通过TCP对Linux 'C‘write()的3个调用发送的3个块是否被Windows C# .BeginReceive()接收为相同的三个块,还是单个连续块,或者在调用.BeginReceived时收到了多少块?
Linux上的一个'C‘应用程序通过3个调用发送消息,通过TCP连接将()写到一个使用C# ()接收的Windows BeginReceive应用程序。
是否需要调用BeginReceive()三次,以接收write()发送的三个块中的每个块?或者BeginReceive()接收的大小是否等于调用BeginReceive()时所接收的大小?哪个字节可以是3写()发送的所有字节,也可以是部分数量,所以应该调用.BeginReceive(),直到全部接收到为止?
Linux应用程序是在嵌入式TI ARM上运行的,在同一个盒子里,Windows C#应用程序运行的是一台单板计算机。ARM与SBC有一个直接的以太网连接。
ARM和SBC之间的通信有时无法在启动时启动,我正在反向工程源代码以检查错误的设计。
ARM端是TCP侦听器,Windows客户端启动TCP连接。
使用MontaVista(R) Linux(注册商标)专业版5.0.0 (0702774)和Windows7Visual-Studio 2010 Visual#。
这是ARM发送软件和Windows接收软件.
LINX 'C‘
char msgBuffer[64];
sprintf(msgBuffer, START_MSG_ENVELOPE, msgId++, ack);
write(connection->fd, msgBuffer, strlen(msgBuffer));
write(connection->fd, msg, strlen(msg));
write(connection->fd, END_MSG_ENVELOPE, strlen(END_MSG_ENVELOPE));
这里是IT.............................................的WINDOWS C#端
private static void makeConnection(Socket clientSocket, int iPortNo)
{
TimeoutObject.Reset();
socketexception = null;
IPAddress ip;
//create the end point
IPEndPoint ipEndPoint;
ip = IPAddress.Parse(ipAddress);
try
{
ipEndPoint = new IPEndPoint(ip, iPortNo);
//connect to the remote host...
clientSocket.BeginConnect(ip, iPortNo, new AsyncCallback(CallBackMethod), clientSocket);
if (TimeoutObject.WaitOne(5 * 1000, false)) //5 secs connection timeout
{
if (!IsConnectionSuccessful)
{
string msg = VNResourceManager.Instance.GetString(VNMessages.DAM_NOT_FOUND);
if (socketexception != null)
msg += ": " + socketexception.Message;
throw new Exception(msg);
}
}
else
{
clientSocket.Close();
throw new TimeoutException(VNResourceManager.Instance.GetString(VNMessages.CONNECTION_TO_DAM_TIMED_OUT));
}
//watch for data ( asynchronously )...
WaitForData();
}
catch (SocketException e)
{
socketexception = e;
throw;
}
}
private static void CallBackMethod(IAsyncResult asyncresult)
{
try
{
IsConnectionSuccessful = false;
Socket socket = asyncresult.AsyncState as Socket;
if (socket.Connected)
{
socket.EndConnect(asyncresult);
IsConnectionSuccessful = true;
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
IsConnectionSuccessful = false;
socketexception = ex;
}
finally
{
TimeoutObject.Set();
}
}
public static void WaitForData()
{
try
{
if (asyncCallBack == null)
{
asyncCallBack = new AsyncCallback(OnDataReceived);
}
CSocketPacket theSocPkt = new CSocketPacket();
theSocPkt.thisSocket = clientSocket;
asyncResult = clientSocket.BeginReceive(theSocPkt.dataBuffer, 0, theSocPkt.dataBuffer.Length, SocketFlags.None, asyncCallBack, theSocPkt);
}
catch (SocketException se)
{
notifyErrorEventSubscribers(se);
}
}
public static void send(string message)
{
try
{
byte[] byData = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(message);
clientSocket.Send(byData);
}
catch (SocketException se)
{
notifyErrorEventSubscribers(se);
throw;
}
}
//[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.Synchronized)]
public static void OnDataReceived(IAsyncResult result)
{
try
{
CSocketPacket theSockId = (CSocketPacket)result.AsyncState;
//end receive...
int messageSize = 0;
messageSize = theSockId.thisSocket.EndReceive(result);
Console.WriteLine(">>>>>>>>> messageSize = " + messageSize); // !!!
char[] chars = new char[messageSize + 1];
System.Text.Decoder d = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetDecoder();
int charLen = d.GetChars(theSockId.dataBuffer, 0, messageSize, chars, 0);
string replyMessage = new System.String(chars);
lock (syncLock) //LastIndexOf function accesses the current culture info and we clear it in WM_TIMECHANGE handler (protecting from that race condition here)
{
if (replyMessage.LastIndexOf("\0") > 0)
replyMessage = replyMessage.Remove(replyMessage.LastIndexOf("\0"), 1);
if (replyMessage.LastIndexOf(Terminator) > 0)
replyMessage = replyMessage.Remove(replyMessage.LastIndexOf(Terminator), 1);
}
// Continue the waiting for data on the Socket
WaitForData();
receivedMsg += replyMessage;
// only serialize when we feel we have a message or we have reached the message line limit
if (((receivedMsg.Contains("message") && receivedMsg.Contains("/>")) || receivedMsg.Contains("</message>")) /* || (mRecvdMsgLineCount == Message.kMaxLines) */ )
{
List<XmlMessage> msgList = new List<XmlMessage>();
int index = -1;
do
{
index = receivedMsg.IndexOf("</message>");
if (index != -1)
{
XmlMessage message;
string strMessage = receivedMsg.Substring(0, index + "</message>".Length);
//MessageBox.Show(strMessage);
strMessage = strMessage.TrimStart(new char[] { '\r', '\n' });
receivedMsg = receivedMsg.Remove(0, index + "</message>".Length);
try
{
message = (XmlMessage)XmlMessage.GetXmlSerializer().Deserialize(XmlReader.Create(new StringReader(strMessage)));
}
catch (InvalidOperationException error)
{
string strErrorMessage = error.Message;
if (error.InnerException != null)
strErrorMessage += "\r\n" + error.InnerException.Message;
notifyErrorEventSubscribers(new Exception(strErrorMessage + "\r\n-----------------------------------------------------------------\r\n" + strMessage));
return;
}
msgList.Add(message);
}
} while (index != -1);
StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();
string serializedXml = string.Empty;
string strXmlMessage = string.Empty;
foreach (XmlMessage message in msgList)
{
if (message.ack_required && (message.update == null))
{
XmlMessage messageAcknowledge = new XmlMessage();
messageAcknowledge.ack_required = false;
messageAcknowledge.ack = new ack();
messageAcknowledge.ack.success = true;
messageAcknowledge.ack.id = message.id;
try
{
sendMessage(messageAcknowledge);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
Logger.Log(EnumLoggingLevel.Error, "SocketCommunicationXMl.OnDataReceived", ex.Message);
}
}
if (dataReceivedEvent != null)
{
dataReceivedEvent(new object(), new DataReceivedEventArgs(message));
}
if ((ackRequiredMsg != null) && (message.ack != null))
{
if ((message.ack.id == ackRequiredMsg.id) && message.ack.success)
{
eventWaitForAck.Set();
}
}
}
}
}
catch (ObjectDisposedException objectDisposedException)
{
// Dispatcher.dispatchDebug(Debug.Level_3,"Socket has been closed", this);
notifyErrorEventSubscribers(objectDisposedException);
}
catch (SocketException se)
{
if (se.ErrorCode == 10054)
{
/*
for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
{
Thread.Sleep(1000);
}
try
{
SocketCommunicationDaq.Reconnect();
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
VNMsgBox.Show(ex.Message, MsgButtonType.OkOnly, MsgIconType.Error);
return;
}
clientSocket.Shutdown(SocketShutdown.Both);
clientSocket.Close();
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++)
{
try
{
connect();
break;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
}
*/
Logger.Log(EnumLoggingLevel.Error, "OnDataReceived: ", se.ToString());
}
else
{
notifyErrorEventSubscribers(se);
}
}
}
发布于 2014-02-18 16:52:22
正如其他人所提到的,TCP是一种流协议,因此您永远无法知道获得全部100个字节需要多少DataReceived回调。可能是1,可能是100。
接收代码相当复杂,性能可以提高(太多的字符串操作)。很难说是否存在控制流问题。我建议打破DataReceived方法来简化。这里有一个合理的骨架:
public static void OnDataReceived(IAsyncResult result)
{
//1) copy all data received into a buffer of some sort, like MemoryStream
//2) Dispatch any/all full messages that have been received
// to a queue or handler method (maybe handle on another thread)
//(hold onto any leftover bytes received that are part of the next message)
//Call BeginReceive() again
}
此外,如果您使用长度前缀消息格式,则可以帮助简化框架设置。
发布于 2014-02-16 11:15:28
正如@nos已经指出的那样,接收的数量并不等于发送的数量,而不管客户端应用程序是在什么情况下写入的。
另见When does TcpClient's NetworkStream finish one read operation?
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21800665
复制相似问题