blocks|key|1683785|text|我没有检查2.4，但最近的2.5规范在第452页的16.3.4.1调用行为操作中对其进行了描述：|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|BOLD|entityRanges|data|1683786|..。一个活动的调用是通过在Action符号中放置一个rake样式的符号来表示的(见图16.15，左)。rake类似于一个小型层次结构，表明此调用启动了另一个表示进一步分解的活动.|blockquote|1683787|我无法帮助EDraw，但是Enterprise在很长一段时间内确实有这种符号。您应该使用建模而不是绘图工具来创建UML模型。|1683788|entityMap^0|P|E|0|0|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|M|8|@$9|N|A|O|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|G|5|H|7|P|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|I|3|J|5|6|7|Q|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|K|3|-4|5|6|7|R|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|L|$]]

I did not check with 2.4, but the recent 2.5 specs describes it in chapter 16.3.4.1 Call Behavior Actions on p. 452:

<blockquote>
 ... The call of an Activity is indicated by placing a rake-style symbol within the Action symbol (see Figure 16.15, left). The rake resembles a miniature hierarchy, indicating that this invocation starts another Activity that represents a further decomposition ...
</blockquote>

I can't help with EDraw, but Enterprise Architect does have this notation since a long time. You should use a modeling rather than a drawing tool to create UML models.

blocks|key|1879830|text|您链接到的网站的断言并不完全正确。UML规范的一部分(据我所知)是CallBehaviorAction。因为Activity是一种Behavior，所以CallBehaviorAction是用来调用Activity的。没有CallActivityAction，因为不需要。CallBehaviorAction有那个rake图标。|type|unstyled|depth|inlineStyleRanges|offset|length|style|CODE|entityRanges|data|1879831|entityMap^0|X|I|1I|8|1T|8|24|I|2R|8|33|I|3S|I|0^^$0|@$1|2|3|4|5|6|7|H|8|@$9|I|A|J|B|C]|$9|K|A|L|B|C]|$9|M|A|N|B|C]|$9|O|A|P|B|C]|$9|Q|A|R|B|C]|$9|S|A|T|B|C]|$9|U|A|V|B|C]]|D|@]|E|$]]|$1|F|3|-4|5|6|7|W|8|@]|D|@]|E|$]]]|G|$]]

The web site you linked to is not quite correct in its assertion. What has been part of the UML specification (as far back as I can remember) is <code>CallBehaviorAction</code>. Since an <code>Activity</code> is a kind of <code>Behavior</code>, the <code>CallBehaviorAction</code> is what you use to invoke an <code>Activity</code>. There is no <code>CallActivityAction</code> because none is needed. The <code>CallBehaviorAction</code> has that rake icon.

Is the Subactivity/Call Acivity Action actually part of the language specification? According to <a href="http://www.uml-diagrams.org/activity-diagrams-reference.html" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this</a> source it's not: 

<blockquote>
 Call activity action is indicated by a rake-style symbol within the action symbol. Note, that though UML 2.4 specification provides this notation, there is no official call activity action in the UML specification.
</blockquote>

However one can find many examples where the rake symbol is used and discussed. Also, I cannot find the symbol within 'Edraw Max'. Since I'm comparing the UML Activity Diagram to another notation in terms of what one can and cannot do, it's important that I stick to the specification.

If it is part of the specification, can anyone tell me where to find it in Edraw Max?

UML Activity Diagram: Subactivity/Call Acivity Action (Edraw Max)

翻译质量差，导致语言生硬或混乱。

没有提供实际的解决方法或示例。

解答不清晰，无法理解或解决问题。

页面排版不美观，阅读体验差。

文章

问答

视频

学习中心

腾讯云实验室

直播

竞赛

腾讯云代码分析专区

腾讯iOA零信任安全管理系统专区

腾讯云架构师技术同盟交流圈

腾讯云数据库专区

腾讯云顾问专区

腾讯云原生专区

腾讯混元专区

腾讯云TCE专区

腾讯云Lighthouse专区

腾讯云HAI专区

腾讯云Edgeone专区

腾讯云存储专区

腾讯云智能专区

腾讯轻联专区 

腾讯云开发专区

TAPD专区

腾讯轻量云游戏服专区

腾讯云最具价值专家

腾讯云架构师技术同盟

腾讯云创作之星

腾讯云开发者先锋

腾讯云代码助手

云原生构建

TAPD 敏捷项目管理

Cloud Studio

SDK中心

API中心

命令行工具

涵盖代码开发、场景应用、自动测试全流程，助你从零构建专属AI助手

一站式MCP教程库，解锁AI应用新玩法

Action /Call Acivity实际上是语言规范的一部分吗？根据的消息来源，这不是：调用活动操作由动作符号中的rake样式符号表示.请注意，尽管UML2.4规范提供了此表示法，但UML规范中没有正式的调用活动操作。然而，我们可以找到许多使用和讨论rake符号的例子。此外，我也找不到符号内的‘画麦克斯’。由于我在...

问：Subactivity/Call Action (Edraw )
EN

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问：Subactivity/Call Action (Edraw )EN

社区

活动

圈层

关于

腾讯云开发者

热门产品

热门推荐

更多推荐

问：Subactivity/Call Action (Edraw )
EN