我编写了一个简单的C程序,包含一些全局和静态变量。一些代码和输出如下所示。
示例源代码:
#include <stdio.h>
int g1, g2;
int main(){
     printf("g1:%p g2:%p\n", &g1, &g2);
     return 0;
}输出:
g1:0x6061b0 g2:0x6061c0这些变量落在数据段中。它们可以在初始化部分,也可以在未初始化(bss)小节中。我打印它们的地址以检查它们在内存中的位置,然后将这些值与start_data和/proc/<pid>/stat伪文件的end_data条目的值进行比较。我的变量不落在那个区域。
对/proc/pid/stat给我的限制:
start_data: 604e10
end_data:   605180来自文档
45) start_data %lu (自Linux3.3起)地址,上面放置程序初始化和未初始化(BSS)数据。 (46) end_data %lu (因为Linux3.3)地址下面放置程序初始化和未初始化(BSS)数据。
我已经成功地使用了由data segment生成的map file获得了正确的linker区域,但是通过使用proc接口,它将更加干净(更容易、更快、.)。
使用链接器中的映射文件::找到的正确限制
start: 605168
end:   606290我使用的是x64和Linux3.13。
完全输出stat:
29505 (myexec) R 29504 29504 1438 34822 29504 24640 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 1 0 55253161 4308992 24 18446744073709551615 4194304 4210644 140737488347232 140737488337560 140737348896784 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 6311440 6312320 6320128 140737488347816 140737488347831 140737488347831 140737488351209 0输出的map_files:
total 0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 400000-41a000 -> /bin/ls
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 619000-61a000 -> /bin/ls
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 61a000-61b000 -> /bin/ls
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff649e000-7ffff64a9000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff64a9000-7ffff66a8000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff66a8000-7ffff66a9000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff66a9000-7ffff66aa000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_files-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff66aa000-7ffff66b5000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_nis-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff66b5000-7ffff68b4000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_nis-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff68b4000-7ffff68b5000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_nis-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff68b5000-7ffff68b6000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_nis-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff68b6000-7ffff68cd000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff68cd000-7ffff6acc000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6acc000-7ffff6acd000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6acd000-7ffff6ace000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnsl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6ad0000-7ffff6ad9000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_compat-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6ad9000-7ffff6cd8000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_compat-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6cd8000-7ffff6cd9000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_compat-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6cd9000-7ffff6cda000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnss_compat-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6cda000-7ffff6fa3000 -> /usr/lib/locale/locale-archive
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6fa3000-7ffff6fa7000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libattr.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff6fa7000-7ffff71a6000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libattr.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff71a6000-7ffff71a7000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libattr.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff71a7000-7ffff71a8000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libattr.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff71a8000-7ffff71ab000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff71ab000-7ffff73aa000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff73aa000-7ffff73ab000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff73ab000-7ffff73ac000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff73ac000-7ffff73e9000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3.13.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff73e9000-7ffff75e8000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3.13.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff75e8000-7ffff75e9000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3.13.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff75e9000-7ffff75ea000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcre.so.3.13.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff75ea000-7ffff77a5000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff77a5000-7ffff79a4000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff79a4000-7ffff79a8000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff79a8000-7ffff79aa000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff79af000-7ffff79b6000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libacl.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff79b6000-7ffff7bb5000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libacl.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7bb5000-7ffff7bb6000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libacl.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7bb6000-7ffff7bb7000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libacl.so.1.1.0
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7bb7000-7ffff7bd7000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libselinux.so.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7bd7000-7ffff7dd6000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libselinux.so.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7dd6000-7ffff7dd7000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libselinux.so.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7dd7000-7ffff7dd8000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libselinux.so.1
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7dda000-7ffff7dfd000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7ffc000-7ffff7ffd000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so
lr-------- 1 root root 64 Apr 21 22:32 7ffff7ffd000-7ffff7ffe000 -> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-2.19.so有什么想法吗?干杯。
发布于 2015-04-21 21:31:36
似乎是的(或不正确的文档)。
精灵使用一个小技巧来指定BSS (我削减了前导零):
$ objdump -x ./a.out
LOAD off    0x00000e00 vaddr 0x00600e00 paddr 0x00600e00 align 2**21
     filesz 0x00000258 memsz 0x00000268 flags rw-对于该PT_LOAD:
vaddr = 0x00600e00
vaddr + filesz = 0x00601058
vaddr + memsz = 0x00601068因此,字节[0x00600e00;0x00601058]从文件加载到内存中,而最后的0x10字节也应该存在于内存中,而不是从ELF文件中加载--它们是零的,因为它是BSS。您也可以使用objdump检查这个值:
25 .bss    00000010  00601058  00601058  00001058  2**2
           ^ size    ^ base address但是,在用于ELF的binfmt加载程序中,只有vaddr + filesz被计算为end_data (参见elf.c):
k = elf_ppnt->p_vaddr + elf_ppnt->p_filesz;
if (k > elf_bss)
    elf_bss = k;
if ((elf_ppnt->p_flags & PF_X) && end_code < k)
    end_code = k;
if (end_data < k)
    end_data = k;
k = elf_ppnt->p_vaddr + elf_ppnt->p_memsz;
if (k > elf_brk)
    elf_brk = k;所以:
end_data指向从文件加载的最后一个字节elf_bss指向BSS的第一个字节(未公开,内部使用)elf_brk指向BSS的最后一个字节(未公开,内部使用)你可以检查/proc/PID/maps --它应该显示出更可靠的结果。
看起来,内核中的文档已经被随机陌生人改变了:https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/6/604。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29780731
复制相似问题