我有一个场景,我想要消除在页面上执行的查询查询的数量。假设我有一个名为filtered_table的结果集:
SELECT
col_a
,col_b
,col_c
FROM
table
where
col_a = 1 然后我得到了一组所有可能的结果,如果查询没有被过滤,distinct_col_a,distinct_col_b,distinct_col_c。
SELECT
distinct col_a
FROM
table
SELECT
distinct col_b
FROM
table
SELECT
distinct col_c
FROM
table最后,对于distinct_col_a、distinct_col_b、distinct_col_c可能包含的每个值,我执行查询以获得filtered_table中的计数。
(for each value in distinct_col_a)
SELECT
count(col_a)
FROM
filtered_table它很笨重,而且占用大量资源。我觉得应该有一些方法来做汇总或其他事情,而不是for each,并一次性获得所有这些数字,但我无法理解它。
举个例子:
table
col_a | col_b | col_c
1 | a | x
2 | b | y
3 | c | z
3 | c | x
1 | d | xfiltered_table,使用where col_a = 1
col_a | col_b | col_c
1 | a | x
1 | d | x我想要的结果是:
col_name| col_value| number results
col_a | 1 | 2
col_a | 2 | 0
col_a | 3 | 0
col_b | a | 1
col_b | b | 0
col_b | c | 0
col_b | d | 1
col_c | x | 2
col_c | y | 0
col_c | z | 0发布于 2019-02-18 16:40:02
我们可以使用unpivot和单独的聚合的时髦组合,在相当紧凑的查询中创建这些结果:
declare @t table (col_a char(1), col_b char(1), col_c char(1))
insert into @t(col_a,col_b,col_c) values
('1','a','x'),
('2','b','y'),
('3','c','z'),
('3','c','x'),
('1','d','x')
select
col_name, col_value, SUM(Cnt) as results_count
from
(select *,CASE WHEN col_a = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END as Cnt from @t) t
unpivot
(col_value for col_name in (col_a, col_b, col_c)) p
group by col_name,col_value结果:
col_name col_value results_count
--------- --------- -------------
col_a 1 2
col_a 2 0
col_a 3 0
col_b a 1
col_b b 0
col_b c 0
col_b d 1
col_c x 2
col_c y 0
col_c z 0(注意-这些结果的顺序与您期望的输出顺序相同。但目前没有ORDER BY条款,因此不能保证)
并不是说您将"WHERE子句“应用为CASE表达式中的检查。如果您不能立即看到它是如何工作的,我建议您运行
select
*
from
(select *,CASE WHEN col_a = 1 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END as Cnt from @t) t
unpivot
(col_value for col_name in (col_a, col_b, col_c)) p首先看看unpivot产生的效果。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54465203
复制相似问题