blocks|key|1067936|text|除非您是在设备上进行开发，否则为什么不直接使用通常使用的IDE呢？反正你也要交叉编译了。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1067937|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

Unless you're developing on the device, why not just use the IDE you usually use? You're gonna be cross-compiling anyway.

blocks|key|1067965|text|我广泛使用代码：：块|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1067966|代码：：块|offset|length|1067967|这个东西太神奇了，如果你有任何的二进制程序，手臂精灵，avr-精灵，VC，mingw，你可以使用任何你想要的，只是选择工具集的项目属性，添加一些库.|1067968|我曾经将用于LPC处理器的flash2000、objdump等工具添加为外部命令。|1067969|这个IDE有很多工具，这使得交叉编译更快、更容易。而且它比Eclipse+%2B+CDT和其他东西要好得多(读得更快，更小)。|1067970|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.codeblocks.org/^0|0|0|5|0|0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@$D|V|E|W|1|X]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]]]

I widely used Code::Blocks 

<a href="http://www.codeblocks.org/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">code::blocks</a>

This thing is so amazing,
If you have any binutils arm-elf, avr-elf, VC, mingw, installed You could use whatever you want, just chose toolset in properties of project, add some libraries etc...

I've used to add other tools like flash2000 for LPC processors, objdump etc. as an external command.

There are plenty of tools for this IDE which makes your cross compilation faster &amp; easier.
And it's much better (read faster, smaller) than Eclipse + CDT and other stuff.

blocks|key|2592923|text|我认为您正在朝着正确的方向前进(使用Eclipse)。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2592924|我认为您的问题是为什么不能标记代码，但是我知道Eclipse支持ctag(所以它不是不可能的)。|2592925|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I think you are going in the right direction (with Eclipse).

I think your question is why you can't tag you code, 
however I know that Eclipse supports ctags (so it is not in any way impossible).

blocks|key|2592971|text|我开发嵌入式产品已经有一段时间了，主要是使用带有ctag+(etags)和cscope的emacs。最近，我开始使用SlickEdit，它运行得很好。不过，我个人建议您熟悉Vim/Emacs任何您觉得舒服的编辑器。emacs/vim的最佳之处在于，它具有灵活性，可以通过插件/任何您所称的插件来扩展功能。有许多第三方插件可用于扩展这些编辑器。当然，你需要投入一些时间才能开始。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2592972|entityMap^0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|D|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|-4|5|6|7|E|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|C|$]]

I have been working on embedded products for quite some time, mostly I use emacs with ctags (etags) and cscope. I have, of late, started using SlickEdit, it works just fine. However, I personally recommend you to get familiar with Vim/Emacs whatever editor you feel comfortable. The best thing about emacs/vim is that the flexibility to extend the functionality through plugin / whatever you call it. There are lot of third party plugins available to extend these editors. Of course, you need to invest some time to get started.

blocks|key|2593007|text|我使用了vim，特别是在Linux/unix系统中使用cscope+(用于源代码交叉引用)。Vim在支持代码完成的最新版本中非常出色。很多插件可用。|type|unordered-list-item|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2593008|Emacs是一个强大的马，许多定制的support.It支持CVS/Clearcase+.|2593009|unstyled|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|E|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|F|$]]

<ul>
<li>I used vim especially working with Linux/unix systems with cscope (for source cross-reference). Vim is nifty with latest versions supporting code-completion. Lot of plugins available.</li>
<li>Emacs is a power-horse, lot of customizing support.It support CVS/Clearcase AFAIK.</li>
</ul>

blocks|key|1068047|text|Eclipse被用作(也是CDT的主要贡献者)、WindRiver、导师图形等嵌入式开发IDE的基础，因此它有一定的份量。绿山有一个Eclipse插件为他们的工具链。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1068048|然而，从集成您自己的工具中获得一个无缝的开发环境是一项艰巨的工作，但由于开放的插件体系结构，它比其他文本编辑器更可行。这取决于您想要的集成级别。在大多数编辑器中，编辑和生成都是直接的.获取所有、编辑、构建、构建/依赖关系管理(makefile生成)、版本控制、源代码浏览和远程源代码级别的调试，都是像上述供应商中的一个现成套件之外的一项任务。|1068049|许多来自Keil或IAR等公司的基于非Eclipse的IDE看起来有点过时，很少能满足于编辑器的要求，尽管它们在目标硬件、RTOS识别和仿真方面经常提供很多低级别的功能。|1068050|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

Eclipse is used as the basis for Embedded development IDEs from QNX Software Systems (who are also the primary contributors to the CDT), WindRiver, Mentor Graphic, and others, so it has some weight behind it. Green-Hills have an Eclipse plug-in for their toolchain. 

Getting a seamless development environment from integrating your own tools is hard work however, but more viable than with other Text Editors because of the open plug-in architecture. It depends on the level of integration you want. Edit and build are straight-forward in most editors. Getting all of, edit, build, build/dependency-management (makefile generation), version control, source browsing and remote source level debug, is a bit of a task outside of an off-the-shelf suite from someone like one of the above vendors.

Many of the proprietary non-Eclipse based IDE's from the likes of Keil or IAR are looking a little old fashioned, and are seldom satisfactory as editors, although they often offer a lot of low level functionality in terms of target hardware and RTOS awareness and simulation.

blocks|key|1065148|text|如果您愿意在内置编译器和SVN支持上妥协，那么我会说源洞察是满足您所有其他需求的最好工具。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|1065149|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.sourceinsight.com/^0|Q|3|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|L|8|@]|9|@$A|M|B|N|1|O]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|E|$F|$5|G|H|I|C|$J|K]]]]

If you are willing to compromise on in-built compiler and SVN support, then I would say <a href="http://www.sourceinsight.com/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Source Insight</a> is the best tool for your all other requirement.

blocks|key|1065160|text|我目前正在使用IAR的工作台，这已经足够好了。我以前在CDT插件中使用了Eclipse+(可能在某个时候还会)，它的代码导航工作得很好。我不记得花了太多时间才能让它索引代码，但我使用的是GCC+(这可能是一个因素)，我还记得在Eclipse导航时，我不得不重新启动Eclipse和/或手动告诉它重新索引。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1065161|然而，即使IAR的Workbench在大多数情况下都能很好地工作，但当我真的想在指尖上拥有良好的代码导航时，我只是在Visual中加载了一个包含源代码树的makefile项目。makefile命令只需调用IAR的命令行实用程序来执行构建。这是非常好的工作，除了调试-我必须去IAR为这个。当我处于调试模式时，保持IAR就更容易了。但是，如果我正在分析或切割代码，我将转到VS。|1065162|因此，基本上，只要目标的工具链提供由命令行驱动的工具，您通常可以在大部分开发中使用您喜欢的任何IDE。|1065163|entityMap^0|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|I|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|J|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|K|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|G|$]]

I'm currently using IAR's Workbench which is nice enough. I've used Eclipse with the CDT plug-in before (and probably will again at some point) and its code navigation worked just fine. I don't recall having to futz around too much to get it to index the code, but I was using GCC (which might be a factor) and I do recall having to restart Eclipse and/or manually tell it to reindex at times when it would seem to have some trouble navigating.

However, even though IAR's Workbench works well enough for most things, when I really want to have nice code navigation at my fingertips, I just load up Visual Studio with a makefile project that includes the source tree. The makefile commands simply call out to IAR's command line utilities to perform the build. This works fantastically well except for the debugging - I have to go to IAR Workbench for that. And when I'm in a debugging mode it's just easier to stay in IAR. But if I'm analyzing or cutting code, I'll move to VS for that.

So basically, you can generally use whatever IDE you prefer for much of your development as long as your toolchain for the target provides for being driven by the command line.

blocks|key|2593134|text|我使用了显微镜(Vex平台)、EVC%2B%2B和Maemo+compilers%2BNano进行嵌入式编程。您所请求的大多数其他工具通常在IDE之外找到。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2593135|然而，Netbeans可以配置为编译非Java代码.不只是不方便而已。如果您使用C%2B%2B进行开发，您可能可以更改所使用的编译器，并且可以轻松地使用C%2B%2B插件。|2593136|entityMap^0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|F|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|G|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|-4|5|6|7|H|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|E|$]]

I've used Microscope (Vex Platform), EVC++, and the Maemo compilers+Nano for embedded programming. Most of the other tools you request are often found outside the IDE.

However, Netbeans can be configured to compile non-Java code. Its not just not as convenient. If you are developping with C++ you might be able to change the compiler used and you would be able to use the C++ plugin with ease.

blocks|key|2593153|text|http://mbeddr.com/|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2593154|刚刚发布了一个嵌入式系统的IDE|2593155|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|I|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@]|9|@$A|N|B|O|1|P]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|4]]]]

<a href="http://mbeddr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mbeddr.com/</a>

Just released an IDE for embedded systems

blocks|key|1068201|text|我认为如果问题是关于IDE的选择，那么答案是Eclipse+。经验丰富的人，如"TDD与嵌入式C“的作者，詹姆斯格伦宁喜欢和使用它。有关更多信息，请参阅上述书的附录。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|1068202|entityMap^0|M|8|14|8|1H|6|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@$9|I|A|J|B|C]|$9|K|A|L|B|C]|$9|M|A|N|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$]]

I think if the question is about the choice of IDE, then the answer is Eclipse with CDT. Seasoned guys like the author of "TDD with Embedded C", James Grenning likes and uses it. See appendix of the mentioned book for more.

I do a lot of embedded development work in C. I'm looking for an IDE that can give me the same kind of features as Eclipse or Visual Studio. In the past I've used Vim, but I'm just not happy with the amount of work it is to use. Right now I'm trying to use Eclipse, but I can't get it to tag my code correctly. I also have access to Visual Studio and I might be able to get a SlickEdit license.

Can anyone recommend an editor? I'm looking for something that has

<ul>
<li>Some type of code completion</li>
<li>SVN support</li>
<li>Indexing/tagging of variable, function names etc</li>
<li>Support for interpreting code that may be #ifed out</li>
<li>Third party compiler support</li>
</ul>

Is there a way to generate tags on the code without having a make file or building the code with gcc?

IDE for embedded development

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

我在C中做了很多嵌入式开发工作，我正在寻找一个IDE，它可以给我提供与Eclipse或Visual相同的特性。在过去，我使用了Vim，但我只是不满意它要使用的工作量。现在我正在尝试使用Eclipse，但是我无法让它正确地标记我的代码。我还可以访问Visual，并可能获得SlickEdit许可证。有人推荐编辑吗？我要找的...

问嵌入式开发IDE
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问嵌入式开发IDEEN