blocks|key|2208545|text|根据我对其他人使用它的了解，我只能主要评论Sitecore，也可以对Umbraco发表一点评论：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2208546|是一个企业级的web，带有“企业价格标签”。它非常可扩展，拥有大量的开发人员/社区支持，并且非常支持开发人员。内容的结构是基于一个具有父-子关系的节点树。在WCM社区中，Sitecore作为内容管理的领导者而闻名，并且被sch公司评为Forrester研究公司等。|2208547|根据我以前的研究和与朋友们的交谈，Umbraco非常相似。它的价格比西科雷低，但它并不是一个完全的剽窃。Umbraco也是建立在ASP.NET上的，就像Sitecore一样。|offset|length|style|BOLD|2208548|来自开发人员的这里有一个三部分的系列文章，讲述的是塞特奥尔和乌姆布拉科。|2208549|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://web.archive.org/web/20130801034615/http://blog.created.dk/post/Sitecore-vs-Umbraco-e28093-introduction.aspx^0|0|0|H|7|0|7|S|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@$F|W|G|X|H|I]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|Y|8|@]|9|@$F|Z|G|10|1|11]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]]]

I can only comment mainly on Sitecore and a bit on Umbraco from my knowledge of others using it:

Sitecore is an enterprise level web CMS with an "enterprise price tag." It's very extensible, has a lot of developer/community support, and is very developer friendly. The structure of content is based on a tree of nodes with parent-children relationships. Sitecore is well known in the WCM community as a leader in content management and is rated very well by companies sch as Forrester Research, etc.

Based on my previous research and conversations with friends, Umbraco is very similar to Sitecore. It has a lower price compared to Sitecore but its not a complete rip off. Umbraco is also built on ASP.NET like Sitecore.

<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130801034615/http://blog.created.dk/post/Sitecore-vs-Umbraco-e28093-introduction.aspx" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Here's a three-part series on Sitecore vs. Umbraco</a> from a developer.

blocks|key|1011437|text|在你上面提到的那些，我只使用Umbraco和Sitecore来构建，并且在这两个方面都得到了认证。我喜欢他们允许我建立对我的客户真正有效的系统的方式。他们都有一种感觉，他们只是给你积木来创建你的杰作，而不是“模块”的功能插在你的博客，论坛等。他们使它真的很容易分享内容在整个网站，并创造了非常好的管理经验。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1011438|的社区真的很棒。他们在文档方面都有一点困难，海事组织，但是Umbraco的视频确实有帮助，社区也很快提供了帮助。另外，如果你说的是成本，那么它是免费的(Umbraco)和相当昂贵的(Sitecore)。|1011439|但现实情况是，每个开发人员都有自己的品味和喜欢与之合作的CMS风格。最终，当涉及到每个CMS如何为最终用户执行时，必须构建站点的团队才是最重要的。|1011440|除了上面的链接之外，下面还有几篇博客文章，可以帮助您了解不同的系统：|1011441|果园与乌姆布拉-游戏攻略+(4的第1部分)-亚伦·鲍威尔|offset|length|1011442|Sitecore与Umbraco术语|1011443|祝好运!|1011444|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.aaron-powell.com/orchard-umbraco|1|http://www.proworks.com/blog/2009/07/15/sitecore-vs-umbraco-terminology/^0|0|0|0|0|0|C|0|0|0|I|1|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|10|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|13|8|@]|9|@$J|14|K|15|1|16]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|M|5|6|7|17|8|@]|9|@$J|18|K|19|1|1A]]|A|$]]|$1|N|3|O|5|6|7|1B|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|P|3|-4|5|6|7|1C|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|Q|$R|$5|S|T|U|A|$V|W]]|X|$5|S|T|U|A|$V|Y]]]]

Of the ones you mention above, I have only used Umbraco and Sitecore to build with and am certified in both. I like the way they allow me to build systems that really work well for my customers. They both have a feel that they simply give you building blocks to create your masterpiece instead of "modules" of functionality plugged in that give you a blog, forum, etc. They make it really easy to share content throughout the site and create really nice admin experiences.

Umbraco's community is really great. They both struggle a little on the documentation side IMO, but Umbraco's videos really help and the community is quick to help. Also, if you're talking cost then its free (Umbraco) vs. quite expensive (Sitecore).

But the reality is that each developer has their own taste and the style of CMS they like to work with. Ultimately, its the team that has to build the site that really matters most when it comes to how each CMS performs for the end user.

In addition to the links above, here are a couple blog posts that may help you get a feel for the different systems:

<a href="http://www.aaron-powell.com/orchard-umbraco" rel="noreferrer">Orchard &amp; Umbraco - Introduction</a> (part 1 of 4) - Aaron Powell

<a href="http://www.proworks.com/blog/2009/07/15/sitecore-vs-umbraco-terminology/" rel="noreferrer">Sitecore vs. Umbraco Terminology</a>

Good luck!

blocks|key|1011489|text|所有不同的网页内容管理系统都有不同的优势。所以哪一个最适合你，很大程度上取决于你创建什么样的网站，你有什么样的预算，在CMS中你认为最重要的是什么。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1011490|例如，Orchard和SiteCore是非常不同的系统。|1011491|我在那里工作时有一点偏见，但我相信CMS节点CMS比您提到的系统有几个重要的优势。|offset|length|1011492|关键字:内容之间的关系，不同内容类型的实际类，用于所有数据访问的自定义LINQ提供程序，将所有内容公开为OData端点等。|1011493|微软使用我们的CMS在Mix11上演示了Mix11。来自Mix+11的视频|1011494|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.webnodes.com/|1|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmEr87-NE40^0|0|0|H|8|0|0|0|Q|B|1|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|W|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|X|8|@]|9|@$F|Y|G|Z|1|10]]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|I|5|6|7|11|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|K|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@$F|13|G|14|1|15]]|A|$]]|$1|L|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|M|$N|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|S]]|T|$5|O|P|Q|A|$R|U]]]]

All the different web content management systems have different strengths. So which one is best for you depends a lot on what kind of sites you create, what kind of budget you have and what you think matters the most in a CMS. 

For example, Orchard and SiteCore are VERY different systems.

I'm a bit biased as I work there, but I believe that <a href="http://www.webnodes.com" rel="nofollow">Webnodes CMS</a> have several important advantages over the systems you mention. 

Keywords: Relations between content, actual classes for the different content types, custom LINQ provider for all data access, expose all content as an OData endpoint etc.

Microsoft used our CMS to demonstrate OData at Mix11. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmEr87-NE40" rel="nofollow">Video from Mix 11</a>

blocks|key|1011504|text|Wordpress与Episerver：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1011505|http://tedgustaf.com/blog/2011/2/comparison-of-episerver-and-wordpress/|offset|length|1011506|好的，写这篇文章的人是Episerver的顾问，但它很有趣，很平衡。|1011507|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url^0|0|0|1Z|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|O|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|P|8|@]|9|@$D|Q|E|R|1|S]]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|H|3|-4|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|I|$J|$5|K|L|M|A|$N|C]]]]

Wordpress vs Episerver:

<a href="http://tedgustaf.com/blog/2011/2/comparison-of-episerver-and-wordpress/" rel="nofollow">http://tedgustaf.com/blog/2011/2/comparison-of-episerver-and-wordpress/</a>

OK so the guy who wrote that is an Episerver consultant but it's interesting and balanced.

blocks|key|2567526|text|我主要是与EPiServer和Sitecore合作，我可以简单地告诉你不同之处：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|2567527|Sitecore具有更广泛的体系结构和更强大的UI。CMS具有高度的可配置性和可扩展性，具有灵活的发布和缓存系统，强大的搜索功能和页面编辑器。但是它并没有提供太多现成的东西，而且UI非常古老，速度慢，而且很难学习。因此，这将是一段漫长的旅程，直到你很好地理解它，并为编辑提供对其所有功能的良好支持。|unordered-list-item|offset|length|style|BOLD|2567528|EPiServer很简单，对用户和开发人员都很友好。它提供了必不可少的一系列功能，具有简单的UI和页面编辑器，良好的拖放体验，易于个性化。它是代码第一，与NuGet一起发布，为其服务提供依赖注入，提供现成的MVC支持。但是它并不是如此的可扩展和可配置，它有纯粹的搜索(没有昂贵的EPiFind模块)，而且与Sitecore相比，它的功能通常更低。因此，这对中小型网站是有益的，但也可能成为复杂解决方案的一个障碍。|2567529|两者都有相似的树项概念，丰富的文档，纯公共模块系统和硬用户界面定制。既昂贵又不开放源码。|2567530|据我所知，Umbraco非常类似于EPiServer和Sitecore，但它是免费的、开源的。当然，您可以获得更少的特性、更多的bug、不多的文档和没有免费的支持。|2567531|Orchard与其他三种不育系有很大的不同。它是基于模块的，就像Wordpress:您使用标准或公共模块和主题，而不是从头开始编写整个网站。您创建您自己的主题和模块，以自定义网站和CMS。因此，整个CMS是高度可扩展的，并提供了许多免费的社区模块。但与此同时，你失去了控制，学习曲线更长。Orchard是免费的，开源的，完全基于MVC的，UI和API都做得很好，但是开发者和编辑器都很难理解它。|2567532|entityMap^0|0|0|8|0|0|9|0|0|5|7|0|0|7|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|D|7|T|8|@$E|U|F|V|G|H]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|D|7|W|8|@$E|X|F|Y|G|H]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|6|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|6|7|10|8|@$E|11|F|12|G|H]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|13|8|@$E|14|F|15|G|H]]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|Q|3|-4|5|6|7|16|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|R|$]]

I mostly work with EPiServer and Sitecore, and I can tell you the difference in short:

<ul>
<li>Sitecore has broader architecture and more powerfull UI. CMS is deeply configurable and highly extensible, it has clever publishing and caching system, powerful search and page editor. But it doesn't provide much out of box and UI is pretty old, slow and hard to learn. So this will be a long journey until you understand it good and make a good support of all its features for editors.</li>
<li>EPiServer is easy, friendly to users and developers. It provides an essential bunch of features out of box, has easy UI and page editor, good drag-and-drop experience, easy personalization. It is code-first, distributed with NuGet, provides dependency injection for its services, out of box MVC support. But it's not so extensible and configurable, has pure search (without expensive EPiFind module) and generally lower-featured comparing to Sitecore. So it's good for small/middle websites, but can be an obstacle in complex solutions.</li>
</ul>

Both have similar tree-item concept, rich documentation, pure public module system and hard UI customization. Both expensive and not open source.

As I know, Umbraco is pretty similar to EPiServer and Sitecore, but free and open source. Of course you get less features, more bugs, not much docs and no free support.

Orchard is really different comparing to other three CMS. It is module-based like Wordpress: you use standard or public modules and themes, instead of writing the whole website from scratch. You create your own themes and modules to customize the website and CMS. So entire CMS is highly extensible and provides a lot of free community modules. But in the same time you lose control and learning curve is much longer. Orchard is free and open-source, entirely MVC-based, UI and API are well done, but it can be hard for both developers and editors to understand it.

Increasingly, I have noticed the number of Content Management Systems in use. I have some familiarity with SiteCore. I have read some literature on Umbraco. I only just got wind of Orchard the other day. I have only heard positive feedback about EPiServer. I am soon to move into a role that uses it.

Do these differ vastly in features and price? What has led you to choose one (or several) over the others?

EDIT

I did a brief review of so-called free CMSs here: <a href="http://blog.philipcarney.com/post/16755851422/on-free-microsoft-compatible-content-management-systems" rel="nofollow noreferrer">On Free Microsoft Compatible Content Management Systems</a>

Reasons I ditched Orchard when developing a 50k page website:

<blockquote>
 The Orchard CMS import tool is simply too slow. It would only accept
 small batches at a time. Initially, it took eight minutes to import
 1000 records. So, working on that principle I expected that it could
 take seven hours to import all the records. Unfortunately, I started
 to receive performance issues as more records were inserted into the
 database. I even started to reduce the batch size, which helped only
 temporarily in the early stages. (See <a href="http://blog.philipcarney.com/post/27252645475/the-beginning-of-carnotaurus-cms" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Saying no to Orchard</a>)
</blockquote>

Choosing a CMS: EPiServer vs Orchard vs SiteCore vs Umbraco

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋 

腾讯云代码助手

CODING DevOps

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

我越来越多地注意到正在使用的内容管理系统的数量。我对SiteCore有些熟悉。我读过一些关于Umbraco的文献。前几天我才听到乌节岛的风声。我只听到了关于EPiServer的积极反馈。我很快就要进入一个使用它的角色了。这些在功能和价格上有很大的不同吗？是什么使你选择了一个(或几个)而不是其他？编辑我在这里简要回顾了所...

问选择一个CMS: EPiServer vs Orchard vs SiteCore vs Umbraco
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问选择一个CMS: EPiServer vs Orchard vs SiteCore vs UmbracoEN