以下代码中是否存在可能导致NullReferenceException的争用条件?
-或者
在null合并操作符检查空值之后,在调用函数之前,是否可以将Callback变量设置为null?
class MyClass {
public Action Callback { get; set; }
public void DoCallback() {
(Callback ?? new Action(() => { }))();
}
}编辑
这是一个出于好奇而产生的问题。我通常不是这样编码的。
我并不担心Callback变量会变得陈旧。我担心Exception会被从DoCallback扔出去。
编辑#2
这是我的班级:
class MyClass {
Action Callback { get; set; }
public void DoCallbackCoalesce() {
(Callback ?? new Action(() => { }))();
}
public void DoCallbackIfElse() {
if (null != Callback) Callback();
else new Action(() => { })();
}
}方法DoCallbackIfElse具有可能抛出NullReferenceException的争用条件。DoCallbackCoalesce方法是否有相同的条件?
这是IL输出:
MyClass.DoCallbackCoalesce:
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call UserQuery+MyClass.get_Callback
IL_0006: dup
IL_0007: brtrue.s IL_0027
IL_0009: pop
IL_000A: ldsfld UserQuery+MyClass.CS$<>9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate1
IL_000F: brtrue.s IL_0022
IL_0011: ldnull
IL_0012: ldftn UserQuery+MyClass.<DoCallbackCoalesce>b__0
IL_0018: newobj System.Action..ctor
IL_001D: stsfld UserQuery+MyClass.CS$<>9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate1
IL_0022: ldsfld UserQuery+MyClass.CS$<>9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate1
IL_0027: callvirt System.Action.Invoke
IL_002C: ret
MyClass.DoCallbackIfElse:
IL_0000: ldarg.0
IL_0001: call UserQuery+MyClass.get_Callback
IL_0006: brfalse.s IL_0014
IL_0008: ldarg.0
IL_0009: call UserQuery+MyClass.get_Callback
IL_000E: callvirt System.Action.Invoke
IL_0013: ret
IL_0014: ldsfld UserQuery+MyClass.CS$<>9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate3
IL_0019: brtrue.s IL_002C
IL_001B: ldnull
IL_001C: ldftn UserQuery+MyClass.<DoCallbackIfElse>b__2
IL_0022: newobj System.Action..ctor
IL_0027: stsfld UserQuery+MyClass.CS$<>9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate3
IL_002C: ldsfld UserQuery+MyClass.CS$<>9__CachedAnonymousMethodDelegate3
IL_0031: callvirt System.Action.Invoke
IL_0036: ret 在我看来,call UserQuery+MyClass.get_Callback只在使用??运算符时被调用一次,在使用if...else时只被调用两次。我做错了什么吗?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10565838
复制相似问题