注意,我特别提到的事实是,类方法使用点表示法,而不是实例方法。
出于好奇,我想看看如果我尝试用一个类方法使用Objective点符号语法会发生什么。我的实验如下:
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
static int _value = 8;
@interface Test : NSObject
+ (int) value;
+ (void) setValue:(int)value;
@end
@implementation Test
+ (int) value {
return _value;
}
+ (void) setValue:(int)value {
_value = value;
}
@end
int main(int argc, char * argv[]) {
NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];
NSLog(@"Test.value: %d", Test.value);
NSLog(@"[Test value]: %d", [Test value]);
Test.value = 20;
NSLog(@"Test.value: %d", Test.value);
NSLog(@"[Test value]: %d", [Test value]);
[Test setValue:30];
NSLog(@"Test.value: %d", Test.value);
NSLog(@"[Test value]: %d", [Test value]);
[pool release];
return 0;
}我惊讶地看到,这是编译的,更不用说用正确的行为来执行了。这是在某个地方被记录下来的,还是编译器的侥幸?
我用GCC在MacOSX10.6上编译了:
gcc --version: i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5659)
compile using: gcc ObjCClassDotSyntax.m -framework Foundation -o ObjCClassDotSyntax
run: ./ObjCClassDotSyntax
output:
2010-03-03 17:33:07.342 test[33368:903] Test.value: 8
2010-03-03 17:33:07.346 test[33368:903] [Test value]: 8
2010-03-03 17:33:07.351 test[33368:903] Test.value: 20
2010-03-03 17:33:07.352 test[33368:903] [Test value]: 20
2010-03-03 17:33:07.353 test[33368:903] Test.value: 30
2010-03-03 17:33:07.353 test[33368:903] [Test value]: 30发布于 2014-07-06 23:27:22
下划线库进一步滥用了这种语法,从类方法中返回块,从而产生如下代码:
NSArray *elements = Underscore.array(array)
.flatten
.uniq
.unwrap;要理解这是如何工作的,请看一下Underscore.array的定义
+ (USArrayWrapper *(^)(NSArray *))array
{
return ^(NSArray *array) {
return [USArrayWrapper wrap:array];
};
}所以:
Underscore.array(array) 与此等价的...is:
NSArray *array = @[];
USArrayWrapper * (^arr)(NSArray *) = [Underscore array];
USArrayWrapper *result = arr(array);https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2375943
复制相似问题