blocks|key|1751100|text|集成IDE:开箱即用，免费使用=>+MSTest。如果您愿意下载和使用，有大量的测试运行程序。NUnit是最老的。如果你愿意付钱，你有重发，测试驱动网络和其他外接程序。Resharper有自己的测试运行包-所以这就是为什么你会看到这些棘手的问题。现在，如果您想运行和调试，那么您的选项将被削减更多。运行就像设置要调试的程序一样简单，就像单元测试运行程序exe一样。底线:除了MSTest之外，其他任何东西的集成都必须付费/下载。|type|ordered-list-item|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|data|1751101|与代码覆盖率的兼容性:再次公开和免费的=>+MSTest。付费:+NCover将与任何执行程序集成.因此，这不是一个约束(但要花费太多的IMHO)。现在也有其他人出现--+Jetbrains推出了他们自己的变体，我假设兼容性将是他们自己的产品中的一种。|1751102|RowTests+:+NUnit有这个。虽然我认为它是从xUnit或MBUnit借来的，但我忘记了。MSTest将其作为一个可下载的扩展来支持。|1751103|与Team集成:参见他们的网页：似乎只适用于NUnit和MSTest。我已经亲自和NUnit查过了。在最小配置下工作。|offset|length|1751104|unstyled|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/features/supported_platforms.html^0|0|0|0|A|5|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|S|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|B|3|C|5|6|7|T|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|U|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$H|W|I|X|1|Y]]|A|$]]|$1|J|3|-4|5|K|7|Z|8|@]|9|@]|A|$]]]|L|$M|$5|N|O|P|A|$Q|R]]]]

<ol>
<li>Integration with IDE: Out of the box and free => MSTest. If you're willing to download and use, there is a plethora of test runners.. NUnit being the oldest. If you're willing to pay, you have resharper, test-driven.net and the other add-ins. Resharper has its own bundled in test runner - so that's why you see those niggling issues. Now if you want to run and debug, then your options would be cut down even more. Running is as easy as setting the program to debug as your unit test runner exe. Bottomline: Integration for anything other than MSTest, has to be paid for/downloaded.</li>
<li>Compatibility with code coverage: Again out of the box and free => MSTest. Paid: NCover will integrate with any exe... so not a constraint (but costs a bit too much IMHO). There are others too cropping up now - with Jetbrains throwing their own variant, I'm assuming compatibility will be a given among their own products. </li>
<li>RowTests : NUnit has this. Although I think it was borrowed from xUnit or MBUnit, I forget. MSTest supports this as a downloadable extension.</li>
<li>Integrate with Team City : See <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/features/supported_platforms.html" rel="nofollow">their page</a>: Seems to work with NUnit and MSTest only. I have personally checked it out with NUnit.. worked with minimal configuration.</li>
</ol>

blocks|key|3304667|text|我建议你使用NUnit|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|3304668|您可以使用TestDriven.NET或ReSharper与Visual进行完全集成|unordered-list-item|3304669|PartCover，Sonar，NCover+1.5.8+free作为代码覆盖工具|3304670|TestCase属性传递不同的参数集(ReSharper完全支持此属性)|3304671|Team+City支持内置于|3304672|TestCase属性的一个示例|3304673|+[Test]
+[TestCase(1)]
+[TestCase(2)]
+[TestCase(3)]
+public+void+TestMe(int+param)
+{
++++Assert.That(param+>+0);
+}|code-block|syntax|javascript|3304674|entityMap^0|6|5|0|5|E|K|9|0|0|9|A|5|G|H|0|0|8|0|0|9|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|X|8|@$9|Y|A|Z|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|10|8|@$9|11|A|12|B|C]|$9|13|A|14|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|H|7|15|8|@$9|16|A|17|B|C]|$9|18|A|19|B|C]|$9|1A|A|1B|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|K|3|L|5|H|7|1C|8|@$9|1D|A|1E|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|M|3|N|5|H|7|1F|8|@$9|1G|A|1H|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|O|3|P|5|6|7|1I|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|Q|3|R|5|S|7|1J|8|@]|D|@]|E|$T|U]]|$1|V|3|-4|5|6|7|1K|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|W|$]]

I would suggest you to use <code>NUnit</code>:

<ul>
<li>You can use <code>TestDriven.NET</code> or <code>ReSharper</code> to have full integration with Visual Studio</li>
<li><code>PartCover</code>, <code>Sonar</code>, <code>NCover 1.5.8 free</code> as code coverage tool </li>
<li><code>TestCase</code> attribute to pass different set of parameters (ReSharper supports this attribute perfectly)</li>
<li><code>Team City</code> support is built in</li>
</ul>

An example for TestCase attribute

<pre class="lang-cs prettyprint-override"><code> [Test]
 [TestCase(1)]
 [TestCase(2)]
 [TestCase(3)]
 public void TestMe(int param)
 {
 Assert.That(param &gt; 0);
 }
</code></pre>

blocks|key|2948234|text|我强烈建议xUnit.net|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|entityRanges|offset|length|data|2948235|请阅读为什么要建和xUnit.net与其他.NET测试框架相比如何？。|2948236|entityMap|0|LINK|mutability|MUTABLE|url|http://xunit.codeplex.com/|1|http://xunit.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&referringTitle=Home|2|http://How%2520does%2520xUnit.net%2520compare%2520to%2520other%2520.NET%2520testing%2520frameworks?^0|5|9|0|0|3|5|1|9|P|2|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|9|@$A|S|B|T|1|U]]|C|$]]|$1|D|3|E|5|6|7|V|8|@]|9|@$A|W|B|X|1|Y]|$A|Z|B|10|1|11]]|C|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|12|8|@]|9|@]|C|$]]]|G|$H|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|M]]|N|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|O]]|P|$5|I|J|K|C|$L|Q]]]]

I strongly suggest <a href="http://xunit.codeplex.com/" rel="nofollow">xUnit.net</a> 

Please read <a href="http://xunit.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=WhyDidWeBuildXunit&amp;referringTitle=Home" rel="nofollow">why it was built</a> and <a href="http://How%20does%20xUnit.net%20compare%20to%20other%20.NET%20testing%20frameworks?" rel="nofollow">how does xUnit.net compare to other .NET testing frameworks</a>.

This is all i'm looking for at a high level:

<ol>
<li>The ability to run unit tests from within visual studio 2008</li>
<li>Compatibility with some code coverage tool</li>
<li>A unit testing framework with a row testing feature like MBUnit's <a href="http://www.gallio.org/oldwiki/MbUnit/RowTestAttribute.html" rel="nofollow">RowTestAttribute</a></li>
<li>Ability to integrate with <a href="http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/" rel="nofollow">Team City</a></li>
</ol>

I thought i had found this with xUnit.net 1.8, resharper 6.0, and dotCover 1.1.1. However, after investing almost a day with messing around with this stuff i've found these major issues with this setup:

<ul>
<li>Theory tests (row tests) are not fully supported in Resharper - <a href="http://xunitcontrib.codeplex.com/workitem/1658" rel="nofollow">more info</a></li>
<li>dotCover basically <a href="http://devnet.jetbrains.com/thread/305911;jsessionid=2BF9739432C921A4D0F7F04220E248A6?decorator=print&amp;displayFullThread=true" rel="nofollow">does not work</a> with xUnit</li>
</ul>

I was successfully using MSTest with ReSharper to do everything i need but the row tests, but it seems that life could be much better with some of the more advanced testing frameworks.

I've started looking at <a href="http://www.gallio.org/" rel="nofollow">Gallio</a>, but I'm hoping that someone can save me some time and recommend a winning combination before I waste any more time exploring.

What combination have you used successfully?

What unit testing framework will meet my requirements?

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

这就是我想要的高层次的东西：在visual studio 2008中运行单元测试的能力与某些代码覆盖率工具的兼容性具有行测试特性的单元测试框架，如MBUnit的与集成的能力我以为我已经在xUnit.net 1.8、resharper6.0和dotCover 1.1.1中找到了这一点。然而，在花了差不多一天的时间来处理这...

问什么单元测试框架将满足我的要求？
EN

Stack Overflow用户

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问什么单元测试框架将满足我的要求？EN