我已经开始使用JJWT在我的服务器应用程序上处理JWT。
我的JWT秘密将存储在resources
文件夹中,我将用Properties
类加载这个秘密。
JJWT提供了三种签署JWT的方法,一个使用byte[]
,另一个使用String
,另一个使用Key
。
JwtBuilder signWith(SignatureAlgorithm var1, byte[] var2);
JwtBuilder signWith(SignatureAlgorithm var1, String var2);
JwtBuilder signWith(SignatureAlgorithm var1, Key var2);
的问题:关于安全性、字符集和其他方面,有哪些建议我应该使用吗?
有一段时间,我支持String
,因为Properties
返回一个String
。
发布于 2016-10-27 00:43:04
对于JJWT >= 0.10.0,由于原始字符串和Base64 64编码字符串之间的混淆,signWith(SignatureAlgorithm var1, String var2)
已不再受欢迎:
/**
* Signs the constructed JWT using the specified algorithm with the specified key, producing a JWS.
*
* <p>This is a convenience method: the string argument is first BASE64-decoded to a byte array and this resulting
* byte array is used to invoke {@link #signWith(SignatureAlgorithm, byte[])}.</p>
*
* <h4>Deprecation Notice: Deprecated as of 0.10.0, will be removed in the 1.0 release.</h4>
*
* <p>This method has been deprecated because the {@code key} argument for this method can be confusing: keys for
* cryptographic operations are always binary (byte arrays), and many people were confused as to how bytes were
* obtained from the String argument.</p>
*
* <p>This method always expected a String argument that was effectively the same as the result of the following
* (pseudocode):</p>
*
* <p>{@code String base64EncodedSecretKey = base64Encode(secretKeyBytes);}</p>
*
* <p>However, a non-trivial number of JJWT users were confused by the method signature and attempted to
* use raw password strings as the key argument - for example {@code signWith(HS256, myPassword)} - which is
* almost always incorrect for cryptographic hashes and can produce erroneous or insecure results.</p>
*
* <p>See this
* <a href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40252903/static-secret-as-byte-key-or-string/40274325#40274325">
* StackOverflow answer</a> explaining why raw (non-base64-encoded) strings are almost always incorrect for
* signature operations.</p>
*
* <p>To perform the correct logic with base64EncodedSecretKey strings with JJWT >= 0.10.0, you may do this:
* <pre><code>
* byte[] keyBytes = {@link Decoders Decoders}.{@link Decoders#BASE64 BASE64}.{@link Decoder#decode(Object) decode(base64EncodedSecretKey)};
* Key key = {@link Keys Keys}.{@link Keys#hmacShaKeyFor(byte[]) hmacShaKeyFor(keyBytes)};
* jwtBuilder.signWith(key); //or {@link #signWith(Key, SignatureAlgorithm)}
* </code></pre>
* </p>
*
* <p>This method will be removed in the 1.0 release.</p>
*
* @param alg the JWS algorithm to use to digitally sign the JWT, thereby producing a JWS.
* @param base64EncodedSecretKey the BASE64-encoded algorithm-specific signing key to use to digitally sign the
* JWT.
* @return the builder for method chaining.
* @throws InvalidKeyException if the Key is insufficient or explicitly disallowed by the JWT specification as
* described by {@link SignatureAlgorithm#forSigningKey(Key)}.
* @deprecated as of 0.10.0: use {@link #signWith(Key)} or {@link #signWith(Key, SignatureAlgorithm)} instead. This
* method will be removed in the 1.0 release.
*/
JwtBuilder signWith(SignatureAlgorithm alg, String base64EncodedSecretKey);
此方法期望字符串参数为byte 64编码的密钥字节数组。它不假设通用字符串(例如用户密码)作为签名密钥。JJWT采用Base64编码,因为如果您指定的字符串密码不是Base64 64编码的,那么您可能使用的是格式错误或弱键。
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7518#section-3.2签名密钥的长度等于或大于签名字节数组长度的JWT规范。
这意味着:
| If you're signing with: | your key (byte array) length MUST be: |
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------- |
| HMAC SHA 256 | >= 256 bits (32 bytes) |
| HMAC SHA 384 | >= 384 bits (48 bytes) |
| HMAC SHA 512 | >= 512 bits (64 bytes) |
很多在线的JWT站点和工具就是搞错了--它们让你认为你可以输入或使用任何旧的字符串,而且你很好。有些人甚至甚至预先填充了单词secret
(显然是个坏主意,甚至不符合规范,因为它太短了!)
为了帮助您简化事情,JJWT提供了一个实用程序,帮助您生成足够的安全随机密钥,适合通过io.jsonwebtoken.security.Keys
类的secretKeyFor
方法进行符合规范的签名。例如:
//creates a spec-compliant secure-random key:
SecretKey key = Keys.secretKeyFor(SignatureAlgorithm.HS256); //or HS384 or HS512
如果要将生成的密钥存储为字符串,可以假定是Base64对其进行编码:
String base64Key = Encoders.BASE64.encode(key.getEncoded());
但是请注意:生成的base64Key
字符串被认为是不安全的,不能向任何人显示。Base64编码不是加密--这个值仍然需要保密。你是如何做到这一点的(加密等等)。
现在,当创建JWS的时候,您可以传入该base64Key
值,JJWT知道首先对其进行base64解码,以获得实际字节,然后使用这些字节来计算签名:
Jwts.builder()
//...
.signWith(SignatureAlgorithm.HS512, base64Key)
.compact();
虽然您可以这样做,但由于原始字符串和base64 64编码字符串之间的模糊性,不建议在JavaDoc中按照上面的弃用通知进行说明。
因此,建议使用JWT构建器的signWith(Key)
或signWith(Key, SignatureAlgorithm)
方法来保证类型安全的Key
参数。例如:
Jwts.builder()
//...
.signWith(key) // or signWith(key, preferredSignatureAlgorithm)
.compact();
建议使用signWith(Key)
来让JJWT根据所提供密钥的强度确定最强大的算法。如果您不想使用最强大的算法,signWith(Key,SignatureAlgorithm)
允许您指定所需的算法。
这两种方法都将拒绝任何不符合最低RFC要求的Key
。
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40252903
复制相似问题