>Using GWT widgets</li>
<li>Possibly becoming a GWT widget developer</li>
</ol>

The benefits include:

<ol>
<li>Coding in Java</li>
<li>Debugging in Java</li>
<li>Skipping the parts of JavaScript that make you pull your hair out</li>
</ol>

GWT is the step past AJAX. It buries the HTML / JavaScript so that you don't need to deal with it, but also provides access in case you do want to deal with it.

Overall, you will spend less time trying to get small things working, and more time adding awesome to your application.

blocks|key|758578|text|还有prototype.js|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|758579|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

blocks|key|910978|text|试试雅虎!用户界面库(YUI)|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|910979|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/^0|2|D|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

Try the <a href="http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Yahoo! User Interface Library (YUI)</a>

blocks|key|910962|text|选择一个图书馆学习，然后拿起其他的--但我不认为我会重新发明轮子。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|910963|我选择了MooTools，并从那时起就开始使用jQuery/Prototype。(选择Mootools是因为当时他们的站点是唯一一个对html进行有效验证的网站，干净的html意味着干净的javascript)。|910964|关于MooTools的旁注:MooTools的一个经常被忽略的特性是下载构建器。您可以下载足够多的框架源代码，使AJAX正常工作，而没有其他任何东西。|910965|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Pick a library to learn, then pick up the others--but I don't think I'd reinvent the wheel.

I picked MooTools and have picked up jQuery/Prototype since. (Picked Mootools because their site, at the time, was the only one that validated, figured clean html meant clean javascript).

Side note about MooTools:
An often overlooked feature of MooTools is the download builder. You can download just enough of the framework source to get your AJAX working, and nothing else.

blocks|key|2283779|text|英国广播公司的开源javascript库名为辉光|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2283780|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.bbc.co.uk/glow/docs/1.5/^0|M|2|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

There's the BBC's open source javascript library called <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/glow/docs/1.5/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Glow</a>

I have some experience in AJAX development, mostly on .NET and MooTools. However, I want to learn more and see what others out there thought about the various other options available. I am looking more for advice about the front end. The back end, I will most probably be coding it in .NET using c# and WCF services.

Please feel free to provide me as much information as you can. Also, I would appreciate any links to resources.

List of Options (feel free to add)

<ul>
<li>Write my own Javascript</li>
<li>Use a framework like MooTools, JQuery, etc. Which one is better?</li>
<li>Use Google Web Toolkit. Am I tying myself to the limitations of GWT? Or are there not limitations? </li>
<li>ASP.NET AJAX</li>
<li>WPF (Will this run on non-IE browsers?)</li>
<li>Flash (it'll be a pain to learn action script)</li>
</ul>

Thanks
Jaspreet

Best Technologies for AJAX Web Development

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我在AJAX开发方面有一些经验，主要是在.NET和MooTools方面。然而，我想了解更多，看看其他人对其他可用的各种选择有什么看法。我正在寻找更多关于前端的建议。在后端，我很可能使用.NET和WCF服务在c#中编写代码。请随时向我提供尽可能多的信息。此外，我希望任何与资源的联系。选项列表(请随意添加)写我自己的Javascript使用MooTools、JQuery等框架，哪个更好？使用。我是否将

问AJAX Web开发的最佳技术
EN

回答 13

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问AJAX Web开发的最佳技术EN

回答 13

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问AJAX Web开发的最佳技术
EN